| Literature DB >> 35701526 |
Nabil Mohamed Selim1, Mina Michael Melk2, Farouk Rasmy Melek3, Dalia Osama Saleh4, Mansour Sobeh5, Seham S El-Hawary2.
Abstract
This study aimed at investigating the chemical composition and the hepatoprotective activities of Plumbago indica L. and P. auriculata Lam. LC-MS/MS analyses for the hydroalcoholic extracts of the aerial parts of the two Plumbago species allowed the tentative identification of thirty and twenty-five compounds from P. indica and P. auriculata, respectively. The biochemical and histopathological alterations associated with thioacetamide (TAA)-induced liver fibrosis in rats were evaluated in vivo where rats received the two extracts at three different dose levels (100, 200 and 400 mg/kg p.o, daily) for 15 consecutive days with induction of hepatotoxicity by TAA (200 mg/kg/day, i.p.) at 14th and 15th days. Results of the present study showed a significant restoration in liver function biomarkers viz. alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), gamma glutamyl transferase and total bilirubin. The liver homogenates exhibited increased levels of antioxidant biomarkers: reduced glutathione (GSH) and catalase (CAT), accompanied with decline in malondialdehyde (MDA). Furthermore, treated groups exhibited a significant suppression in liver inflammatory cytokines: tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interlukin-6 (IL-6), and fibrotic biomarker: alpha smooth muscle relaxant. Histopathological examination of the liver showed normality of hepatocytes. Noteworthy, P. indica extract showed better hepatoprotective activity than P. auriculata, particularly at 200 mg/kg. To sum up, all these results indicated the hepatoprotective properties of both extracts, as well as their antifibrotic effect was evidenced by reduction in hepatic collagen deposition. However, additional experiments are required to isolate their individual secondary metabolites, assess the toxicity of the extracts and explore the involved mechanism of action.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35701526 PMCID: PMC9197831 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-13718-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Phenolic compounds of the hydroalcoholic extracts of the aerial parts of Plumbago indica and P. auriculata by LC–MS–MS.
| No | Compound name | Rt | Relative abundance (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gallic acid[ | 1.61 | 169 | 6.82 | 1.31 |
| 2 | Caffeic acid | 7.08 | 179, 163, 107 | 3.94 | 7.20 |
| 3 | Catechin[ | 7.51 | 289, 275 | 4.37 | 2.05 |
| 4 | Syringic acid[ | 7.77 | 197, 153 | 6.97 | 1.15 |
| 5 | Coumaric acid | 8.31 | 163, 159 | 0.81 | 0.82 |
| 6 | Cinnamic acid | 8.51 | 147, 119 | 5.64 | 0.34 |
| 7 | Ellagic acid[ | 8.87 | 301, 229, 211 | 9.68 | 0.55 |
| 8 | Methyl gallate[ | 9.90 | 183, 171, | 2.92 | 50.36 |
