| Literature DB >> 35707478 |
Marzieh Nekooi1, Fatemeh Bazarganipour2, Mohammad Zoladl2, Reza Heshmat3,4, Shahintaj Aramesh5, Nazafarin Hosseini2.
Abstract
The present study was conducted to determine the effect of acupressure on health-related quality of life in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. This study was a double-blind, randomized clinical trial with a control group. Ninety-six patients with polycystic ovary syndrome from Mofateh gynecological clinic in Yasuj in Iran were enrolled according to the inclusion criteria. Patients were randomly assigned to intervention and control groups. In the intervention group, pressure on the points, Ren3, Ren4, Liv3, Sp6, and Sp10 and in the control group, pressure on sham points were performed for 6 weeks (2 sessions per week). The primary outcome was health-related quality of life, measured by the modified polycystic ovary syndrome health-related quality of life questionnaire (MPCOSQ). The secondary outcomes were total testosterone levels and clinical symptoms in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. The outcome variables were measured before the intervention at week 0 (baseline) and after the intervention at week 18 (12 weeks after the end of intervention). The results indicated that at week 18, the score of clinical symptoms and the total testosterone level of the intervention group were lower than those of the control group. The health-related quality of life score in the intervention group was higher than that in the control group, which was statistically significant (P < 0/05). Therefore, acupressure in these points is recommended as a practical and effective method of treating polycystic ovarian syndrome.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35707478 PMCID: PMC9192291 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2920132
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.650
Figure 1Location of points; red: acupressure point; green: placebo point. (a) Liv3 and placebo points, (b) SP6 and placebo points, (c) SP10 and placebo points, and (d) REN 3, REN 4, and placebo.
Figure 2Flow diagram of patient's enrolment and study progress.
Comparison of demographic characteristics between the two groups at baseline.
| Variables | Control | Intervention | Total |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ethnicity | Fars | 18 (37.4) | 24 (50) | 42 (43.8) | 0.32 |
| Lor | 22 (45.8) | 20 (41, 7) | 42 (43.8) | ||
| Turkish | 8 (16.7) | 4 (8.3) | 12 (12.4) | ||
|
| |||||
| Education | Elementary | 18 (37.2) | 9 (18.8) | 27 (28.1) | 0.1 |
| High school | 16 (33.3) | 24 (50) | 40 (41.7) | ||
| Diploma and higher | 14 (29.2) | 15 (31.2) | 29 (30.2) | ||
|
| |||||
| Employment | Employer | 13 (27.1) | 11 (22.9) | 24 (25) | 0.64 |
| Housewife | 35 (72.9) | 37 (77.1) | 72 (75) | ||
|
| |||||
| Menstruation problems | Regular | 15 (3.31) | 12 (25) | 27 (28.1) | 0.74 |
| Irregular | 14 (29.2) | 19 (39.6) | 33 (34.4) | ||
| Less than 21 days | 15 (31.3) | 14 (29.2) | 29 (30.2) | ||
| More than 35 days | 4 (8, 2) | 3 (6, 2) | 7 (7.3) | ||
|
| |||||
| Infertility | Primary | 32 (66.7) | 28 (58.3) | 60 (62.5) | 0.4 |
| Secondary | 16 (33.3) | 20 (41.7) | 36 (37.5) | ||
|
| |||||
| Number of children | 1 | 18 (37.5) | 14 (29.2) | 32 (33.3) | 0.47& |
| 2 | 20 (41.7) | 19 (39.6) | 39 (40.7) | ||
| 3 and more | 10 (20.8) | 15 (31.2) | 25 (26) | ||
|
| |||||
| Age (years) (mean ± SD) | 32.8 ± 2.7 | 32.6 ± 3.4 | 0.74∗∗ | ||
|
| |||||
| BMI (mean ± SD) | 26.2 ± 2.1 | 26.8 ± 2.2 | 0.18∗∗ | ||
|
| |||||
| Infertile (years) (mean ± SD) | 3.1 ± 1.3 | 2.9 ± 1.2 | 0.4∗∗ | ||
Based on independent t-test, ∗∗chi-square test, N (%) = number (percent).
Comparison of clinical symptoms, total testosterone, and HRQOL of women with polycystic ovarian syndrome between study groups.
