| Literature DB >> 35698222 |
Junya Itou1, Umito Kuwashima1, Masafumi Itoh1, Ken Okazaki2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Change in the joint line convergence angle (JLCA) of the knee after high tibial osteotomy (HTO) is difficult to predict accurately. Given that any change in JLCA is intra-articular, the shape of the articular surface, including the bone morphology of the proximal tibia, may affect the alignment of the knee joint postoperatively. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the shape of the tibial plateau and postoperative alignment of the knee joint by focusing on changes in JLCA.Entities:
Keywords: Bone morphology; High tibial osteotomy; Joint line convergence angle
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35698222 PMCID: PMC9195202 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05526-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.562
Fig. 1Shape of the tibial plateau. a Depressed. b Flat. c Convex (pagoda-like)
Fig. 2Definition of the slope (inclination) of the articular surface. The inclination was defined as the line connecting the tibial outer edge (star) and the midpoint between the tibial outer edge and the apex of the intercondylar ridge (circle and double arrows, respectively)
Patient characteristics
| Depressed ( | Flat ( | Pagoda-like ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years), mean (SD) | 57.2 (10.0) | 56.5 (7.2) | 54.5 (8.0) | 0.53 |
| Male sex, n (%) | 13 (34.2) | 23 (44.2) | 12 (63.1) | 0.11 |
| Body mass index (%) | 25.6 (3.9) | 26.8 (4.0) | 27.7 (4.0) | 0.17 |
| Preoperative knee extension angle (°) | 1.1 ± 2.1 | 1.2 ± 2.5 | 1.0 ± 2.1 | 0.98 |
| Preoperative knee flexion angle (°) | 135.5 ± 9.5 | 138.2 ± 8.1 | 135.0 ± 8.3 | 0.30 |
| K/L grade (1/2/3/4) | 9/10/15/1 | 20/13/12/2 | 5/5/6/1 | 0.74 |
| Procedure (OWHTO/OWDTO) | 26/12 | 42/10 | 16/3 | 0.28 |
K/L grade Kellgren-Lawrence grade, OWHTO open-wedge high tibial osteotomy, OWDTO open-wedge distal tibial tuberosity osteotomy, SD standard deviation
The knee extension angle is expressed as 0° for full extension, with a negative value for hyperextension and as a positive value for limitation of extension
Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, chi-squared test, and one-way analysis of variance
Radiographic data
| Depressed ( | Flat ( | Pagoda-like ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPTA (°) before surgery | 83.8 (2.3) | 83.8 (2.1) | 83.6 (3.2) | 0.93 |
| MPTA (°) after surgery | 91.7 (2.4) | 91.4 (2.3) | 91.9 (1.8) | 0.71 |
| HKA angle (°) before surgery | 175.3 (2.5) | 175.0 (1.8) | 174.8 (2.5) | 0.71 |
| HKA angle (°) after surgery | 183.6 (1.8) | 183.4 (1.9) | 183.3 (1.8) | 0.78 |
| JLCA (°) before surgery | 2.2 (1.5) | 2.3 (1.4) | 2.5 (1.8) | 0.82 |
| JLCA (°) after surgery | 1.6 (1.7) | 1.6 (1.4) | 1.5 (1.7) | 0.92 |
| mLDFA (°) before surgery | 87.0 (1.6) | 87.1 (1.3) | 87.3 (2.1) | 0.78 |
| Inclination (°) before surgery | −7.4 (2.6) | 0.1 (1.7) | 6.0 (1.9) | < 0.01 |
MPTA medial proximal tibial angle, HKA hip-knee-ankle angle, JLCA joint line convergence angle, mLDFA mechanical lateral distal femoral angle
Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and one-way analysis of variance
Fig. 3Correlations of ΔJLCA with HKA before surgery. a Depressed (r = − 0.09). b Flat (r = 0.24). c Convex (pagoda-like) (r = 0.56). ΔJLCA, change in joint line convergence angle of the knee after surgery; HKA, hip-knee-ankle angle
Fig. 4Correlations of ΔJLCA with ΔMPTA. a Depressed (r = 0.07). b Flat (r = 0.03). c Convex (pagoda-like) (r = − 0.44). ΔJLCA, change in joint line convergence angle of the knee after surgery; ΔMPTA, change in the medial proximal tibial angle
Results of correlation analyses among various radiographic parameters for knee joints with a pagoda-shaped tibial plateau
| JLCA (Pre) | JLCA (Post) | ΔJLCA | MPTA (Pre) | MPTA (Post) | ΔMPTA | HKA (Pre) | HKA (Post) | ΔHKA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JLCA (Pre) | 1.00 | 0.69 | −0.42 | 0.13 | 0.66 | 0.28 | − 0.28 | 0.37 | 0.37 |
| JLCA (Post) | 1.00 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.52 | −0.05 | 0.15 | 0.07 | −0.06 | |
| ΔJLCA | 1.00 | 0.27 | −0.20 | − 0.44 | 0.56 | − 0.39 | −0.57 | ||
| MPTA (Pre) | 1.00 | 0.48 | −0.81 | 0.72 | −0.34 | − 0.64 | |||
| MPTA (Post) | 1.00 | 0.11 | −0.04 | 0.35 | 0.20 | ||||
| ΔMPTA | 1.00 | −0.85 | 0.63 | 0.87 | |||||
| HKA (Pre) | 1.00 | −0.48 | −0.90 | ||||||
| HKA (Post) | 1.00 | 0.81 | |||||||
| ΔHKA | 1.00 |
MPTA medial proximal tibial angle, HKA hip-knee-ankle angle, JLCA joint line convergence angle, mLDFA mechanical lateral distal femoral angle, Pre before surgery, Post after surgery
Δ represents the change in each radiological parameter after surgery
Correlations were determined using a simple linear regression model