| Literature DB >> 35694165 |
Mian Anjum Murtaza1, Shafeeqa Irfan1, Iram Hafiz2, Muhammad Modassar A N Ranjha1, Abdul Rahaman3, Mian Shamas Murtaza4, Salam A Ibrahim5, Shahida Anusha Siddiqui6,7.
Abstract
Background: In recent years, researchers have focused on functional ingredients, functional foods, and nutraceuticals due to the rapidly increasing interest in bioactive components, especially in bioactive peptides. Dairy proteins are a rich and balanced source of amino acids and their derived bioactive peptides, which possess biological and physiological properties. In the dairy industry, microbial fermentation and enzymatic hydrolysis are promising methods for producing bioactive peptides because of their rapid efficiency, and mild reaction conditions. However, these methods utilize less raw material, take long reaction time, result in low yields, and low activity products when used alone, which pose industry to seek for novel methods as pretreatments to increase the yield of bioactive peptides. Scope and Approach: This review emphasizes the production of peptides from the dairy proteins and discusses the potential use of novel technologies as pretreatments to conventional methods of bioactive peptides production from dairy proteins, including the mechanisms of novel technologies along with respective examples of use, advantages, limitations, and challenges to each technology. Key Findings andEntities:
Keywords: bioactive peptides production; dairy proteins; enzymatic hydrolysis; fermentation; green technologies; ultrasound-assisted extraction
Year: 2022 PMID: 35694165 PMCID: PMC9178506 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.780151
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
FIGURE 1Schematic diagram of the production of bioactive peptides from dairy products.
FIGURE 2Novel and conventional methods of bioactive peptides production from dairy proteins.
FIGURE 3Major milk components with bioactive potential.
Bioactive peptides released from milk proteins by various microorganisms and microbial enzymes.
| References | Microorganisms/Microbial enzyme | Protein fragment | Amino acid sequence | Bioactivity |
| Mudgil et al. ( | Alcalase and pronase E | NR | FLWPEYGAL, LPTGWLM, MFE, GPAHCLL HLPGRG, QNVLPLH, PLMLP | Anti-diabetic [inhibition of α-amylase (AA), α-glucosidase (AG), and dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-IV)] |
| Shanmugam et al. ( | Pepsin, trypsin, chymotrypsin and their combination | α S1 Casein | HIQKEDVPSER, EDVPSER | ACE inhibitory |
| α S2 Casein | EQLSTSEENSK, NPWDQVK, YQGPIVLNPWDQVK, RNAVPITPTL, NAVPITPTLNR, NAVPITPTL | |||
| β Casein | IHPFAQTQSL, YQEPVLGPVR, VLPVPQK, YPVEPFTESQSL | |||
| κ Casein | YIPIQYVLSR, YPSYGLNYYQQKPVAL, HPHPHLSF | |||
| Baba et al. ( | Pepsin | NR | PAGNFLMNGLMHR, PAVACCLPPLPCHM, MLPLMLPFTMGY, PAGNFLPPVAAAPVM | α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibitory |
