| Literature DB >> 35712694 |
Nicolas Melin1,2, Tural Yarahmadov1,2, Daniel Sanchez-Taltavull1,2, Fabienne E Birrer1,2, Tess M Brodie1,2, Benoît Petit3, Andrea Felser4, Jean-Marc Nuoffer4, Matteo Montani5, Marie-Catherine Vozenin3, Evelyn Herrmann6, Daniel Candinas1, Daniel M Aebersold6, Deborah Stroka1,2.
Abstract
Background & Aims: High-dose irradiation is an essential tool to help control the growth of hepatic tumors, but it can cause radiation-induced liver disease (RILD). This life-threatening complication manifests itself months following radiation therapy and is characterized by fibrosis of the pericentral sinusoids. In this study, we aimed to establish a mouse model of RILD to investigate the underlying mechanism of radiation-induced liver fibrosis.Entities:
Keywords: 4HNE, 4-hydroxynonenal; CV, central vein; ECM, extracellular matrix; ETC, electron transfer chain; GSH, reduced glutathione (glutathione); GSSG, oxidized glutathione (glutathione disulfide); HSCs, hepatic stellate cells; IGRT, image-guided radiation therapy; IHC, immunohistochemistry; IMC, imaging mass cytometry; MDA, malondialdehyde; RILD, radiation-induced liver disease; RNAseq, RNA sequencing; ROS; ROS, reactive oxygen species; RT, radiation therapy; SASP, senescence-associated secretory phenotype; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; SOS, sinusoidal obstruction syndrome; fibrosis; image guided radiation therapy (IGRT); mitochondrial dysfunction; mitochondrial-DNA; mouse model; mtDNA, mitochondrial DNA; mtROS, mitochondrial reactive oxygen species; p53; radiation-induced liver disease (RILD); rcf, relative centrifuge force; senescence; sinusoidal obstruction syndrome
Year: 2022 PMID: 35712694 PMCID: PMC9192810 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2022.100508
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JHEP Rep ISSN: 2589-5559
Fig. 1Image-guided irradiation plan.
Mouse liver is imaged by CT using a liver/spleen targeting contrast agent (A), allowing a 3D reconstruction of the liver in the abdominal cavity (B). The irradiation plane of a 50 Gy single-dose irradiation using a 180° arc irradiation (C). The dose-volume histogram depicting the dose delivered on the x-axis and the volume of the organ irradiated on the y-axis (D). A schematic view of the delivered doses allows to visually locate the dose delivered to the different liver lobe and the liver pieces used for the paired transcriptomic analysis; H for HIGH-irradiated, and L for LOW-irradiated (E).
Fig. 250 Gy local liver irradiation leads to SOS and immune cell infiltration.
Mice were fed with a LAO diet starting 2 weeks before the irradiation and during the experiment. The livers were collected at day-1 (n = 4), day-6 (n = 4), week-6 (n = 4), and week-20 (n = 3) (A). Schematic representation of the doses delivered to the left and median lobe. Histological evaluation focusing on the annotated hot spot (B). Histological evaluation of the livers using H&E staining (C), Masson’s trichrome staining (D), and Prussian blue (E). Imaging mass cytometry visualization of Ly6G, CD3e, CD11b, and DNA (F), and E-cadherin, CD31, α-SMA, and DNA (G) around the CV. CV, central vein; LAO, low antioxidant; SOS, sinusoidal obstruction syndrome.
Fig. 3Paired analysis of irradiated and non-irradiated liver transcriptome.
Time-dependent PCA analysis displaying the control tissue in black, HIGH-irradiated tissue in red, and LOW-irradiated in blue. The paired HIGH- and LOW-irradiated tissue (coming from the same mouse) were represented with the same shape (A). Bar graph illustrating the numbers of upregulated and downregulated genes issued from comparing the paired HIGH- vs. LOW-irradiated sample (B). Venn diagram displaying the upregulated genes (C) and downregulated genes (D) at the different time post-irradiation. Pathway enrichment analysis depicting only the most relevant summary terms for each time point; day-1 p <5x10-15; day-6 p <4x10-4; week-6 p <1x10-10; week-20 p <5x10-15 (Hypergeometric test) (E-H). PCA, principal component analysis.
Fig. 4Irradiated mouse hepatocyte displays modified reparation post-irradiation.
Percentage of mtDNA heteroplasmy to the reference mtDNA sequence (AJ512208.1) in the paired LOW- and HIGH-irradiated liver (n = 4) 24 h post-irradiation (paired t test) (A). Number (B) and confluency (C) of mouse hepatocyte 6 days after control (n = 4) or irradiation treatment (n = 4). Basal and maximal respiration of hepatocyte cultured following control or irradiation treatment, levels of significance displayed on the graph (paired t test) (D), and their basal respiration and complex I, I I+II, and IV activity normalized to the maximal respiration, level of significance displayed on the fig. (paired t test) (E). mtDNA, mitochondrial DNA.
Fig. 5RedOx balance following hepatic irradiation.
GSH and GSSG in isolated hepatocytes at day-6 post-irradiation (t test) (A). GSH (B), and GSSG (C) in HIGH and its LOW samples at day-1, day-6, week-6, and week-20 following irradiation, levels of significance displayed on the graph (paired t test). 4HNE (D) and MDA (E) staining of the HIGH-irradiated liver and its LOW-irradiated counterpart at day-1, day-6, week-6, and week-20 following irradiation. 4HNE, 4-hydroxynonenal; GSSG, oxidized glutathione (glutathione disulfide); GSH, reduced glutathione (glutathione); MDA, malondialdehyde.
Fig. 6p53 and senescence promote profibrotic pathways following hepatic radiation.
Regulation of genes within the p53 pathway (A), and cellular senescence (B) at the different time points. p16INK4a (Cdkn2a) staining 20-weeks post-irradiation at 0.5x and 35x (C). Heat map of regulated SASP (D). Regulation of genes within the extracellular matrix organization (E). ECM, extracellular matrix; SASP, senescence-associated secretory phenotype.
Fig. 7From hepatic irradiation to sinusoidal obstruction syndrome.
Schematic representation of the proposed mechanism leading to radiation-induced liver disease. mtDNA, mitochondrial DNA; ROS, reactive oxygen species.