A semiflow microwave (MW) heating reactor similar to a flow reactor system was developed. Slurry raw materials in the reaction tube were heated continuously and cooled rapidly by moving a thin MW resonator instead of flowing slurry raw materials. From highly viscous mother slurries, Linde-type A (LTA) and faujasite (FAU)-type zeolite nanoparticles of small crystal grains were synthesized quickly. Results show that this heating system can synthesize hydroxy-sodalite (SOD)-type zeolite from coal fly ash particles including those larger than 50 μm. Numerical calculations using the COMSOL Multiphysics program revealed the thermal distribution of liquids of various viscosities using the semiflow MW heating reactor.
A semiflow microwave (MW) heating reactor similar to a flow reactor system was developed. Slurry raw materials in the reaction tube were heated continuously and cooled rapidly by moving a thin MW resonator instead of flowing slurry raw materials. From highly viscous mother slurries, Linde-type A (LTA) and faujasite (FAU)-type zeolite nanoparticles of small crystal grains were synthesized quickly. Results show that this heating system can synthesize hydroxy-sodalite (SOD)-type zeolite from coal fly ash particles including those larger than 50 μm. Numerical calculations using the COMSOL Multiphysics program revealed the thermal distribution of liquids of various viscosities using the semiflow MW heating reactor.
A transition from batch-type to flow-type
production processing
is underway in various industrial fields.[1−11] Flow-type processing reduces the need for separation and purification
of intermediate products and enables continuous processing from raw
material supplies to the final product. Flow processes are being put
to practical use in the fields of petrochemicals, fine chemicals,
and pharmaceutical manufacturing, which are also contributing to energy
cost reduction and environmental load reduction.[12−14]Microwave
(MW) heating, which enables direct and selective heating
of materials, is an effective heat source for constructing efficient
production processes.[15−18] However, using conventional MW equipment, which requires a magnetron
generator, uniform MW irradiation is difficult to provide because
of the output fluctuation.[19,20] Therefore, batch-type
equipment with a stirring mechanism is mainly used. In recent years,
the adoption of a semiconductor-type MW generator has enabled accurate
irradiation in a narrow wavelength band in addition to the reduction
of output fluctuations.[20] The development
of new MW equipment, including flow-type processing, is progressing
rapidly.[21−29]For the past 10 years, we have also developed a flow-type
MW heating
reactor with a cylindrical resonator.[21,23] Its salient
feature is that uniform MW irradiation can be maintained by constantly
feeding back the resonance frequency, which varies depending on the
internal state to the oscillation frequency using a variable-frequency
semiconductor generator. With this mechanism, a stable electromagnetic
field distribution is always maintained on the central axis of the
cylindrical resonator, where the reaction tube is installed. Various
metal nanoparticle syntheses and catalytic reactions were also performed
using this reactor.[25,30,31] Moreover, we have developed another type of flow process: sheet-type
flow processing.[32] It is effective for
reactions involving highly viscous raw material solutions and raw
materials that generate gas, which are difficult to handle with conventional
flow processes that use reaction tubes. For this process, the raw
material solution is held by the capillary phenomenon between the
sheet fibers. Then, MW heating was conducted while transporting the
raw material solution, similarly to a belt conveyor; an example of
its application to metal nanoparticle synthesis was presented.Other examples that are difficult to handle with flow processes
include reactions using slurry under pressure, which requires a closed
system. Slurry raw materials present a risk of clogging in the liquid
feed pump and the pressure-reduction valve. One example is zeolite
particle synthesis. Zeolites, which are porous oxide crystals made
of silica and alumina, are widely used industrially as separation/adsorbents,
catalysts, etc.[33−35] In recent years, zeolite syntheses in flow processes
have been studied actively while undertaking various efforts such
as fluid control using droplet formation or mixing control with a
micromixer.[36−39] Few reports have described flow-MW zeolite synthesis that is able
to produce high yields.[40,41]As presented
herein, we developed a semiflow MW heating reactor
for syntheses using slurry raw materials in closed systems that require
pressurization. This reactor was designed so that flow-type reactors
with rapid homogeneous heating and cooling are producible by moving
a thin cylindrical resonator using a reaction tube similarly to the
flow process. We demonstrated the syntheses of LTA-type and FAU-type
zeolite particles. In addition, zeolite synthesis from coal fly ash
was performed as a synthetic example including larger particles (approximately
50 μm). Furthermore, numerical calculations using the COMSOL
Multiphysics program revealed the thermal distributions in the reaction
tube using a semiflow reactor. By comparing the simulations of MW
heating and conventional heating for various viscosity liquids, the
heat transfer characteristics of this semiflow reactor were ascertained.
