Literature DB >> 35697749

A novel method for assessing and measuring homophily in networks through second-order statistics.

Nicola Apollonio1, Paolo G Franciosa2, Daniele Santoni3.   

Abstract

We present a new method for assessing and measuring homophily in networks whose nodes have categorical attributes, namely when the nodes of networks come partitioned into classes (colors). We probe this method in two different classes of networks: (i) protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks, where nodes correspond to proteins, partitioned according to their functional role, and edges represent functional interactions between proteins (ii) Pokec on-line social network, where nodes correspond to users, partitioned according to their age, and edges respresent friendship between users.Similarly to other classical and well consolidated approaches, our method compares the relative edge density of the subgraphs induced by each class with the corresponding expected relative edge density under a null model. The novelty of our approach consists in prescribing an endogenous null model, namely, the sample space of the null model is built on the input network itself. This allows us to give exact explicit expression for the [Formula: see text]-score of the relative edge density of each class as well as other related statistics. The [Formula: see text]-scores directly quantify the statistical significance of the observed homophily via Čebyšëv inequality. The expression of each [Formula: see text]-score is entered by the network structure through basic combinatorial invariant such as the number of subgraphs with two spanning edges. Each [Formula: see text]-score is computed in [Formula: see text] time for a network with n nodes and m edges. This leads to an overall efficient computational method for assesing homophily. We complement the analysis of homophily/heterophily by considering [Formula: see text]-scores of the number of isolated nodes in the subgraphs induced by each class, that are computed in O(nm) time. Theoretical results are then exploited to show that, as expected, both the analyzed network classes are significantly homophilic with respect to the considered node properties.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35697749      PMCID: PMC9192693          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-12710-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.996


  19 in total

1.  Guilt-by-association goes global.

Authors:  S Oliver
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-10       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  A Bayesian networks approach for predicting protein-protein interactions from genomic data.

Authors:  Ronald Jansen; Haiyuan Yu; Dov Greenbaum; Yuval Kluger; Nevan J Krogan; Sambath Chung; Andrew Emili; Michael Snyder; Jack F Greenblatt; Mark Gerstein
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-10-17       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Mixing patterns in networks.

Authors:  M E J Newman
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2003-02-27

4.  STRING: a database of predicted functional associations between proteins.

Authors:  Christian von Mering; Martijn Huynen; Daniel Jaeggi; Steffen Schmidt; Peer Bork; Berend Snel
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Modularity and community structure in networks.

Authors:  M E J Newman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Distribution of node characteristics in complex networks.

Authors:  Juyong Park; Albert-László Barabási
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The art of community detection.

Authors:  Natali Gulbahce; Sune Lehmann
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.345

8.  Prediction of protein function using protein-protein interaction data.

Authors:  Minghua Deng; Kui Zhang; Shipra Mehta; Ting Chen; Fengzhu Sun
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.479

9.  The STRING database in 2017: quality-controlled protein-protein association networks, made broadly accessible.

Authors:  Damian Szklarczyk; John H Morris; Helen Cook; Michael Kuhn; Stefan Wyder; Milan Simonovic; Alberto Santos; Nadezhda T Doncheva; Alexander Roth; Peer Bork; Lars J Jensen; Christian von Mering
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Human Protein Reference Database--2009 update.

Authors:  T S Keshava Prasad; Renu Goel; Kumaran Kandasamy; Shivakumar Keerthikumar; Sameer Kumar; Suresh Mathivanan; Deepthi Telikicherla; Rajesh Raju; Beema Shafreen; Abhilash Venugopal; Lavanya Balakrishnan; Arivusudar Marimuthu; Sutopa Banerjee; Devi S Somanathan; Aimy Sebastian; Sandhya Rani; Somak Ray; C J Harrys Kishore; Sashi Kanth; Mukhtar Ahmed; Manoj K Kashyap; Riaz Mohmood; Y L Ramachandra; V Krishna; B Abdul Rahiman; Sujatha Mohan; Prathibha Ranganathan; Subhashri Ramabadran; Raghothama Chaerkady; Akhilesh Pandey
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.