| Literature DB >> 35712359 |
Zhihao Zhang1, Ting Wang1, Jin Kuang1, Fabian Herold2, Sebastian Ludyga3, Jingming Li1, Daniel L Hall4, Alyx Taylor5, Sean Healy6, Albert S Yeung7, Arthur F Kramer7,8, Liye Zou1.
Abstract
Background/objective: Negative emotional states, such as depression, anxiety, and stress challenge health care due to their long-term consequences for mental disorders. Accumulating evidence indicates that regular physical activity (PA) can positively influence negative emotional states. Among possible candidates, resilience and exercise tolerance in particular have the potential to partly explain the positive effects of PA on negative emotional states. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the association between PA and negative emotional states, and further determine the mediating effects of exercise tolerance and resilience in such a relationship. Method: In total, 1117 Chinese college students (50.4% female, Mage =18.90, SD=1.25) completed a psychosocial battery, including the 21-item Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21), the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), the Preference for and Tolerance of the Intensity of Exercise Questionnaire (PRETIE-Q), and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire short form (IPAQ-SF). Regression analysis was used to identify the serial multiple mediation, controlling for gender, age and BMI.Entities:
Keywords: Depression; Emotion; Exercise tolerance; Physical activity; Resilience
Year: 2022 PMID: 35712359 PMCID: PMC9168153 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2022.100312
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Clin Health Psychol ISSN: 1697-2600
Gender difference on sociodemographic and anthropometric.
| Variables | Total (1117) | Male (554) | Female (563) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M ±SD | M ±SD | M ±SD | T | p | |
| Age(years) | 18.90 ±1.25 | 19.03 ±1.26 | 18.78 ±1.217 | 3.43 | 0.001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 20.94 ±3.05 | 21.76 ±3.33 | 20.12 ±2.50 | 9.30 | 0.000 |
| PA level (MET) | 2590.51 ±1192.41 | 2593.53 ±1190.24 | 2587.53 ±1195.59 | 0.08 | 0.933 |
| Exercise Tolerance | 12.82 ±2.70 | 13.25 ±2.73 | 12.40 ±2.60 | 4.79 | 0.000 |
| Resilience | 87.83 ±14.3 | 89.88 ±15.05 | 85.82 ±13.25 | 5.33 | 0.000 |
| DASS (total score) | 35.07±10.60 | 35.93 ±11.20 | 34.22 ±9.91 | 2.70 | 0.007 |
Note. MET = metabolic equipment, DASS = Depression Anxiety Stress Scale, PA = physical activity,
p < .01.
p < .001.
Correlations of all tested variables.
| Variables | PA level | Exercise Tolerance | Resilience | DASS (Total score) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PA level (MET) | ||||
| Exercise Tolerance | 0.099 | |||
| Resilience | 0.098 | 0.247 | ||
| DASS (total score) | -0.087 | -0.005 | -0.304 |
Note. DASS: Depression Anxiety Stress Scale, PA = physical activity.
p < .01.
Mediation modeling results.
| Path | Standardized Effect | SE | LLCI | ULCI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total effect | -0.087057 | 0.000265 | -0.003528 | -0.000255 |
| Direct effect | -0.061435 | 0.000253 | -0.001043 | -0.000050 |
| Total indirect effects | -0.025622 | 0.000097 | -0.000422 | -0.000046 |
| Indirect 1 | 0.006714 | 0.000060 | 0.000032 | 0.000128 |
| Indirect 2 | -0.024934 | 0.000092 | -0.000406 | -0.000048 |
| Indirect 3 | -0.007402 | 0.000025 | -0.0001214 | -0.000024 |
Note. SE, standard error; LLCI and ULCI, lower level and upper level of the bias-corrected 95% bootstrap confidence interval; Indirect 1, PA level → exercise tolerance → DASS; Indirect 2, PA level → resilience → DASS; Indirect 3, PA level → exercise tolerance → resilience → DASS.
Figure 1Conceptual and statistical diagram of the multiple mediation model for the direct and indirect effects of PA on negative emotions. *p < .05; **p < .01.
Associations of VO2max with resilience, intensity-tolerance, and emotional states.
| VO2max | Exercise tolerance | Resilience | DASS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VO2max | ||||
| Exercise tolerance | 0.499 | |||
| Resilience | 0.177 | 0.239 | ||
| DASS | -0.091 | -0.226 | -0.335 |
Note.
p < .05.
p < .01, DASS=Depression Anxiety Stress Scale, VO2max = maximal oxygen uptake.