Experimental
Section
Semiflow MW Reactor
Figure presents a schematic drawing and the appearance
of the semiflow MW reactor. This reactor consists mainly of a cylindrical
resonator with a moving mechanism, a variable-frequency semiconductor
generator (2.4–2.5 GHz, 0–100 W), and a liquid transfer
unit.[23,42] The resonator’s inner diameter is
designed so that the electromagnetic field distribution on the central
axis of the resonator is maximized. The reaction tube is installed
on the central axis. By feeding back the resonance frequency reflecting
the inner state in the reaction tube to the oscillation frequency,
a homogeneous electromagnetic field distribution is always formed.
In this semiflow reactor, the reaction tube liquid does not flow during
MW heating; instead, the resonator moves. In fact, the resonator was
moved with an X-axis stage (300 mm movable distance)
controlled using a servo motor. As a synthetic procedure, the raw
material slurry is first filled in the reaction tube with a syringe
pump. Subsequently, continuous MW heating is performed while moving
the thin (20 mm) resonator. After MW heating is completed, the ball
valve on the discharge side is opened. Then, the reaction product
is discharged while the next raw material slurry is pumped and the
resonator is returned to the start position. This cycle is repeated.
By alternating the transfer of the slurry and the MW heating, one
can avoid clogging in the pump and in the back pressure valve, which
tend to occur during flow syntheses. During zeolite synthesis, the
magnetic field concentrated TM110 mode was used instead
of the commonly used electric field concentrated mode. In our earlier
studies, TM110 mode MW heating was suitable for highly
conductive liquids such as zeolite raw materials.[32,40] The reaction tube temperature was measured using a radiation thermometer
(TMHX-CNE500-0070E003; Japansensor Corp.) with 0–500 °C
measurable range. The measurement wavelength is 2–6.8 μm,
which is the wavelength range that permeates partially through quartz.
Figure 1
(a) Schematic
drawing and (b) appearance of the semiflow MW reactor.
In this reactor, after the reaction tube is filled with the raw material
slurry to stop the flow, the reaction tube is heated continuously
by moving the resonator. Finally, the reactant is discharged after
the heating is completed. This cycle is repeated.
(a) Schematic
drawing and (b) appearance of the semiflow MW reactor.
In this reactor, after the reaction tube is filled with the raw material
slurry to stop the flow, the reaction tube is heated continuously
by moving the resonator. Finally, the reactant is discharged after
the heating is completed. This cycle is repeated.
Synthetic Conditions of Zeolite Particles
Similarly
to our earlier study,[40] the raw material
slurry for LTA-type zeolite synthesis can be described as follows:
each of 30% colloidal silica, sodium hydroxide, and sodium aluminate
was dissolved in distilled water and mixed in the molar ratios of
Na/Al/Si/H2O = 4:1:1:53. After stirring at room temperature
for 24 h, the slurry was supplied to a quartz reaction tube (ID 4
mm, OD 6 mm) and was heated continuously in the magnetic field by
moving a 2.45 GHz cylindrical resonator (146 mm diameter; 20 mm width)
at 1 mm/s (equivalent to heating time of 20 s). The reaction tube
temperature during the MW irradiation was controlled to 140 °C.
The internal pressure was controlled to around 0.8 MPa. The product
was collected by centrifugation and was washed with pure water several
times by centrifugation. Subsequently, the precipitate was dried at
room temperature. Particle analysis was performed. In addition, to
confirm the slurry temperature, an experiment comparing the surface
temperature of the reaction tube with the internal temperature was
conducted under MW heating at atmospheric pressure. An optical fiber
thermometer (FL-2000; Anritsu Meter Co., Ltd.) was installed in the
reaction tube. The temperature findings were compared with those obtained
from the radiation thermometer. Furthermore, to compare the particle
size distribution, LTA-type zeolite synthesis was performed using
flow-type MW heating (140 °C, 2 min), batch-type MW heating (140
°C, 2 min), and conventional heating (140 °C, 1 h) on the
basis of the synthetic conditions used for our earlier study.[40]The raw material slurry for FAU-type zeolite
synthesis is described as follows: each of 30% colloidal silica, sodium
hydroxide, and sodium aluminate was dissolved in distilled water and
was mixed at molar ratios of Na/Al/Si:/H2O = 4:1:1:90.
