Literature DB >> 35712922

[Clinical study on real-time three-dimensional CT navigation-guided full-endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion].

Yang Yang1, Jianwen Dong1, Zhongyu Liu1, Ruiqiang Chen1, Zihao Chen1, Zhengjia Zhai1, Jiakun Qi1, Limin Rong1.   

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the technical notes, effectiveness, and current issues of real-time three-dimensional CT navigation-guided full-endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion.
Methods: Between April 2020 and October 2021, a total of 27 patients received real-time three-dimensional CT navigation-guided full-endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion. There were 18 males and 9 females with an average age of 63.2 years (range, 48-84 years). There were 6 cases of lumbar spinal stenosis, 1 case of lumbar instability, 9 cases of lumbar spinal stenosis with instability, 3 cases of degenerative spondylolisthesis, 6 cases of isthmus spondylolisthesis, and 2 cases of recurrent lumbar disc herniation. All patients showed neurological symptoms before operation (ipsilateral symptom for 15 cases and bilateral symptom for 12 cases). The symptom duration was 1-300 months (median, 24 months). The operations were performed via transforaminal approach in 8 cases, trans-facet joint approach in 18 cases, and combined approaches in 1 case. A total of 32 levels were fused, including 23 single-level cases, 3 two-level cases, and 1 three-level case. Lumbar fusion segment was L 2, 3 in 1 case, L 3, 4 in 4 cases, L 4, 5 in 20 cases, and L 5, S 1 in 7 cases. The operation time, intraoperative estimated blood loss (IEBL), and perioperative complications were recorded. The improvement of intervertebral space height at fusion level was measured, and the accuracy of percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) and Cage placement was also evaluated based on CT images performed at 1 week postoperatively. Visual analogue scale (VAS) score for both low back pain and leg pain, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were evaluated before operation, at 1 week postoperatively, and at last follow-up. Satisfaction to effectivenss were assessed by patients using modified MacNab criteria at last follow-up.
Results: The operation time was ranged from 255 to 805 minutes (mean, 424.9 minutes). IEBL was 150-290 mL (mean, 219.3 mL). All patients received follow-up with the duration from 4 to 22 months (mean, 12.4 months). At 1 week postoperatively and last follow-up, VAS scores of low back pain and leg pain, JOA score, and ODI were significantly improved when compared with those before operation ( P<0.05). At last follow-up, the clinical indicators were similar in comparison with those at 1 week postoperatively ( P>0.05). There were 26 patients and 1 patient who respectively ranked excellent and mild in terms of effectiveness according to the modified MacNab criteria, with the excellent and good rate of 96.3%. There was 1 patient who suffered from incomplete injury of L 5 nerve root and partial neurological function recovered after 3-month conservative treatments. There were 118 implanted PPSs, and 116 of them were implanted under navigation. There were 33 Cages that were implanted under navigation. The accuracy of PPS and Cage placement was 99.1% and 97.0% respectively based on CT performed at 1 week postoperatively. The postoperative intervertebral space height was significantly increased in comparison with that before operation ( P<0.05). During follow-up, mild Cage subsidence was observed in 1 patient, whereas no fixation loosing was found.
Conclusion: Real-time three-dimensional CT navigation-guided full-endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion has great safety and effectiveness with satisfactory preliminary clinical results. Design and further improvement of surgical equipment and instruments are expected to resolve the current technical difficulties.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Real-time navigation; lumbar interbody fusion; spine endoscopic surgery; three-dimensional CT; transforaminal apporoach

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35712922      PMCID: PMC9240844          DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202202092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi        ISSN: 1002-1892


  17 in total

1.  Minimally Invasive Computer Navigation-Assisted Endoscopic Transforaminal Interbody Fusion with Bilateral Decompression via a Unilateral Approach: Initial Clinical Experience at One-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Yaqing Zhang; Chuang Xu; Yue Zhou; Bo Huang
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 2.104

2.  Comparison of Preliminary clinical outcomes between percutaneous endoscopic and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases in a tertiary hospital: Is percutaneous endoscopic procedure superior to MIS-TLIF? A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Shengxiang Ao; Wenjie Zheng; Junlong Wu; Yu Tang; Chao Zhang; Yue Zhou; Changqing Li
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 6.071

Review 3.  Incorporating New Technologies to Overcome the Limitations of Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Navigation, Robotics, and Visualization.

Authors:  Bang-Sang Hahn; Jeong-Yoon Park
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.104

4.  The endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: A Systematic review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuanqiao Kou; Jianjun Chang; Xiaoming Guan; Chang Qiang; Haoyu Feng
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 2.104

Review 5.  Clinical Results and Complications of Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Dong Hwa Heo; Dong Chan Lee; Hyeun Sung Kim; Choon Keun Park; Hungtae Chung
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 2.104

6.  How I do it? Interlaminar contralateral endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy assisted with the O-arm navigation.

Authors:  Kuo-Tai Chen; Myung-Soo Song; Jin-Sung Kim
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 2.216

7.  Navigation-assisted full-endoscopic spine surgery: a technical note.

Authors:  Yasushi Shin; Hiromu Sunada; Yuki Shiraishi; Makoto Hosokawa; Yumi Koh; Rinsei Tei; Shuta Aketa; Yasushi Motoyama; Taiji Yonezawa; Hiroyuki Nakase
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-06

8.  A Review of Techniques, Time Demand, Radiation Exposure, and Outcomes of Skin-anchored Intraoperative 3D Navigation in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spinal Surgery.

Authors:  Avani S Vaishnav; Robert K Merrill; Harvinder Sandhu; Steven J McAnany; Sravisht Iyer; Catherine Himo Gang; Todd J Albert; Sheeraz A Qureshi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Endoscopic transforaminal decompression, interbody fusion, and percutaneous pedicle screw implantation of the lumbar spine: A case series report.

Authors:  Said G Osman
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2012-12-01

10.  Early Clinical Evaluation of Percutaneous Full-endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Pedicle Screw Insertion for Treating Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Xiao-Bing Zhao; Hai-Jun Ma; Bin Geng; Hong-Gang Zhou; Ya-Yi Xia
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-01-10       Impact factor: 2.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.