Literature DB >> 35695137

Lessons learned in the Apple Heart Study and implications for the data management of future digital clinical trials.

Ariadna Garcia1, Vidhya Balasubramanian1, Justin Lee1, Rebecca Gardner1, Santosh Gummidipundi1, Grace Hung1, Todd Ferris1, Lauren Cheung1, Christopher Granger1, Peter Kowey1, John Rumsfeld1, Andrea Russo1, Mellianie Ture Hills1, Nisha Talati1, Divya Nag1, Jeffrey Stein1, David Tsay1, Sumbul Desai1, Kenneth Mahaffey1, Mintu Turakhia1, Marco Perez1, Haley Hedlin1, Manisha Desai1.   

Abstract

The digital clinical trial is fast emerging as a pragmatic trial that can improve a trial's design including recruitment and retention, data collection and analytics. To that end, digital platforms such as electronic health records or wearable technologies that enable passive data collection can be leveraged, alleviating burden from the participant and study coordinator. However, there are challenges. For example, many of these data sources not originally intended for research may be noisier than traditionally obtained measures. Further, the secure flow of passively collected data and their integration for analysis is non-trivial. The Apple Heart Study was a prospective, single-arm, site-less digital trial designed to evaluate the ability of an app to detect atrial fibrillation. The study was designed with pragmatic features, such as an app for enrollment, a wearable device (the Apple Watch) for data collection, and electronic surveys for participant-reported outcomes that enabled a high volume of patient enrollment and accompanying data. These elements led to challenges including identifying the number of unique participants, maintaining participant-level linkage of multiple complex data streams, and participant adherence and engagement. Novel solutions were derived that inform future designs with an emphasis on data management. We build upon the excellent framework of the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative to provide a comprehensive set of guidelines for data management of the digital clinical trial that include an increased role of collaborative data scientists in the design and conduct of the modern digital trial.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial fibrillation; digital clinical trial; digital health; pragmatic trial; wearables

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35695137      PMCID: PMC9378511          DOI: 10.1080/10543406.2022.2080698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biopharm Stat        ISSN: 1054-3406            Impact factor:   1.503


  18 in total

Review 1.  The emerging field of mobile health.

Authors:  Steven R Steinhubl; Evan D Muse; Eric J Topol
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 2.  Using e-technologies in clinical trials.

Authors:  Carmen Rosa; Aimee N C Campbell; Gloria M Miele; Meg Brunner; Erin L Winstanley
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-07-12       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Rationale and design of a large population study to validate software for the assessment of atrial fibrillation from data acquired by a consumer tracker or smartwatch: The Fitbit heart study.

Authors:  Steven A Lubitz; Anthony Z Faranesh; Steven J Atlas; David D McManus; Daniel E Singer; Sherry Pagoto; Alexandros Pantelopoulos; Andrea S Foulkes
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 4.749

4.  Systematic review of smartphone-based passive sensing for health and wellbeing.

Authors:  Victor P Cornet; Richard J Holden
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 6.317

5.  Large-Scale Assessment of a Smartwatch to Identify Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Marco V Perez; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Haley Hedlin; John S Rumsfeld; Ariadna Garcia; Todd Ferris; Vidhya Balasubramanian; Andrea M Russo; Amol Rajmane; Lauren Cheung; Grace Hung; Justin Lee; Peter Kowey; Nisha Talati; Divya Nag; Santosh E Gummidipundi; Alexis Beatty; Mellanie True Hills; Sumbul Desai; Christopher B Granger; Manisha Desai; Mintu P Turakhia
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 176.079

6.  A Review of Persuasive Principles in Mobile Apps for Chronic Arthritis Patients: Opportunities for Improvement.

Authors:  Jonas Geuens; Thijs Willem Swinnen; Rene Westhovens; Kurt de Vlam; Luc Geurts; Vero Vanden Abeele
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.773

7.  Increasing the use of mobile technology-derived endpoints in clinical trials.

Authors:  William G Herrington; Jennifer C Goldsack; Martin J Landray
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 8.  Digitizing clinical trials.

Authors:  O T Inan; P Tenaerts; S A Prindiville; H R Reynolds; D S Dizon; K Cooper-Arnold; M Turakhia; M J Pletcher; K L Preston; H M Krumholz; B M Marlin; K D Mandl; P Klasnja; B Spring; E Iturriaga; R Campo; P Desvigne-Nickens; Y Rosenberg; S R Steinhubl; R M Califf
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-07-31

9.  Rationale and design of a large-scale, app-based study to identify cardiac arrhythmias using a smartwatch: The Apple Heart Study.

Authors:  Mintu P Turakhia; Manisha Desai; Haley Hedlin; Amol Rajmane; Nisha Talati; Todd Ferris; Sumbul Desai; Divya Nag; Mithun Patel; Peter Kowey; John S Rumsfeld; Andrea M Russo; Mellanie True Hills; Christopher B Granger; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Marco V Perez
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 4.749

10.  Beyond the Randomized Controlled Trial: A Review of Alternatives in mHealth Clinical Trial Methods.

Authors:  Quynh Pham; David Wiljer; Joseph A Cafazzo
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 4.773

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.