| Literature DB >> 35707007 |
Ruoying Zhao1, Danting Li1, Xinlong Wang1, Zhong Li2, Xiaoping Yu1, Xuping Shentu1.
Abstract
Management of the rice brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens Stål is challenging because it can rapidly adapt to new pesticides within several generations. Combined use of chemical insecticides and antimicrobials was proposed as an alternative strategy to control N. lugens. Our previous experiments identified two effective agents (chemical insecticide: pymetrozine and antimicrobial: zhongshengmycin) that act on different targets in N. lugens. However, conditions and effectiveness of combinations of antimicrobials and insecticides against N. lugens are still unknown. Here, we evaluated separate and combined effects of pymetrozine and zhongshengmycin on third instar nymphs of N. lugens under laboratory and greenhouse conditions. Results showed that zhongshengmycin exerts significant inhibitory effects on the three endosymbionts Pichia guilliermondii, Cryptococcus peneaus, and Pichia anomala cultured in vitro of N. lugens. Combinations of pymetrozine and zhongshengmycin under laboratory conditions produced additive or synergistic effects on N. lugens and caused higher mortality in third instar nymphs than either of them used alone. Experiments under greenhouse conditions further demonstrated that effective component quality ratio of pymetrozine to zhongshengmycin of 1:10 and 1:40 with co-toxicity coefficients of 221.63 and 672.87, respectively, also produced significant synergistic effects against N. lugens. Our results indicated that chemical insecticides combined with antimicrobials may provide a potential novel strategy for controlling N. lugens by inhibiting its endosymbionts.Entities:
Keywords: Nilaparvata lugens; antimicrobials; chemical insecticide; combination; synergistic effect
Year: 2022 PMID: 35707007 PMCID: PMC9191275 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.875610
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.755
Inhibitory effect of different antimicrobials on YLS isolated from Nilaparvata lugens.
| Antimicrobials |
|
|
| |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concentration (μg/L) | 0 | 0.01 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.1 | 1.0 |
| Tebuconazole | +++ | + | + | − | +++ | + | + | − | +++ | + | ++ | − |
| Zhongshengmycin | +++ | ++ | − | − | +++ | − | − | − | +++ | + | − | − |
+++: Vast growth, ++: Major growth, +: Minimal growth, and −: Negative growth.
FIGURE 1The growth of YLSs isolated from Nilaparvata lugens at different concentrations of antimicrobials. (A) Tebuconazole; (B) Zhongshengmycin.
Median lethal concentrations of pymetrozine and zhongshengmycin on third instar nymphs of Nilaparvata lugens.
| Antimicrobials | Probit equation | Standard error | χ2 (df) | LC50 value mg ai/L (95% CI) | LC95 value mg ai/L (95% CI) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 96.6% Pymetrozine | Y = 4.3532 + 1.1161x | 0.17 | 0.24 (8) | 3.80 (1.84 − 7.85) | 113.04 (38.73 − 329.94) | 0.0076 |
| 12% Zhongshengmycin | Y = 0.3247 + 2.1411x | 0.55 | 1.28 (8) | 152.61 (45.34 − 513.70) | 895.00 (262.10 − 3056.18) | 0.0295 |
Interactions between pymetrozine and zhongshengmycin against third instar nymphs of Nilaparvata lugens 5 days after treatment.
| Treatment | Py:Zs | Number | Death number | Observed mortality (%)±SE | Expected mortality | Toxic effect ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 100:0 | 30 | 20 | 66.67 ± 0.27 | ||
| 2 | 90:10 | 30 | 23 | 76.67 ± 0.09 | 64.67 | 1.19 |
| 3 | 80:20 | 30 | 24 | 80.00 ± 0.13 | 62.67 | 1.28 |
| 4 | 70:30 | 30 | 21 | 70.00 ± 0.22 | 60.67 | 1.15 |
| 5 | 60:40 | 30 | 18 | 60.00 ± 0.39 | 58.67 | 1.02 |
| 6 | 50:50 | 30 | 22 | 73.33 ± 0.11 | 56.67 | 1.29 |
| 7 | 40:60 | 30 | 18 | 60.00 ± 0.42 | 54.67 | 1.10 |
| 8 | 30:70 | 30 | 17 | 56.67 ± 0.38 | 52.67 | 1.08 |
| 9 | 20:80 | 30 | 18 | 60.00 ± 0.17 | 50.67 | 1.18 |
| 10 | 10:90 | 30 | 15 | 50.00 ± 0.42d,e | 48.67 | 1.03 |
| 11 | 0:100 | 30 | 14 | 46.67 ± 0.27e | ||
| 12 | CK | 30 | 0 | 0f |
Note : Py, Pymetrozine and Zs, Zhongshengmycin (The ratio of Py:Zs represent volume ratio).
Mean values of three replicates of the experiment. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different treatments in the same day after application (p < 0.05, Tukey’s LSD test).
Expected mortality = Ma × the volume proportion of agent A in the mixture + Mb × the volume proportion of agent B in the mixture.
Ma: the observed mortality caused by agent A alone, Mb: the observed mortality caused by agent B alone, The concertration of agent A and agent B were both LC50 (median lethal concentration) on test insects.
Toxic effect ratio = observed mortality/Expected Mortality.
Significant differences were indicated by different letters at p < 0.05.
Determination of the cotoxicity coefficient of pymetrozine and zhongshengmycin on third instar nymphs of N. lugens and statistical results of the adjustment to the log-probit model under greenhouse condition.
| Treatment (Py:Zs) | Probit equation | LC50 value (mg ai/L) | LC50 value mg ai/L (95% CI) |
|
| CTC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1:10 | Y = 5.6708 + 0.3684x | 15.1012 | 8.66–26.31 | 0.0039 | 0.9780 | 221.63 |
| 1:40 | Y = 6.6181 + 0.8360x | 11.6010 | 6.62–20.30 | 0.0028 | 0.9824 | 672.87 |
Py, pymetrozine; Zs, Zhongshengmycin; CTC, Cotoxicity coefficient.