| Literature DB >> 35712460 |
Dongmei Liang1,2, Lihua Qiu3,4, Xujun Duan5, Huafu Chen5, Chengyi Liu1,2, Qiyong Gong4,6.
Abstract
Background: Our previous reports reflected some aspects of neuroplastic changes from long-term Chinese chess training but were mainly based on large-scale intrinsic connectivity. In contrast to functional connectivity among remote brain areas, synchronization of local intrinsic activity demonstrates functional connectivity among regional areas. Until now, local connectivity changes in professional Chinese chess players (PCCPs) have been reported only at specific hubs; whole-brain-based local connectivity and its relation to training profiles has not been revealed.Entities:
Keywords: AD prevention; Chinese chess; Chinese language cognition; automaticity; board games; regional homogeneity
Year: 2022 PMID: 35712460 PMCID: PMC9195868 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.877103
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurosci ISSN: 1662-453X Impact factor: 5.152
FIGURE 1One-sample results for novices (left column) and professional Chinese chess players (PCCPs) (right column). The regions indicated by a warm color showed greater regional homogeneity (ReHo). The threshold was P < 0.01, FDR corrected. The left side of the image corresponds to the left side of the brain.
FIGURE 2Two-sample result between PCCPs and novices (P < 0.05, AlphaSim corrected, a combined threshold of P < 0.005, and a minimum cluster size of 46 voxels). Hot and cold colors indicate ReHo increases and decreases in PCCPs, respectively, and the number indicates the t-value. The left and right sides in this figure correspond to the right and left sides of the brain, respectively. Further details of these regions are presented in Table 1.
Comparison of regions with increased/decreased regional homogeneity (ReHo) in professional Chinese chess players (PCCPs) compared to novices.
| Anatomical region | MNI ( | BA | Voxels |
|
|
| ||||
| L cerebellum posterior lobe | −27, −57, −51 | – | 125 | 3.94 |
| L temporal pole | −48, 18, −27 | 38 | 104 | 4.45 |
| R amygdala | 27, 0, −18 | – | 79 | 4.04 |
| brainstem | 3, −21, −18 | 60 | 3.50 | |
|
| ||||
| R precentral gyrus | 63, 3, 30 | 6 | 90 | −3.68 |
MNI, Montreal Neurologic Institute; BA, Brodmann’s area; L, left; R, right.
ReHo, regional homogeneity; MNI, Montreal Neurologic Institute; BA, Brodmann’s area; L, left; R, right.
FIGURE 3Significant correlations between ReHo and training profiles in PCCPs (P < 0.05, AlphaSim corrected, a combined threshold of P < 0.001, and a minimum cluster size of 20 voxels). Hot and cold colors indicate positive and negative correlations, respectively. The numbers on the right color-bar refer to the t-value. The left and right sides in this figure correspond to the right and left sides of the brain, respectively. Further details of these regions are presented in Table 2.
Significant correlations between ReHo and training profiles in PCCPs.
| Anatomical region (BA areas) | MNI ( | Voxels |
|
|
| |||
| R precentral gyrus (6) | 39, −9, 45 | 35 | 5.11 |
| L PCC/precuneus (31) | −12, −54, 27 | 40 | −6.90 |
| R middle temporal gyrus (21) | 57, 0, −30 | 27 | −6.58 |
|
| |||
| L supplementary motor area (SMA) (6) | −15, −12, 63 | 26 | −6.24 |
| R cerebellum posterior lobe | 15, −60, −42 | 79 | −6.20 |
|
| |||
| R caudate | 18, 12, 15 | 31 | −4.00 |
MNI, Montreal Neurologic Institute; BA, Brodmann’s area; L, left; R, right.