| 9 | Chlorogenic acid | 11.58 | 353, 191, 135, 85 | 1.32 | 1.13 |
| 10 | Rutin[ | 12.55 | 609, 301 | 3.14 | 1.93 |
| 11 | Callistephin | 13.20 | 269 | – | 3.50 |
| 12 | Vitexin[ | 13.23 | 431, 341, 311 | 5.99 | – |
| 13 | Resveratrol | 16.62 | 227, 185, 143 | – | 1.25 |
| 14 | Ferulic acid | 17.42 | 193, 165 | 2.50 | 5.35 |
| 15 | Quercetin-3,7-O-alpha-L-dirhamnopyranoside | 18.45 | 446, 301 | 3.31 | – |
| 16 | Kaempferitrin | 19.63 | 430, 285, | 1.94 | – |
| 17 | Gentistein 8-C-glucoside | 19.91 | 311, 283 | 1.46 | 4.11 |
| 18 | Pyro catechol[ | 21.32 | 109 | 2.75 | 4.77 |
| 19 | Quercetin-3-glucuronide | 23.68 | 477, 301 | 2.72 | – |
| 20 | Kaempferol glucoside | 26.28 | 447, 285, 93 | 5.66 | 3.47 |
| 21 | Tricin glucoside | 26.89 | 491, 329, 299 | 4.72 | – |
| 22 | Daidzin | 27.05 | 415, 253 | 2.65 | – |
| 23 | 3-Hydroxy-3’, 4’, 5’,-trimethoxyflavone | 27.65 | 327, 297, 210 | 6.73 | 2.65 |
| 24 | Plumbagin[ | 29.54 | 187 | 4.88 | 0.35 |
| 25 | Luteolin-7-glucoside | 30.77 | 285, 447 | 1.05 | 0.73 |
| 26 | Puerarin | 30.65 | 415, 277, 235 | 0.00 | 0.70 |
| 27 | Apigenin glucoside[ | 30.75 | 431, 269, 225 | 0.00 | 0.68 |
| 28 | Myricetin | 30.85 | 317, 179 | 0.44 | 0.00 |
| 29 | Quercetin-3-O-α-L-rahmnopyranoside[ | 31.11 | 447, 301 | 1.50 | – |
| 31 | Quercetin-3-O-β-D-glucopyranoside[ | 31.31 | 463, 301, 179 | 0.78 | – |
| 32 | Plumbagin | 31.40 | 333, 187, 159 | 0.36 | – |
| 33 | 6-Ethoxy-3(4’-hydroxyphenyl)-4-methylcoumarin | 31.58 | 295, 266, 238 | 2.84 | 1.46 |
| 34 | Vanillin[ | 31.69 | 151, 109 | 0.45 | 1.36 |
| 35 | Naringenin[ | 31.78 | 271, 177, 151 | 1.48 | 0.88 |
RT. (min): Retention time per minute.
M/Z: mass fragmentation.
Effect of pretreatment with hydroalcoholic extracts of the aerial parts of P. indica or P. auriculata on serum hepatic functions biomarkers in TAA-induced liver toxicity in rats.
| Parameters | ALT (U/L) | AST(U/L) | GGT(U/L) | Bilirubin (umol/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 32.35 ± 0.51 | 34.44 ± 1.7 | 5.93 ± 0.21 | 6.09 ± 0.11 |
| TAA | 120.04 ± 2.52* | 123.02 ± 3.11* | 34.06 ± 2.55* | 30.40 ± 1.60* |
| TAA + SLM (100 mg/Kg) | 41.09 ± 3.62@ | 43.32 ± 3.4@ | 7.76 ± 0.56@ | 7.77 ± 0.7@ |
| TAA + AEPI (100 mg/Kg) | 87.99 ± 4.81@* | 89.05 ± 4.13@* | 22.74 ± 1.66@* | 20.92 ± 1.93@* |
| TAA + AEPI (200 mg/Kg) | 43.39 ± 3.31@ | 54.88 ± 3.37@* | 14.40 ± 0.58@* | 11.82 ± 1.07@* |
| TAA + AEPI (400 mg/Kg) | 68.53 ± 1.99@* | 70.89 ± 2.33@* | 18.59 ± 0.96@* | 13.27 ± 0.83@* |
| TAA + AEPA (100 mg/Kg) | 96.18 ± 5.72@* | 96.70 ± 4.89@* | 25.83 ± 0.74@* | 21.57 ± 0.84@* |
| TAA + AEPA (200 mg/Kg) | 59.48 ± 1.43@* | 65.36 ± 2.89@* | 17.51 ± 0.72@* | 12.83 ± 0.75@* |
| TAA + AEPA (400 mg/Kg) | 75.62 ± 2.7@* | 79.44 ± 2.77@* | 20.25 ± 1.8@* | 18.32 ± 1.06@* |
Results were expressed as Mean ± S.D., n = 5. SLM: Silymarin, *,@Significantly different from normal control and TAA groups at p > 0.05, respectively.