| Khajeh et al. ( | NR | IAGKCGLVPVL, AASKKSVRW, CTTSPAESSKCAQ, ECIQAISTEKADAVT, LRPIAAEV, GTENNPQTH, KSCHTGL, …, RRCSTSP | Antimicrobial | |
| Panchal et al. ( | NR | SCQDQPTTLAR, TIDMESTEVFTKK, YIQKEDVPSER | Antioxidative | |
| Liu et al. ( | Alcalase Trypsin | Yak-CN | RELEEL, GKEKVNEL, LPVPQ, HPHPHL, VLPVP, VPYPQ | Antioxidative |
| Parmar et al. ( | CASA1_CAPHI Alpha-S1-casein OS | LARPKHPINHRGLSPE, ENSGKTTMPLW | ACE inhibitory Antihypertensive | |
| CASA2_ CAPHI Alpha-S2-casein OS | TEEEKNRLNFLKKISQY, PEEIKITVDDKHYQKALNEI | |||
| Zhao et al. ( | αS1- CN (f106–117) | YLGYLEQLLRLK | Antimicrobial | |
| Guzmán-Rodríguez et al. ( | β-CN κ-CN | NR | Iron binding Antithrombotic | |
| Wali et al. ( | Trypsin Pepsin Alcalase Papain | NR | RLDGQGRPRVWLGR TPDNIDIWLGGIAEPQVKR VAYSDDGENWTEYRDQGAVEGK | Antioxidative |
| Jiang et al. ( | Trypsin | α-La (113–117), (115–123), (109–122), (94–108), (99–114), (63–79), (80–98) | KILDK, LDQWLCEKL, ALCSEKLDQWLCEK, KILDKVGINYWLAHK, VGINYWLAHKALCSEK, NDQDPHSSNICNISCDK, FLDDDLTDDIMCVKKILLDK | Antioxidative |
| β-Lg (149–162), (61–75), (125–141), (102–124) | LSFNPTQLEEQCHI WENGECAQKKIIAEK TPEVDDEALEKFDKALK YLLFCMENSAEPEQSLACQCLVR | |||
| Özturk and Akin ( | α-La β-Lg | NR | Antithrombotic | |
| Elkhtab et al. ( | Lactic acid bacteria strains | κ-CN | LVESPPELNTVQ, VLESPPELN, RSYPSYGIN | ACE inhibitory Antihypertensive |
| β-CN | DQIHPFAQTK | |||
| Kombucha culture | αS1-CN | AVPQEVLNENLLR, FVAPEPFVFGKEK | ||
| αS2-CN | KFKGFVEPFPAVE, VAPFPEVFGK | |||
| β-CN | LVYPFPGPLH, LVYPFPGLPAAPVLPQ | |||
| Capriotti et al. ( |
| β-CN (205–209) | FPIIV | ACE inhibitory |
NR, not reported; α
Bioactive peptides identified in fermented dairy products.
| References | Product | Protein fragment | Amino acid sequence | Bioactivity |
| Yousefi et al. ( | Iranian ultrafiltered white cheese | αS1-CN (1–6) αS1-CN (102–108) | RPKHPI, KKYNVPQ | ACE inhibitory |
| β-CN (f205–209), (f126–133), (f114–121), (f57–68), (f193–209) | FPIIV, FPKYPVEP, YPVEPFTE, SLVYPFPGPIHN, YQEPVLGPVRGPFPIIV | |||
| Kim et al. ( | Fermented milk | NR | ATISAG | Lipase Inhibitory |
| Mullaiselvan et al. ( | Cultured dairy product | αs1-CN αs2-CN β-CN | NR | Casein phosphopeptide Immunomodulatory |
| Timón et al. ( | Hard cow milk cheese | αs1-CN β-CN | EIVPN, DKIHPF, VAPFPQ | Antioxidative |
| Fan et al. ( | Fermented casein | α-La (113–117), (115–123), (109–122), (94–108), (99–114), (63–79), (80–98) | KILDK, LDQWLCEKL, ALCSEKLDQWLCEK, KILDKVGINYWLAHK, VGINYWLAHKALCSEK, NDQDPHSSNICNISCDK, FLDDDLTDDIMCVKKILLDK | Antioxidative |
| β-Lg (149–162), (61–75), (125–141), (102–124) | LSFNPTQLEEQCHI WENGECAQKKIIAEK TPEVDDEALEKFDKALK YLLFCMENSAEPEQSLACQCLVR | |||
| Baptista et al. ( | Prato cheese | β-CN (f194–209) | NR | ACE inhibitory |
