| Literature DB >> 35694544 |
Panhong Liu1,2, Mingyan Fang2,3, Yuxue Luo2, Fang Zheng4, Yan Jin4, Fanjun Cheng5, Huanhuan Zhu2, Xin Jin2,3,6.
Abstract
Host genetic factors have been shown to play an important role in SARS-CoV-2 infection and the course of Covid-19 disease. The genetic contributions of common variants influencing Covid-19 susceptibility and severity have been extensively studied in diverse populations. However, the studies of rare genetic defects arising from inborn errors of immunity (IEI) are relatively few, especially in the Chinese population. To fill this gap, we used a deeply sequenced dataset of nearly 500 patients, all of Chinese descent, to investigate putative functional rare variants. Specifically, we annotated rare variants in our call set and selected likely deleterious missense (LDM) and high-confidence predicted loss-of-function (HC-pLoF) variants. Further, we analyzed LDM and HC-pLoF variants between non-severe and severe Covid-19 patients by (a) performing gene- and pathway-level association analyses, (b) testing the number of mutations in previously reported genes mapped from LDM and HC-pLoF variants, and (c) uncovering candidate genes via protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis of Covid-19-related genes and genes defined from LDM and HC-pLoF variants. From our analyses, we found that (a) pathways Tuberculosis (hsa:05152), Primary Immunodeficiency (hsa:05340), and Influenza A (hsa:05164) showed significant enrichment in severe patients compared to the non-severe ones, (b) HC-pLoF mutations were enriched in Covid-19-related genes in severe patients, and (c) several candidate genes, such as IL12RB1, TBK1, TLR3, and IFNGR2, are uncovered by PPI network analysis and worth further investigation. These regions generally play an essential role in regulating antiviral innate immunity responses to foreign pathogens and in responding to many inflammatory diseases. We believe that our identified candidate genes/pathways can be potentially used as Covid-19 diagnostic markers and help distinguish patients at higher risk.Entities:
Keywords: Covid-19; PPI network analysis; gene-level tests; inborn errors of immunity; pathway-based analysis
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35694544 PMCID: PMC9184678 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.888582
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 6.073
Participant characteristics.
| Number, n (%) | Men, n (%) | Age, average (sd) | Depth, average (sd) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 451 | 21.67 | |||
| 159 (35.25%) | 67 (42.14%) | 58.33 (14.62) | 19.04 (8.94) | |
| 292 (64.75%) | 154 (52.74%) | 64.11 (13.31) | 23.1 (10.43) |
Figure 1The flow diagram of rare variants analysis. A total of 32,232,865 variants were identified from the 451 Covid-19 patients with whole genome sequencing. After filtering by VQSR and MAF, 13,934,341 rare variants were annotated by VEP, and 42,730 candidate variants were included.
Figure 2Quality estimate of the cohort. (A) Heterozygote concordance rate vs. sequencing depth for 218 array-genotyped individuals. The black point and red triangle represent one sample before and after refinement. (B) PCA of 159 non-severe and 292 severe Covid-19 patients. The red and blue represent the severe or non-severe patients.
The pLoF variants identified in Covid-19 patients in 159 candidate genes.
| Gene | SNP | Variant annotation | HGVSc/HGVSp | Genotype | Sample ID | Sex | Age range | Phenotype | Category |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs780744847 | Stop gained | c.1180C>T/p.Arg394Ter | Het | U312 | F | 70-79 | Severe | IFN-genes | |
| rs748584696 | Stop gained | c.853C>T/p.Arg285Ter | Het | U088 | F | 80-89 | Severe | HGI-genes | |
| chr1_155206198_A_C | Splice donor variant | c.286+2T>G | Het | U359 | F | 70-79 | Severe | HGI-genes | |
| rs372635644 | Splice acceptor variant | c.124-1G>A | Het | U429 | F | 60-69 | Severe | HGI-genes | |
| rs770927552 | Frameshift variant | c.209_212del/p.Cys70SerfsTer21 | Het | U422 | F | 80-89 | Severe | HGI-genes | |
| chr6_31112292_C_T | Splice acceptor variant | c.68-1G>A | Het | U107 | M | 60-69 | Severe | HGI-genes | |
| rs777641795 | Splice donor variant | c.1195+1G>A | Het | U012 | M | 40-49 | Non-severe | HGI-genes | |
| chr16_89179469_C_G | Stop gained | c.96C>G/p.Tyr32Ter | Het | U174 | F | 50-59 | Severe | HGI-genes | |
| chr6_31116133_G_GA | Frameshift variant | c.1481dup/p.Cys496LeufsTer20 | Het | U021 | F | 50-59 | Non-severe | HGI-genes | |
| rs541048548 | Frameshift variant | c.1053delC/p.Ala352ArgfsTer11 | Het | U225 | M | 70-79 | Severe | HGI-genes | |
| rs541048548 | Frameshift variant | c.1053delC/p.Ala352ArgfsTer11 | Het | U047 | F | 70-79 | Severe | HGI-genes | |
| rs745851558 | Splice donor variant | c.174+1G>T | Het | U071 | M | 70-79 | Severe | HGI-genes | |
| chr19_48853718_CA_C | Frameshift variant | c.1289delT/p.Leu430ArgfsTer4 | Het | U261 | F | 60-69 | Severe | HGI-genes | |
| chr19_48853720_GCCGGT_G | Frameshift variant | c.1283_1287delACCGG/p.Asp428AlafsTer76 | Het | U261 | F | 60-69 | Severe | HGI-genes | |
| rs768756506 | Frameshift variant | c.1535_1536delAT/p.Tyr512CysfsTer14 | Het | U309 | M | 60-69 | Severe | HGI-genes | |
| rs79153019 | Frameshift variant | c.281delC/p.Pro94LeufsTer35 | Het | U075 | M | 60-69 | Severe | HGI-genes | |
| rs79153019 | Frameshift variant | c.281delC/p.Pro94LeufsTer35 | Het | U150 | M | 60-69 | Severe | HGI-genes | |
| rs79153019 | Frameshift variant | c.281delC/p.Pro94LeufsTer35 | Het | U144 | M | 60-69 | Severe | HGI-genes | |
| chr19_48881045_T_TC | Frameshift variant | c.1528_1529insG/p.Gln510ArgfsTer17 | Het | U176 | F | 70-79 | Severe | HGI-genes |
The comparison of allele frequency for two loci.
| rs777044791 | rs11385942 | |
|---|---|---|
| CHROM | chr3 | chr3 |
| POS (hg38) | 46,266,186 | 45,834,967 |
| ALT | T | GA |
| REF | C | G |
| Variant annotation | Missense variant | Intron variant |
| Severe (N = 292) | 0.005 | 0 |
| Non-severe (N = 159) | 0 | 0 |
| ChinaMAP | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| 1000G_EAS | 0 | 0.005 |
| 1000G_EUR | 0 | 0.0805 |
| 1000G_SAS | 0 | 0.296 |
| 1000G_AFR | 0 | 0.053 |
| gnomAD_EAS | 0.0005 | 0.0006 |
Figure 3The results of protein-protein interaction network analysis. The plot of the PPI network (A) between the “individual variant-driven” genes with the candidate genes, and (B) between the “all variant-driven” genes with the candidate genes.