| Literature DB >> 35698098 |
Wenjun Liu1, Tianyi Zhuang2, Ruyi Xia1, Zhuoru Zou1, Lei Zhang3,4, Mingwang Shen5,6,7, Guihua Zhuang8,9,10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) requires reduction in the prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antigen (HBsAg) in children to 0.1% by 2030, a key indicator for eliminating viral hepatitis as a major public health threat. Whether and how China can achieve this target remains unknown, although great achievements have been made. We aimed to predict the decline of HBsAg prevalence in China and identify key developments needed to achieve the target.Entities:
Keywords: Hepatitis B; Mathematical model; Peripartum antiviral prophylaxis; Prediction; Prevalence
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35698098 PMCID: PMC9195287 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13594-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 4.135
Fig. 1Age- and time-dependent dynamic compartmental model of HBV transmission. Boxes with solid line represent compartments of the transmission process, and lines with arrowhead represent transitions and their directions. The box with dashed line is not a compartment, only representing the transient process of acute HBV infection. λ, age- and time-dependent force of HBV infection; q, age-dependent proportion of acute HBV infections that become chronic; r, rate of chronic HBV infections that become immune (HBV clearance); d, age- and time-dependent background mortality; d, age-dependent mortality of acute HBV infection; d, age-dependent mortality of cirrhosis; d, age-dependent mortality of hepatocellular carcinoma; v, vaccine coverage of newborns at a given time; p, vaccine protection against HBV infection at a given time; θ, catch-up vaccine coverage during 2009 − 2011 in children born between 1994 − 2001 who missed the routine vaccination; b, birth rate at a given time; ɛ, HBV intrauterine infection rate in infected pregnant women; N, total number of people with a specific age at a given time. denotes HBV carriage rate of women with childbearing age (15 − 49 years) at a given time
Estimates of parameters used in the model
| Parameter | Base-case value | Range | Distribution | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Table S | Table S | Uniform | ||
| [ | ||||
| < 1 year | 0.3 | ± 20% | Uniform (0.24, 0.36) Uniform (0.2, 0.3) Uniform (0.048, 0.072) Uniform (0.032, 0.048) | |
| 1 − 5 years | 0.25 | |||
| 6 − 19 years | 0.06 | |||
| ≥ 20 years | 0.04 | |||
| 0.01 | 0.005–0.02 | Triangular (0.005, 0.01, 0.02) | [ | |
| Based on the age-specific risks of symptomatic infection and fulminant hepatitis and the fatality rate of fulminant hepatitis [ | ||||
| < 1 year | 0.000007 | ± 50% | Uniform (0.0000035, 0.0000105) | |
| 1 − 5 years | 0.00042 | Uniform (0.00021, 0.00063) | ||
| ≥ 6 years | 0.00126 | Uniform (0.00063, 0.00189) | ||
| Age-specific HBV-related cirrhosis mortality curve | ± 50% | Uniform | [ | |
| Age-specific HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma mortality curve | ± 50% | Uniform | [ | |
| 0.94 | 0.9 − 0.98 | Normal (0.94, 0.020408) | [ | |
| 0.95 | 0.92 − 0.98 | Normal (0.95, 0.015306) | [ | |
| 0.95 | 0.9 − 0.97 | Uniform (0.9, 0.97) | [ | |
| 0.03 | 0.02 − 0.035 | Triangular (0.02, 0.03, 0.035) | [ |
aAlso be used in the catch-up vaccination during 2009 − 2011
Fig. 2HBsAg prevalence with time in different age groups under status quo scenario
Fig. 3Impacts of sensitive parameters on HBsAg prevalence in populate aged 1 − 59 years and children aged < 5 years under status quo scenario
Fig. 4HBsAg prevalence with time in children aged < 5 years under status quo + PAP scenario and scaling up current interventions + PAP scenario, respectively. PAP, peripartum antiviral prophylaxis