Literature DB >> 35706072

Limits of Monoclonal Antibody Treatment in Pregnant Women Complicated with COVID-19 Due to The Omicron Variant.

Hyun-Hwa Cha1, Sujeong Kim1, Hyun Mi Kim1, Mi Ju Kim1, Won Joon Seong2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35706072      PMCID: PMC9259917          DOI: 10.3947/ic.2022.0034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Chemother        ISSN: 1598-8112


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor: Administration of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been reported to reduce disease progression in those at high risk of disease progression [1]. In November 2021, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Treatment Guidelines Panel (Panel) recommended the use anti-SARS-CoV mAbs products, such as bamlanivimab plus etesevimab (Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA), casirivimab plus imdevimab (REGEN-COV, Regeneration Pharmaceuticals, Tarry Town, NY, USA) or sortrovimab (GlaxoSmithKline plc, Brentford, UK) to treat non-hospitalized patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 who are at high risk of clinical progression and pregnant patients [2]. The Korean Society of Infectious Diseases released similar guideline [3], and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Society of Maternal-Fetal Medicine also support it [4]. We provided information regarding the administration of regdanvimab (Celltrion, Incheon, Korea), the only available mAb in Korea, to 22 pregnant women with mild symptoms of COVID-19 between December 2021 and January 2022 who met the following criteria: positive result based on nasopharyngeal polymerase chain reaction testing, unvaccinated or incompletely vaccinated status, onset of symptoms within 7 days, and SpO2 >94% in room air with no requirement for oxygen supplementation. Three patients consented to administration of regdanvimab (Table 1). Their maternal age ranged from 33 - 34 years; their gestational age at the time of the treatment ranged from 14 to 27 weeks. All patients received regdanvimab without any immediate acute complications and continued their pregnancies. Although it was too small number of patients to conclude whether mAb therapy is effective treatment in pregnant women, we could find there was no acute complication in our study group. Therefore, we planned to administer mAb to pregnant women with mild COVID-19. However, in January 2022, the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA) revised the authorizations for two monoclonal antibody treatments — bamlanivimab plus etesevimab and REGEN-COV and limited their use to only when the patient is likely to get infected or exposed to a variant that is susceptible to these treatments [5]. Because the omicron variant of SARS-CoV 2 is estimated to account for more than 99% of cases in the United States from January 2022, the FDA did not authorize the use of these mAbs at this time. In Korea, the first cases of omicron variant (a couple) were reported on December 1, 2021 [6], and it became dominant variant on third week of January, 2022 [7]. The Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Agency is also concerned with the reduced activity against the omicron variant of regdanvimab and recommends the caution of mAb administration in omicron dominant situations [8]. Because the variant type in our study group was not confirmed, we could not report whether mAb therapy is effective treatment in pregnant women during the omicron variant dominant era. We are writing this letter to share our experience about the administration of mAb to pregnant women, information regarding the administration of mAbs which is changing with emerging a new variant.
Table 1

Patient characteristics and outcomes

PatientAge (yr)BMI (kg/m2)Co-morbidityGestational age at treatment (wk+d)COVID-19 severity at treatmentCOVID-19 progression or additional care requiredPregnancy outcomes
13322.8No17 + 0MildNoCurrently 25 weeks pregnant
23421.7No26 + 6MildNoCurrently 32 weeks pregnant
33422.1No14 + 2MildNoCurrently 18 weeks pregnant

BMI, body mass index; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019.

  4 in total

1.  Who is providing contraception care in the United States? An observational study of the contraception workforce.

Authors:  Candice Chen; Julia Strasser; Rachel Banawa; Qian Luo; Mandar Bodas; Catarina Castruccio-Prince; Kirsten Das; Patricia Pittman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Korean Society of Infectious Diseases/National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency Recommendations for Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Monoclonal Antibody Treatment of Patients with COVID-19.

Authors:  Sun Bean Kim; Jimin Kim; Kyungmin Huh; Won Suk Choi; Yae Jean Kim; Eun Jeong Joo; Youn Jeong Kim; Young Kyung Yoon; Jung Yeon Heo; Yu Bin Seo; Su Jin Jeong; Su Yeon Yu; Kyong Ran Peck; Miyoung Choi; Joon Sup Yeom
Journal:  Infect Chemother       Date:  2021-06

3.  Clinical Characteristics of 40 Patients Infected With the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant in Korea.

Authors:  Min-Kyung Kim; Bora Lee; Youn Young Choi; Jihye Um; Kyung-Shin Lee; Ho Kyung Sung; Yeonjae Kim; Jun-Sun Park; Myungsun Lee; Hee-Chang Jang; Ji Hwan Bang; Ki-Hyun Chung; Jaehyun Jeon
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  Bamlanivimab plus Etesevimab in Mild or Moderate Covid-19.

Authors:  Michael Dougan; Ajay Nirula; Masoud Azizad; Bharat Mocherla; Robert L Gottlieb; Peter Chen; Corey Hebert; Russell Perry; Joseph Boscia; Barry Heller; Jason Morris; Chad Crystal; Awawu Igbinadolor; Gregory Huhn; Jose Cardona; Imad Shawa; Princy Kumar; Andrew C Adams; Jacob Van Naarden; Kenneth L Custer; Michael Durante; Gerard Oakley; Andrew E Schade; Timothy R Holzer; Philip J Ebert; Richard E Higgs; Nicole L Kallewaard; Janelle Sabo; Dipak R Patel; Matan C Dabora; Paul Klekotka; Lei Shen; Daniel M Skovronsky
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 91.245

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.