| Literature DB >> 35701448 |
Himanshu Sekhar Swain1, Basanta Kumar Das2, Aurobinda Upadhyay3, Mitesh Hiradas Ramteke1, Vikas Kumar1, Dharmendra Kumar Meena1, Uttam Kumar Sarkar1, Narinder Kumar Chadha3, Kiran Dube Rawat3.
Abstract
The present study was conducted for 240 days to evaluate the effects of stocking density based on growth attributes, digestive enzymes, muscular composition, biochemical and physiological responses of Labeo rohita fingerlings in tropical inland open water cages. L. rohita (30.35 ± 1.08 g) were randomly distributed into three treatments, namely low stocking density, LSD (10 m-3), medium stocking density, MSD (20 m-3) and high stocking density, HSD (30 m-3) in triplicates. Fish were fed twice daily with CIFRI CAGEGROW® floating feed (crude protein-28%, crude fat-4%). Fish growth and feed efficiency were higher (p < 0.05) in LSD, however, MSD registered a higher yield. Amylase and protease activity reduced whereas lipase activity increased with increasing stocking density. Muscle crude protein and crude fat formed an inverse correlation. The fillet quality deteriorated at higher stocking densities based on Muscle pH, drip loss and frozen leakage rate. The stress biomarkers level (glucose, cortisol, superoxide dismutase and catalase) increased in serum under crowding conditions. Glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase and glutamate pyruvate transaminase in serum were significantly increased in HSD. Serum protein levels decreased with the increase in stocking densities. Body ionic imbalance (Na+, Cl- and K+) was observed under crowding stress. Based on growth attributes and multiple biomarker responses, L. rohita @ 10 m-3 was found to be the optimum density for inland open water cage culture.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35701448 PMCID: PMC9197843 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-13570-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Growth performance and feed utilization efficiency of L. rohita stocked at three different stocking densities.
| Treatment | IBW (g) | FBW (g) | WG (g) | SGR (%) | AGR (g) | Survival (%) | FCR | PER | FCE | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSD | 30.35 ± 1.08 | 680.69 ± 21.30a | 650.34 ± 21.30a | 1.29 ± 0.01a | 2.70 ± 0.08a | 88.00 ± 0.11a | 1.96 ± 0.01c | 1.69 ± 0.01a | 0.50 ± 0.02a | 5.98 ± 0.53b |
| MSD | 30.35 ± 1.08 | 560.52 ± 25.98b | 530.17 ± 25.98b | 1.21 ± 0.01a | 2.20 ± 0.10b | 72.00 ± 0.14b | 2.56 ± 0.02b | 1.29 ± 0.01b | 0.38 ± 0.02b | 8.059 ± 0.71a |
| HSD | 30.35 ± 1.08 | 405.45 ± 32.79c | 375.1 ± 32.79c | 1.07 ± 0.03b | 1.56 ± 0.13c | 66.00 ± 0.18c | 2.87 ± 0.01a | 1.16 ± 0.02c | 0.34 ± 0.03c | 8.050 ± 1.13a |
Values are mean ± SE. Means in the same column within each classification bearing different superscripts (a, b, c) are significantly different (P < 0.05).
IBW initial body weight, FBW final body weight, WG weight gain, SGR specific growth rate, AGR absolute growth rate, FCR feed conversion ratio, PER protein efficiency ratio, FCE feed conversion efficiency, LSD low stocking density, MSD medium stocking density, HSD high stocking density.
Figure 1Activities of (A) glucose, cortisol, superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) in serum (B) triiodothyronine (T3) and thyroxine (T4) in serum, (C) insulin like growth factor 1 (IGF1) in serum, (D) amylase, protease and lipase in the gut, and (E) concentration of DNA, RNA and RNA/DNA ratio in the muscle of L. rohita stocked at three different stocking densities. Each bar represents values as mean ± SE. Within endpoints and groups, bars with different superscripts (a, b, c) are significantly different (P < 0.05).
Serum biochemical indices of L. rohita stocked at three different stocking densities.
| Treatments | SGOT | SGPT (UL−1) | Protein (gdL−1) | Albumin (gdL−1) | Globulin (gdL−1) | A:G ratio | Na+ | K+ | Cl− |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSD | 58.16 ± 1.72b | 3.88 ± 0.04b | 3.29 ± 0.01a | 0.96 ± 0.01a | 2.33 ± 0.01a | 0.41 ± 0.01a | 131.13 ± 0.54a | 2.52 ± 0.02a | 112.50 ± 4.04a |
| MSD | 60.01 ± 2.89b | 4.00 ± 0.04b | 2.96 ± 0.05b | 0.85 ± 0.01b | 2.11 ± 0.04b | 0.40 ± 0.01a | 129.50 ± 0.28b | 2.58 ± 0.07a | 102.40 ± 3.41ab |
| HSD | 66.09 ± 1.90a | 4.51 ± 0.08a | 2.33 ± 0.08c | 0.72 ± 0.01c | 1.61 ± 0.06c | 0.44 ± 0.01b | 130.50 ± 0.28ab | 2.12 ± 0.05b | 98.16 ± 1.30b |
Values are mean ± SE. Means in the same column within each classification bearing different superscripts (a, b, c) are significantly different (P < 0.05).
