Literature DB >> 3570489

Musculoskeletal load of municipal employees aged 44 to 58 years in different occupational groups.

C H Nygård, T Suurnäkki, K Landau, J Ilmarinen.   

Abstract

This study is part of a comprehensive multidisciplinary project aimed at determining criteria for retirement ages in municipal occupations in Finland. Musculoskeletal load at work was studied in eight different occupational groups to see what differences between occupational groups exist. A job analysis of the work of 116 subjects was made with the ergonomic job description analysis method (AET). The work of 116 men and women, mean age 52 years, was studied in the work place. The study revealed three levels of overall musculoskeletal load. The groups with high musculoskeletal load worked in installation, auxiliary, home care and transport groups, with an assessed load of on average about one third of the maximal on the AET scale. Both quantitative and qualitative loading problems were concentrated in these groups. In contrast, teaching and administration groups had low musculoskeletal load averaging about 10% of the maximal. The nursing and office groups were between these two levels with a load of approximately 20% of the maximal. However, with the same overall quantity, the quality of the musculoskeletal load varied. In the transport group, monotonous static work with both arms (about 60% of workshift) and legs (30%) was most common, while the musculoskeletal load of the auxiliary and home care groups consisted of heavy dynamic muscular work with arms (60% of workshift) and legs (70%). On the other hand, the administration group alone had a static load of the arms (about 15% of workshift) and legs (2%) and also a low dynamic load with arms (0%) and legs (33%), which could have hypokinetic effects. In conclusion, there are significant differences between the profile groups in both the quantitative and qualitative load of the musculoskeletal system. The differences are even more pronounced when aging employees are studied. These facts support different retirement ages for the profile groups, at least when the musculoskeletal system is concerned.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3570489     DOI: 10.1007/bf00377737

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health        ISSN: 0340-0131            Impact factor:   3.015


  12 in total

1.  Correcting working postures in industry: A practical method for analysis.

Authors:  O Karhu; P Kansi; I Kuorinka
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 3.661

2.  Work load in nursing aides, heart rate, oxygen uptake and isomeric muscle strength in nursing aides in long-term care hospital wards.

Authors:  O Dehlin; G Grimby; A Svanborg
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1974

3.  [Human postures on production work places, in motor-repair works and mines (author's transl)].

Authors:  W Rohmert; R Schott
Journal:  Int Arch Arbeitsmed       Date:  1974-01-04

4.  [Postures during activities in industry, administration, agriculture and coal mining (author's transl)].

Authors:  K Landau; J Reus
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  [Informative studies of cardiovascular stress in nurses of an intensive care unit].

Authors:  K Knoblich; H Bauer
Journal:  Z Gesamte Hyg       Date:  1980

6.  Back pain in the nursing profession. I. Epidemiology and pilot methodology.

Authors:  D A Stubbs; P W Buckle; M P Hudson; P M Rivers; C J Worringham
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  [Development and practicability of an ergonomic job description questionnaire for the area of requirement "activity" (A-EJDQ) (author's transl)].

Authors:  W Rohmert; E Haider; K Landau
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1979-03-07       Impact factor: 3.015

8.  [Occupational health studies on airport transport workers. I. Results of ergonomic time and motion studies (author's transl)].

Authors:  J Rutenfranz; I Löwenthal; H Kylian; F Klimmer; R Flöring; K H Gärtner; W Brockmann
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 3.015

9.  The cost of work in medical nursing.

Authors:  M Fordham; K Appenteng; R Goldsmith; C O'Brien
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Load on back in concrete reinforcement work.

Authors:  J Saari; G Wickström
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 5.024

View more
  5 in total

1.  Strenuous working conditions and musculo-skeletal disorders among female hospital workers.

Authors:  M Estryn-Behar; M Kaminski; E Peigne; M F Maillard; A Pelletier; C Berthier; M F Delaporte; M C Paoli; J M Leroux
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Muscle strength and muscle endurance of middle-aged women and men associated to type, duration and intensity of muscular load at work.

Authors:  C H Nygård; T Luopajärvi; T Suurnäkki; J Ilmarinen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Musculoskeletal capacity of employees aged 44 to 58 years in physical, mental and mixed types of work.

Authors:  C H Nygård; T Luopajärvi; G Cedercreutz; J Ilmarinen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1987

4.  Midlife job profiles and disabilities in later life: a 28-year follow-up of municipal employees in Finland.

Authors:  K C Prakash; Subas Neupane; Päivi Leino-Arjas; Mikaela B von Bonsdorff; Taina Rantanen; Monika E von Bonsdorff; Jorma Seitsamo; Juhani Ilmarinen; Clas-Håkan Nygård
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  Effects of musculoskeletal work load and muscle strength on strain at work in women and men aged 44 to 58 years.

Authors:  C H Nygård; T Suurnäkki; J Ilmarinen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1988
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.