Alexander Ovchinnikov1, Anja-Verena Mudring1,2. 1. Department of Materials and Environmental Chemistry, Stockholm University, Svante Arrhenius väg 16 C, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden. 2. Department of Chemistry, Aarhus University, Langelandsgade 140, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
Abstract
Reaction of the elements yielded Ca3Pt4Bi8 and CaPtBi, which are, to the best of our knowledge, the first reported ternary Ca-Pt-Bi compounds. The compounds crystallize isostructural to the Pd analogs Ca3Pd4Bi8 (own structure type) and CaPdBi (TiNiSi structure type), respectively. Employing a multistep temperature treatment allows for the growth of mm-sized single crystals of Ca3Pd4Bi8 and Ca3Pt4Bi8 from a Bi self-flux. Their crystal structures can be visualized as consisting of a three-dimensional extended polyanion [M4Bi8]6- (M = Pd, Pt), composed of interlinked M-Bi chains propagating along the c direction, and Ca2+ cations residing in one-dimensional channels between the chains. First-principles calculations reveal quasi-one-dimensional electronic behavior with reduced effective electron masses along [001]. Bader analysis points to a strong anionic character of the M species (M = Pd, Pt) in Ca3M4Bi8. Thus, it is more appropriate to address the compounds Ca3Pd4Bi8 and Ca3Pt4Bi8 as a palladide and platinide, respectively. Magnetization measurements indicate diamagnetic behavior with no indications for superconductivity down to 2 K. Electrical resistivity data are consistent with metallic behavior and suggest predominant electron-phonon scattering.
Reaction of the elements yielded Ca3Pt4Bi8 and CaPtBi, which are, to the best of our knowledge, the first reported ternary Ca-Pt-Bi compounds. The compounds crystallize isostructural to the Pd analogs Ca3Pd4Bi8 (own structure type) and CaPdBi (TiNiSi structure type), respectively. Employing a multistep temperature treatment allows for the growth of mm-sized single crystals of Ca3Pd4Bi8 and Ca3Pt4Bi8 from a Bi self-flux. Their crystal structures can be visualized as consisting of a three-dimensional extended polyanion [M4Bi8]6- (M = Pd, Pt), composed of interlinked M-Bi chains propagating along the c direction, and Ca2+ cations residing in one-dimensional channels between the chains. First-principles calculations reveal quasi-one-dimensional electronic behavior with reduced effective electron masses along [001]. Bader analysis points to a strong anionic character of the M species (M = Pd, Pt) in Ca3M4Bi8. Thus, it is more appropriate to address the compounds Ca3Pd4Bi8 and Ca3Pt4Bi8 as a palladide and platinide, respectively. Magnetization measurements indicate diamagnetic behavior with no indications for superconductivity down to 2 K. Electrical resistivity data are consistent with metallic behavior and suggest predominant electron-phonon scattering.
Intermetallic compounds
containing noble metals, such as Pd, Pt, or Au, are of special interest
for condensed matter research. Their crystal structures, physical
and chemical properties are often affected by the pronounced relativistic
influences, leading to peculiar bonding situations. Relativistic stabilization
of the s valence orbitals yields comparatively high
electron affinities and, consequently, high electronegativities, resulting
in compositions with strongly polarized bonding. With its high electronegativity,
Au (2.54 on the Pauling scale[1]) is able
to form an ionic intermetallic compound (Cs+)(Au–), featuring an optical bandgap of 2.5 eV and crystallizing isotypic
to CsCl.[2−5] The ionic nature of this phase lends it a range of properties, typical
for inorganic salts, such as the formation of solvates, e.g., CsAu·NH3.[6]Even
compounds with metallic behavior often display properties
originating from the high electron affinity of the noble metal atoms.
For instance, the binary compound Yb3Pd5 hosts
Yb in the oxidation state +3, owing to the high electronegativity
of Pd (2.20 on the Pauling scale),[7] while
in many intermetallic materials with less electronegative metals,
Yb is found to be divalent.[8,9] The Pd species in Yb3Pd5 assume therefore anionic character. In PdGa,
partial charge transfer from Ga onto the electronegative Pd atoms
is responsible for significant modification of the Pd(d) states compared to the elemental Pd, which contributes to a good
performance of this material as a catalyst for the semihydrogenation
of acetylene.[10]Sizeable spin–orbit
coupling, another effect of relativity,
in compounds of Au and Pt often favors realization of nontrivial electronic
topologies, such as the predicted three-dimensional Dirac semimetallic
state in YbAuSb.[11] Combination of noble
metals with heavy p-elements provides even more opportunities
for introduction of relativistic effects and targeting materials with
unusual electronic properties. Thus, the binary compound of platinum
with a heavy tetrel (group 14 element), Pb–PtPb4—has been recently identified as a potential Weyl-semimetal
superconductor candidate. The superconducting transition temperature
(Tc) of PtPb4 is about 2.8
K.[12] Another example is the Pd compound
with a heavy pnictogen (group 15 element), Bi–PdBi—which
exhibits Dirac surface states in the presence of superconductivity
(Tc = 3.8 K).[13] In general, superconducting properties are often observed for intermetallic
phases containing noble metals and heavy p-elements.
Besides the already-mentioned examples, a notable material is Au2Bi, which was one of the first intermetallic compounds discovered
to be superconducting (Tc = 1.9 K).[14,15]In the search for new superconductors with noble metals and p-elements, we focused our attention on the Ca–Pt–Bi
and Ca–Pd–Bi ternary systems. By careful optimization
of the crystal growth procedure, high-quality single crystals of the
new compound Ca3Pt4Bi8 and its known
isostructural analog Ca3Pd4Bi8 have
been produced. Although both materials lack bulk superconductivity
down to 2 K, they do demonstrate interesting electronic properties,
namely, quasi-one-dimensional electronic transport, as predicted by
our first-principles calculations. The high electronegativity of the
noble metals, M = Pd, Pt, results in the pronounced anionic character
of the M species in Ca3M4Bi8.