| Daliri et al. ( | Fermented whey proteins | αS1-CN (f10–23), (f10–22), (f1–23), (f14–23), (f10–21), (f24–34), (f24–38), (f80–98) | GLPQEVLNENLLRF, GLPQEVLNENLLR, RPKHPIKHQGLPQEVLNENLLRF, EVLNENLLRF, GLPQEVLNENLL, FVAPFPEVFGK, VAPFPEVFGK, FVAPFPEVFGKEKVNEL, HIQKEDVPSERYLGYLEQL | ACE inhibitory Antihypertensive |
| β-CN (f1–27), (f1–25), (f1–22), (f1–24), (f192–209), (f193–209), (f193–208), (f194–209), (f195–209), (f83–95) | RELEELNVPGEIVESL, RELEELNVPGEIVE, RELEELNVPGE, RELEELNVPGEIV, LYQEPVLGPVRGPFPIIV, YQEPVLGPVRGPFPIIV, YQEPVLGPVRGPFPII, QEPVLGPVRGPFPIIV, EPVLGPVRGPFPIIV, VVPPFLQPEVMGV | |||
| κ-CN (f161–169), (f155–169), (f149–169), (f151–169), (f159–169), (f152–169), (f150–169), (f157–169), (f151–169), (f151–165), (f151–163), (f149–162), (f149–163), (f151–162), (f116–141), (f109–151), (f106–149) | TVQVTSTAV, SPPEINTVQVTSTAV, SPEVIESPPEINTVQVTSTAV, EVIESPPEINTVQVTSTAV, INTVQVTSTAV, VIESPPEINTVQVTSTAV, PEVIESPPEINTVQVTSTAV, PEINTVQVTSTAV, EVIESPPEINTVQVTSTAV, EVIESPPEINTVQVT, EVIESPPEINTVQ, SPEVIESPPEIN, SPEVIESPPEINTVQ, EVIESPPEIN, MAIPPKKNQDKTEIPTINTIASGEPT, PPKKNQDKTEIPTINTIASGEPT-STPTTEAVESTVATLEDSPE, MAIPPKKNQDKTEIPTINTIASGE-PTSTPTTEAVESTVATLED | |||
| β-lg (f130–149), (f130–146), (f130–145), (f1–11), (f153–162), (f147–156), (f1–11), (f1–12), (f153–162), (f147–156), (f1–10) | DEALEKFDKALKALPMHIRL, DEALEKFDKALKALPMH, DEALEKFDKALKALPM, LIVTQTMKGLD, PTQLEEQCHI, IRLSFNPTQL, LIVTQTMKGL, LIVTQTMKGLD, PTQLEEQCH, IRLSFNPTQL, LIVTQTMKGL, | |||
| Lactophorin (PP3) (f1–18), (f1–17), (f57–67), (f54–67) | ILNKPEDETHLEAQPTDA, ILNKPEDETHLEAQPTD, QPQSQNPKLPL, SSRQPQSQNPKLPL | |||
| PIGR (f383–404) | PGRPTGYSGSSKALVSTLVPLA | |||
| UP (GP2) (f455–473) | SEGVAIDPARVLDLGPITR | |||
| Pérez-Escalante et al. ( | Commercial fermented milks | α-La β-Lg | NR | Antithrombotic |
| Özturk et al. ( | Goat milk Tulum cheese Cow milk Tulum cheese | NR | NR | Antimicrobial |
| Rafiq et al. ( | Cow Cheddar cheese Buffalo cheddar cheese | α-CN β-CN | NR | Antihypertensive Antithrombotic |
| Padghan et al. ( | Fermented Milks (Lassi) | β-CN (f47–56), (f47–57), (f199–209), (f176–182), (f176–183), (f176–184), (f1–7), (f57–68), (f166–175), (f195–206), (f195–207), (f195–209), (f94–106), (f169–176) | NR | ACE inhibitory Immunomodulatory Antioxidative Opioid Cytomodulatory |
| Jin et al. ( | Yogurt | β-CN (f1–27), (f1–25), (f1–22), (f1–24), (f192–209), (f193–209), (f193–208), (f194–209), (f195–209) | RELEELNVPGEIVESL, RELEELNVPGEIVE, RELEELNVPGE, RELEELNVPGEIV, LYQEPVLGPVRGPFPIIV, YQEPVLGPVRGPFPIIV, YQEPVLGPVRGPFPII, QEPVLGPVRGPFPIIV, EPVLGPVRGPFPIIV | ACE inhibitory Antihypertensive |
| Sah et al. ( | Symbiotic yoghurt | β-CN | YQEPVLGPVRGPFPIIV, SLPQNIPPLTQTPVVVPPF | Antiproliferative Antioxidative |
| Dabarera et al. ( | Curd Whey | Di and tripeptides Penta-octapeptides | Closely similar to YGGFM YGGFL, IPI | ACE inhibitory Antihypertensive |
NR, not reported; α
Applications of ultrasound- assisted processing for the production of bioactive peptides.