After stirring at room temperature for 240 h similarly to our earlier
work,[43] the slurry was supplied to a quartz
reaction tube and was heated continuously in the magnetic field by
moving a cylindrical resonator at 10 mm/min (2 min heating time).
The reaction tube temperature was controlled at 140 °C during
MW irradiation. The internal pressure was controlled around 0.8 MPa.
Then, centrifugation and drying were performed.The raw material
slurry including coal fly ash is described as
follows: after 5 M aqueous sodium hydroxide solution was added to
coal fly ash (JIS standard type IV), the mixture was stirred at room
temperature for 10 min. The amount of coal fly ash contained in the
raw material slurry was about 35 wt %. The speed of the resonator
motion was 2 mm/min (10 min heating time). The reaction tube temperature
during MW irradiation was controlled at 140 °C; the internal
pressure was controlled to around 0.8 MPa. Then, centrifugation and
drying were performed.
Analyses of Semiflow Synthesized Zeolite
Particles
An X-ray diffractometer (XRD, SmartLab; Rigaku
Corp.) was used for
structural analyses. Dynamic light scattering spectroscopy (DLS, ELS-Z;
Otsuka Electronics Co., Ltd.), scanning electron microscopy (SEM,
S-4800; Hitachi High-Technologies Corp.), and transmission electron
microscopy (TEM, TECNAI G2; FEI Co.) were used to analyze the particle
size and shape. The water vapor adsorption isotherm and the nitrogen
adsorption isotherm were obtained, respectively, from the following
apparatus: BELSORP-aqua3 and BELSORP MAX (MicrotracBEL Corp.). Mercury
porosimetry (Autopore 9500; Micromeritics Instrument Corp.) was conducted
to analyze the size distribution of mesopores and macropores in the
LTA-type zeolite sample. In addition, a sine-wave vibro viscometer
(SV-10A; A&D Co. Ltd.) was used to measure the LTA-type raw material
slurry viscosity.
Thermal Distribution of Semiflow Reactor
Obtained by Numerical
Calculation
The thermal distribution of the liquid that absorbed
the electromagnetic energy supplied by the moving resonator was obtained
using a finite element method simulation conducted using the COMSOL
Multiphysics program.[44] On the basis of
the heat transfer and fluid governing equations, numerical calculations
were performed using a model that incorporated heat convection using
a radiofrequency module, a heat transfer module, and a CFD module.
Moreover, by moving the heating zone over time and by performing calculations,
the temperature distribution in the reaction tube was estimated over
time. In addition to MW heating, the temperature distribution under
conventional heating was calculated. In MW heating, the entire liquid
in the resonator generates heat. However, during conventional heating,
heat flows from the outer wall of the reaction tube with an electric
furnace having the same width as the MW resonator. The dielectric
loss coefficient of the liquid used the value of water (10 at 25 °C).
Details of the parameter values used for numerical calculations such
as the reaction tube size are presented in Table .
Table 1
Details of Parameter
Values Used for
Numerical Calculations
parameter
set values
MW power or electric furnace power
10 W
viscosity of liquid
1, 10, 100 mPa·s
resonator width
20 mm
resonator moving speed
1 mm/s
quartz reaction tube inner diameter
4 mm
quartz reaction tube
outer diameter
6 mm
reaction tube length
150 mm
Results and Discussion
LTA-Type Zeolite Synthesis
Using Semiflow MW Reactor
For the LTA-type zeolite synthesis,
the reaction tube was filled
with the raw material slurry (Na/Al/Si/H2O = 4:1:1:53). Semiflow MW synthesis (140
°C, 20 s) was performed while moving the resonator. The reactor
surface temperature was maintained at 140 ± 5 °C during MW heating.