Experimental Section
Synthesis
All
weighing and mixing procedures were performed
in an Ar-filled glovebox with H2O and O2 levels
below 0.1 ppm.Needle-like single crystals of Ca3M4Bi8 (M = Pd, Pt) with axial dimensions of
up to several mm were grown from a liquid Bi flux. Metallic Ca (Alfa
Aesar), M (Alfa Aesar and Neyco for M = Pd and Pt, respectively),
and Bi (Alfa Aesar), all with purity ≥99.98 wt %, were mixed
in the ratio Ca/M/Bi = 3:4:12 and placed in an alumina crucible topped
with quartz wool. The crucible was loaded in a fused silica tube,
which was sealed under vacuum. The temperature program used for reaction
and crystal growth is sketched in Figure . The reactor was first heated to 1173 K
in a box furnace at a rate of 100 K/h and kept at this temperature
for 5 h. After this homogenization step, a complex sawtooth-shaped
temperature profile was applied, containing several cooling and heating
steps. Such treatment was found to promote the growth of larger crystals,
as will be explained in the Results and Discussion
section (vide infra). In every cooling step,
the temperature was lowered by 150 K at a rate of 3 K/h. In the heating
steps, the temperature was increased by 50 K at a rate of 50 K/h and
kept at the new T value for 1 h before proceeding
to the next cooling step. After reaching a temperature of 723 K, the
reactor was taken out of the furnace, flipped over, and placed in
a centrifuge to remove the excess liquid Bi. The grown crystals were
isolated mechanically from the quartz wool filter after break-opening
the fused silica tube.
Figure 1
Schematic representation of the temperature profile used
for the
crystal growth of Ca3M4Bi8 (M = Pd,
Pt).
Schematic representation of the temperature profile used
for the
crystal growth of Ca3M4Bi8 (M = Pd,
Pt).In addition to flux synthesis
and growth, we attempted examination
of the phase formation in the Ca–Pt–Bi system employing
high-temperature annealing of the elements in Nb tubes. For this purpose,
the elements were mixed in different ratios, gently pressed to form
a pellet, and loaded in a metal tube, sealed at one end. The metal
tube was then transported to a custom-built arc-welding facility and
sealed under about 600 mbar of high-purity Ar. After that, the sealed
containers were enclosed in evacuated fused silica tubes. The reaction
mixtures were heated to 1173 K at a rate of 200 K/h, kept at this
temperature for 48 h, and cooled to room temperature at a rate of
5 K/h.
Powder X-ray Diffraction (PXRD)
PXRD measurements were
carried out on two powder diffractometers: Bruker Phaser D2 diffractometer
(filtered Cu Kα radiation, λmean = 1.5418 Å),
which was mainly utilized for phase identification, and PANalytical
X’Pert diffractometer (monochromatized Cu Kα1 radiation,
λ = 1.54056 Å), employed for high-quality data collections
used in crystal structure refinements. In both cases, the data were
acquired in the reflection geometry in the 2Θ range of 5–90°.
The ground powders were dusted onto low-background silicon holders
through a 60 μm sieve. The sieving procedure helped reduce the
preferred orientation; although, due to the inherently anisotropic
shape of the grown crystals, texture effects were still pronounced
in the PXRD patterns. Rietveld refinements were performed with the
Jana2006 software.[16]
Single-Crystal
X-ray Diffraction (SCXRD)
Single crystals
were cut to desired dimensions with a scalpel under vacuum grease.
The crystals were attached to low-background MiTeGen plastic loops
and placed on a Bruker D8 Venture diffractometer (Mo Kα, λ
= 0.71073 Å) equipped with a PHOTON 100 CMOS detector. All data
were collected at room temperature. Data integration and absorption
corrections were accomplished with the SAINT[17] and SADABS[18] software, respectively.
Crystal structures were solved by dual-space methods as implemented
in SHELXT[19] and refined by a full-matrix
least-squares method on F2 with SHELXL.[20] Atomic coordinates were standardized using STRUCTURE
TIDY.[21] Details of the data collection
and selected crystallographic parameters are summarized in Tables –3.
Table 1
Refinement Details and Selected Crystallographic
Data for Ca3M4Bi8 (M = Pd, Pt, Space Group Pbam,
Room Temperature, Mo Kα λ = 0.71073 Å, Z = 2)
refined composition
Ca3Pd4Bi8
Ca3Pt4Bi8
CCDC no.
2165536
2165537
fw (g mol–1)
2217.68
2572.44
a (Å)
10.8345(10)
10.8683(6)
b (Å)
17.0788(14)
17.0386(9)
c (Å)
4.1526(4)
4.1433(2)
V (Å3)
768.40
767.26
ρcalc (g cm–3)
9.58
11.13
μMo Kα (mm–1)
96.7
128.6
Rint
0.046
0.040
R1 [I > 2σ(I)]a
0.024
0.022
wR2 [I > 2σ(I)]a
0.047
0.049
R1 [all data]a
0.027
0.024
wR2 [all data]a
0.048
0.050
Δρmax,min (e Å–3)
1.44, −2.29
2.13, −1.90
R1 =
∑||Fo| – |Fc||/∑|Fo|; w2 = [∑[w(Fo2 – Fc2)2]/ ∑[w(Fo2)2]]1/2, where w = 1/[σ2Fo2 + (AP)2 + (BP)] and P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3. A and B are the respective weight coefficients (see
the CIF data).
