Literature DB >> 35702122

Biomechanics of the unilateral posterosuperior, unipedicular, and bipedicular approaches for treatment by percutaneous vertebroplasty: a comparative study.

Chenxi Gu1, Anquan Huang1, Yefeng Wang1, Dongzhu Liang2, Peidong Sun2, Zhenfeng Zhang3, Xiaoqiang Cai1, Jun Shen1, Jun Ou-Yang2, Tianming Zou1, Xiao Yu1.   

Abstract

Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) via the unilateral posterosuperior approach has achieved good clinical results for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. This study compared the biomechanical performance of a single vertebral body after PVP by the unilateral posterosuperior, unipedicular, and bipedicular approaches. Twenty-one vertebral bodies from the osteoporotic spine segments (T11-L1) of seven older female cadavers were randomly assigned to the unipedicular (group A), bipedicular (group B), or unilateral posterosuperior approach group (group C). After constructing the fracture compression model, PVP was performed by the different approaches. CT scans showed symmetrical, evenly distributed bone cement in groups B and C and unilaterally distributed cement in group A. The recovery rates of the anterior vertebral body height in groups B and C were significantly higher than those in group A after PVP (P<0.05). The left curvature elastic moduli after PVP were significantly higher in group A than in groups B and C; however, the right curvature moduli in group A were lower than in the other groups (P<0.05). The flexion, extension, and vertical compression elastic moduli were lowest in group B (P<0.05). After PVP, failure strength and stiffness in groups B and C were comparable (P>0.05) and higher than those in group A (P<0.05). PVP through the unilateral posterosuperior approach was superior to the unipedicular approach and comparable to the bipedicular approach based on the biomechanical performance of a single vertebral body. Due to its safety, simplicity, and efficacy, the unilateral posterosuperior approach is recommended for clinical application. AJTR
Copyright © 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Percutaneous vertebroplasty; compression fracture; extrapedicle; polymethylmethacrylate; transpedicle

Year:  2022        PMID: 35702122      PMCID: PMC9185039     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transl Res        ISSN: 1943-8141            Impact factor:   3.940


  17 in total

1.  Single balloon kyphoplasty using far-lateral extrapedicular approach: technical note and preliminary results.

Authors:  Kyeong-Sik Ryu; Chun-Kun Park; Moon-Kyu Kim; Dong-Hyun Kim
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2007-07

2.  Unilateral and Bilateral Percutaneous Kyphoplasty for Thoracolumbar Osteoporotic Compression Fractures.

Authors:  Jin Tang; Wei-Chun Guo; Jin-Feng Hu; Ling Yu
Journal:  J Coll Physicians Surg Pak       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 0.711

Review 3.  Appropriateness criteria for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  S Luthman; J Widén; F Borgström
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  The effect of vertebral body percentage fill on mechanical behavior during percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Sean Molloy; John M Mathis; Stephen M Belkoff
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Fracture generation in human vertebrae under compression loading: The influence of pedicle preservation and bone mineral density on in vitro fracture behavior.

Authors:  Michael Kraxenberger; Christian Schröder; Tobias Geith; Andreas Büttner; Christoph von Schulze-Pellengahr; Christof Birkenmaier; Peter E Müller; Volkmar Jansson; Bernd Wegener
Journal:  Technol Health Care       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 1.285

6.  Can an unipedicular approach replace bipedicular percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture?

Authors:  Wentao Wang; Kun Duan; Minjie Ma; Yong Jiang; Tuanjiang Liu; Jijun Liu; Dingjun Hao
Journal:  J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 1.398

Review 7.  Vertebral Fractures: Clinical Importance and Management.

Authors:  D L Kendler; D C Bauer; K S Davison; L Dian; D A Hanley; S T Harris; M R McClung; P D Miller; J T Schousboe; C K Yuen; E M Lewiecki
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Bone cement distribution in the vertebral body affects chances of recompression after percutaneous vertebroplasty treatment in elderly patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  Liang Zhang; Qiang Wang; Lin Wang; Jian Shen; Qiwei Zhang; Changtai Sun
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 4.458

9.  Polymethylmethacrylate distribution is associated with recompression after vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Yu Hou; Qi Yao; Genai Zhang; Lixiang Ding; Hui Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Kambin triangle approach in percutaneous vertebroplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  Ye-Feng Wang; Jun Shen; Suo-Yuan Li; Xiao Yu; Tian-Ming Zou
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.817

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  A 20-Year Review of Biomechanical Experimental Studies on Spine Implants Used for Percutaneous Surgical Repair of Vertebral Compression Fractures.

Authors:  Sairam Gajavelli; Aaron Gee; Z Shaghayegh Bagheri; Emil H Schemitsch; Christopher S Bailey; Parham Rasoulinejad; Radovan Zdero
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 3.246

2.  Clinical Evaluation of Unilateral Vertebroplasty for OVCF.

Authors:  Xiaoming Wen; Yan Zhang; Wei Jiang; Wenbo An; Binggang Zhang; Jianjun Liu
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 1.621

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.