| Literature DB >> 35694669 |
Beatrice Gabbin1, Viviana Meraviglia1, Christine L Mummery1,2, Ton J Rabelink3,4, Berend J van Meer1, Cathelijne W van den Berg3,4, Milena Bellin1,5,6.
Abstract
Heart and kidney diseases cause high morbidity and mortality. Heart and kidneys have vital functions in the human body and, interestingly, reciprocally influence each other's behavior: pathological changes in one organ can damage the other. Cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) is a group of disorders in which there is combined dysfunction of both heart and kidney, but its underlying biological mechanisms are not fully understood. This is because complex, multifactorial, and dynamic mechanisms are likely involved. Effective treatments are currently unavailable, but this may be resolved if more was known about how the disease develops and progresses. To date, CRS has actually only been modeled in mice and rats in vivo. Even though these models can capture cardiorenal interaction, they are difficult to manipulate and control. Moreover, interspecies differences may limit extrapolation to patients. The questions we address here are what would it take to model CRS in vitro and how far are we? There are already multiple independent in vitro (human) models of heart and kidney, but none have so far captured their dynamic organ-organ crosstalk. Advanced in vitro human models can provide an insight in disease mechanisms and offer a platform for therapy development. CRS represents an exemplary disease illustrating the need to develop more complex models to study organ-organ interaction in-a-dish. Human induced pluripotent stem cells in combination with microfluidic chips are one powerful tool with potential to recapitulate the characteristics of CRS in vitro. In this review, we provide an overview of the existing in vivo and in vitro models to study CRS, their limitations and new perspectives on how heart-kidney physiological and pathological interaction could be investigated in vitro for future applications.Entities:
Keywords: cardiorenal syndrome; disease modeling; hiPSCs; organ-on-chip; tissue-specific organoids
Year: 2022 PMID: 35694669 PMCID: PMC9177996 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.889553
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
Classification of the clinical types of CRS.
| Type 1 | Type 2 | Type 3 | Type 4 | Type 5 | |
| Definition | Acute worsening of heart function leading to kidney injury and/or dysfunction | Chronic abnormalities in heart function leading to kidney injury or dysfunction | Acute worsening of kidney function leading to heart injury and/or dysfunction | Chronic kidney disease leading to heart injury and/or dysfunction | Systemic conditions leading to simultaneous injury and/or dysfunction of heart and kidney |
| Primary events | Acute heart failure | Chronic heart disease (e.g., LV remodeling and dysfunctions or cardiomyopathy) | Acute kidney injury | Chronic kidney disease | Systemic disease (e.g., sepsis, amyloidosis) |
| Secondary events | Acute kidney injury | Chronic kidney disease | Acute heart failure | Chronic heart disease | Acute heart failure |
| Cardiac biomarkers | Troponin, CK-MB, BNP, NT-proBNP, MPO, IMA | BNP, NT-proBNP, C-reactive protein | BNP, NT-proBNP | BNP, NT-proBNP, C-reactive protein | C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, BNP |
| Renal biomarkers | Serum cystatin C, creatinine, NGAL, Urinary KIM-1, IL-18, NGAL, NAG | Serum creatinine, cystatin C, urea, uric acid, C-reactive protein, decreased GFR | Serum creatinine, cystatin C, NGAL, Urinary KIM-1, IL-18, NGAL, NAG | Serum creatinine, cystatin C, urea, uric acid, decreased GFR | Creatinine, NGAL, IL-18, KIM-1, NAG |
The table summarizes the different types of CRS, underlying the primary and secondary events occurring for each subtype. Moreover, the clinically relevant cardiac and renal biomarkers are listed. Adapted from Ronco et al. (
FIGURE 1Mechanisms interplaying in CRS development. Multiple complex and dynamic mechanisms play a role in the occurrence of CRS. SNS/RAAS system activation, oxidative stress, and inflammation as well as tissue remodeling and fibrosis are the main hallmarks of the disease in both (A) cardio-renal and (B) reno-cardiac types of CRS.