Table 3
Selected Interatomic Distances (Å)
for Ca3M4Bi8 (M = Pd, Pt)
atoms
distances (M = Pd)
distances (M = Pt)
Ca1
–M1 × 2
3.104(2)
3.0556(17)
–M2
3.125(3)
3.128(2)
–M2
3.153(3)
3.165(2)
–Bi2 × 2
3.335(2)
3.3518(17)
–Bi3 × 2
3.425(2)
3.4225(19)
–Bi1 × 2
3.442(2)
3.4326(18)
–Bi1 × 2
3.708(2)
3.7302(19)
Ca2
–M2 × 2
3.0999(10)
3.1147(4)
–Bi2 × 4
3.3106(4)
3.3253(3)
–Bi3 × 4
3.4143(4)
3.3915(3)
M1
–M1
2.861(2)
2.8997(8)
–Bi2
2.7982(12)
2.7880(6)
–Bi1
2.8590(11)
2.8510(6)
–Bi4 × 2
2.8990(8)
2.8951(4)
–Bi4 × 2
3.0245(8)
3.0491(4)
M2
–Bi1 × 2
2.8411(8)
2.8368(4)
–Bi3 × 2
2.9050(8)
2.9177(4)
–Bi2 × 2
2.9124(8)
2.8953(4)
Bi1
–Bi3
3.2758(7)
3.2835(6)
–Bi3
3.4123(7)
3.4157(6)
–Bi2
3.5528(7)
3.5586(6)
–Bi4 × 2
3.6379(6)
3.6093(5)
Bi2
–Bi3
3.4406(7)
3.4287(6)
–Bi4 × 2
3.5245(6)
3.5078(5)
–Bi1
3.5528(7)
3.5586(6)
Bi3
–Bi1
3.2758(7)
3.2835(6)
–Bi1
3.4123(7)
3.4157(6)
–Bi2
3.4406(7)
3.4287(6)
Bi4
–Bi4
3.1109(10)
3.1277(8)
–Bi2 × 2
3.5245(6)
3.5078(5)
–Bi1 × 2
3.6379(6)
3.6093(5)
R1 =
∑||Fo| – |Fc||/∑|Fo|; w2 = [∑[w(Fo2 – Fc2)2]/ ∑[w(Fo2)2]]1/2, where w = 1/[σ2Fo2 + (AP)2 + (BP)] and P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3. A and B are the respective weight coefficients (see
the CIF data).Ueq is
defined as one-third of the trace of the orthogonalized U tensor.
Physical Property Measurements
The surface of the crystals
was cleaned with a scalpel to remove traces of the Bi flux before
the measurements.Magnetization was measured on a Quantum Design
Physical Property Measurement System (PPMS) in the temperature range T = 2–300 K under applied fields of 20–1000
Oe, using the vibrating-sample magnetometer option (VSM). The samples
were ground and packed in polypropylene containers. Isothermal magnetization
measurements were taken at 2 K under applied fields of up to 6 T employing
the same setup. The contribution of the sample holder was measured
separately and subtracted from the signal of the examined materials.The temperature dependence of the electrical resistivity was recorded
using a four-probe setup on the PPMS in the temperature range of 2–300
K. Pt wires with a diameter of 25 μm were attached to the crystal
surface with a PELCO conductive silver paint. Measurements were performed
on cooling and heating to assure reproducibility.
First-Principles
Calculations
Electronic structures
of Ca3Pd4Bi8 and Ca3Pt4Bi8 were evaluated within the density functional
theory approach (DFT) using the TB-LMTO-ASA code on the scalar-relativistic
level.[22] The von Barth–Hedin flavor
of the local density approximation functional (LDA) was applied.[23] The basis set contained the following states:
Ca: 4s, (4p), 3d; Pd: 5s, 5p, 4d, (4f); Pt: 6s, 6p, 5d, (5f); and
Bi: 6s, 6p, (6d), (5f), with the states in parenthesis being down-folded.
The Brillouin zone was sampled by a 6 × 4 × 12 k-point grid. To satisfy the atomic sphere approximation (ASA), empty
spheres were added following the standard procedure in the LMTO code.
The chemical bonding was analyzed by means of the Crystal Orbital
Hamilton Population approach (COHP).[24] Bader
charges were calculated by integration of the total charge density
with the program Critic2.[25]
Results
and Discussion
Our original motivation
for the exploratory
studies in the Ca–Pt–Bi system was the search for possible
ternary superconducting materials. Some compounds containing Pt–Bi
polyanions have been found to be superconducting at low temperatures,
including LuPtBi[26] and BaPt2Bi2.[27] However, no ternary
compounds have been reported in the Ca–Pt–Bi system,
which raises questions, as whether any such compounds exist and whether
they display superconductivity as well.In our early attempts
to produce ternary Ca–Pt–Bi phases, we used high-temperature
annealing of the elements in metal containers made of Nb. These attempts
yielded two new ternary phases: Ca3Pt4Bi8 and CaPtBi, isostructural to the Pd analogs Ca3Pd4Bi8[28] and CaPdBi.[29] To the best of our knowledge, these are the
first reported ternary Ca–Pt–Bi compounds. However,
reactions in Nb tubes yielded multiphase samples, even when the correct
starting compositions were used (Figure S1a). In particular, CaPtBi, crystallizing in the TiNiSi structure type,
could not be prepared single-phase. However, the structure of this
compound was determined from single-crystal X-ray diffraction data
of a single crystal extracted from a sample with about 70 wt % of
CaPtBi. This sample was synthesized in an Nb tube, as described in
the Experimental Section, starting from the
Ca:Pt:Bi = 1:1:1 element ratio. Crystallographic information for CaPtBi
is provided in Tables S1 and S2. In short,
CaPtBi crystallizes in the TiNiSi structure type, just like its Pd
analog, CaPdBi.[29] Details on the physical
properties of CaPtBi will be communicated once a pure sample is available.The failure to produce single-phase samples in Nb tubes is likely
related to side reactions with the container material. Indeed, closer
examination of the PXRD patterns and analysis of the single crystals
revealed the occasional presence of the binary impurity Nb3Pt in the samples, especially in Pt-rich ones. This impurity was
found to be responsible for the apparent superconductivity of most
of the investigated samples, visible in the magnetization data below
about 9 K (Figure S1b).To avoid
contamination by possible superconducting impurities and
assure high purity of the synthesized materials, we attempted single-crystal
growth of the newly discovered ternary Ca–Pt–Bi phases
from metal fluxes. Although so far, this method has been proved unsuccessful
for the production of CaPtBi, millimeter-sized single crystals of
Ca3Pt4Bi8 could be obtained using
the Bi flux approach (since Bi is also one of the constituent elements
in the composition, the applied procedure can be called a “self-flux
method”[30]).In the first experiments,
upon slow cooling (3–5 K/h) from
a Ca–Pt–Bi mixture with excess Bi, numerous submillimeter-sized
crystals of Ca3Pt4Bi8 were grown.