SGOT serum glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase, SGPT serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase, A:G ratio albumin:globulin ratio, LSD low stocking density, MSD medium stocking density, HSD high stocking density.
Muscle chemical composition and flesh quality of L. rohita stocked at three different stocking densities.
| Treatments | Moisture (%) | Crude protein (%) | Crude fat (%) | Ash (%) | Muscle pH | Drip loss (%) | FLR (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSD | 77.67 ± 0.74a | 13.82 ± 0.11b | 2.03 ± 0.05a | 3.72 ± 0.01a | 6.5 ± 0.11a | 2.1 ± 0.17b | 0.7 ± 0.05b |
| MSD | 77.03 ± 0.26a | 14.45 ± 0.52ab | 1.90 ± 0.06a | 3.74 ± 0.01a | 6.0 ± 0.05b | 3.2 ± 0.11a | 1.1 ± 0.11ab |
| HSD | 75.61 ± 1.62a | 15.28 ± 0.22a | 1.63 ± 0.06b | 3.72 ± 0.02a | 5.8 ± 0.17b | 3.8 ± 0.40a | 1.4 ± 0.17a |
Values are mean ± SE. Means in the same column within each classification bearing different superscripts (a, b, c) are significantly different (P < 0.05).
FLR frozen leakage rate, LSD low stocking density, MSD medium stocking density, HSD high stocking density.
Variations in cage water quality parameters in cages.
| Parameters | LSD | MSD | HSD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water temperature (°C) | 28.5 ± 1.20 | 28.50 ± 1.30 | 29.0 ± 1.20 |
| Water transparency (cm) | 118.00 ± 4.02 | 127.00 ± 5.12 | 136.00 ± 4.65 |
| Dissolved oxygen (mgl−1) | 7.20 ± 0.26 | 7.70 ± 0.31 | 6.98 ± 0.18 |
| pH | 7.85 ± 0.88 | 7.50 ± 0.90 | 7.70 ± 0.64 |
| Specific conductivity (mmhocm−1) | 87.21 ± 2.30 | 79.50 ± 3.50 | 82.20 ± 2.80 |
| Alkalinity (mg l−1) | 58.50 ± 0.56 | 56.10 ± 1.50 | 58.33 ± 1.02 |
| Hardness (mgl−1) | 49.52 ± 2.13 | 48.16 ± 1.28 | 56.00 ± 1.36 |
| Total nitrogen (mgl−1) | 0.60 ± 0.05 | 0.62 ± 0.04 | 0.57 ± 0.02 |
| Total phosphorous (mgl−1) | 0.16 ± 0.01 | 0.17 ± 0.04 | 0.18 ± 0.02 |
Values are mean ± SE. No significant variation was observed in water quality parameters among different treatments (P > 0.05).
LSD low stocking density, MSD medium stocking density, HSD high stocking density.
Figure 2(A) *Pearson correlation coefficient, (B) **Principal component analysis, and (C) ***Hierarchical cluster analysis using growth attributes and multiple biomarkers of L. rohita cultured in three stocking densities in cages. *Red coloured small eclipse showed negatively correlated variables while blue coloured small eclipse shape showed positively correlated variables, large eclipse showed less correlated variables, boxed variables showing significantly (P < 0.05) correlated. **Extraction method: Principal component analysis, Rotation method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization, ***Wards method with Euclidean method.
Figure 3(a) GIS map* of experimental site, Salia reservoir, Ganjam district, Odisha, India (N19° 48.3887ʹ and E85° 03.6983ʹ). The reservoir area is 947.8 ha at its full reservoir level. The present experiment was conducted in 9 cages out of 58 installed in the reservoir. *GIS map was prepared by using ArcGIS software, version 9.3 (https://arcgis.software.informer.com/9.3/). (b) Experimental cage (HDPE) site, Salia reservoir, Ganjam district, Odisha, India. The photography was taken by the author (Dr. Himanshu Sekhar Swain). (c) Underwater image of L. rohita in the cage. The images were taken by using SONY-RX 100 VI underwater camera in the daytime during 10 AM to 2 PM. The underwater photography was undertaken by the scuba divers as well as by the authors with all safety features as per requirement and visibility in the water.