| Literature DB >> 35693788 |
Seyed Reza Banihashemi1, Ali Es-Haghi2, Mohammad Hossein Fallah Mehrabadi3, Mojtaba Nofeli4, Ali Rezaei Mokarram5, Alireza Ranjbar6, Mo Salman7, Monireh Hajimoradi1, Seyad Hossein Razaz1, Maryam Taghdiri1, Mohsen Bagheri2, Maryam Dadar4, Zuhair Mohammad Hassan8, Mohammad Eslampanah9, Zahra Salehi Najafabadi4, Mohsen Lotfi10, Akbar Khorasani4, Fereidoon Rahmani2.
Abstract
Several vaccine candidates for COVID-19 have been developed, and few vaccines received emergency approval with an acceptable level of efficacy and safety. We herein report the development of the first recombinant protein-based vaccine in Iran based on the recombinant SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in its monomeric (encompassing amino acid 1-674 for S1 and 685-1211 for S2 subunits) and trimer form (S-Trimer) formulated in the oil-in-water adjuvant system RAS-01 (Razi Adjuvant System-01). The safety and immunity of the candidate vaccine, referred to as RAZI-COV PARS, were evaluated in Syrian hamster, BALB/c mice, Pirbright guinea pig, and New Zeeland white (NZW) rabbit. All vaccinated animals received two intramuscular (IM) and one intranasal (IN) candidate vaccine at 3-week intervals (days 0, 21, and 51). The challenge study was performed intranasally with 5×106 pfu of SARS-CoV-2 35 days post-vaccination. None of the vaccinated mice, hamsters, guinea pigs, or rabbits showed any changes in general clinical observations; body weight and food intake, clinical indicators, hematology examination, blood chemistry, and pathological examination of vital organs. Safety of vaccine after the administration of single and repeated dose was also established. Three different doses of candidate vaccine stimulated remarkable titers of neutralizing antibodies, S1, Receptor-Binding Domain (RBD), and N-terminal domain (NTD) specific IgG antibodies as well as IgA antibodies compared to placebo and control groups (P<0.01). Middle and high doses of RAZI-COV PARS vaccine significantly induced a robust and quick immune response from the third-week post-immunization. Histopathological studies on vaccinated hamsters showed that the challenge with SARS-CoV-2 did not induce any modifications in the lungs. The protection of the hamster was documented by the absence of lung pathology, the decreased virus load in the lung, rapid clearance of the virus from the lung, and strong humoral and cellular immune response. These findings confirm the immunogenicity and efficacy of the RAZI-COV PARS vaccine. Of the three tested vaccine regimens, the middle dose of the vaccine showed the best protective immune parameters. This vaccine with heterologous prime-boost vaccination method can be a good candidate to control the viral infection and its spread by stimulating central and mucosal immunity.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; RAZI-COV PARS; SARS-CoV-2 preclinical study; spike protein; vaccine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35693788 PMCID: PMC9179012 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.836745
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 8.786
The detail of animal studies for evaluation of safety pharmacology, including toxicity, toxicity upon repeated doses and pyrogenicity assessment, performed in accordance with the ICH M3 guidelines.
| Animal species/strain | BALB/c mice | Golden hamster | Guinea pigs (pirbright) | New Zeeland white rabbit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of animals | 50/group | 10/group | 10/group | 5/group |
| Administration | 2 IM in 3w interval | 2 IM (in 3w interval) + 1 IN (4w after 2nd dose) | 2 IM (in 3w interval) + 1 IN (4w after 2nd dose) | 2 IM (in 3w interval) + 1 IN (4w after 2nd dose) |
| Dose levels for safety | 5µg/10µg/20µg | 5µg/10µg/20µg | 5µg/10µg/20µg | 5µg/10µg/20µg |
| Clinical observations | Once daily for the first 3 days then twice a week | Once daily for the first 3 days then twice a week | Once daily for the first 3 days then twice a week | Once daily for the first 3 days then twice a week |
| Body weight | Once daily for the first 3 days then at least weekly | Once daily for the first 3 days then at least weekly | Once daily for the first 3 days then at least weekly | Once daily for the first 3 days then at least weekly |
| Body temperature | Continuously recorded during the whole experiment, Once daily for the first 3 days then weekly | Continuously recorded during the whole experiment, Once daily for the first 3 days then weekly | Continuously recorded during the whole experiment, Once daily for the first 3 days then weekly | Continuously recorded during the whole experiment, Once daily for the first 3 days then weekly |
| Injection site reaction (local tolerance) | Macroscopic (once daily for the first 3 days then at least weekly/Microscopic (histopathology) examination | Macroscopic (once daily for the first 3 days then at least weekly/Microscopic (histopathology) examination | Macroscopic (once daily for the first 3 days then at least weekly/Microscopic (histopathology) examination | Macroscopic (once daily for the first 3 days then at least weekly/Microscopic (histopathology) examination |
| Laboratory investigations | Haematology, blood biochemistry, serology and urinalysis | Haematology, blood biochemistry, serology and urinalysis | Haematology, blood biochemistry, serology and urinalysis | Haematology, blood biochemistry, serology and urinalysis |
| Post-mortem organs investigations | LNs, liver, respiratory tract, GI tract, nervous system, spleen, kidney, heart | LNs, liver, respiratory tract, GI tract, nervous system, spleen, kidney, heart | LNs, liver, respiratory tract, GI tract, nervous system, spleen, kidney, heart | LNs, liver, respiratory tract, GI tract, nervous system, spleen, kidney, heart |
