Literature DB >> 35707023

Assigning scores for ordered categorical responses.

Daniel Fernández1,2, Ivy Liu2, Roy Costilla3, Peter Yongqi Gu4.   

Abstract

Deciding on the best statistical method to apply when the response variable is ordinal is essential because the way the categories are ordered in the data is relevant as it could change the results of the analysis. Although the models for continuous variables have similarities to those for ordinal variables, this paper presents the advantages of the use of the ordering information on the outcomes with methods developed for modeling ordinal data such as the ordered stereotype model. The novelty of this article lies in showing the dangers of assigning equally spaced scores to ordered response categories in statistical analysis, which are illustrated with a simulation study and a case study. We propose a new way to use the score parameters, which incorporates the fitted spacing dictated by the data. Additionally, this article uses score parameter estimates in the ordered stereotype model to propose a new measure to calculate continuous medians in the raw data: the adjusted c-median. It benefits the general audience who can easily understand the median as a summary statistic. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.
© 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Global odds ratio; linear-by-linear association model; median measure; ordered stereotype model; uneven spacing

Year:  2019        PMID: 35707023      PMCID: PMC9042035          DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2019.1674790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Stat        ISSN: 0266-4763            Impact factor:   1.416


  16 in total

1.  Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease.

Authors:  N MANTEL; W HAENSZEL
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1959-04       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  On the equivalence of posterior inference based on retrospective and prospective likelihoods: application to a case-control study of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  M Ghosh; J Song; J J Forster; R Mitra; B Mukherjee
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  On the Theory of Scales of Measurement.

Authors:  S S Stevens
Journal:  Science       Date:  1946-06-07       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  A goodness-of-fit test for the ordered stereotype model.

Authors:  Daniel Fernández; Ivy Liu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Regression with an ordered categorical response.

Authors:  T J Hastie; J L Botha; C M Schnitzler
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Alternative models for ordinal logistic regression.

Authors:  S Greenland
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1994-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Discussion of 'Regularized Regression for Categorical Data'.

Authors:  Bryan E Shepherd; Qi Liu
Journal:  Stat Modelling       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 2.039

8.  Bayesian inference for the stereotype regression model: Application to a case-control study of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jaeil Ahn; Bhramar Mukherjee; Mousumi Banerjee; Kathleen A Cooney
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  The assignment of scores procedure for ordinal categorical data.

Authors:  Han-Ching Chen; Nae-Sheng Wang
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-09-11

10.  ordinalgmifs: An R Package for Ordinal Regression in High-dimensional Data Settings.

Authors:  Kellie J Archer; Jiayi Hou; Qing Zhou; Kyle Ferber; John G Layne; Amanda E Gentry
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2014-12-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.