It has been pointed out that the surface temperature of the reaction
tube and the internal temperature differ under MW heating.[45] In the experiment conducted at atmospheric pressure,
when the slurry temperature inside the reaction tube measured by the
optical fiber thermometer was 100 °C, the radiation temperature
on the reaction tube surface was 97–98 °C. Therefore, the
slurry temperature was estimated as about 5–10 °C higher when the
reaction tube outer wall temperature was 140 °C.The slurry
after MW heating appeared to have solid–liquid separation.
Single-phase LTA-type structure was confirmed from the XRD pattern
of the synthetic sample presented in Figure a. Homogeneous particles with approximately
400 nm particle diameter were observed in the SEM image (Figure b). In our earlier
study of flow MW synthesis, homogeneous particles with approximately
400 nm particle diameter were observed.[40] Also, 500–1000 nm particles were
obtained from batch MW heating and conventional heating.[40] Even in the particle size distribution obtained
from DLS, the particles synthesized by flow and semiflow MW heating
were smaller than the particles synthesized by batch MW and conventional
heating (Figure c).
During the particle synthesis process, rapid and homogeneous heating
by MW caused more nucleation than conventional heating.[34] Subsequently, because it was cooled rapidly
after maintaining a uniform heating field in the flow and semiflow
MW heating synthesis, it was presumed that the dissolution of microcrystals
and the regrowth of particles because of Ostwald ripening were suppressed.[40] Consequently, LTA-type zeolite particles having
smaller particle size were obtained from semiflow synthesis as well
as from flow MW synthesis. Additionally, heating times of several
minutes to several tens of minutes are necessary for batch MW heating
and conventional heating. Therefore, this reactor can synthesize LTA-type
zeolite particles during the short time of 20 s. In the TEM image,
many small grains were observed on the inner side of the rigid cubic-shaped
particles on the outside (Figure d). Furthermore, the small grain size was similar to
that of crystal grains of the mesoporous LTA-type zeolite reported
earlier from flow synthesis.[40] Pore size
data obtained using a mercury porosimeter indicated that mesopores
and macropores were formed in addition to the micropores (Figure e). The water vapor
adsorption isotherm confirmed that, in addition to water adsorption
by micropores with RH of less than 20%, water adsorption also presented
in the mesopore region with RH of 20% or more (Figure f). The description above revealed that LTA-type
zeolites having similar features to those synthesized in the flow
system are obtainable in the semiflow system. From these experiment
results, one syringe pump was used. After MW heating, the synthetic
sample was extruded by supplying a raw material slurry in an amount
slightly smaller than the volume of the reaction tube. Therefore,
it is presumed that a synthetic sample with a longer heating time
was mixed. By supplying and discharging the slurry using separate
pumps, higher-quality synthesis can be achieved. In this reactor system,
the semiflow synthesis cycle can be conducted continuously and repeatedly
using a double piston pump.
Figure 2
(a) XRD pattern, (b) SEM image, (c) particle
size distribution
obtained by DLS, (d) TEM image, (e) pore size distribution measured
using a mercury porosimeter, and (f) water vapor adsorption isotherm
for semiflow MW synthesized LTA-type zeolite. The raw material solution,
which is Na/Al/Si/H2O = 4:1:1:53, was stirred at room temperature
for 24 h.
(a) XRD pattern, (b) SEM image, (c) particle
size distribution
obtained by DLS, (d) TEM image, (e) pore size distribution measured
using a mercury porosimeter, and (f) water vapor adsorption isotherm
for semiflow MW synthesized LTA-type zeolite. The raw material solution,
which is Na/Al/Si/H2O = 4:1:1:53, was stirred at room temperature
for 24 h.
Nanosized FAU-Type Zeolite
Synthesis Using a Semiflow MW Reactor
Subsequently, semiflow
MW synthesis of FAU-type zeolite was conducted
under conditions similar to those used for LTA-type zeolite synthesis
except that the raw material slurry, aging time, and MW heating time
differed. The reaction tube was filled with the raw material slurry
(Na/Al/Si/H2O = 4:1:1:90, stirred at room temperature
for 240 h). Semiflow MW synthesis (140 °C, 120 s) was performed.
