| Literature DB >> 35711846 |
Yushu Liu1,2, Jiantao Gong1,2, Yanyi Huang1,2, Shanshan Xing1,2, Ling Chen3, Tao Yi4, Zhiyong Wang5, Yunxia Lv1.
Abstract
Background: Mostly current studies are limited to the impact of lymph node metastasis(LNM) on the prognosis of papillary thyroid cancer(PTC) or the impact of glucose metabolism on the occurrence of PTC, but no one has paid attention to the connection between fasting serum glucose(FSG) and LNM. The purpose of our study was to explore the relationship between FSG and LNM in non-diabetic PTC patients.Entities:
Keywords: Fasting serum glucose; Lymph node metastasis; Papillary thyroid carcinoma
Year: 2022 PMID: 35711846 PMCID: PMC9174864 DOI: 10.7150/jca.71514
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cancer ISSN: 1837-9664 Impact factor: 4.478
Figure 1PTC patients exclusion flowchart. Abbreviation: PTC, papillary thyroid cancer
Figure 2The data analysis process of the article. Abbreviations: PTC, Papillary thyroid cancer; FSG, fasting serum glucose; LNM, lymph node metastasis; LLNM, lateral cervical lymph node metastasis; CLNM, central lymph node metastasis
Baseline characteristics of PTC patients
| Charateristics | Development cohort | Internal validation cohort | External validation cohort | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/Mean±SD | ||||
|
| n = 2720 | n = 2720 | n = 594 | - |
| Age | 42.72±11.74 | 43.11±11.95 | 43.56±12.93 | 0.253 |
|
| ||||
| Male | 676(24.85%) | 646(23.75%) | 135(22.73%) | 0.443 |
| Female | 2044(75.15%) | 2074(76.25%) | 459(77.27%) | |
|
| ||||
| Yes | 918(33.75%) | 921(33.86%) | 208(35.02%) | 0.836 |
| No | 1802(66.25%) | 1799(66.14%) | 386(64.98%) | |
|
| ||||
| Yes | 852(31.32%) | 838(30.81%) | 182(30.64%) | 0.899 |
| No | 1868(68.68%) | 1882(69.19%) | 412(69.36%) | |
|
| ||||
| Yes | 312(11.47%) | 295(10.85%) | 67(11.28%) | 0.762 |
| No | 2408(88.53%) | 2425(89.15%) | 527(88.72%) | |
|
| ||||
| Unifocal | 1934(71.10%) | 1882(69.19%) | 405(68.18%) | 0.187 |
| Multifocal | 786(28.90%) | 838(30.81%) | 189(31.82%) | |
| Extension | ||||
| Yes | 646(23.75%) | 683(25.11%) | 141(23.74%) | 0.471 |
| No | 2074(76.25%) | 2037(74.89%) | 453(76.26%) | |
|
| 1.16±0.96 | 1.12±0.93 | 1.22±1.03 | 0.115 |
|
| 5.81±1.32 | 5.84±1.33 | 5.82±1.17 | 0.239 |
|
| 2.22±2.48 | 2.17±2.29 | 2.18±2.14 | 0.275 |
|
| 3.23±0.52 | 3.25±0.56 | 3.13±1.01 | 0.170 |
|
| 1.28±0.31 | 1.29±0.37 | 1.28±0.38 | 0.516 |
|
| 2.59±0.50 | 2.61±0.55 | 2.63±1.16 | 0.148 |
Abbreviations: PTC, papillary thyroid cancer; LNM, lymph node metastasis; CLNM, central lymph node metastasis; LLNM, lateral cervical lymph node metastasis; TSH,t hyrotrophin; fT3, free triiodothyronine; fT4, free thyroxine; extension, extension of tumor
Figure 3Abbreviation: LNM, lymph node metastasis. The Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve of glucose in the development cohort (a), internal validation cohort (b) and external validation cohort (c).The differential level of glucose in the patients with LNM and without LNM in the development cohort (d), internal validation cohort (e) and external validation cohort (f).
