| Literature DB >> 35712272 |
Surbhi Bhatia1, Dhruvisha Bansal2, Seema Patil2, Sharnil Pandya2, Qazi Mudassar Ilyas1, Sajida Imran3.
Abstract
Climate change is unexpected weather patterns that can create an alarming situation. Due to climate change, various sectors are affected, and one of the sectors is healthcare. As a result of climate change, the geographic range of several vector-borne human infectious diseases will expand. Currently, dengue is taking its toll, and climate change is one of the key reasons contributing to the intensification of dengue disease transmission. The most important climatic factors linked to dengue transmission are temperature, rainfall, and relative humidity. The present study carries out a systematic literature review on the surveillance system to predict dengue outbreaks based on Machine Learning modeling techniques. The systematic literature review discusses the methodology and objectives, the number of studies carried out in different regions and periods, the association between climatic factors and the increase in positive dengue cases. This study also includes a detailed investigation of meteorological data, the dengue positive patient data, and the pre-processing techniques used for data cleaning. Furthermore, correlation techniques in several studies to determine the relationship between dengue incidence and meteorological parameters and machine learning models for predictive analysis are discussed. In the future direction for creating a dengue surveillance system, several research challenges and limitations of current work are discussed.Entities:
Keywords: climatic factors; dengue; machine learning; predictive models; surveillance system
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35712272 PMCID: PMC9197220 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.884645
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Figure 1A chronological representation of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare from 1952 to 2020.
Figure 2Causes and consequences of climate change.
Figure 3Symptoms of dengue.
Figure 4Roadmap of the conducted review.
Figure 5No. of studies in different regions and time-period of scopus database: (A) No. of studies carried out on predicting dengue based on climatic factors for the time period 1997–2022 and (B) No. of studies carried out on predicting dengue based on climatic factors, age group and gender for the time-period 2000–2021.
Figure 6Data pre-processing stages.
Detailed representation of explanatory variables and data sources of different studies.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Leandro et al. ( | Brazil | 2007–16 | Dengue Data: State Department of Health of the State of Rio de Janeiro |
| Joseph et al. ( | Philippines | 2014–18 | Age and Gender of patient: Philippine Epidemiological Bureau (Department of Health) |
| Daniel et al. ( | Mexico | 2010–14 | Dengue Incidence Count/Ministry of Health of the State Government of San Luis Potosí |
| Jian Cheng et al. ( | China | 2006–15 | Daily number of dengue cases: China Centre for Disease Control and Prevention |
| HaorongMeng et al. ( | China | 2006–18 | Dengue Case Count: Chinese National Notifiable Infectious Disease Reporting Information System |
| Kumar Shashvat et al. ( | India | 2014–17 | Dengue Cases: Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme, Government of India. |
| Sourabh Bal et al. ( | India | 2005–16 | Records of dengue cases/Directorate of Health Services, Government of West Bengal |
| Pi Guo et al. ( | China | 2011–14 | Dengue case count: China National Notifiable Disease Surveillance System |
| Wei Wu et al. ( | China | 2003–14 | Dengue Cases: National Notifiable Infectious Disease Reporting Information System (NIDRIS) |
| Sabrina IslamI et al. ( | Bangladesh | 2002–13 | Dengue Case Data: Directorate General of Health and Services |
| Teerawad Sriklin et al. ( | Thailand | 2015–19 | Dengue Fever Cases: Bureau of Epidemiology, Ministry of Public Health |
| Gayan et al. ( | Sri Lanka | 2005–17 | Dengue Incidence Data: Regional Epidemiology Unit |
| Felestin et al. ( | Malaysia | 2010–13 | Dengue Fever Confirmed Cases: Ministry of Health Malaysia (MOH) portal |
Figure 7Frequency of machine learning techniques used for dengue incidence prediction (SVM, Support Vector Machine; NB, Naive Bayes; DLNM, Distributed Lag Non-Linear Model; PRM, Poisson Regression Model; LSTM, Long Short Term Memory, ANN, Artificial Neural Network; GLM, Generalized Linear Model; GAM, Generalized Additive Model; LoR, Logistic Regression; LR, Linear Regression; RF, Random Forest; DT, Decision Tree; SVR, Support Vector Regressor).
Figure 8Process of developing a dengue surveillance system.
