| Literature DB >> 35712136 |
Muhammad Tariq Yousafzai1, Tariq Shah2, Salim Khan3, Sana Ullah4, Muhammad Nawaz5, Heesup Han6, Antonio Ariza-Montes7, Horacio Molina-Sánchez8, Alejandro Vega-Muñoz9.
Abstract
The study uses a transformative worldview to give voice to an economically marginalized group of tenant farmers vulnerable to climate changes due to their calamity prone geographical location. Drawing on anthropogenic global warming (AGW) theory lens, we examine the impact of manmade actions on climate change in District "Swat" and "Malakand" of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK) province, Pakistan using a sequential mixed methods research design. Through this research design, the results of quantitative survey were complemented with a qualitative analysis of in-depth interviews. In first phase, we conducted a survey of 200 tenant farmers, followed by second wave of data collection involving 12 open-ended in-depth interviews (IDIs). The both qualitative and quantitative results suggest that farmers in both districts are affected by climate change although their crop yield had progressively increased signaling better coping and survival skills than other parts of country. Majority of respondents believed that climate change is something beyond their control in disagreement with AGW theory. Major economic losses were specifically, due to sudden alterations in weather patterns, such as floods, and hailstorms that reduce productivity as well as results in food waste with no avenues available to reclaim the energy laden in organic food waste. Besides, a productivity loss was attributed to outdated farming, lack of awareness regarding sharecropping and crop loan insurance practices. The study concludes that farmers are most vulnerable to climate change in socioeconomic terms as such changes impact their income sources; This inwardly compels cash strapped tenant farmers to delve in practice of informal credit with substantive risks attached which further deteriorates their livelihoods. The study offers understanding of how low-literate and economically marginalized indigenous tenant farmers cope to climate change and offers policy recommendations to advocate for the rights to earn sustainable livelihoods in the face of grand climate challenge.Entities:
Keywords: anthropogenic global warming; climate change; economic risks; sustainable development; tenant farmers
Year: 2022 PMID: 35712136 PMCID: PMC9197473 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.870555
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Figure 1Conceptual framework of the study.
Figure 2Study areas.
Impact of climate change on socioeconomic conditions of farmers.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
| Educated | 51 | 29 | 80 | 40 |
| Uneducated | 49 | 71 | 120 | 60 |
| Total | 100 | 100 | 200 | 100 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |||
| No | 14 | 42 | 56 | 28 |
| Yes | 84 | 58 | 144 | 72 |
| Total | 100 | 100 | 200 | 100 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |||
| No | 18 | 0 | 18 | 9 |
| Yes | 182 | 100 | 182 | 91 |
| Total | 100 | 100 | 200 | 100 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |||
| Cool | 16 | 1 | 17 | 8.5 |
| Warm | 84 | 99 | 183 | 91.5 |
| Total | 100 | 100 | 200 | 100 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |||
| No | 10 | 0 | 10 | 5 |
| Yes | 90 | 100 | 190 | 95 |
| Total | 100 | 100 | 200 | 100 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |||
| Drier | 84 | 99 | 183 | 91.5 |
| Wetter | 16 | 1 | 17 | 8.5 |
| Total | 100 | 100 | 200 | 100 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |||
| No | 10 | 2 | 12 | 6 |
| Yes | 90 | 98 | 188 | 94 |
| Total | 100 | 100 | 200 | 100 |
Countermeasures to climate changes adopted by farmers.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
| Changing planting dates | 10 | 23 | 33 | 16.5 |
| Using different crop varieties | 55 | 65 | 120 | 60 |
| Adding irrigation | 11 | 5 | 16 | 8 |
| Crop rotation | 24 | 7 | 31 | 15.5 |
| Total | 100 | 100 | 200 | 100 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |||
| Use past season weather | 34 | 10 | 44 | 22 |
| Expert opinion | 36 | 61 | 97 | 48.5 |
| TV/ radio | 19 | 5 | 24 | 12 |
| Internet | 10 | 4 | 14 | 7 |
| Others | 1 | 20 | 21 | 11.5 |
| Total | 100 | 100 | 200 | 100 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |||
| Drought | 62 | 61 | 123 | 61.5 |
| Cyclone | 2 | 3 | 5 | 2.5 |
| Floods | 12 | 24 | 36 | 18 |
| Storms | 9 | 2 | 10 | 5 |
| Heavy rain | 15 | 8 | 23 | 11.5 |
| Others | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| Total | 100 | 100 | 200 | 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Crop Yield | 61.5 | 29.5 | 8.5 | 0.5 |
| crop quality | 48 | 34 | 18 | - |
| crop growth | 36.5 | 51.5 | 11.5 | 0.5 |
| crop disease | 87.5 | 8.5 | 4 | - |
| crop water requirement | 89 | 9 | 2 | - |
Information of the farmers regarding Agricultural risk and major losses due to climate change.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
| Production risk | 69 | 16 | 85 | 42.5 |
| Price/market risk | 29 | 60 | 89 | 44.5 |
| Financial risk | 2 | 23 | 25 | 12.5 |
| Others | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 |
| Total | 100 | 100 | 200 | 100 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |||
| Heavy rainfall (floods) | 15 | 11 | 26 | 13 |
| Drought | 51 | 39 | 90 | 45 |
| Rising temperature | 3 | 1 | 4 | 2 |
| Loss of Agric. production | 26 | 42 | 68 | 34 |
| Others | 5 | 7 | 12 | 6 |
| Total | 100 | 100 | 200 | 100 |
Impact of climate change on indigenous yield and mitigating strategies by the farmers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medicinal Plants | 5.5 | 88 | 5 | 1.5 |
| Birds and wildlife | 5 | 83 | 10.5 | 1.5 |
| Pears trees | 3.5 | 83 | 12.5 | 1 |
| Apple trees | 29 | 61 | 9 | 1 |
| Wheat | 38 | 53 | 9 | 0 |
| Maize | 15.5 | 75 | 9.5 | 0 |
| Walnut trees | 3 | 51 | 21 | 25 |
| Honeybee colony | 22.5 | 74 | 3.5 | 22.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Reduce the use of artificial fertilizer | 27 | 11.5 | 32 | 29.5 |
| Enhance the knowledge of farmers | 1.5 | 2.5 | 24 | 72 |
| Create fund research activity | 2.5 | 9 | 31 | 56.5 |
| Introduce crop insurance policy | 15.5 | 6 | 19.5 | 59 |
| Strengthen through agricultural finance | 3 | 6 | 27 | 64 |
| Advancement weather forecasting system | 4.5 | 10.5 | 24 | 66 |
| Provision of Training for adoptive capacity | 4 | 4 | 16.5 | 75.5 |