| References | Protein source | Equipment | Type of treatment | Treatment conditions | Peptides/hydrolyzate size | Major findings |
| Abadía-García et al. ( | Whey proteins | Probe ultrasound homogenizer | The high intensity ultrasound (HIUS) pretreatment before enzymatic hydrolysis (bromelain) | The ultrasonic pretreatment at 500 W, 20 kHz, 25 and 50% amplitude, 10 min | Higher concentration of peptides with a molecular weight below 5 kDa was found when ultrasound pretreatment was applied. | In comparison to control, both HIUS pretreatments resulted reduced the IC50 value in hydrolyzates, small size fractions (1 and 3 kDa) showed highest ACE inhibition activity, and significant changes were observed in structure of whey protein. |
| Koirala et al. ( | Caprine milk protein | Probe sonicator | The ultrasonic pretreatment before enzymatic hydrolysis (pepsin and neutral protease) | 200 W power, 24 kHz frequency and a fixed cycle of 0.5 | Ultrasonic pre-treated caprine milk proteins had a higher degree of hydrolysis with neutral protease at 360 min and with pepsin at 300 min. The molecular weight of peptides after sonication was not measured. | The ultrasonication pretreatment increased the soluble protein concentration in caprine milk, enhanced peptides and protein hydrolyzates production, and accelerated unfolding of complex insoluble protein structure into a simpler soluble matrix, and increased bioactive antioxidant and ACE-inhibitory activities. |
| Cui et al. ( | Milk protein | Multi-mode ultrasonic | The ultrasonic pretreatment before enzymatic hydrolysis (neutral protease) | Single frequency 28 kHz, various times ranging 10–60 min, different levels of ultrasound density between 10 and 50 W/L at initial temperature 30°C. | Ultrasonic pre-treated milk proteins had a higher degree of hydrolysis than the non-ultrasound samples. The molecular weight of peptides after sonication was not measured. | Compared with control and non-ultrasonic samples, the ultrasonic pretreatment showed significantly increased ACE inhibitory activity of milk protein (28 kHz, 20 W, and 40 min). Also, secondary structure studies showed reduced content of α-helix and β-corner, increased content of β-folding, and random coil in ultrasonic treated milk proteins. And, increased surface hydrophobicity and the content of free sulfhydryl, reduced content of disulfide bond in ultrasonic pretreated milk protein. |
| Munir et al. ( | Cheddar cheese | Probe sonicator | The ultrasonic pretreatment of milk before cheddar cheese manufacturing and compared with control and other processing techniques. | 80% amplitude 20 kHz frequency at <40°C. Applied in two levels: US-1 (21 J/g calorimetric power) & US-2 (41 J/g) | The molecular weight of peptides after sonication was not measured. | In comparison to control, both levels of ultrasonic treatments increased the proteolysis process of cheese as well as fat content, ACE-inhibition activity, total phenolics, total flavonoids, antioxidant and DPPH scavenging activities of the cheddar cheese during ripening. |
| Lorenzetti et al. ( | Whey protein isolate | Ultrasonic tip sonicator | The ultrasonic pretreatment before enzymatic hydrolysis (low purity enzymes: pepsin and papain) | 20 kHz frequency, pepsin (4 min at 400 W), papain (2 min at 300 W) | The highest degree of hydrolysis reported from pepsin. The molecular weight of peptides after sonication was not measured. | The ultrasonic pretreatment reduced the 6 h in the process. The highest degree of hydrolysis occurred with the use of pepsin (10 h, 37°C, and pH 2.5). After partial enzymatic hydrolysis and ultrasound pretreatment a higher proportion of low molar mass peptides were observed at 1,000–2,000 g.mol–1. |
| Abadía-García et al. ( | Whey protein | Ultrasound homogenizer | The ultrasonic pretreatment before enzymatic hydrolysis (vegetable proteases) | 20 kHz frequency, 750 W nominal power, amplitude between 30 and 60%. | The molecular weight of peptides after sonication was not measured. | The results showed that ultrasound density exerted a significant effect on proteolysis increased the ACE inhibition by 13% and a 95% reduction of hydrolysis time in bromelain hydrolyzates. Also, changes in denaturation enthalpy (ΔH), reduction of reactive thiol groups and changes in secondary structure suggest protein rearrangements and aggregate formation. |
| Uluko et al. ( | Milk protein concentrate (MPC) | Cell disruptor | The ultrasonic pretreatment before enzymatic hydrolysis with digestive enzymes (pepsin and trypsin) and compared with thermal and microwave pre-treatments. | Different combination of pretreatments were set. The ultrasonic pretreatment at 90°C, US at 800 W and 20 kHz for 10 min. Samples were jacketed with ice during treatment. Control received no pretreatment. | The molecular weight of peptides after sonication was not measured. | Compared with the control and other treatments, US pretreated samples showed the highest radical scavenging activity (EC50 = 0.283 mg mL–1) and had the highest number of hydrophobic peptides. |
| Uluko et al. ( | Milk protein concentrate (MPC) | Ultrasonic homogenizer | The ultrasonic pretreatment before enzymatic hydrolysis (neutrase) | Different combinations of independent variables were set (pre-treatment time, hydrolysis time, and enzyme/substrate (E/S) ratio) | The optimal ultrasonic pre- treatment significantly increased the degree of hydrolysis. | According to response surface analysis, the highest ACE inhibitory activity (IC50 = 0.044 mg mL–1) could be achieved by 4.11 min, 2.32 h and 2.33% for ultrasound pretreatment time, hydrolysis time and E/S ratio, respectively. Also, the ultrasound pretreatment has a significant effect on ACE inhibition of enzyme hydrolyzates from MPC during enzymatic hydrolysis with digestive enzymes. |
Applications of microwave-assisted processing for the production of bioactive peptides.