The FAU-type zeolite single phase was confirmed from the XRD pattern
(Figure a). From the
TEM images presented in Figure b,c, the formation of crystal particles having 10–30 nm particle diameter
was confirmed. The lattice fringe shows that each nanoparticle was
well-crystallized. Nitrogen adsorption measurements were taken to
investigate the pore characteristics. Pore volumes in the micropore
(P/P0 ≤ 0.1),
mesopore (0.1 < P/P0 ≤ 0.96), and macropore regions (0.96 < P/P0 ≤ 0.99) were, respectively,
0.24, 0.54, and 0.50 cm3/g. The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller
(BET) surface area was 670 m2/g (Figure d). Furthermore, the pore size distribution
of the mesopore calculated using the BJH method is shown in Figure e. A broad peak visible
at around 44 nm is probably attributable to interstices among the
nanoparticles. Reportedly, homogeneous microcrystal nuclei were generated
by aging treatment of the raw material slurry. Nanosized FAU-type
zeolites having 10–15 nm particle size were synthesized.[46] Semiflow MW synthesized particles had a greater
specific surface area than the earlier report value of 180 m2/g,[46] which suggests that this semiflow
heating system formed fine homogeneous particles including less-amorphous
particles. The discussion presented above showed that the semiflow
MW heating system presents benefits for nanosized zeolite synthesis
with large specific surface area.
Figure 3
(a) XRD pattern, (b and c) TEM images,
(d) nitrogen adsorption
isotherm, and (e) pore size distribution of the mesopore by the BJH
method for semiflow MW synthesized FAU-type zeolite. The raw material
solution is Na/Al/Si/H2O = 4:1:1:90, which was stirred at room
temperature for 240 h.
(a) XRD pattern, (b and c) TEM images,
(d) nitrogen adsorption
isotherm, and (e) pore size distribution of the mesopore by the BJH
method for semiflow MW synthesized FAU-type zeolite. The raw material
solution is Na/Al/Si/H2O = 4:1:1:90, which was stirred at room
temperature for 240 h.
Zeolite Synthesis from
Coal Fly Ash Using a Semiflow MW Reactor
For synthesis from
raw materials containing large particles (approximately
50 μm), slurry transfer becomes difficult because of sedimentation,
which makes flow synthesis even more difficult. Semiflow synthesis
of zeolite from coal fly ash was conducted as an illustrative example.
Zeolite synthesis using coal fly ash can be performed in tens of minutes
to several hours when using MW heating, whereas conventional heating
requires several hours to several tens of hours. Therefore, it has
been studied actively using MW heating in recent years.[47] Sodium hydroxide aqueous slurry including coal
fly ash was filled in a reaction tube. Then semiflow MW synthesis
was conducted at 140 °C for 10 min. Figure a shows the XRD patterns obtained for coal
fly ash particles before and after MW heating. After MW heating, in
addition to the peaks of quartz and mullite contained in the raw materials,
which were mixtures confirmed in the earlier study,[48] SOD-type zeolite peaks were confirmed. The SEM images presented
in Figure b,c show
that the surface areas of particles were greater after MW heating
because of undulations on the particle surface. In this synthesis,
sedimentation of the particles was observed during MW heating. For
maintaining a homogeneous slurry state, one must take measures such
as vibrating of the reactor tube, as reported in the literature.[49] However, this reactor can shorten the synthesis
time. Therefore, it is valuable for synthesis with a raw material
slurry that is prone to precipitate.
Figure 4
(a) XRD pattern and (b and c) SEM images
of coal fly ash particles
before and after semiflow MW heating.
(a) XRD pattern and (b and c) SEM images
of coal fly ash particles
before and after semiflow MW heating.