| Variables | Time | Mean ± dtandarddeviation | MeanDifference | Independent | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Control | t | Sig. (2-tailed) | ||||
| Clinical symptoms | Acne | Before | 7.3 ± 2.9 | 6.7 ± 2.1 | 0.563 | 1.10 | 0.28 |
| After | 5.3 ± 1.9 | 6.4 ± 2.1 | −1.083 | −2.64 | 0.01 | ||
| Hirsutism | Before | 8.3 ± 3.1 | 8.1 ± 1.9 | 0.229 | 0.44 | 0.66 | |
| After | 5.8 ± 1.5 | 7.6 ± 2.4 | −1.854 | −4.50 | 0.001 | ||
| Alopecia | Before | 1.7 ± 0.7 | 1.6 ± 0.7 | 0.125 | 0.92 | 0.36 | |
| After | 1.3 ± 0.5 | 1.6 ± 0.7 | −0.313 | −2.58 | 0.01 | ||
|
| |||||||
| Total testosterone (Ng/DL) | Before | 4.3 ± 1.1 | 4.1 ± 0.8 | 0.250 | 1.28 | 0.20 | |
| After | 2.7 ± 0.6 | 3.8 ± 1.2 | −1.104 | −5.72 | 0.001 | ||
|
| |||||||
| HRQOL scores | Before | 107.5 ± 5.8 | 107.1 ± 5.6 | 0.396 | 0.34 | 0.74 | |
| After | 120.6 ± 5.5 | 108.3 ± 4.4 | 12.292 | 12.16 | 0.001 | ||
|
| |||||||
| Domains of HRQOL | Emotionaldisturbance | Before | 24.3 ± 3.4 | 25.2 ± 2.8 | −0.813 | −1.29 | 0.20 |
| After | 26.3 ± 2.2 | 24.3 ± 2.8 | 2.000 | 3.91 | 0.001 | ||
| Weight | Before | 21.5 ± 2.2 | 21.3 ± 2.1 | 0.188 | 0.44 | 0.66 | |
| After | 22.7 ± 2.3 | 21.1 ± 2.1 | 1.542 | 3.46 | 0.001 | ||
| Infertility | Before | 10.4 ± 1.4 | 10.2 ± 1.7 | 0.250 | 0.78 | 0.44 | |
| After | 12.2 ± 1.8 | 10.8 ± 1.7 | 1.417 | 4.04 | 0.001 | ||
| Menstrualdisturbance | Before | 18.2 ± 2.1 | 17.5 ± 2.8 | 0.771 | 1.56 | 0.12 | |
| After | 21.4 ± 3.3 | 18.2 ± 2.5 | 3.250 | 5.51 | 0.001 | ||
| Hirsutism | Before | 18.5 ± 2.6 | 18.5 ± 3.3 | −0.042 | −0.07 | 0.95 | |
| After | 21.6 ± 2.7 | 19.3 ± 3.1 | 2.313 | 3.93 | 0.001 | ||
| Acne | Before | 14.5 ± 2.1 | 14.5 ± 2.2 | 0.042 | 0.10 | 0.93 | |
| After | 16.4 ± 2.3 | 14.7 ± 2.1 | 1.729 | 3.82 | 0.001 | ||
Based on independent t-test., M ± SD = mean ± standard deviation.
Comparison of clinical symptoms, total testosterone, and HRQOL of women with polycystic ovarian syndrome within study groups.
| Variables | Time | Before | After |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M ± SD | M ± SD | |||||
| Clinical symptoms | Acne | Intervention | 7.3 ± 2.9 | 5.3 ± 1.9 | 0.001 | |
| Control | 6.7 ± 2.1 | 6.4 ± 2.1 | 0.32 | |||
| Hirsutism | Intervention | 8.3 ± 3 | 5.8 ± 1.5 | 0.001 | ||
| Control | 8 ± 1.9 | 7.6 ± 2.4 | 0.36 | |||
| Alopecia | Intervention | 1.7 ± 0.7 | 1.3 ± 0.5 | 0.001 | ||
| Control | 1.6 ± 0.7 | 1.6 ± 0.7 | 0.88 | |||
|
| ||||||
| Total testosterone (Ng/DL) | Intervention | 4.3 ± 1.1 | 2.7 ± 0.6 | 0.001 | ||
| Control | 4.1 ± 0.8 | 3.8 ± 1, | 0.14 | |||
|
| ||||||
| HRQOL | Intervention | 107.5 ± 5.8 | 120.6 ± 5.5 | 0.001 | ||
| Control | 107.1 ± 5.6 | 108.3 ± 4.4 | 0.27 | |||
|
| ||||||
| Domains of HRQOL | Emotional disturbance | Intervention | 24.3 ± 3.4 | 26.3 ± 2.2 | 0.002 | |
| Control | 25.2 ± 2.8 | 24.3 ± 2.8 | 0.15 | |||
| Weight | Intervention | 21.5 ± 2.2 | 22.7 ± 2.3 | 0.02 | ||
| Control | 21.3 ± 2.1 | 21.1 ± 2.1 | 0.68 | |||
| Infertility | Intervention | 10.4 ± 1.4 | 12.2 ± 1.8 | 0.001 | ||
| Control | 10.2 ± 1.7 | 10.8 ± 1.7 | 0.07 | |||
| Menstrual disturbance | Intervention | 18.2 ± 2.1 | 21.4 ± 3.3 | 0.001 | ||
| Control | 17.5 ± 2.8 | 18.2 ± 2.5 | 0.17 | |||
| Hirsutism | Intervention | 18.5 ± 2.6 | 21.6 ± 2.7 | 0.001 | ||
| Control | 18.5 ± 3.3 | 19.3 ± 3.1 | 0.18 | |||
| Acne | Intervention | 14.5 ± 2.1 | 16.4 ± 2.3 | 0.001 | ||
| Control | 14.5 ± 2.2 | 14.7 ± 2.1 | 0.68 | |||
Based on pair t-test, M ± SD = mean ± standard deviation.