| References | Protein source | Equipment | Type of treatment | Treatment conditions | Peptides/hydrolyzate size | Major findings |
| Munir et al. ( | Cheddar cheese | Microwave oven | The microwave pretreatment of milk before cheddar cheese manufacturing and compared with control and other processing techniques. | Temperature <40°C, specific energy 86.5 J/g | The molecular weight of peptides after microwave treatment was not measured. | In comparison to control, MA showed increased antioxidant activity and ACE-inhibitory potential of cheese. However, ultrasound was the most effective pre-treatment to improve the antioxidant capacity of cheddar cheese during ripening. |
| El Mecherfi et al. ( | Bovine whey proteins | Microwave device consisted of a solid-state microwave generator | Microwave pre-treatment followed by proteolysis (pepsin), and compared with conventional heating. | Different microwave temperatures conditions at 37, 50, 65, and 70°C for 30 min and microwave power was not reported | The highest degree of hydrolysis reported from pepsin compared to conventional heating. Whey proteins showed two major bands with molecular weights: 18 kDa bovine beta-lactoglobulin and 14 kDa alpha-lactalbumin. | The microwave heating process in concomitance with enzymatic proteolysis improved the susceptibility of resistant proteins (BLG) to pepsinolysis. Also, hydrolyzed whey protein hydrolyzates were obtained by MA only at 65°C and in a shorter time compared with the conventional thermal treatment. |
| Uluko et al. ( | Milk protein concentrate (MPC) | Microwave | Microwave pre-treatment followed by enzymatic hydrolysis with digestive enzymes (pepsin and trypsin) and compared with thermal and ultrasound pre-treatments. | Samples were microwaved for 10 min and microwave power was not reported | The peptides have been concentrated in the filtrates of 5 kDa molecular weight | Microwave pretreated filtrates (<5 kDa) improved the radical scavenging activity compared to control; however, when microwave pretreatment was used in combination with other treatments, the samples showed lower radical scavenging activity than the control. Ultrasound was the most effective pre-treatment to improve the antioxidant capacity of milk protein concentrate. |
| Chen et al. ( | Bovine serum albumin (BSA) | MAS-II Smart Microwave Digestion System | Continuous microwave-assisted protein digestion with an immobilized enzyme (trypsin) | Continuous microwave power at 100–700 W for 5–20 min for BSA digestion. | The molecular weight of the BSA- derived peptides ranged from 3 to 14 kDa (at 300, 500, and 700 W) | The bioactivity of peptides was not measured. Continuous microwave- assisted enzymatic digestion with immobilized enzyme was a fast and efficient digestion method for protein. Different levels of microwave power significantly affected the number of peptides obtained from the BSA. |
| Izquierdo et al. ( | Bovine whey protein concentrate (WPC) | Oven MDS-2000 | Microwave pre-treatment followed by proteolysis (pronase, chymotrypsin, papain, corolases 7089 and PN-L 100, alcalase and, neutrase) | 532 W, 40 or 50°C during 5 min | The molecular weight of peptides after microwave treatment was not measured. | Microwave irradiation (MWI) treatment enhanced the enzymatic hydrolysis of bovine WPC. Pronase and Papain showed the highest proteolysis under MWI followed by Alcalase. |
Applications of high-pressure processing for the production of bioactive peptides.