Thermal Distribution of Semiflow MW Heating Reactor Obtained
by Numerical Calculations
Numerical calculations were performed
to obtain general insight into the heating characteristics of the
semiflow MW reactor. First, we compared the heat distribution of a
liquid in the reaction tube with and without consideration of heat
convection. We also compared it with conventional heating (CH), by
which heat flows in from the outer wall of the reaction tube. Parts
a and b of Figure show the thermal distribution obtained when a liquid with a viscosity
of 1 mPa·s, which is equivalent to
pure water, is heated while moving the resonator to a 0–90 mm position without consideration
of heat convection. In MW heating, the temperature of the central
part in the reaction tube became high. In CH, the temperature near
the outer wall became high. The central part of the reaction tube
tended to be heated with a delay. Considering heat convection, the
upper side of the central axis of the reaction tube was heated easily
by MW heating, presuming that ascending flow was generated (Figure c). In CH, the central
part of the reaction tube tended to be difficult to heat (Figure d). Figure e shows the temperature distribution
at the central axis of the reaction tube after heating as 0–90 s. Actually, MW heating
shows a steeper curve than CH. These findings confirmed that the temperature
of the narrow area in the reaction tube rises sharply. Next, we investigated
the liquid viscosity effects on the heat distribution. Parts a–c
of Figure show the
thermal distribution by MW heating calculated at viscosities of 1,
10, and 100 mPa·s. Parts d–f of Figure show the thermal
distribution by CH calculated using the same viscosities. Higher viscosities
are associated with less ascending flow and greater uniform thermal
distribution. Furthermore, its characteristics were clearer for MW
heating than for CH. The results presented above clarified that more
homogeneous MW heating can be achieved using a reaction tube with
inner diameter that incorporates consideration of the viscosity of
the raw material liquids. In our experiment, the viscosity of the
raw material slurry used in the LTA-type zeolite synthesis was 27.2 mPa·s (at 25 °C), which
has a certain degree of viscosity. It is therefore suitable for synthesis
with this semiflow MW reactor. From the viewpoint of the mass transfer,
the raw material slurry was not mechanically stirred during MW heating.
However, a single-phase material was obtained by X-ray diffraction
of the LTA-type zeolite. Because numerical calculation results indicated
local agitation from heat convection, the mass transfer which was
presumed to be necessary for particle synthesis was conducted. When
synthesizing materials using this semiflow system, it is noteworthy
that raw materials with a higher viscosity showed better uniformity
of heating, but more mass transfer is suppressed.
Figure 5
Thermal distribution
of semiflow reactor when the resonator moves
from 0 to 90 mm: (a) MW heating and (b) conventional heating (CH)
without considering heat convection, (c) MW heating, and (d) CH considering
heat convection. (e) Heat distribution in the reaction tube considering
heat convection by MW heating and CH. The displayed time is the elapsed
time from the start of heating. The liquid viscosity was calculated
as 1 mPa·s.
Figure 6
Effects
of liquid viscosity (μ) on thermal distribution of
semiflow reactor when the resonator moves from 0 to 90 mm: (a) MW
heating, μ = 1 mPa·s; (b) MW heating, μ
= 10 mPa·s; (c) MW heating, μ
= 100 mPa·s; (d) CH, μ = 1 mPa·s; (e) CH, μ = 10 mPa·s; and (f) CH, μ =
100 mPa·s.
Thermal distribution
of semiflow reactor when the resonator moves
from 0 to 90 mm: (a) MW heating and (b) conventional heating (CH)
without considering heat convection, (c) MW heating, and (d) CH considering
heat convection. (e) Heat distribution in the reaction tube considering
heat convection by MW heating and CH. The displayed time is the elapsed
time from the start of heating. The liquid viscosity was calculated
as 1 mPa·s.Effects
of liquid viscosity (μ) on thermal distribution of
semiflow reactor when the resonator moves from 0 to 90 mm: (a) MW
heating, μ = 1 mPa·s; (b) MW heating, μ
= 10 mPa·s; (c) MW heating, μ
= 100 mPa·s; (d) CH, μ = 1 mPa·s; (e) CH, μ = 10 mPa·s; and (f) CH, μ =
100 mPa·s.
Conclusion
We developed a semiflow MW reactor able to perform
material synthesis
similarly to a flow MW reactor by moving the resonator instead of
the raw material. This developed reactor is effective for processes
that use slurry raw materials that are difficult to handle using conventional
flow processes. Results indicate that the LTA-type zeolite has features
similar to those of material synthesized using the flow reactor. Furthermore,
the synthesis of nanosized FAU-type zeolite with a large specific
surface area was achieved, which revealed that the semiflow MW reactor
presents benefits for synthesizing nanocrystals from raw materials
that entail difficulties, which hinder processing in a flow reactor.
This developed reactor was also suitable for syntheses, including
syntheses of large particles such as zeolite synthesis from coal fly
ash. Numerical calculations show that homogeneous heating can be achieved
using a reaction tube with an inner diameter that includes consideration
of the raw material slurry viscosity. This process is a promising
candidate not only for zeolite particle synthesis but also for various
chemical processes, especially those for which slurry raw materials
present barriers that hinder process construction.