Literature DB >> 35706573

Variable selection and importance in presence of high collinearity: an application to the prediction of lean body mass from multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance.

Camillo Cammarota1, Alessandro Pinto2.   

Abstract

In prediction problems both response and covariates may have high correlation with a second group of influential regressors, that can be considered as background variables. An important challenge is to perform variable selection and importance assessment among the covariates in the presence of these variables. A clinical example is the prediction of the lean body mass (response) from bioimpedance (covariates), where anthropometric measures play the role of background variables. We introduce a reduced dataset in which the variables are defined as the residuals with respect to the background, and perform variable selection and importance assessment both in linear and random forest models. Using a clinical dataset of multi-frequency bioimpedance, we show the effectiveness of this method to select the most relevant predictors of the lean body mass beyond anthropometry.
© 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Variable selection; anthropometric variables; bioimpedance; importance; lean body mass; linear model; multi-frequency; random forests

Year:  2020        PMID: 35706573      PMCID: PMC9042145          DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2020.1763930

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Stat        ISSN: 0266-4763            Impact factor:   1.416


  15 in total

Review 1.  Bioelectrical impedance analysis--part I: review of principles and methods.

Authors:  Ursula G Kyle; Ingvar Bosaeus; Antonio D De Lorenzo; Paul Deurenberg; Marinos Elia; José Manuel Gómez; Berit Lilienthal Heitmann; Luisa Kent-Smith; Jean-Claude Melchior; Matthias Pirlich; Hermann Scharfetter; Annemie M W J Schols; Claude Pichard
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.324

2.  Optimal designs for studying bioimpedance.

Authors:  J M McGree; S B Duffull; J A Eccleston; L C Ward
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 2.833

Review 3.  Human body composition: in vivo methods.

Authors:  K J Ellis
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 37.312

4.  Bio-impedance analysis for appendicular skeletal muscle mass assessment in (pre-) frail elderly people.

Authors:  H van Baar; P J M Hulshof; M Tieland; C P G M de Groot
Journal:  Clin Nutr ESPEN       Date:  2015-06-19

5.  Multi-frequency impedance for the prediction of extracellular water and total body water.

Authors:  P Deurenberg; A Tagliabue; F J Schouten
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.718

6.  Sarcopenia: alternative definitions and associations with lower extremity function.

Authors:  Anne B Newman; Varant Kupelian; Marjolein Visser; Eleanor Simonsick; Bret Goodpaster; Michael Nevitt; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Frances A Tylavsky; Susan M Rubin; Tamara B Harris
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  The behaviour of random forest permutation-based variable importance measures under predictor correlation.

Authors:  Kristin K Nicodemus; James D Malley; Carolin Strobl; Andreas Ziegler
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Comparison of single- or multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis and spectroscopy for assessment of appendicular skeletal muscle in the elderly.

Authors:  Yosuke Yamada; Yuya Watanabe; Masahiro Ikenaga; Keiichi Yokoyama; Tsukasa Yoshida; Taketoshi Morimoto; Misaka Kimura
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2013-06-27

9.  Mean Expected Error in Prediction of Total Body Water: A True Accuracy Comparison between Bioimpedance Spectroscopy and Single Frequency Regression Equations.

Authors:  Fernando Seoane; Shirin Abtahi; Farhad Abtahi; Lars Ellegård; Gudmundur Johannsson; Ingvar Bosaeus; Leigh C Ward
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Conditional variable importance for random forests.

Authors:  Carolin Strobl; Anne-Laure Boulesteix; Thomas Kneib; Thomas Augustin; Achim Zeileis
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.