| References | Protein source | Equipment | Type of treatment | Treatment conditions | Peptides/hydrolyzate size | Major findings |
| Landim et al. ( | Whey protein concentrate (WPC) | High hydrostatic pressure equipment | The HPP pretreatment of WPC | Different pressure (100, 250, and 400 MPa) and time (5, 20, and 35 min) levels for each treatment | The molecular weight of peptides after HPP treatment was not measured. | As compared to conventional hydrolysis, the HPP pretreatment increased antioxidant activity, less soluble protein hydrolyzates, and decreased allergenicity. |
| Paula et al. ( | Whey protein concentrate | High hydrostatic pressure equipment | The HPP assisted hydrolysis and pretreatment of whey protein | Different pressure (100, 250, and 400 MPa) and time (5, 20, and 35 min) levels for each treatment | The molecular weight of peptides after HPP treatment was not measured. | In comparison to conventional hydrolysis, HPP assisted hydrolysis resulted in 35% protein reduction at 100 MPa after 35 min, and HPP pretreatment resulted that about 98% peptic hydrolysis of β-lactoglobulin and increased antioxidant capacity of hydrolyzates. |
| Munir et al. ( | Cheddar cheese | High-pressure vessel | The HPP pretreatment of milk before cheddar cheese manufacturing and compared with control and other processing techniques. | The high-pressure processing at 400 MPa for 15 min, at temperature <40°C | The molecular weight of peptides after HPP treatment was not measured. | In comparison to control, MA and US-1, HPP showed increased antioxidant activity and ACE-inhibitory potential of cheese. However, ultrasound was the most effective pre-treatment to improve the antioxidant capacity of cheddar cheese during ripening. |
| Boukil et al. ( | Bovine whey protein beta- lactoglobulin (β-LG) | Discontinuous hydrostatic pressurization unit | HHP pre-treatment followed by tryptic hydrolysis | Three different pressures at 0.1 (control), 400, and 600 MPa for 10 min at room temperature | Tryptic hydrolysis of pre-pressurized β-LG at 400 MPa generated two new peptides, (QEAKDAFLGSF and WENGECAQKK), and their relative abundance decreased at 600 MPa. | HHP pre-treatment at 400 MPa improved the generation of bioactive peptides compared to the control and 600 MPa. The relative proportions of the bioactive peptides in hydrolyzates were 38.64% at 400 MPa, higher than the control, and 600 MPa (26.7 and 20.5%, respectively). |
| Piccolomini et al. ( | Whey protein isolate (WPI) | Avure High-pressure Processing System | HHP pre-treatment followed by proteolysis (pepsin, trypsin, and chymotrypsin) | Pressure levels at 550 MPa and control | High molecular weight peptides were removed with a membrane with a molecular weight cut-off 10 kDa. | Whey protein hydrolyzates with HHP treatment could reduce inflammation and oxidative stress in intestinal cells. A significant reduction of H2O2-induced IL-8 secretion was observed for the HHP treated hydrolyzates (50%) compared to the control (30%). |
| Voigt et al. ( | Cheddar cheese | Equipment type not mentioned | Raw and HP-treated milk and their impact on cheddar cheese during ripening | 400 or 600 MPa for 10 min at 20°C | The molecular weight of peptides after HPP treatment was not measured. | Increased proteolysis and levels of free fatty acids were found in cheese manufactured from milk HP-treated at 600 MPa |
| Chicón et al. ( | β-Lactoglobulin | 900 HP apparatus | HHP pre-treatment followed by proteolysis (chymotrypsin) | Pressure levels at 400 MPa | The molecular weight of peptides after HPP treatment was not measured. | Proteolysis during or after high-pressure treatment showed longer and more hydrophobic peptides than proteolysis at atmospheric pressure. |
| Peñas et al. ( | Bovine whey proteins | Discontinuous high-pressure machine | HHP pre-treatment followed by proteolysis (trypsin, chymotrypsin, and pepsin) | 100–300 MPa for 15 min at 37°C | The hydrolyzates obtained at 200 MPa showed two additional bands of 3 and 1.4 kDa with higher intensity than in the control. Also, the highest degree of tryptic proteolysis occurred at 200 MPa, with production of smaller peptides, in agreement with the highest degree of hydrolysis. | The high- pressure treatment enhanced the enzymatic hydrolysis of bovine whey proteins. Chymotrypsin and trypsin showed the highest proteolysis at 100 and 200 MPa followed by pepsin at 300 MPa. Bovine whey hydrolyzates obtained by pepsin and trypsin in combination with HP treatment could be used as a source of peptides in hypo- allergenic infant formulae |