Temjen Sunup Jamir1, Bhawana Ashok Badhe2, Norton Stephen3, Bheemanathi Hanuman Srinivas4, Biju Pottakkat5. 1. North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences Shillong, Meghalaya, India. 2. Department of Pathology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER) Puducherry, India. 3. Department of Pathology, Sri Venkateshwara Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre [SVMCH&RC] Puducherry, India. 4. Department of Pathology, JIPMER Puducherry, India. 5. Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, JIPMER Puducherry, India.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The neuroendocrine system of the gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) region gives rise to unique, heterogeneous malignancies that need a high index of suspicion to make a diagnosis owing to their indolent course. AIMS: The present study aimed to find the incidence and the differences in the morphologic and immunohistochemical profile of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEPNET) in a referral center of South India, JIPMER, Puducherry, India. METHODS: There were 55 gastroenteropancreatic region neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) assessed for demographic, clinical and radiological features. Gross morphological features, histopathological features, mitotic index, Ki67 proliferation index, and immunohistochemical positivity for synaptophysin, chromogranin-A, CD-56, NSE (Neuron Specific Enolase) and pan-cytokeratin (Pan-CK) were also assessed. RESULTS: The majority were nonfunctional tumors presenting with abdominal pain, gastrointestinal bleed, vomiting, jaundice, and loss of weight and appetite. The sites of involvement according to the order of frequency were duodenum, stomach, rectum, pancreas, ileum, appendix and jejunum. The endoscopic appearance of duodenal and jejunal tumors showed polypoidal, nodular and ulceroproliferative growth. These tumors were diagnosed by preoperative biopsy; 54% of them were grade-1 neuroendocrine tumors exhibiting nesting, trabecular, cord, and solid sheet patterns. All 55 cases were synaptophysin-positive with variable positivity for chromogranin, neuron-specific enolase, CD56, and Pan-CK. Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas (MANECs) involving the duodenum and stomach comprised 7.3% of all GEPNETs. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors constituted 9% of all tumors; one was multifocal. Lymph node metastasis was seen in 12/55 tumors; 6/12 showed liver metastasis also. All metastasizing tumors measured less than 4 cm in size. Statistical correlation of the tumor grade, mitotic count and Ki67 index as analysed by Spearman's correlation between the paired data denoted by rs in 55 tumors showed a strong correlation between mitotic count and Ki67 index; a moderate correlation was noted between the tumor grade and Ki67 index. CONCLUSION: The clinicopathologic profile of 55 GEPNET revealed a majority to be sporadic Grade 1 tumor. Tumors that showed lymph node and liver metastasis were less than 4 cm in size. MANECs were found in the duodenum and stomach. IJCEP
BACKGROUND: The neuroendocrine system of the gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) region gives rise to unique, heterogeneous malignancies that need a high index of suspicion to make a diagnosis owing to their indolent course. AIMS: The present study aimed to find the incidence and the differences in the morphologic and immunohistochemical profile of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEPNET) in a referral center of South India, JIPMER, Puducherry, India. METHODS: There were 55 gastroenteropancreatic region neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) assessed for demographic, clinical and radiological features. Gross morphological features, histopathological features, mitotic index, Ki67 proliferation index, and immunohistochemical positivity for synaptophysin, chromogranin-A, CD-56, NSE (Neuron Specific Enolase) and pan-cytokeratin (Pan-CK) were also assessed. RESULTS: The majority were nonfunctional tumors presenting with abdominal pain, gastrointestinal bleed, vomiting, jaundice, and loss of weight and appetite. The sites of involvement according to the order of frequency were duodenum, stomach, rectum, pancreas, ileum, appendix and jejunum. The endoscopic appearance of duodenal and jejunal tumors showed polypoidal, nodular and ulceroproliferative growth. These tumors were diagnosed by preoperative biopsy; 54% of them were grade-1 neuroendocrine tumors exhibiting nesting, trabecular, cord, and solid sheet patterns. All 55 cases were synaptophysin-positive with variable positivity for chromogranin, neuron-specific enolase, CD56, and Pan-CK. Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas (MANECs) involving the duodenum and stomach comprised 7.3% of all GEPNETs. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors constituted 9% of all tumors; one was multifocal. Lymph node metastasis was seen in 12/55 tumors; 6/12 showed liver metastasis also. All metastasizing tumors measured less than 4 cm in size. Statistical correlation of the tumor grade, mitotic count and Ki67 index as analysed by Spearman's correlation between the paired data denoted by rs in 55 tumors showed a strong correlation between mitotic count and Ki67 index; a moderate correlation was noted between the tumor grade and Ki67 index. CONCLUSION: The clinicopathologic profile of 55 GEPNET revealed a majority to be sporadic Grade 1 tumor. Tumors that showed lymph node and liver metastasis were less than 4 cm in size. MANECs were found in the duodenum and stomach. IJCEP
Authors: Jacob E Møller; Patricia A Pellikka; Alain M Bernheim; Hartzell V Schaff; Joseph Rubin; Heidi M Connolly Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-11-14 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: R Garcia-Carbonero; J Capdevila; G Crespo-Herrero; J A Díaz-Pérez; M P Martínez Del Prado; V Alonso Orduña; I Sevilla-García; C Villabona-Artero; A Beguiristain-Gómez; M Llanos-Muñoz; M Marazuela; C Alvarez-Escola; D Castellano; E Vilar; P Jiménez-Fonseca; A Teulé; J Sastre-Valera; M Benavent-Viñuelas; A Monleon; R Salazar Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2010-02-05 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: James C Yao; Manal Hassan; Alexandria Phan; Cecile Dagohoy; Colleen Leary; Jeannette E Mares; Eddie K Abdalla; Jason B Fleming; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Asif Rashid; Douglas B Evans Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-06-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jonathan R Strosberg; Jill M Weber; Max Feldman; Domenico Coppola; Kenneth Meredith; Larry K Kvols Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-12-17 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: C Lombard-Bohas; E Mitry; D O'Toole; C Louvet; D Pillon; G Cadiot; F Borson-Chazot; T Aparicio; M Ducreux; T Lecomte; P L Etienne; W Cacheux; J L Legoux; J F Seitz; P Ruszniewski; J A Chayvialle; P Rougier Journal: Neuroendocrinology Date: 2008-08-22 Impact factor: 4.914
Authors: Irvin M Modlin; Kjell Oberg; Daniel C Chung; Robert T Jensen; Wouter W de Herder; Rajesh V Thakker; Martyn Caplin; Gianfranco Delle Fave; Greg A Kaltsas; Eric P Krenning; Steven F Moss; Ola Nilsson; Guido Rindi; Ramon Salazar; Philippe Ruszniewski; Anders Sundin Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 41.316