Correlation between FSG and other indicators of PTC patients in the development cohort,internal and external validation cohort
| Characteristics | Development cohort | Internal validation cohort | External validation cohort | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSG<5.745 | FSG≥5.745 | P | FSG<5.745 | FSG≥5.745 | P | FSG<5.745 | FSG≥5.745 | P | ||
|
| 40.97(11.5) | 45.46(11.6) |
| 41.58(11.9) | 45.39(11.6) |
| 42.81(12.9) | 44.71(12.9) | 0.073 | |
|
| ||||||||||
| Male | 369(22.3%) | 307(28.9%) |
| 348(21.4%) | 298(27.2%) |
| 72(20.1%) | 63(26.8%) | 0.069 | |
| Female | 1289(77.7%) | 755(71.1%) | 1276(78.6%) | 798(72.8%) | 287(79.9%) | 172(73.2%) | ||||
|
| ||||||||||
| Yes | 504(30.4%) | 414(39.0%) |
| 518(31.9%) | 403(36.8%) |
| 101(28.1%) | 107(45.5%) |
| |
| No | 1154(69.6%) | 648(61.0%) | 1106(68.1%) | 693(63.2%) | 258(71.9%) | 128(54.5%) | ||||
|
| ||||||||||
| Unifocal | 1198(72.3%) | 736(69.3%) | 0.107 | 1154(71.1%) | 728(66.4%) |
| 300(83.6%) | 153(65.1%) |
| |
| Multifocal | 460(27.7%) | 326(30.7%) | 470(28.9%) | 368(33.6%) | 59(16.4%) | 82(34.9%) | ||||
|
| ||||||||||
| Yes | 353(21.3%) | 293(27.6%) |
| 376(23.2%) | 307(28.0%) |
| 131(36.5%) | 111(47.2%) |
| |
| No | 1305(78.7%) | 769(72.4%) | 1248(76.8%) | 789(72.0%) | 228(63.5%) | 124(52.8%) | ||||
|
| 1.07(0.8) | 1.3(1.1) |
| 1.08(0.9) | 1.19(1.0) |
| 1.10(0.9) | 1.39(1.2) |
| |
|
| 2.04(2.7) | 2.49(2.1) |
| 2.02(2.4) | 2.39(2.1) |
| 2.13(2.3) | 2.29(1.8) |
| |
|
| 3.24(0.5) | 3.23(0.5) | 0.622 | 3.26(0.5) | 3.23(0.6) | 0.076 | 3.08(1.1) | 3.21(0.9) | 0.093 | |
|
| 1.28(0.3) | 1.29(0.3) | 0.961 | 1.28(0.3) | 1.29(0.4) | 0.967 | 1.27(0.3) | 1.30(0.5) | 0.636 | |
|
| 2.60(0.5) | 2.57(0.4) | 0.270 | 2.62(0.6) | 2.60(0.5) | 0.286 | 2.58(1.7) | 2.69(1.1) | 0.327 | |
Abbreviations: FSG, fasting serum glucose; PTC, papillary thyroid cancer; TSH, thyroid stimulating hormone; extension, extension of tumor; fT3, free triiodothyronine; fT4, free thyroxine
#Mean (standard deviation)
*P < 0.05 considered as statistically significant.
LNM in the development cohort,internal and external validation cohort
| LNM | Development cohort (n=918) | Internal validation cohort (n=921) | External validation cohort (n=208) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 606(66.01%) | 626(67.97%) | 141(67.79%) |
|
| 246(26.80%) | 212(23.02%) | 41(19.71%) |
|
| 66(7.19%) | 83(9.01%) | 26(12.5%) |
Abbreviations: PTC, papillary thyroid cancer; LNM, lymph node metastasis; CLNM, central lymph node metastasis; LLNM, lateral cervical lymph node metastasis.
Figure 4The differential level of glucose in the patients without LNM, with CLNM and with CLNM combined with LLNM in the development cohort (a), internal validation cohort (b) and external validation cohort (c).The differential level of glucose in the patients without LNM, with CLNM and with LLNM in the development cohort (d), internal validation cohort (e) and external validation cohort (f).