Literature DB >> 35710103

On the haemodynamic consequence of the chemoreflex and muscle mechanoreflex interaction in women and men: two tales, one story.

Hsuan-Yu Wan1, Joshua C Weavil2, Taylor S Thurston3, Vincent P Georgescu3, Candice K Morrissey1, Markus Amann1,2,3.   

Abstract

The cardiovascular response resulting from the individual activation of the muscle mechanoreflex (MMR) or the chemoreflex (CR) is different between men and women. Whether the haemodynamic consequence resulting from the interaction of these sympathoexcitatory reflexes is also sex-dependent remains unknown. MMR and CR were activated by passive leg movement (LM) and exposure to hypoxia (O2 -CR) or hypercapnia (CO2 -CR), respectively. Twelve young men and 12 young women completed two experimental protocols: (1) resting in normoxia (PET O2 : ∼83 mmHg, PET CO2 : ∼34 mmHg), normocapnic hypoxia (PET O2 : ∼48 mmHg, PET CO2 : ∼34 mmHg) and hyperoxic hypercapnia (PET O2 : ∼524 mmHg, PET CO2 : ∼44 mmHg); (2) LM under the same gas conditions. During the MMR:O2 -CR coactivation, in men, the observed mean arterial pressure (MAP) and cardiac output (CO) were not different (additive effect), while the observed leg blood flow (LBF) and vascular conductance (LVC) were significantly lower (hypo-additive), compared with the sum of the responses elicited by each reflex alone. In women, the observed MAP was not different (additive) while the observed CO, LBF and LVC were significantly greater (hyper-additive), compared with the summated responses. During the MMR:CO2 -CR coactivation, in men, the observed MAP, CO and LBF were not different (additive), while the observed LVC was significantly lower (hypo-additive), compared with the summated responses. In women, the observed MAP was significantly higher (hyper-additive), while the observed CO, LBF and LVC were not different (additive), compared with the summated responses. The interaction of the MMR and CR has a pronounced influence on the autonomic cardiovascular control, with the haemodynamic consequences differing between men and women. KEY POINTS: The cardiovascular response resulting from the activation of the muscle mechanoreflex (MMR) or the chemoreflex (CR) was previously shown to be different between women and men; this study focused on the haemodynamic consequence of the interaction of these two sympathoexcitatory reflexes. MMR and CR were activated by passive leg movement and exposure to hypoxia (O2 -CR) or hypercapnia (CO2 -CR), respectively. Individual and interactive reflex effects on central and peripheral haemodynamics were quantified in healthy young women and men. In men, the MMR:O2 -CR and MMR:CO2 -CR interactions restricted peripheral haemodynamics, likely by potentiating sympathetic vasoconstriction. In women, the MMR:O2 -CR interaction facilitated central and peripheral haemodynamics, likely by potentiating sympathetic vasodilatation; however, the MMR:CO2 -CR interaction was simply additive for the central and peripheral haemodynamics. The interaction between the MMR and the CR exerts a profound influence on the autonomic control of cardiovascular function in humans, with the haemodynamic consequences differing between women and men.
© 2022 The Authors. The Journal of Physiology © 2022 The Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  autonomic cardiovascular control; group III and IV muscle afferents; hypercapnia; hypoxia; sex differences; sympathetic vasoconstriction; sympathetic vasodilatation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35710103      PMCID: PMC9378608          DOI: 10.1113/JP283051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   6.228


  54 in total

1.  Muscle sympathetic nerve activity responses to dynamic passive muscle stretch in humans.

Authors:  Jian Cui; Cheryl Blaha; Raman Moradkhan; Kristen S Gray; Lawrence I Sinoway
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-07-27       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Sex and ageing differences in resting arterial pressure regulation: the role of the β-adrenergic receptors.

Authors:  Emma C Hart; Nisha Charkoudian; B Gunnar Wallin; Timothy B Curry; John Eisenach; Michael J Joyner
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Menstrual cycle and sex effects on sympathetic responses to acute chemoreflex stress.

Authors:  Charlotte W Usselman; Tamara I Gimon; Chantelle A Nielson; Torri A Luchyshyn; Nicole S Coverdale; Stan H M Van Uum; J Kevin Shoemaker
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 4.733

4.  Exposure to hypoxia produces long-lasting sympathetic activation in humans.

Authors:  A Xie; J B Skatrud; D S Puleo; B J Morgan
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2001-10

5.  Interaction of baroreceptor and chemoreceptor reflex control of sympathetic nerve activity in normal humans.

Authors:  V K Somers; A L Mark; F M Abboud
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  The influence of small fibre muscle mechanoreceptors on the cardiac vagus in humans.

Authors:  V F Gladwell; J Fletcher; N Patel; L J Elvidge; D Lloyd; S Chowdhary; J H Coote
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-06-09       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Limb movement-induced hyperemia has a central hemodynamic component: evidence from a neural blockade study.

Authors:  Joel D Trinity; Markus Amann; John McDaniel; Anette S Fjeldstad; Zachary Barrett-O'Keefe; Sean Runnels; David E Morgan; D Walter Wray; Russell S Richardson
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 4.733

8.  Gender-related differences in the sympathetic vasoconstrictor drive of normal subjects.

Authors:  Andrew J Hogarth; Alan F Mackintosh; David A S G Mary
Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.124

9.  Acute hypoxemia and hypercapnia: increase in plasma catecholamines in conscious dogs.

Authors:  C E Rose; J A Althaus; D L Kaiser; E D Miller; R M Carey
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1983-12

10.  Hypoxia potentiates exercise-induced sympathetic neural activation in humans.

Authors:  D R Seals; D G Johnson; R F Fregosi
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1991-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.