| Literature DB >> 35708895 |
Zhi-Yuan Liu1,2, Yun-Gong Wang1, Xiao-Bi Huang1, Xiao-Hui Qi1, Cui-Ping Qian1, Sheng Zhao3,4.
Abstract
This study aimed to establish and validate an effective nomogram to predict the risk of cardiotoxicity in children after each anthracycline treatment. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the eligible children were randomly divided into the training cohort (75%) and the validation cohort (25%). Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was used to select the predictors and a nomogram was developed. Then, concordance index (C-index), the area under the curve (AUC), Hosmer-Lemeshow (H-L) test, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were employed to evaluate the performance and clinical utility of nomogram. Internal validation was processed to inspect the stability of the model. A total of 796 eligible children were included in this study and divided into a training set (n = 597) and a validation set (n = 199). LASSO regression analysis revealed that cumulative anthracycline dose, ejection fractions, NT-proBNP, and diastolic dysfunction were effective predictors of cardiotoxicity. The nomogram was established based on these variables. The C-index and the AUC of the predicting nomogram were 0.818 in the training cohort and 0.773 in the validation cohort, suggesting that the nomogram had good discrimination. The calibration curve of the nomogram presented no significant deviation from the reference line, and the P-value of the H-L test was 0.283, implying a preferable degree of calibration. The threshold of DCA also reflects that the nomogram is clinically useful. A nomogram was developed to predict anthracycline chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity in children with hematological tumors. The nomogram has a good prediction effect and can provide a reference for clinicians' diagnosis and treatment.Entities:
Keywords: Anthracycline; Cardiotoxicity; Children; Hematologic; Nomogram; Tumor
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35708895 PMCID: PMC9381481 DOI: 10.1007/s12012-022-09755-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Toxicol ISSN: 1530-7905 Impact factor: 2.755
Fig. 1Flowchart of patient selection process based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria
Baseline characteristics of pediatric patients with cancer
| Patient characteristics | All patients | Training set | Validation set | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years), | 0.8437a | |||
| ≤ 5 | 438 (55.03) | 330 (55.28) | 108 (54.27) | |
| 6–10 | 268 (33.67) | 198 (33.17) | 70 (35.18) | |
| ≥ 11 | 90 (11.31) | 69 (11.56) | 21 (10.55) | |
| Gender, | 0.5564a | |||
| Male | 488 (61.31) | 362 (60.64) | 126 (63.32) | |
| Female | 308 (38.69) | 235 (39.36) | 73 (36.68) | |
| Type of malignancy, | 0.7858a | |||
| ALL | 601 (75.50) | 448 (75.04) | 153 (76.88) | |
| AML | 152 (19.10) | 115 (19.26) | 37 (18.59) | |
| NHL | 43 (5.40) | 34 (5.70) | 9 (4.52) | |
| Type of anthracycline, | 0.4821a | |||
| Daunorubicin | 253 (31.78) | 193 (32.33) | 60 (30.15) | |
| Doxorubicin | 97 (12.19) | 74 (12.40) | 23 (11.56) | |
| Combine doxorubicin and daunorubicin | 336 (42.21) | 252 (42.21) | 84 (42.21) | |
| Combine idarubicin and daunorubicin | 79 (9.92) | 53 (8.88) | 26 (13.07) | |
| Combine pirarubicin and daunorubicin | 31 (3.89) | 25 (4.19) | 6 (3.02) | |
| Cumulative anthracycline dose (mg/m2), | 0.9016a | |||
| < 300 | 385 (48.37) | 286 (47.91) | 99 (49.75) | |
| 300–550 | 342 (42.96) | 259 (43.38) | 83 (41.71) | |
| > 550 | 69 (8.67) | 52 (8.71) | 17 (8.54) | |
| Pericardial effusion, | 0.6642a | |||
| No | 749 (94.10) | 560 (93.80) | 189 (94.97) | |
| Yes | 47 (5.90) | 37 (6.20) | 10 (5.03) | |
| EF (SD) | 66 (62–69) | 65 (62–69) | 66 (63–71) | 0.4252b |
| cTn I, | 0.358a | |||
| Normal | 745 (93.59) | 562 (94.14) | 183 (91.96) | |
| Abnormal | 51 (6.41) | 35 (5.86) | 16 (8.04) | |
| NT-proBNP, | 0.7742a | |||
| Normal | 677 (85.05) | 506 (84.76) | 171 (85.93) | |
| Abnormal | 119 (14.95) | 91 (15.24) | 28 (14.07) | |
| Arrhythmia, | 0.3218a | |||
| Normal | 779 (97.86) | 582 (97.49) | 197 (98.99) | |
| Abnormal | 17 (2.14) | 15 (2.51) | 2 (1.01) | |
| Diastolic dysfunction, | 0.8583a | |||
| Normal | 687 (86.31) | 514 (86.10) | 173 (86.93) | |
| Abnormal | 109 (13.69) | 83 (13.90) | 26 (13.07) |
ALL acute lymphoblastic leukemia, AML acute myeloid leukemia, NHL non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, EF left ventricular ejection fraction, SD standard deviation, cTn I cardiac troponin I, NT-proBNP N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide
aP value for Fisher exact test
bP value for Wilcoxon rank-sum test
Fig. 2Feature selection using a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model. A The LASSO coefficients of the 15 features. B Tuning parameter (λ) selection in the LASSO model used tenfold cross-validation using the minimal criteria. Dotted vertical lines were drawn at the λ minimum value
Fig. 3The nomogram for predicting the risk of anthracycline chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity in children with hematological tumors in the training cohort
Fig. 4A The ROC curve of the nomogram for predicting the probability of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity in the training cohort. B The ROC curve of the nomogram for predicting the probability of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity in the validation cohort. C The calibration curve of nomograms for predicting anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity in the training cohort. D The calibration curve of nomograms for predicting anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity in the validation cohort
Fig. 5Decision curve analysis for the nomogram to predict anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity. A Training cohort. B Validation cohort