Decreasing the cooling rate even further (down to 1.5 K/h) did not
affect the size of the crystals significantly, suggesting that fast
seed formation could be the reason for insufficiently large final
crystals. Therefore, to improve the crystal size, we developed a multistep
cooling procedure, with several cooling and heating segments. The
idea behind was to dissolve smaller crystals in the heating steps,
while preserving the larger ones as seed crystals, and to allow the
latter to grow in the cooling segments, in a process similar to Ostwald
ripening. Indeed, the developed technique enabled the growth of needle-like
single crystals with lengths of up to about 7 mm.Since we were
interested in studying potential superconductivity,
we also grew single crystals of the known isostructural compound Ca3Pd4Bi8 using the same flux growth approach.
The electron–phonon coupling is expected to be stronger in
materials with lighter atoms. Therefore, we anticipated that the Pd
representative could be a better candidate for superconductivity.
Nevertheless, as we will discuss below, neither Ca3Pt4Bi8, nor its Pd analog, exhibits superconductivity
above 2 K.Both Ca3Pd4Bi8 and
Ca3Pt4Bi8 samples, produced by the
self-flux method,
demonstrate high purity, as indicated by PXRD analysis (Figure ). The only detectable secondary
phase is the residual Bi flux, occasionally present on the surface
of the crystals.
Figure 2
Powder X-ray diffraction patterns (Cu Kα1) along
with the
corresponding Rietveld refinement for Ca3Pd4Bi8 (top) and Ca3Pt4Bi8 (bottom). Experimental data, calculated profile, and difference
curve are shown in black, red, and blue, respectively. Tick marks
indicate the positions of the Bragg reflections for the major phase
(upper row) and the residual Bi (bottom row). The refined Bi content
is around 4 wt % in both samples. Insets show optical images of the
respective flux-grown crystals on an mm grid.
Powder X-ray diffraction patterns (Cu Kα1) along
with the
corresponding Rietveld refinement for Ca3Pd4Bi8 (top) and Ca3Pt4Bi8 (bottom). Experimental data, calculated profile, and difference
curve are shown in black, red, and blue, respectively. Tick marks
indicate the positions of the Bragg reflections for the major phase
(upper row) and the residual Bi (bottom row). The refined Bi content
is around 4 wt % in both samples. Insets show optical images of the
respective flux-grown crystals on an mm grid.
Crystal Structure
Analysis of the needle-like single
crystals of Ca3Pd4Bi8 and Ca3Pt4Bi8 indicates that the two compounds
are isostructural and crystallize in space group Pbam (No. 55). The unit cells exhibit relatively large a and b edges and a short c edge:
for Ca3Pd4Bi8, a = 10.8345(10) Å, b = 17.0788(14) Å, c = 4.1526(4) Å; for Ca3Pt4Bi8, a = 10.8683(6) Å, b = 17.0386(9) Å, c = 4.1433(2) Å (as determined
from the SCXRD data). Indexing of the crystal faces on the single-crystal
diffractometer suggests that the crystalline needles grow along the
[001] direction. The structure of Ca3Pd4Bi8 has been reported before.[28] Therefore,
we will focus on describing Ca3Pt4Bi8 and its specific features.Considering high electronegativity
differences between Ca (1.00 on the Pauling scale) and Pt (2.28) or
Bi (2.02),[1] the ionic notation (Ca2+)3[Pt4Bi8]6– appears to be a valid approximation of the charge partitioning in
Ca3Pt4Bi8, as we will also show using
first-principles calculations (vide infra). Hence,
the principal building block in the discussed crystal structure is
the complex polyanion [Pt4Bi8]6– (Figure ). Although
this structural unit is extended in all three dimensions, it can be
viewed as consisting of two kinds of interlinked polyhedral Pt–Bi
chains, running along the c direction, which lends
a quasi-one-dimensional character to the structure (Figure , bottom).
Figure 3
Crystal structure of
Ca3Pt4Bi8 viewed as Ca atoms embedded
in a Pt–Bi framework. The unit
cell is outlined in black. The Bi coordinations around Ca and Pt atoms
and Pt–Pt interatomic connections are shown. The close-up view
of the polyhedral Pt–Bi chains constituting the framework is
given at the bottom.
Crystal structure of
Ca3Pt4Bi8 viewed as Ca atoms embedded
in a Pt–Bi framework. The unit
cell is outlined in black. The Bi coordinations around Ca and Pt atoms
and Pt–Pt interatomic connections are shown. The close-up view
of the polyhedral Pt–Bi chains constituting the framework is
given at the bottom.The first kind of chains,
accommodating Pt1 species, is built up
of dimeric Pt2Bi8 units, representing pairs
of face-sharing PtBi6-distorted trigonal prisms. These
dimeric units, linked by edge-sharing into chains that run parallel
to [001], are hallmarked by a relatively short Pt–Pt distance
of 2.900 Å, suggesting metal–metal bonding.The
second type of chains is based on the same kind of coordination
environment—a trigonal prism of Bi atoms around the Pt2 species.
