| Literature DB >> 35709372 |
Julian Maklar1, Raúl Stühler2, Maciej Dendzik1, Tommaso Pincelli1, Shuo Dong1, Samuel Beaulieu1, Alexander Neef1, Gang Li3, Martin Wolf1, Ralph Ernstorfer1,4, Ralph Claessen2, Laurenz Rettig1.
Abstract
Two-dimensional quantum spin Hall (QSH) insulators are a promising material class for spintronic applications based on topologically protected spin currents in their edges. Yet, they have not lived up to their technological potential, as experimental realizations are scarce and limited to cryogenic temperatures. These constraints have also severely restricted characterization of their dynamical properties. Here, we report on the electron dynamics of the novel room-temperature QSH candidate bismuthene after photoexcitation using time- and angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy. We map the transiently occupied conduction band and track the full relaxation pathway of hot photocarriers. Intriguingly, we observe photocarrier lifetimes much shorter than those in conventional semiconductors. This is ascribed to the presence of topological in-gap states already established by local probes. Indeed, we find spectral signatures consistent with these earlier findings. Demonstration of the large band gap and the view into photoelectron dynamics mark a critical step toward optical control of QSH functionalities.Entities:
Keywords: Topological insulators; bismuthene; quantum spin Hall effect; time- and angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy; trARPES; ultrafast carrier dynamics
Year: 2022 PMID: 35709372 PMCID: PMC9284614 DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c01462
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nano Lett ISSN: 1530-6984 Impact factor: 12.262
Figure 1Experimental scheme and photoelectron constant-energy contours. (a) Illustration of the trARPES experiment. An optical pump pulse excites the bismuthene sample, followed by an XUV pulse that probes the electronic distribution after a time delay, Δt. The green and blue arrows represent the two spin channels of the coupled ESs at a domain boundary and of the exposed ESs at a substrate step edge. (b) Constant-energy contours with radius k∥ ≈ 2 Å–1 of bismuthene after photoexcitation (hν = 1.55 eV, Δt = −75 to +75 fs). Two exemplary BZs and high-symmetry points are indicated.
Figure 2Electronic band-structure maps. (a) False-color plots of the trARPES measurements of bismuthene along the Γ̅–K̅ direction (gray line in inset) in equilibrium and (b) after optical excitation (hν = 1.55 eV, incident fluence F = 0.50 mJ cm–2, Δt = −40 to +40 fs). The intensity in the inset is enhanced by a factor of 5. DFT band structure calculations (black) are adopted from Reis et al.[14] (c) Differential photoemission intensity (pre-excitation signal subtracted) at Δt = 0 fs. (d, e) Energy distribution curves (EDCs) (d) at K̅ and (e) at Γ̅ in equilibrium and after weak excitation (F = 0.14 mJ cm–2, Δt = −40 to +40 fs, momentum-integration ±0.05 Å–1). The red dashed curves mark best fits as described in the text. The black arrow indicates the in-gap intensity extending into the conduction band upon photoexcitation (see discussion). The direct and indirect band gaps are marked in blue.
Figure 3Carrier relaxation dynamics. (a) Excited-state band dispersion after 1.55 eV optical excitation (F = 0.50 mJ cm–2). (b) Normalized photoemission intensities corresponding to boxes 1–3 indicated in panel a as a function of pump–probe delay. The solid lines show best fits using a single-exponential decay convolved with a Gaussian (Gaussian width as free parameter). The fit parameters tmax (temporal intensity maximum) and τ (1/e decay constant) are given with one standard deviation as uncertainty. Inset: dynamics near Δt = 0 fs. The gray dashed line indicates the temporal profile of the pump-laser pulse. (c) Temporal maximum tmax and (d) carrier lifetimes τ from bin-wise energy- and momentum-dependent decay fits. For this, the transient photoemission intensities are extracted across the energy-momentum region shown in panel a using a sliding-window integration (ΔE = 0.1 eV, Δk = 0.15 Å–1) and fitted using the function described above. Regions with low photoemission intensity or large fit uncertainties (σ > 10 fs, στ > 40 fs) are masked in gray. (e) Schematic scattering processes within the DFT band structure (see text). The in-gap states are indicated in blue.
Figure 4In-gap intensity. (a) Photoemission spectra at Γ̅ in equilibrium and (b) after optical excitation (hν = 1.55 eV, F = 0.32 mJ cm–2). Faint spectral weight is located between the band gap predicted by bulk DFT calculations (black), connecting the valence and conduction states. Visibility of the in-gap states is enhanced by a logarithmic color scale. (c, d) (top) Sketch of helical ESs (blue, green) at an exposed sample edge with zigzag termination and of coupled ESs at a domain boundary, respectively. (bottom) Schematic dispersion of infinitely extended exposed and coupled 1D ESs, respectively. The projected bulk band structure is indicated in gray. The hybridization of coupled ES pairs opens an energy gap and lifts spin-momentum locking, enabling single-particle backscattering, indicated by the black arrow. The size of the gap opening at the crossing of the ES dispersion, however, is expected to be significantly lower than our experimental energy resolution of ∼150 meV. Adopted from refs (14 and 24).