In vivo recapitulation of CRS hallmarks.
| Model | Heart to kidney dysfunction | Kidney to heart dysfunction | Combined dysfunction of heart and kidney | SNS/RAAS activation | Oxidative stress and inflammation | Fibrosis and tissue remodeling | References |
| Mouse |
|
| ( | ||||
| Rat |
|
|
| ( | |||
| Mouse |
|
| ( | ||||
| Mouse |
|
|
| ( | |||
| Mouse |
|
| ( | ||||
| Rat |
|
|
| ( | |||
| Mouse |
|
|
| ( | |||
| Transgenic mouse |
|
| ( | ||||
| Transgenic mouse |
|
| ( | ||||
| Rat |
|
|
| ( | |||
| Rat |
|
|
| ( | |||
| Mouse |
|
| ( | ||||
| Mouse |
|
| ( | ||||
| Rat |
|
|
| ( | |||
| Mouse |
|
| ( | ||||
| Rat |
|
| ( | ||||
| Mouse |
|
|
| ( | |||
| Mouse |
|
|
| ( | |||
| Transgenic mouse |
|
|
| ( | |||
| Rat |
|
|
| ( | |||
| Mouse |
|
| ( | ||||
| Mouse |
|
| ( | ||||
| Mouse |
|
| ( | ||||
| Rat |
|
|
|
| ( | ||
| Rat |
|
|
| ( | |||
| Rat |
|
| ( | ||||
| Rat |
|
|
| ( | |||
| Rat |
|
|
| ( | |||
| Rat |
|
| ( | ||||
| Transgenic mouse |
|
| ( | ||||
| Rat |
|
|
|
| ( | ||
| Rat |
|
| ( |
Summarized are the in vivo models where the study of heart and/or kidney dysfunction identified hallmarks characterizing CRS (indicated with dots).
In vitro recapitulation of CRS hallmarks.
| Cell type | Heart | Kidney | SNS/RAAS activation | Oxidative stress and inflammation | Fibrosis and tissue remodeling | References |
| Neonatal rat cardiomyocytes |
|
|
| ( | ||
| Human myocardial tissue homogenates |
|
| ( | |||
| Adult rat ventricular myocytes |
|
| ( | |||
| Neonatal rat ventricular myocytes and fibroblasts |
|
|
| ( | ||
| Human cardiac myocytes and fibroblasts from CKD patients |
|
|
| ( | ||
| Neonatal rat ventricular myocytes and fibroblasts |
|
|
| ( | ||
| Neonatal rat ventricular myocytes and fibroblasts |
|
|
| ( | ||
| Human kidney proximal tubular epithelial cells |
|
|
| ( | ||
| Neonatal rat cardiomyocytes |
|
| ( | |||
| Human cardiac fibroblasts |
|
| ( | |||
| Human cardiac mesenchymal stromal cells and right ventricular endomyocardial bioptic samples from ACM patients |
|
| ( | |||
| Human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes and primary ventricular cardiac fibroblasts |
|
| ( | |||
| Rat proximal tubular epithelial cell line |
|
| ( | |||
| Rat glomerular mesangial cells |
|
| ( | |||
| Rat kidney tubular epithelial cells |
|
| ( | |||
| Human renal glomerular endothelial cells |
|
| ( | |||
| Human nephrectomy-derived cells |
|
| ( | |||
| Human renal proximal tubular epithelial cells and fibroblasts |
|
| ( | |||
| Human renal tubular epithelial cell line |
|
| ( |
Summarized are the in vitro models of heart and kidney where hallmarks characterizing CRS (indicated with dots) were shown.
FIGURE 2Modeling CRS in vitro. There are several approaches for the fabrication of heart and kidney organoids, where aggregation is either based on endogenously-produced extracellular matrix, or addition of scaffold material, or hydrogel. Coupling the engineered organoid constructs into a OoC microfluidic system may allow the establishment of CRS in vitro, supporting the study of the organ-organ interaction and the measurement of important parameters identifying the hallmarks of the disease. The analysis of secreted factors could detect cardio-renal biomarkers, while protein and gene expression may be investigated though Western blot and quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Metabolic assays would serve to detect a significant change in increased oxidative stress. Structural analysis would allow the visualization of phenotypical changes in the organoids. Functional analyses specific to the organoid of interest (e.g. conduction for the heart and filtration rate for the kidney) may also be conducted.