Detailed representations of different models and feature engineering techniques used in different studies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leandro et al. ( | 2021 | Brazil | Feature Engineering: ARMAX model | ARMAX model best fits the data used in this study and produced the dengue incidence count with good precision for future. |
| Joseph et al. ( | 2021 | Philippines | Feature Engineering: Pearson's Coefficient | Regression modeling estimated the annual dengue force of infection across urban centers from the age of those with infections and the transmission intensity showed significant spatiotemporal variation. |
| Daniel et al. ( | 2019 | Mexico | Feature Engineering: Multivariate Analysis | The connection between dengue and explanatory factors was evaluated via MLRM. A high spatial resolution map was created to highlight the most likely patterns of dengue risk. |
| Sourabh et al. ( | 2020 | India | Feature Engineering: AutoCorrelation Coefficient, Partial Correlation Coefficient and Cross-correlation coefficient | Based on the numerous explanatory factors, the ZIP Model was used to predict the severity of dengue fever in Kolkata. |
| Oladimeji et al. ( | 2021 | Brazil | Feature Engineering: Statistical Analysis | This study used RNN to forecast dengue count and it also uses clustering before modeling which aggregates dengue count with similar temporal patterns. |
| Micanaldo et al. ( | 2021 | Phillipines | Feature Engineering: Cross-correlation Analysis, Variable selection using Random Forest algorithm | MOB recursive partitioning displayed high correlation between dengue transmission and climatic factors and gave accurate predictions. |
| Sandali et al. ( | 2021 | India | Feature Engineering: Data Imputation and Normalization, filling missing values with mean | A new ANN based multimodal outbreak prediction algorithm is used to predict dengue with the accuracy of 86 percent. |
| Ivan et al. ( | 2020 | Indonesia | Feature Engineering: Cross-correlation, Augmented Dickey Fuller Test | SVR with a linear kernel was applied to climate and dengue incidence data for predicting dengue count and this study also provides a comparative analysis of linear and radial kernel. |
| Mohd et al. ( | 2019 | Malaysia | Feature Engineering: Average Nearest Neighbor (ANN) | The hotspot locations were detected using ANN and Kernel density estimation. Based on past data, this study found that it is feasible to estimate dengue risk. |
| Sabrina et al. ( | 2021 | Bangladesh | Feature Engineering: Statistical Analysis | The GLM and GAM models were used to show the link between dengue and environmental variables. |
| Teerawad et al. ( | 2021 | Thailand | Feature Engineering: Spearman's Rank Correlation Test | Spatial and Temporal modeling of dengue fever transmission was presented and Poisson regression model was used for prediction of dengue based on various climatic factors |
| Gayan et al. ( | 2018 | Sri Lanka | Feature Engineering: Pearson Correlation Coefficient, AutoCorrelation Coefficient, Partial Correlation Coefficient | The suggested weather-based forecasting algorithm provides high-precision warnings of oncoming dengue outbreaks and epidemics up to one month ahead of time. |
| Felestin et al. ( | 2021 | Malaysia | Feature Engineering: Pearson Correlation Coefficient | The TempeRain factor (TRF), a novel risk factor, was discovered and employed as an input parameter for a dengue epidemic prediction model. The Bayes network produced reliable findings. |
| Rachel et al. ( | 2021 | Brazil | Feature Engineering: Pearson Correlation Test | Space-varying, non-linear, and delayed connections between hydrometeorological parameters and dengue incidence are described using coupled spatiotemporal Bayesian hierarchical models with distributed lag non-linear models. |
| Wu et al. ( | 2021 | China | Feature Engineering: Spearman's Correlation Coefficient | ENMs determined the non-random association between dengue count and meteorological factors. Maxnet model was used to predict dengue incidence. |
Figure 9A logical mapping of research challenges and possible solutions.
Research challenges.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Nuraini et al. ( | 2021 | Stratifying dengue incidences based on age, gender and occupation | Classifying the population based on different vulnerable groups can help understand which crowd has been affected the most and make future predictions accordingly |
| Nuraini et al. ( | 2021 | Different Regions | Climatic and non-climatic factors vary in different regions. Hence, it is important to understand the geographic and weather patterns to predict dengue accurately for a particular region. |
| Sriklin et al. ( | 2021 | Stratifying dengue incidences based on age, gender and occupation | Non atmospheric data can help understand the factors contributing to dengue and help prevent dengue at an early stage. |
| Nuraini et al. ( | 2021 | Climatic Factors | Rise in dengue incidences became correlated to the temperature and rainfall which would help make dengue outbreak predictions based on weather forecast. |
| Sriklin et al. ( | 2021 | Dataset | Available datasets of dengue incidence were mostly yearly or monthly, hence weekly data could help make accurate predictions. And also the dengue incidences dataset were not accurate and had some missing data regarding patients. |