Figure 1Effects of pretreatment with hydroalcoholic extracts of the aerial parts of P. indica or P. auriculata on the liver contents of oxidative stress markers in TAA-induced liver toxicity in rats. (A) reduced glutathione (GSH), (B) catalase enzyme (CAT) and (C) malondialdehyde (MDA). Animals were given TAA (200 mg/kg/day; i.p.) on 14th and 15th days. Other regimens were given orally and daily for 15 days. Results were expressed as Mean ± SD, n = 5. SLM: Silymarin, *,@Significantly different from normal control and TAA groups at p < 0.05, respectively.
Score functions and interactions of P. indica and P. auriculata secondary metabolites in TNF-α and IL-6 active sites using in silico modeling.
| Compound | TNF-α | IL-6 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF* | Interactions | SF* | Interactions | |
| 18 | − 5.92 | Glu 23 (H bonding) | − 7.34 | Arg 104 (H bonding) |
| 1 | − 8.41 | Lys 65 (Salt bridge) Phe 144 (Hydrophobic interaction) | − 13.72 | Arg 104 (H bonding) Lys 46 (Salt bridge) Ser 107 (H bonding) |
| 35 | − 7.91 | Glu 23 (H bonding) Lys 65 (H bonding) | − 10.08 | Glu 106 (H bonding) Asp 160 (H bonding) |
| 8 | − 7.08 | Glu 23 (H bonding) Ala 22 (H bonding) | − 13.48 | Arg 104 (H bonding) Ser 107 (H bonding) |
| 25 | − 6.04 | Glu 23 (H bonding) | − 8.68 | Glu 106 (H bonding) |
| 4 | − 7.32 | Lys 65 (H bonding and salt bridge) | − 12.05 | Lys 45 (Salt bridge) Ser 107 (H bonding) |
| 36 | − 8.20 | Lys 65 (H bonding and hydrophobic interaction) Asp 140 (hydrophobic interaction) | − 10.54 | Asp 160 (H bonding through solvent) Arg 104 (H bonding through solvent) Thr 163 (H bonding through solvent) |
| 13 | − 7.36 | Glu 23 (H bonding) Gly 24 (H bonding) Lys 65 (hydrophobic interaction) | − 11.21 | Asp 160 (H bonding) Ser 108 (H bonding through solvent) Glu 42 (H bonding through solvent) |
| 33 | − 6.77 | Ala 22 (H bonding) | − 6.52 | Glu 106 (Hydrophobic interaction) |
| 23 | − 5.61 | Asp 140 (hydrophobic interaction) | Failed | |
| 12 | − 8.74 | Glu 23 (H bonding) Ala 22 (H bonding) Lys 65 (H bonding) Gln 21 (H bonding) | − 12.46 | Glu 42 (H bonding through solvent) Ser 108 (H bonding through solvent) Glu 106 (H bonding) |
| 28 | − 7.06 | Glu 23 (H bonding) | − 10.69 | Asp 160 (H bonding) Glu 106 (H bonding) |
| 10 | − 9.39 | Lys 65 (H bonding) Glu 23 (H bonding) Asp 140 (H bonding) | − 12.51 | Arg 104 (H bonding) Glu 106 (H bonding) Gln 159 (H bonding through solvent) Gln 156 (H bonding through solvent) |
| 17 | − 8.67 | Glu 23 (H bonding) Gly 24 (H bonding) Ala 22 (H bonding) | − 10.48 | Ser 107 (H bonding) |
| 27 | − 8.50 | Glu 23 (H bonding) Gly 24 (H bonding) Lys 65 (hydrophobic interaction) | − 10.23 | Glu 42 (H bonding through solvent) Ser 108 (H bonding through solvent) |
| 7 | − 9.65 | Gly 24 (H bonding Pro 139 (H bonding) Gln 21 (Hydrophobic interaction) Leu 142 (H bonding) | − 11.63 | Glu 106 (H bonding through solvent) Ser 107 (H bonding through solvent) |
| 31 | − 9.56 | Glu 23 (H bonding) Leu 142 (H bonding) Lys 65 (H bonding) | − 12.25 | Arg 104 (H bonding) Asp 160 (H bonding through solvent) |