However, instead of forming dimers, the prisms link directly into
chains parallel to [001] by face sharing. The shortest Pt–Pt
contact in these chains measures 4.143 Å, which is clearly outside
the range of typical bonding contacts.[31]The two types of polyhedral chains join by sharing Bi vertices.
The chains propagate along the c direction and form
two interpenetrating motifs: a distorted trigonal rod packing of the
chains based on the Pt1 species and a distorted honeycomb rod packing
of the chains based on the Pt2 species (Figure ). The Pt–Bi distances in both types
of chains span from 2.788 to 3.049 Å, in accordance with bonding
Pt–Bi distances in other reported compounds.[27,32−35]
Figure 4
Polyhedral
representation of the Ca3Pt4Bi8 crystal
structure projected along [001]. Bi polyhedra around
Ca (Ca1 + Ca2), Pt1, and Pt2 are shown in dark green, red, and violet,
respectively. The distorted trigonal and honeycomb rod packings of
the polyhedral Pt–Bi chains are highlighted in orange and light
blue, respectively. Atom color codes: Ca: green, Pt: red, and Bi:
blue.
Polyhedral
representation of the Ca3Pt4Bi8 crystal
structure projected along [001]. Bi polyhedra around
Ca (Ca1 + Ca2), Pt1, and Pt2 are shown in dark green, red, and violet,
respectively. The distorted trigonal and honeycomb rod packings of
the polyhedral Pt–Bi chains are highlighted in orange and light
blue, respectively. Atom color codes: Ca: green, Pt: red, and Bi:
blue.The Ca2+ ions occupy
the channels formed between the
Pt–Bi chains in the [Pt4Bi8]6– framework. The Ca–Bi distances that can be considered bonding
contacts lie in the region 3.325–3.730 Å, typical for
Ca bismuthides.[36−40] The symmetry-independent Ca1 and Ca2 positions are both eight-fold
coordinated by Bi, adopting distorted cubic environments. The resulting
CaBi8 polyhedra link into chains along [001] by face sharing.
Just like the polyhedral chains accommodating the Pt2 species, the
Ca–Bi chains are arranged in a distorted honeycomb rod packing
(Figure ).It
is worth noting that besides the Pt–Bi and Ca–Bi
bonds, other bonding interactions that can be deduced based on the
interatomic distances are Ca–Pt and Bi–Bi. The shortest
Ca–Pt contacts fall in the range of 3.056–3.165 Å,
which is similar to the distances found in Ca platinides, i.e., compounds with anionic Pt species, such as CaPt2 and CaPt5.[41] The Bi–Bi
bonding is suggested by the presence of Bi–Bi contacts of 3.128–3.609
Å. All of these values appear to exceed single Bi–Bi bonds
but are in line with multicenter bonding.[38−40,42−44] Due to this complex chemical
bonding pattern, the Bi–Bi interactions form an extended three-dimensional
network (Figure S2), not very typical for
polyanionic compounds of pnictogens (group 15 elements).[45,46]A comparison of the Ca3M4Bi8 crystal
structures (M = Pd, Pt) suggests slight variations in the atomic packing.
Thus, despite the smaller unit cell volume, the structure of Ca3Pt4Bi8 exhibits a noticeably larger
unit cell parameter a. This can be, in part, explained
by an anisotropic elongation of some of the Ca–Bi bonding contacts
in Ca3Pt4Bi8. The latter effect is
in turn related to a more sizeable electron density transfer from
the Ca atoms onto the M atoms for M = Pt, which calls for redistribution
of the bond lengths in the Ca–Bi polyhedra. In this respect,
it would be interesting to study the evolution of the unit cell parameters
in the solid-solution Ca3Pd4–PtBi8, which can likely
be prepared.
Physical Properties
Since we were
interested in realization
of superconductivity in the Ca–M–Bi system with M =
Pd or Pt, we examined the magnetic properties of Ca3Pd4Bi8 and Ca3Pt4Bi8. No Meissner effect was observed down to 2 K under applied fields
as low as 20 Oe, suggesting the lack of bulk superconductivity.It is worth noting that other Bi-containing superconductors with
Pd or Pt often exhibit superconducting properties at temperatures
outside the range of our measurements. Thus, a critical temperature
of about 1.6 K was reported for the half-Heusler phases YPdBi and
LuPdBi,[47] while the isostructural Pt representatives
YPtBi and LuPtBi superconduct below 0.8 and 1.0 K, respectively.[26,48] The ternary Pt-bearing intermetallic compound BaPt2Bi2 displays superconductivity below 2.0 K.[27] In contrast, the binary material PdBi2 enters
a superconducting state at a relatively high temperature of 5.3 K,[49] while the Bi-poorer PdBi superconducts below
3.8 K.[13] The absence of superconductivity
in Ca3Pd4Bi8 and Ca3Pt4Bi8 above 2 K does not exclude that the zero-resistance
state can be observed at lower temperatures, which will require further
studies.The temperature dependence of the magnetic susceptibility
(corrected
for the sample holder contribution) for Ca3Pd4Bi8 and Ca3Pt4Bi8 measured
under a field of 20 Oe is shown in Figure (a,b, left). Both compounds demonstrate
a weak signal, with essentially no temperature dependence, except
for a small paramagnetic contribution, especially visible in the field-cooled
data of Ca3Pt4Bi8.
