D Gompelmann1, K Sinn2, J Brugger3, D Bernitzky4, B Mosleh2, H Prosch5, S Geleff6, A Blessing6, A Tiefenbacher6, K Hoetzenecker2, M Idzko4, M A Hoda2. 1. Division of Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. daniela.gompelmann@meduniwien.ac.at. 2. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 3. Department for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 4. Division of Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. 5. Department for Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 6. Department of Pathology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Abstract
PURPOSES: Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) testing is performed mainly on biopsy specimens in patients with advanced lung cancer. It is questionable whether the small amount of tissue analysed in biopsies may represent the true PD-L1 expression of a tumour. METHODS: In this retrospective study, PD-L1 expression on tumour cells derived from bronchoscopy brush cytology, endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), endobronchial biopsy, transbronchial biopsy (TBB) and computed tomography (CT)-guided transthoracic biopsy was compared to the PD-L1 expression of the corresponding surgical resection in lung cancer patients with regard to neoadjuvant treatment in-between. RESULTS: A quantitative comparison between the diagnostic biopsy of the primary tumour with corresponding resected surgical specimens in a total of 113 lung cancer patients (60% male, mean age 65 ± 9 years) revealed a statistically significant correlation of PD-L1 expression on tumour cells (r = 0.58, p< 0.001), for patients without neoadjuvant treatment in-between and for patients who underwent neoadjuvant treatment (both p < 0.001). Using a cut-off value of ≥ 50% PD-L1 TPS for comparing the biopsy samples and resected specimens, the concordance rate was 78% with a Cohen's Kappa of 0.45. CONCLUSION: A statistically significant concordance for PD-L1 expression on tumour cells between biopsies from primary lung tumour and resected specimen was found, but of uncertain clinical accuracy. The use of a cut-off value of ≥ 50% PD-L1 TPS resulted only in a moderate agreement. Therefore, the interpretation of the PD-L1 determined form biopsy specimens status should only be considered with caution for treatment decisionsQuery.
PURPOSES: Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) testing is performed mainly on biopsy specimens in patients with advanced lung cancer. It is questionable whether the small amount of tissue analysed in biopsies may represent the true PD-L1 expression of a tumour. METHODS: In this retrospective study, PD-L1 expression on tumour cells derived from bronchoscopy brush cytology, endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), endobronchial biopsy, transbronchial biopsy (TBB) and computed tomography (CT)-guided transthoracic biopsy was compared to the PD-L1 expression of the corresponding surgical resection in lung cancer patients with regard to neoadjuvant treatment in-between. RESULTS: A quantitative comparison between the diagnostic biopsy of the primary tumour with corresponding resected surgical specimens in a total of 113 lung cancer patients (60% male, mean age 65 ± 9 years) revealed a statistically significant correlation of PD-L1 expression on tumour cells (r = 0.58, p< 0.001), for patients without neoadjuvant treatment in-between and for patients who underwent neoadjuvant treatment (both p < 0.001). Using a cut-off value of ≥ 50% PD-L1 TPS for comparing the biopsy samples and resected specimens, the concordance rate was 78% with a Cohen's Kappa of 0.45. CONCLUSION: A statistically significant concordance for PD-L1 expression on tumour cells between biopsies from primary lung tumour and resected specimen was found, but of uncertain clinical accuracy. The use of a cut-off value of ≥ 50% PD-L1 TPS resulted only in a moderate agreement. Therefore, the interpretation of the PD-L1 determined form biopsy specimens status should only be considered with caution for treatment decisionsQuery.
Authors: Leena Gandhi; Delvys Rodríguez-Abreu; Shirish Gadgeel; Emilio Esteban; Enriqueta Felip; Flávia De Angelis; Manuel Domine; Philip Clingan; Maximilian J Hochmair; Steven F Powell; Susanna Y-S Cheng; Helge G Bischoff; Nir Peled; Francesco Grossi; Ross R Jennens; Martin Reck; Rina Hui; Edward B Garon; Michael Boyer; Belén Rubio-Viqueira; Silvia Novello; Takayasu Kurata; Jhanelle E Gray; John Vida; Ziwen Wei; Jing Yang; Harry Raftopoulos; M Catherine Pietanza; Marina C Garassino Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-04-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Julie Brahmer; Karen L Reckamp; Paul Baas; Lucio Crinò; Wilfried E E Eberhardt; Elena Poddubskaya; Scott Antonia; Adam Pluzanski; Everett E Vokes; Esther Holgado; David Waterhouse; Neal Ready; Justin Gainor; Osvaldo Arén Frontera; Libor Havel; Martin Steins; Marina C Garassino; Joachim G Aerts; Manuel Domine; Luis Paz-Ares; Martin Reck; Christine Baudelet; Christopher T Harbison; Brian Lestini; David R Spigel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-05-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Louis Fehrenbacher; Alexander Spira; Marcus Ballinger; Marcin Kowanetz; Johan Vansteenkiste; Julien Mazieres; Keunchil Park; David Smith; Angel Artal-Cortes; Conrad Lewanski; Fadi Braiteh; Daniel Waterkamp; Pei He; Wei Zou; Daniel S Chen; Jing Yi; Alan Sandler; Achim Rittmeyer Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-03-10 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Reinhard Büttner; John R Gosney; Birgit Guldhammer Skov; Julien Adam; Noriko Motoi; Kenneth J Bloom; Manfred Dietel; John W Longshore; Fernando López-Ríos; Frédérique Penault-Llorca; Giuseppe Viale; Andrew C Wotherspoon; Keith M Kerr; Ming-Sound Tsao Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-10-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jonas J Heymann; William A Bulman; David Swinarski; Carlos A Pagan; John P Crapanzano; Mehrvash Haghighi; Ladan Fazlollahi; Mark B Stoopler; Joshua R Sonett; Adrian G Sacher; Catherine A Shu; Naiyer A Rizvi; Anjali Saqi Journal: Cancer Cytopathol Date: 2017-10-12 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Nadia Howlader; Gonçalo Forjaz; Meghan J Mooradian; Rafael Meza; Chung Yin Kong; Kathleen A Cronin; Angela B Mariotto; Douglas R Lowy; Eric J Feuer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2020-08-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Rogier Butter; Liesbeth M Hondelink; Lisette van Elswijk; Johannes L G Blaauwgeers; Elisabeth Bloemena; Rieneke Britstra; Nicole Bulkmans; Anna Lena van Gulik; Kim Monkhorst; Mathilda J de Rooij; Ivana Slavujevic-Letic; Vincent T H B M Smit; Ernst-Jan M Speel; Erik Thunnissen; Jan H von der Thüsen; Wim Timens; Marc J van de Vijver; David C Y Yick; Aeilko H Zwinderman; Danielle Cohen; Nils A 't Hart; Teodora Radonic Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2022-03-05 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: Alexander Haragan; John K Field; Michael P A Davies; Carles Escriu; Aaron Gruver; John R Gosney Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2019-06-05 Impact factor: 5.705