| Literature DB >> 35702548 |
Zhengdong Gao1,2, Yaxiao Liu1,2, Lekai Zhang1,2, Zizhuo Yang1,2, Linchen Lv1,2, Shuai Wang1,2, Lipeng Chen1,2, Nan Zhou1,2, Yaofeng Zhu1, Xuewen Jiang1, Benkang Shi1,2, Yan Li1,2.
Abstract
Purpose: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) can evoke a rapid host immune response leading to bladder inflammation and epithelial damage. Neuroimmune interactions are critical for regulating immune function in mucosal tissues. Yet the role of nociceptor neurons in bladder host defense has not been well defined. This study aimed to explore the interaction between nociceptor neurons and bladder immune system during UTIs.Entities:
Keywords: CGRP; UPEC; UTIs; innate immune cells; nociceptor neurons
Year: 2022 PMID: 35702548 PMCID: PMC9188809 DOI: 10.2147/JIR.S356960
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Inflamm Res ISSN: 1178-7031
Figure 1CFT073 induces neuron activation and CGRP release (A) Representative Fura-2 ratiometric fields (left) and calcium traces (right) of DRG neurons responding to CFT073 (5 x 107 CFUs), LPS (10 ng/mL) and capsaicin (1 μM) (n=3). (B) Experimental schematic of TRPV1+ neuron ablation and CFT073-induced UTIs to mice. (C) Representative images of TRPV1+ (red) neurons by immunofluorescence assays (n=5). (D) Measurement of CGRP release with an ELISA kit. CGRP released from bladder (0, 8 and 24 hours) after CFT073 infection (5 x 107 CFUs) of vehicle-treated or Caph mice (n = 3; ns, P > 0.05; ***P < 0.001).
Figure 2Nociceptor neurons mediate bladder epithelial function and bacterial load during UPEC infection Vehicle-treated mice were randomly divided into uninfected or infected group. Caph mice were infected equivalent CFT073 (5 x 107 CFUs). (A) H&E Staining of bladders from groups “vehicle-uninfected”, “vehicle-infected” and “Caph-infected” (n=6). (B) Representative images of WGA-FITC in superficial bladder epithelial cells (n=4). (C) Representative images of trypan blue staining in bladders (n=4). (D) Bacterial load recovery (log10 CFU) from urine in “Caph-infected” or “vehicle-infected” group (n =22-24; **P < 0.01). (E) Ex vivo gentamicin protection assays representing invaded bacteria in “Caph-infected” or “vehicle-infected” group (n =12; **P < 0.01).
Figure 3Nociceptor neurons suppress recruitment and bactericidal function of neutrophils (A) Representative FACS plots (left) showing neutrophils (CD11b+Ly6G+ gates) in Caph or vehicle-treated mouse bladders. Assessment ratio (right) of Caph or vehicle-treated mice bladder neutrophils by flow cytometry analysis (n=3; *P < 0.05). Mouse neutrophils were co-cultured with CFT073 in presence of vehicle or CGRP (1μM) for 1 hour (B–D). (B) Myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity of neutrophils (n=5; ***P < 0.001; #P < 0.0001). (C) Bacterial phagocytosis of neutrophils (n=6; ns, P > 0.05). (D) Bacterial killing function of neutrophils (n=6; *P < 0.05).
Figure 4Continued.
Figure 4Nociceptor neurons affect polarization of macrophages (A) Representative FACS plots (left) showing macrophages (F4/80+ CD11B+) in Caph or vehicle-treated mouse bladders. Assessment ratio (right) of Caph or vehicle-treated mice bladder macrophages by flow cytometry analysis (n=5; ns, P > 0.05). (B) Representative images of the locations of F4/80-positive cell in Caph or vehicle-treated mice bladders by immunofluorescence assays (n=4). (C) Representative FACS plots (left) showing M1 (F4/80+CD11B+CD86+ gates) and M2 (F4/80+CD11B+CD206+) in Caph or vehicle-treated mouse bladders. Assessment ratio (right) of Caph or vehicle-treated mice bladder M1 and M2 by flow cytometry analysis (n=5; *P < 0.05). mRNA expression from mouse BMDM after 6 hours post-infection with CGRP or PBS-treated (D–G). (D) Measurement of mRNA of mouse macrophages polarization marker by PCR (n= 3; **P < 0.01; #P < 0.0001). (E) Transcriptome analysis by Hallmark gene sets. (F) Transcriptome analysis by KEGG gene sets. (G) Differentially expressed genes for transcriptome analysis. (H) Representative images of pH probe (red) for the pH levels of mouse BMDM by immunofluorescence assays (n=6).
Figure 5BoNT/A and BIBN4096 treatment block neural signal (A–C) Representative images show bladder inflammation and uroepithelium damage for groups “vehicle-infected”, “BoNT/A-infected” and “BIBN4096-infected”. (A) H&E staining (B) WGA-FITC and (C) trypan blue staining (n=3–5). (D) Bacterial load recovery (log10 CFU) from urine for each group (n =9/group; **P < 0.01). (E) Representative FACS plots (left) showing neutrophils (CD11b+Ly6G+ gates) in Caph or vehicle-treated mouse bladders. Assessment ratio (right) of Caph or vehicle-treated mice bladder neutrophils by flow cytometry analysis (n=5; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001). (F) Representative FACS plots (left) showing M1 (F4/80+CD11B+CD86+ gates) and M2 (F4/80+CD11B+CD206+) in Caph or vehicle-treated mouse bladders. Assessment ratio (right) of Caph or vehicle-treated mice bladder M1 and M2 by flow cytometry analysis (n=5; ns, P > 0.05; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01).
Figure 6A schematic diagram of the results. UPEC could directly stimulate nociceptor neurons, releasing CGRP into the infected bladder which inhibited the recruitment of neutrophils, MPO releasing and affected the polarization of macrophages, and finally caused bladder inflammation, epithelial barrier dysfunction and increased bacterial load.