Literature DB >> 35696612

Model definition for genetic evaluation of purebred and crossbred lambs including heterosis.

Napoleón Vargas Jurado1, David R Notter2, Joshua B Taylor3, Daniel J Brown4, Michelle R Mousel3, Ronald M Lewis1.   

Abstract

Crossbreeding is a common practice among commercial sheep producers to improve animal performance. However, genetic evaluation of U.S. sheep is performed within breed type (terminal sire, semi-prolific, and western range). While incorporating crossbred records may improve assessment of purebreds, it requires accounting for heterotic and breed effects in the evaluation. The objectives of this study were to: 1) describe the development of a paternal composite (PC) line, 2) determine the effect of direct and maternal heterosis on growth traits of crossbred lambs, 3) estimate (co)variance components for direct and maternal additive, and uncorrelated maternal environmental, effects, and 4) provide an interpretation of the estimates of random effects of genetic groups, and to use those solutions to compare the genetic merit of founding breed subpopulations. Data included purebred and crossbred records on birth weight (BN; n = 14,536), pre-weaning weight measured at 39 or 84 d (WN; n = 9,362) depending on year, weaning weight measured at 123 d (WW; n = 9,297), and post-weaning weight measured at 252 d (PW; n = 1,614). Mean (SD) body weights were 5.3 (1.1), 16.8 (3.9) and 28.0 (7.6), 39.1 (7.2), and 54.2 (8.7) kg for BN, WN (at the two ages), WW, and PW, respectively. In designed experiments, the Siremax, Suffolk, Texel, Polypay, Columbia, Rambouillet, and Targhee breeds were compared within the same environment. Estimates of heterotic effects and covariance components were obtained using a multiple trait animal model. Genetic effects based on founders' breeds were significant and included in the model. Percent estimates of direct heterosis were 2.89 ± 0.61, 2.60 ± 0.65, 4.24 ± 0.56, and 6.09 ± 0.86, and estimates of maternal heterosis were 1.92 ± 0.87, 4.64 ± 0.80, 3.95 ± 0.66, and 4.04 ± 0.91, for BN, WN, WW, and PW, respectively. Correspondingly, direct heritability estimates were 0.17 ± 0.02, 0.13 ± 0.02, 0.17 ± 0.02, and 0.46 ± 0.04 for BN, WN, WW, and PW. Additive maternal effects accounted for trivial variation in PW. For BN, WN, and WW, respectively, maternal heritability estimates were 0.16 ± 0.02, 0.10 ± 0.02, and 0.07 ± 0.01. Uncorrelated maternal environmental effects accounted for little variation in any trait. Direct and maternal heterosis had considerable impact on growth traits, emphasizing the value of crossbreeding and the need to account for heterosis, in addition to breed effects, if crossbred lamb information is included in genetic evaluation. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  body weight; crossbreeding; heterosis; lambs; multiple-trait animal model; parameter estimates

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35696612      PMCID: PMC9191838          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skac188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.338


  22 in total

1.  Genetic parameter estimates for pre-weaning weight traits in Dorper sheep.

Authors:  F W.C. Neser; G J. Erasmus; J B. van Wyk
Journal:  Small Rumin Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.611

2.  A genetic evaluation of growth, ultrasound, and carcass traits at alternative slaughter endpoints in crossbred heavy lambs.

Authors:  Erin Massender; Luiz F Brito; Angela Cánovas; Christine F Baes; Delma Kennedy; Flavio S Schenkel
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 3.  Chemical composition of distillers grains, a review.

Authors:  KeShun Liu
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 5.279

4.  Breed effects and heterosis for weight traits and tick count in a cross between an indigenous fat-tailed and a commercial sheep breed.

Authors:  S W P Cloete; K Thutwa; A J Scholtz; J J E Cloete; K Dzama; A R Gilmour; J B van Wyk
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 1.559

5.  The U.S. National Sheep Improvement Program: across-flock genetic evaluations and new trait development.

Authors:  D R Notter
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Phenotypic and genetic associations between lamb growth traits and adult ewe body weights in western range sheep.

Authors:  R C Borg; D R Notter; R W Kott
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Connectedness in Targhee and Suffolk flocks participating in the United States National Sheep Improvement Program.

Authors:  L A Kuehn; R M Lewis; D R Notter
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Measuring plant diversity in the tall threetip sagebrush steppe: influence of previous grazing management practices.

Authors:  Steven S Seefeldt; Scott D McCoy
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.266

9.  Breeding objectives for Targhee sheep.

Authors:  R C Borg; D R Notter; L A Kuehn; R W Kott
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Factors affecting birth weight in sheep: maternal environment.

Authors:  D S Gardner; P J Buttery; Z Daniel; M E Symonds
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.906

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.