Literature DB >> 3569465

Olfactory bulb responses telemetered during an odor discrimination task in rats.

S J Goldberg, D G Moulton.   

Abstract

Electrodes were chronically implanted in eight rats to record multiple-unit activity during the acquisition and performance of an isoamyl acetate (10(-3) concentration)/air discrimination task in order to obtain a water reward. Localized stimulus choice points permitted each rat to regulate its time of exposure to the two positive reinforcing stimuli. Each rat had stimulus sampling times of much less than 1 s while performing at an 80% or more correct choice level. Whereas four of the rats exhibited only occasional neural activity, probably due to electrode position, the other four developed individual neural burst patterns, after learning, which were different for the two stimuli. Changes in the neural patterns during testing, when they occurred in two of the four responsive animals, appeared to correlate with changes in stimulus sampling. These results confirm that much less than 1 s is needed for odor identification and demonstrate that multiunit activity can show differential response patterns. The results have possible implications for future studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3569465     DOI: 10.1016/0014-4886(87)90060-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Neurol        ISSN: 0014-4886            Impact factor:   5.330


  9 in total

1.  Learning modulates the ensemble representations for odors in primary olfactory networks.

Authors:  Kevin C Daly; Thomas A Christensen; Hong Lei; Brian H Smith; John G Hildebrand
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Temporal dynamics and latency patterns of receptor neuron input to the olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Hartwig Spors; Matt Wachowiak; Lawrence B Cohen; Rainer W Friedrich
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Multiday recordings from olfactory bulb neurons in awake freely moving rats: spatially and temporally organized variability in odorant response properties.

Authors:  U S Bhalla; J M Bower
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.621

4.  Why sniff fast? The relationship between sniff frequency, odor discrimination, and receptor neuron activation in the rat.

Authors:  Daniel W Wesson; Justus V Verhagen; Matt Wachowiak
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  From the top down: flexible reading of a fragmented odor map.

Authors:  Diego Restrepo; Wilder Doucette; Jennifer D Whitesell; Thomas S McTavish; Ernesto Salcedo
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 13.837

6.  Need for related multipronged approaches to understand olfactory bulb signal processing.

Authors:  Diego Restrepo; Jennifer Whitesell; Wilder Doucette
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  Revealing the unique features of each individual's muscle activation signatures.

Authors:  Jeroen Aeles; Fabian Horst; Sebastian Lapuschkin; Lilian Lacourpaille; François Hug
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Profound context-dependent plasticity of mitral cell responses in olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Wilder Doucette; Diego Restrepo
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Rapid encoding and perception of novel odors in the rat.

Authors:  Daniel W Wesson; Ryan M Carey; Justus V Verhagen; Matt Wachowiak
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 8.029

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.