| 11 | − 9.83 | Glu 23 (H bonding) Lys 65 (H bonding) Leu 142 (H bonding) Asp 140 (H bonding) | − 12.29 | Arg 104 (H bonding) Glu 106 (Salt bridge) Gln 159 (H bonding through solvent) |
| Plumbagic acid | − 8.25 | Glu 23 (H bonding) Lys 65 (H bonding) | − 12.70 | Thr 43 (H bonding) Asp 160 (H bonding) Lys (Hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interaction) |
| Azalein | − 9.13 | Glu 23 (H bonding) Ala 22 (H bonding) Pro 20 (H bonding) | − 11.80 | Glu 106 (Hydrophobic interaction) |
| Azaleatin | − 8.43 | Glu 23 (H bonding) Gly 24 (H bonding) Pro 139 (H bonding) | − 11.33 | Arg 104 (H bonding) Glu 106 (Hydrophobic interaction) |
| Luteolin | − 8.24 | Lys 65 (H bonding) | − 11.24 | Asn 103 (H bonding) Glu 106 (Hydrophobic interaction) |
| Ayanin | − 8.23 | Lys 65 (H bonding) | − 10.44 | Arg 104 (H bonding) |
| Capensinidin | − 9.18 | Glu 23 (H bonding) Pro 139 (H bonding) | − 13.67 | Glu 106 (Salt bridge) Asn 103 (H bonding) |
| Droserone | − 8.39 | Lys 65 (Salt bridge) | − 12.88 | Asp 160 (H bonding) |
Compound numbers are from Table 1.
*Score function (kcal/mol).
Figure 22D representative of selected secondary metabolites of P. indica and P. auriculata in TNF-α and IL-6 active sites using in silico modeling.
Figure 3Effects of pretreatment with hydroalcoholic extracts of the aerial parts of P. indica or P. auriculata on the hepatic contents of inflammatory markers in TAA-induced injury in rats. (A) Tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α) and (B) interleukin (IL-6). Animals were given TAA (200 mg/kg/day; i.p.) on 14th and 15th days. Other regimens were given orally and daily for 15 days. Results were expressed as Mean ± SD, n = 5. SLM: Silymarin, *,@Significantly different from normal control and TAA groups at p < 0.05, respectively.
Figure 4Effects of pretreatment with hydroalcoholic extracts of the aerial parts of P. indica or P. auriculata on the hepatic α-SMA in TAA-induced liver injury in rats. Animals were given TAA (200 mg/kg/day; i.p.) on 14th and 15th days. Other regimens were given orally and daily for 15 days. Results were expressed as Mean ± SD, n = 5. SLM: Silymarin, *,@Significantly different from normal control and TAA groups at p < 0.05, respectively.
Figure 5Histopathological findings of liver sections for different studied groups. (A) Section of normal control group; (B–H) Sections of TAA (200 mg/kg bw/i.p.) treated group; (I) Sections of silymarin (100 mg/kg bw/p.o.) treated group; (J, K) Sections of P. indica (100 mg/kg bw/p.o) treated rats; (L) Section of P. indica (200 mg/kg bw/p.o.) treated rats; (M, N) Sections of P. indica (400 mg/kg bw/p.o.) treated rats; (O, P) Sections of P. auriculata (100 mg/kg bw/p.o.) treated rats; (Q, R) Sections of P. auriculata (200 mg/kg bw/p.o.) treated rats; (S, T) Sections of P. auriculata (400 mg/kg bw/p.o.) treated rats. (Arrowhead, vacuolar degeneration; four point star, cellular apoptosis; Arrow pointed to inflammatory cells; five point star, vascular congestion; elbow arrow connector, fine strands of fibrous tissue, H&E stained).