Figure 5
Temperature dependence
of magnetic susceptibility (left) and isothermal
magnetization at T = 2 K (right) for Ca3Pd4Bi8 (a) and Ca3Pt4Bi8 (b). ZFC and FC refer to zero-field-cooled and field-cooled
data, respectively. Open orange circles denote experimental isothermal
magnetization data and the blue solid curves correspond to the best
nonlinear fits with eq .
Temperature dependence
of magnetic susceptibility (left) and isothermal
magnetization at T = 2 K (right) for Ca3Pd4Bi8 (a) and Ca3Pt4Bi8 (b). ZFC and FC refer to zero-field-cooled and field-cooled
data, respectively. Open orange circles denote experimental isothermal
magnetization data and the blue solid curves correspond to the best
nonlinear fits with eq .Since the data at 20 Oe were noisy,
it was not possible to conclude
whether the studied materials are intrinsically diamagnetic or paramagnetic.
To resolve this, we measured isothermal magnetization at 2 K under
applied fields of up to 6 T. The data, presented in Figure (a,b, right), suggest that
the prevailing behavior is diamagnetic, although both compounds contain
small amounts of paramagnetic impurities. To extract the intrinsic
diamagnetic contribution, χint, we fitted the isothermal
magnetization data with the expressionwhere α is the mole fraction
of the
paramagnetic impurity and Msat is the
saturation magnetization for the paramagnetic impurity. The field
dependence of the paramagnetic signal is described by the Brillouin
function BJ(x), x = JgμBB/kBT, where J is the total angular momentum, g is the g-factor, μB is the Bohr magneton, kB is the Boltzmann constant, and B and T are the field and temperature, respectively.The fits yield the intrinsic diamagnetic contributions χint = −1.568 10–4 emu mol–1 for Ca3Pd4Bi8 and χint = −3.336 10–4 emu mol–1 for Ca3Pt4Bi8. By taking the total
electronic density of states (DOS) at the Fermi level from our first-principles
calculations (vide infra), it is possible to estimate
the core diamagnetism, χcore, using the formulawhere
the first term takes into account the Pauli paramagnetism and Landau
diamagnetism (χLandau = (−1/3)χPauli). μ0, μB, and N(EF) are the vacuum permeability,
Bohr magneton, and DOS at the Fermi level, respectively.With
the calculated N(EF)
= 5.04 states eV–1 f.u.–1 and
6.48 states eV–1 f.u.–1 for Ca3Pd4Bi8 and Ca3Pt4Bi8, respectively, the core diamagnetic susceptibility
was estimated to be χcore(Ca3Pd4Bi8) = −2.654 10–4 emu mol–1 and χcore(Ca3Pt4Bi8) = −4.756 10–4 emu mol–1. The higher absolute value for the Pt member is expected
owing to the larger number of core electrons in Pt in comparison to
Pd.The temperature dependence of the electrical resistivity,
ρ(T), for Ca3Pd4Bi8 and Ca3Pt4Bi8 is shown in Figure . Due to the needle-like
shape
of the crystals, it was possible to measure the resistivity only along
the needle axis, i.e., along the [001] crystal direction.
Since we expect anisotropic electron transport based on our first-principles
calculations (vide infra), the resistivity is anticipated
to be higher in perpendicular directions. Both compounds display metallic
behavior with room temperature resistivity of about 57 μΩ
cm (Ca3Pd4Bi8) and 86 μΩ
cm (Ca3Pt4Bi8) and residual resistivity
ratios, RRRs = ρ(300 K)/ρ(2 K), of 6.7 and 4.2, respectively.
The temperature evolution of the resistivity can be well fitted with
the modified Bloch–Grüneisen equationwhere ρ0 is the
residual
resistivity, ΘR is the Debye temperature, and A is a material-specific constant. The fits yield the values
ρ0 = 8.5 μΩ cm, ΘR =127.7
K, A = 76.7 μΩ cm, and n = 4.64 for Ca3Pd4Bi8 and ρ0 = 20.6 μΩ cm, ΘR =116.6 K, A = 103.3 μΩ cm, and n = 4.99
for Ca3Pt4Bi8. The fitted power of n in the equation is close to 5 for both materials, as expected
for metals with dominating electron–phonon scattering.[50]
Figure 6
Temperature dependence of electrical resistivity for Ca3Pd4Bi8 (a) and Ca3Pt4Bi8 (b). Open circles denote experimental data
and the
blue red curves are the best nonlinear fits with eq .
Temperature dependence of electrical resistivity for Ca3Pd4Bi8 (a) and Ca3Pt4Bi8 (b). Open circles denote experimental data
and the
blue red curves are the best nonlinear fits with eq .
Electronic Structure and Chemical Bonding
Analysis
of the electronic densities of states (DOS, Figure a,b top) for Ca3Pd4Bi8 and Ca3Pt4Bi8 suggests
metallic behavior for both materials. Due to the electron delocalization
and low local symmetry for most of the atoms (the majority of the
atoms are located in the positions with the ..m site
symmetry), considerable mixing of the electronic states is observed
in a wide energy region around the Fermi level (EF). In the immediate vicinity of EF, the DOS is predominantly composed of the M(d) and Bi(p)
states, where M is Pd or Pt, respectively. The M(d) states form a
domain of localized character in the energy window −2 eV < E – EF < −6
eV. The M(s) states are mainly located below the Fermi level and are
rather delocalized. Well below the Fermi level, at E – EF < −10 eV, the
DOS is dominated by the Bi(s) states, mostly originating from the
electron lone pairs on the Bi atoms. The presence of the lone pairs
on the Bi atoms was previously noted for Ca3Pd4Bi8 based on the analysis of the electron localization
function (ELF).[28]
Figure 7
Total and projected electronic
densities of states (DOS, top) and
averaged crystal orbital Hamilton population curves (COHPs) for heteroatomic
(middle) and homoatomic (bottom) interactions in Ca3Pd4Bi8 (a) and Ca3Pt4Bi8 (b).
