| Literature DB >> 35712519 |
Rixin Su1, Shusheng Wu2, Hao Shen1, Yaolin Chen1, Jingya Zhu1, Yu Zhang1, Haodong Jia3, Mengge Li2, Wenju Chen2, Yifu He1,2, Fei Gao3.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to create a nomogram for the risk prediction of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) resistance in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).Entities:
Keywords: clinicopathology; intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion weighted imaging; locally advanced rectal cancer; nomogram; prediction; response to nCRT; texture analysis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35712519 PMCID: PMC9197196 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.886101
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 5.738
Figure 1Flow chart for establishing a nomogram for predicting nCRT resistant in LARC patients.
Scan parameters of each sequence in MRI.
| Sequences | T1WI FSE | T2WI FSE | T2WI FSE | T2WI FSE | IVIM-DWI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plane | Axial | Axial | Sagittal | Coronal | Axial |
| TR/TE (ms) | 500/7.2 | 3500/109.1 | 3500/109.1 | 3500/109.1 | 4000/75 |
| NEX | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | – |
| FOV (mm) | 320 × 320 | 240 × 240 | 240 × 240 | 240 × 240 | 420 × 420 |
| Slice thickness (mm) | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
| Slice interval (mm) | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
T1WI, T1-weighted imaging; FSE, fast spin-echo; T2WI, T2-weighted imaging; TR/TE, repetition time/echo time; NEX, number of excitations; FOV, field of view.
Figure 2IVIM-DWI measurement (b = 800 s/mm2) (A); each radiologist drew ROI three times to get the values on the maps of ADC, D, D∗, and f, respectively (B–E).
Figure 3Texture features acquisition workflow.
Clinicopathologic characteristics in rectal cancer Patients.
| Characteristics | Response group (n = 44) | No-Response group (n = 18) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 59.4 ± 15.5 | 57.2 ± 16.5 | 0.609 |
| Sex | 0.954 | ||
| Male | 29 | 12 | |
| Female | 15 | 6 | |
| Differentiation | 0.022 | ||
| Well/Moderate | 41 | 12 | |
| Poor | 3 | 6 | |
| Tumor diameter (cm) | 4.4 ± 2.1 | 5.2 ± 2.2 | 0.178 |
| T stage | 0.003 | ||
| T2~3 | 28 | 4 | |
| T4 | 16 | 14 | |
| N stage | 0.492 | ||
| N0 | 7 | 1 | |
| N1~2 | 37 | 17 | |
| CEA (ng/ml) | 0.008 | ||
| <5 | 26 | 4 | |
| ≥5 | 18 | 14 | |
| CA199 (U/ml) | 0.068 | ||
| <37 | 36 | 10 | |
| ≥37 | 8 | 8 | |
| HB (g/l) | 120.5 ± 17.6 | 119.4 ± 20 | 0.829 |
CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CA199, carbohydrate antigen 19-9; HB, Hemoglobin; CR, complete response; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; PD, disease progression; Response group, the first-time evaluation results was CR or PR; No-Response group, the first-time evaluation results was SD or PD.
Statistical analysis results of clinicopathologic characteristics in rectal cancer patients.
| Characteristics | Univariate analysis ( | Multivariate logistic regression analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95%CI | |||
| Age (year) | 0.603 | |||
| Sex | 0.954 | |||
| Differentiation | 0.014 | 14.516 | 1.726-122.057 | 0.014* |
| Tumor diameter (cm) | 0.179 | |||
| T stage | 0.005 | 11.589 | 2.103-63.860 | 0.005* |
| N stage | 0.292 | |||
| CEA (ng/ml) | 0.012 | 3.825 | 0.764-19.142 | 0.103 |
| CA199 (U/ml) | 0.037 | 2.464 | 0.460-13.208 | 0.292 |
| HB (g/l) | 0.825 | |||
*P < 0.05.
CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CA199, carbohydrate antigen 19-9; HB, Hemoglobin; CR, complete response; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; PD, disease progression; Response group, the first-time evaluation results was CR or PR; No-Response group, the first-time evaluation results was SD or PD.
Statistical analysis results of the IVIM-DWI and texture parameters in rectal cancer patients.
| Parameters | Response group | No-Response group | Univariate analysis ( | Multivariate logistic regression analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95%CI | |||||
| ADC (×10−3 mm2/s) | 0.935 ± 0.256 | 0.996 ± 0.193 | 0.364 | |||
| D (×10−3 mm2/s) | 0.593 ± 0.194 | 0.846 ± 0.308 | 0.002 | 2.717 | 0.019-380.669 | 0.692 |
| D∗(×10−3 mm2/s) | 14.62 ± 13.73 | 24.74 ± 20.05 | 0.038 | 0.976 | 0.906-1.052 | 0.530 |
| f (%) | 47.01 ± 13.95 | 27.03 ± 10.33 | <0.001 | 0.855 | 0.752-0.971 | 0.016* |
| Rads-score | 4.67 ± 1.19 | 6.14 ± 1.31 | 0.002 | 2.790 | 1.163-6.696 | 0.022* |
*P < 0.05.
IVIM-DWI, intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion weighted imaging; CR, complete response; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; PD, disease progression; Response group, the first-time evaluation results was CR or PR; No-Response group, the first-time evaluation results was SD or PD; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient; D, slow diffusion coefficient; D*, fast diffusion coefficient; f, perfusion-related diffusion fraction.
Figure 4A regression coefficient-based nomogram to predict the possibility of nCRT resistant in LARC patients. f, perfusion-related diffusion fraction.
Figure 5The ROC curves of different parameters and models. f, perfusion-related diffusion fraction; Rads-score, radiomics score.
The predictive performance of the model in rectal cancer patients.
| Parameters | AUC | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Accuracy (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Differentiation | 0.633 | 0.333 | 0.932 | 0.774 |
| T stage | 0.707 | 0.778 | 0.636 | 0.661 |
| Differentiation and T stage | 0.778 | 0.889 | 0.568 | 0.661 |
| f | 0.857 | 1.000 | 0.611 | 0.887 |
| Rads-score | 0.783 | 0.944 | 0.500 | 0.629 |
| f and Rads-score | 0.917 | 0.944 | 0.727 | 0.790 |
| The nomogram | 0.979 | 0.944 | 0.909 | 0.919 |
f, perfusion-related diffusion fraction; Rads-score, radiomics score.
Figure 6(A) The fivefold cross-validation plot of the nomogram. (B) Decision curve analysis (DCA) of different models.