| Literature DB >> 35707383 |
Ali A Assiry1, Shaeesta Khaleelahmed Bhavikatti2,3, Fahad A Althobaiti4, Roshan Noor Mohamed5, Mohmed Isaqali Karobari6.
Abstract
Background: Dental/oral diseases are one of the significant public health problems globally. Herbal medicines for managing oral diseases are considered an effective alternative to synthetic compounds due to their lower side effect. Azadirachta indica, Terminalia chebula, Camellia sinensis, and Piper nigrum are used to control and prevent oral inflammations in dentistry. In this study, we have evaluated the protease inhibition activity of these plant extracts, and further, the binding mode of the active ingredient of these plants with trypsin was studied using molecular docking.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35707383 PMCID: PMC9192215 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5870443
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.246
Yield of the aqueous extract of Azadirachta Indica, Terminalia chebula, Piper nigrum, and Camellia sinensis.
| Plant name | Dried material (gm) | Extract (gm) | Colour | Extract yield (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 16 | 3.22 | Brownish solid | 20.12 |
|
| 16 | 2.28 | Brownish solid | 14.25 |
|
| 16 | 3.10 | Brownish solid | 19.37 |
|
| 16 | 3.96 | Brownish solid | 24.75 |
Figure 1Flow chart of the study design to evaluate the anti-inflammatory activity of the plant extract.
In vitro anti-inflammatory activity of aqueous extracts of selected medicinal plants by protease inhibition method.
| Plant name | Conc ( | OD | % inhibition | IC50 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blank | — | 2.138 | — | — |
|
| ||||
| Standard (diclofenac sodium) | 100 | 1.221 | 42.89 | 93.00 |
| 200 | 0.905 | 57.67 | ||
| 400 | 0.851 | 60.19 | ||
| 800 | 0.768 | 64.07 | ||
| 1000 | 0.704 | 67.07 | ||
|
| ||||
|
| 100 | 1.211 | 43.35 | 96.19 |
| 200 | 0.938 | 56.12 | ||
| 400 | 0.819 | 61.69 | ||
| 800 | 0.774 | 63.79 | ||
| 1000 | 0.689 | 67.77 | ||
|
| ||||
|
| 100 | 1.481 | 30.72 | 371.20 |
| 200 | 0.969 | 54.67 | ||
| 400 | 0.912 | 57.34 | ||
| 800 | 0.827 | 61.31 | ||
| 1000 | 0.811 | 62.06 | ||
|
| ||||
| Terminalia chebula | 100 | 1.869 | 12.58 | 639.48 |
| 200 | 1.752 | 18.05 | ||
| 400 | 0.969 | 54.67 | ||
| 800 | 0.861 | 59.72 | ||
| 1000 | 0.715 | 66.55 | ||
|
| ||||
|
| 100 | 1.121 | 47.56 | 188.50 |
| 200 | 1.010 | 52.75 | ||
| 400 | 0.990 | 53.69 | ||
| 800 | 0.877 | 58.98 | ||
| 1000 | 0.645 | 69.83 | ||
Values represented in the results are mean ± SD of three replicates; linear regression analysis was used to calculate IC50 value).
Figure 2Docking of trypsin with azadirachtin, chebulagic acid, catechin, and piperine. (a) The binding mode of azadirachtin (green), chebulagic acid (cyan), catechin (magenta), and piperine (yellow) with trypsin. (b) The solvent-accessible surface area of the trypsin binding pocket with the docked structure of azadirachtin, chebulagic acid, catechin, and piperine. Here, all the compounds prefer the same binding site of the trypsin receptor.
Hydrogen bonding interactions of trypsin with active ingredients of azadirachtin, chebuligenic acid, catechin, and piperine after molecular docking.
| Protein-drug complex | Binding energy (kcal/mol) | Atoms involved in bonding | Distance (Å) | Angle (°) | Figure reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Azadirachtin | -5.93 | GLY216:N-LIG1:O | 2.63642 | 116.175 | 2A |
| LIG1:H-SER195:OG | 1.93069 | 113.056 | |||
| LIG1:H-GLY216:O | 2.11922 | 138.919 | |||
|
| |||||
| Chebuligenic acid | -6.14 | LIG1:H-A:GLY219:O | 1.99686 | 100.082 | 2B |
| LIG1:H-A:CYS220:SG | 2.79062 | 154.215 | |||
| LIG1:H-A:GLY219:O | 2.01555 | 133.026 | |||
| LIG1:H-A:SER190:OG | 1.83137 | 115.943 | |||
| LIG1:H-A:CYS220:SG | 2.65444 | 131.571 | |||
|
| |||||
| Catechin | -7.57 | LIG1:H-SER190:OG | 2.11049 | 112.514 | 2C |
| LIG1:H-ASP189:OD1 | 2.65182 | 130.387 | |||
| LIG1:H-SER190:O | 2.93003 | 115.032 | |||
| LIG1:H-PHE41:O | 2.35007 | 145.123 | |||
|
| |||||
| Piperine | -8.36 | SER190:HG-LIG1:O | 2.54118 | 100.688 | 2D |
| GLN192:HE21-LIG1:O | 2.25269 | 108.11 | |||
Lig was denoted for the drug.
Figure 3The 2D interactions of trypsin residues with azadirachtin, chebulagic acid, catechin, and piperine. (a) The interactions of trypsin residues with azadirachtin. (b) The interactions of trypsin residues with chebulagic acid. (c) The interactions of trypsin residues with catechin. (d) The interactions of trypsin residues with piperine.