Total and projected electronic
densities of states (DOS, top) and
averaged crystal orbital Hamilton population curves (COHPs) for heteroatomic
(middle) and homoatomic (bottom) interactions in Ca3Pd4Bi8 (a) and Ca3Pt4Bi8 (b).The Ca electronic states are predominantly
found above the Fermi
level, indicating the cationic nature of the Ca species, although
some states extend down to about E – EF = −6 eV, which points toward incomplete
charge transfer. Nevertheless, the general picture of electronic interactions
in both Ca3Pd4Bi8 and Ca3Pt4Bi8 allows the description of their structures
as consisting of the Ca2+ cations and [M4Bi8]6– polyanions, in accordance with the notion
proposed by Johrendt and Mewis for Ca3Pd4Bi8.[28]The chemical bonding
in Ca3Pd4Bi8 and Ca3Pt4Bi8 was examined with
the aid of crystal orbital Hamilton population analysis (COHP, Figure a,b middle and bottom).
The Ca–Bi, Ca–M, and M–Bi interactions (M = Pd
or Pt) show exclusively bonding states below the Fermi level, while
for the homoatomic M–M and Bi–Bi contacts, some occupation
of antibonding states is also observed. The strongest interactions
(per bond), as measured by the integrated COHP at EF, are the covalent M–Bi and the metal–metal
M–M bonds. The M–Bi interactions are fully optimized
as EF. Interestingly, the averaged Ca–M
bond appears to be as strong as or even stronger than the Ca–Bi
interaction. The latter is underoptimized at the Fermi level, which
is anticipated owing to its partially ionic character. For the Ca–Bi
interactions, as well as for the Ca–M contacts,
the underoptimization is related to the availability of bonding states
above the Fermi level. Due to the complex combination of bonding and
antibonding states, not unusual for Bi-rich compounds,[39,44,51,52] the averaged Bi–Bi interaction is comparably weak, although
it is essentially optimized at EF.The band structures of Ca3Pd4Bi8 and Ca3Pt4Bi8 are given in Figure . From these images,
it is evident that the metallic behavior of the two materials originates
from their multiband character at the Fermi level. A noteworthy feature
of both band structures is the high band dispersion along the paths
Γ → Z, X → U, Y → T, and S → R in
the momentum space, corresponding to the direction along [001] in
the direct space, which suggests lower electron effective masses along
the c axis. These steep bands exhibit predominantly
the Bi(p) and M(d) character, with sizeable contributions from the
Ca(p, d) states. Thus, the electronic structure reflects the quasi-one-dimensional
nature of Ca3M4Bi8 with two kinds
of interlinked polyhedral Pt−Bi chains running along the c direction (Figure , bottom).
Figure 8
Electronic band structures and selected orbital projections
(in
“fat band” representation) for Ca3Pd4Bi8 (a) and Ca3Pt4Bi8 (b).
Electronic band structures and selected orbital projections
(in
“fat band” representation) for Ca3Pd4Bi8 (a) and Ca3Pt4Bi8 (b).Finally, we would like to address
the question of charge distribution
in Ca3M4Bi8. As was mentioned above,
the ionic picture (Ca2+)3[M4Bi8]6– appears to be a reasonable first approximation
of the charge partitioning. However, the assignment of formal charges
within the [M4Bi8]6– polyanion
is less straightforward. The high electronegativity of Pd and Pt calls
into question the possible classification of Ca3M4Bi8 (M = Pd, Pt) as bismuthides, i.e., compounds with anionic bismuth species. Indeed, the sizeable occupation
of the M(d) states, observed in the projected DOS, points toward the
anionic nature of the Pd and Pt species. A similar observation was
previously made for Ca3Pd4Bi8, where
analysis of the electronic state occupations pointed toward cationic
and anionic nature for Ca and Pd, respectively, and essentially neutral
character of the Bi atoms.[28]The
problem of charge assignment in compounds of electronegative
noble metals with p-elements has been discussed before. For example,
the ternary phases RE3Pt4Sn6 (RE
= Pr–Dy) have been described as platinides rather than stannides,
based on the Pt/Sn electronegativity differences.[53] Similarly, the Al-rich compound Yb2Pt6Al15 has been identified as a platinide, rather than an
aluminide.[54]To evaluate the atomic
charges in Ca3M4Bi8 (M = Pd, Pt),
we used the approach of the quantum theory
of atoms in molecules (QTAIM) and calculated the respective Bader
charges,[55] which depend only on the distribution
of the total electron density, the latter being immediately available
from our all-electron DFT calculations. The calculated Bader charges
for Ca3Pd4Bi8 and Ca3Pt4Bi8 are presented in Table .
Table 4
Calculated Bader Charges for Ca3M4Bi8 (M = Pd, Pt)
atom
Ca3Pd4Bi8
Ca3Pt4Bi8
Ca1
+1.30
+1.22
Ca2
+1.27
+1.24
M1
–0.81
–1.16
M2
–0.74
–1.22
Bi1
+0.04
+0.21
Bi2
–0.28
–0.03
Bi3
–0.17
–0.09
Bi4
+0.02
+0.44
The Ca atoms in both
compounds display a clear cationic character,
in line with the charge partitioning discussed above, although the
absolute values of the charges (around 1.2–1.3) are expectedly
lower than the fully ionic limit of +2. Both symmetry-independent
positions of the noble metal atoms are found to have negative Bader
charges, which is not surprising taking into account their high electronegativity
(2.20 and 2.28 for Pd and Pt, respectively, on the Pauling electronegativity
scale[1]). The somewhat higher absolute values
for the Pt Bader charges in comparison to those of Pd correlate well
with the higher electronegativity of Pt, which in turn can be in part
explained by the relativistic contraction of the Pt 6s state. This
effect is responsible for stabilization of anionic Pt species in many
compounds, including the ionic materials Cs2Pt and Cs9Pt4H.[56,57] The charges on the
Bi atoms, on the contrary, are rather small by absolute value: in
both Ca3Pd4Bi8 and Ca3Pt4Bi8, the sites Bi1 and Bi4 exhibit weak
cationic character, whereas the sites Bi2 and Bi3 possess low negative
Bader charges. The magnitudes of the Bi charges change considerably
upon going from M = Pd to Pt in Ca3M4Bi8, reflecting the interplay between the Pd/Pt electronegativity
differences and subtle variations in the Bi–X (X = Ca, M, Bi)
bonding interactions. For example, the longest Ca1–Bi1 bonding
distance increases by about 0.022 Å upon going from Ca3Pd4Bi8 to Ca3Pt4Bi8, which probably reduces the electron density transfer onto
the Bi1 atom, resulting in its higher positive charge in Ca3Pt4Bi8, and at the same time lowers the positive
charge on the Ca1 atom, despite a shorter Ca1–M1 distance in
the case of M = Pt. However, in general, identifying the origins of
the Bi atomic charges is complicated due to the apparent presence
of multicenter bonding and the possible effect of an extended coordination
environment due to the metallicity of the studied compounds.To sum up, the Bader charge distribution suggests that Ca3Pd4Bi8 and Ca3Pt4Bi8 cannot be classified as simple bismuthides. The highly negative
charges on the Pd and Pt atoms call for their designation as palladide
and platinide for Ca3Pd4Bi8 and Ca3Pt4Bi8, respectively. Following the
convention of placing the anion at the end of the chemical formula,
the compositions of the two compounds should be properly given as
Ca3Bi8Pd4 and Ca3Bi8Pt4.
Conclusions
The isostructural ternary
compounds Ca3Pd4Bi8 and Ca3Pt4Bi8 have
been successfully grown as mm-sized single crystals from a Bi flux
using a sophisticated temperature program that allowed the growth
of high-quality crystals in a process similar to Ostwald ripening.Supported by electron structure calculations, Ca3Pd4Bi8 and Ca3Pt4Bi8 can be described as polar intermetallics featuring complex polyanions
[M4Bi8]6– (M = Pd, Pt). The
polyanionic network comprises interlinked polyhedral M–Bi chains
that propagate along the c direction in the orthorhombic
crystal structure of Ca3M4Bi8 (M
= Pd, Pt), while the Ca species occupy the channels formed in the
polyanion between the M–Bi chains.These crystal structural
features result in quasi-one-dimensional
electronic behavior, as suggested by our band-structure calculations.
The structural stability is provided mainly by strong covalent M–Bi
interactions in the polyanions, revealed in the analysis of the chemical
bonding. Bader charges, calculated by integration of the total charge
density in the atomic basins, point toward the presence of Ca cations
with incomplete charge transfer and anionic character of the M sites
in Ca3M4Bi8 (M = Pd, Pt), while the
Bi atoms carry small charges with varying signs. For that reason,
it is more appropriate to address the compounds as palladide and platinide,
respectively, and the formulae should be rewritten as Ca3Bi8M4 (M = Pd, Pt).Magnetization measurements
indicate intrinsic diamagnetism of Ca3Pd4Bi8 and Ca3Pt4Bi8, with no signs
of superconductivity down to 2 K. Electrical
resistivity data suggest metallic behavior with dominating electron–phonon
scattering and confirm the absence of superconductivity. Considering
that many intermetallic compounds of Pd and Pt with Bi demonstrate
superconductivity at even lower temperatures, further studies will
be necessary to check if the ground state of Ca3Pd4Bi8 and Ca3Pt4Bi8 is superconducting.
Table 2
Atomic Coordinates and Equivalent
Isotropic Displacement Parameters (Å2) for Ca3M4Bi8 (M = Pd, Pt)
atom
site
x
y
z
Ueqa
Ca3Pd4Bi8
Ca1
4g
0.3576(2)
0.19902(15)
0
0.0214(5)
Ca2
2a
0
0
0
0.0301(9)
Pd1
4h
0.45378(9)
0.07844(6)
1/2
0.0255(2)
Pd2
4g
0.07146(10)
0.17575(6)
0
0.0244(2)
Bi1
4h
0.11000(4)
0.28664(3)
1/2
0.02203(12)
Bi2
4h
0.19577(4)
0.08586(3)
1/2
0.02193(12)
Bi3
4h
0.39122(5)
0.35709(3)
1/2
0.02377(12)
Bi4
4g
0.12981(4)
0.46110(3)
0
0.02417(12)
Ca3Pt4Bi8
Ca1
4g
0.3638(2)
0.19842(14)
0
0.0200(4)
Ca2
2a
0
0
0
0.0269(7)
Pt1
4h
0.45488(4)
0.08008(2)
1/2
0.02151(11)
Pt2
4g
0.07816(4)
0.17588(2)
0
0.01901(11)
Bi1
4h
0.11464(3)
0.28720(2)
1/2
0.01749(10)
Bi2
4h
0.19848(4)
0.08531(2)
1/2
0.01755(11)
Bi3
4h
0.39627(4)
0.35697(2)
1/2
0.01950(11)
Bi4
4g
0.12981(4)
0.46039(2)
0
0.02055(11)
Ueq is
defined as one-third of the trace of the orthogonalized U tensor.
Authors: M J Winiarski; B Wiendlocha; S Gołąb; S K Kushwaha; P Wiśniewski; D Kaczorowski; J D Thompson; R J Cava; T Klimczuk Journal: Phys Chem Chem Phys Date: 2016-08-03 Impact factor: 3.676