Figure 1Histological lesions in BALB/c mice tissues in high toxic dose of candidate vaccine (20µg). (A) Section from a kidney showing hyperemia (arrow), intratubular edema and multiple foci of edema (arrowhead) in kidney parenchyma (Hematoxylin and eosin×100). (B) Section from a brain showing small foci of perineuronal edema (arrow) (Hematoxylin and eosin×100). (C) Section from an intestine showing villous atrophy (arrowhead), submucosal edema (arrow) and vacuolated enterocytes (Hematoxylin and eosin×100). (D) Section from an injection site showing edema between muscles bundles (arrowhead) (Hematoxylin and eosin×100). (E) Section from a mediastinal lymph node showing lymphatic depletion (lymphoid reduction), decreased paracortical lymphocytes (arrow) and small foci of edema (arrowhead) (Hematoxylin and eosin×100). (F) Section from a spleen showing no lesion (Hematoxylin and eosin×100). (G) Section from liver showing foci of hyperemia (arrow) in the sinusoids and parenchymal edema with mild fatty degeneration (Hematoxylin and eosin×40). (H) Section from heart showing mild hyperemia between cardiac muscle fibers (arrow) (Hematoxylin and eosin×40). (I) Section from lung showing parenchymal and vascular sections hyperemia as well as serous secretions (arrow) and increasing in alveolar septa (Hematoxylin and eosin×40).
Figure 2Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin-G (IgG) antibody titers against S1 antigen in different animal models immunized with candidate vaccine. (A) Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin-G (IgG) antibody titers against S antigen for 180 days from the day it is received candidate vaccine in mice. (B) Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin-G (IgG) antibody titers against S1 antigen for 180 days from the day it is received candidate vaccine in rabbit. (C) Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin-G (IgG) antibody titers against S1 antigen from 1st to 180 day of immunization with candidate vaccine in hamster. (D) Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin-G (IgG) antibody titers against S antigen for 180 days from the day it is received candidate vaccine in in Pirbright guinea pig. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The levels of statistical significance for differences between test groups were determined using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. Statistical comparison was done by comparing the vaccinated group with the placebo group as a control. All animal groups receiving candidate vaccine (low, middle, and high dose) showed a statistically significant difference of IgG antibody in compared with the groups receiving placebo and adjuvant (P<0.001) on days 28, 35, 120 and 180. Placebo (adjutant of RAS-01) (group A), phosphate buffered saline (PBS, group B), low dose candidate vaccine (group C), middle dose candidate vaccine (group D), and high dose candidate vaccine (group E).
Figure 3Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin-G (IgG) antibody titers against RBD antigen in different animal models immunized with candidate vaccine. (A) Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin-G (IgG) antibody titers against RBD for 180 days from the day it is received candidate vaccine in mice. (B) Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin-G (IgG) antibody titers against RBD for 180 days from the day it is received candidate vaccine in rabbit. (C) Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin-G (IgG) antibody titers against RBD for 180 days from the day it is received candidate vaccine in hamster. (D) Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin-G (IgG) antibody titers against RBD for 180 days from the day it is received candidate vaccine in guinea pig. Data are presented as mean ± SD. The levels of statistical significance for differences between test groups were determined using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. Statistical comparison was done by comparing the vaccinated group with the placebo group as a control. A significant increase of IgG against the RBD was observed one week after the second dose of the candidate vaccine (day 28) in all animal groups receiving the candidate vaccine and remained significantly higher until day 180 in compared with the groups receiving placebo and adjuvant (P<0.001). Placebo (adjutant of RAS-01) (group A), phosphate buffered saline (PBS, group B), low dose candidate vaccine (group C), medium dose candidate vaccine (group D), and high dose candidate vaccine (group E).
Figure 4Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin-G (IgG) antibody titers against NTD antigen in different animal models immunized with candidate vaccine. (A) Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin-G (IgG) antibody titers against NTD for 180 days from the day it is received candidate vaccine in mice. (B) Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin-G (IgG) Antibody titers against NTD for 180 days from the day it is received candidate vaccine in rabbit. (C) Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin-G (IgG) antibody titers against NTD for 180 days from the day it is received candidate vaccine in hamster. (D) Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin-G (IgG) antibody titers against NTD in for 180 days from the day it is received candidate vaccine in guinea pig. Data are presented as mean ± SD. The levels of statistical significance for differences between test groups were determined using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. Statistical comparison was done by comparing the vaccinated group with the placebo group as a control. A significant increase of IgG against the NTD was observed one week after the second dose of the candidate vaccine (day 28) in all animal groups receiving the low, middle, and high doses of candidate vaccine and remained significantly higher until day 180 in compared with the groups receiving placebo and adjuvant (P<0.001). Placebo (adjutant of RAS-01) (group A), phosphate buffered saline (PBS, group B), low dose candidate vaccine (group C), medium dose candidate vaccine (group D), and high dose candidate vaccine (group E).
Figure 5Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin-A (IgA) antibody titers against RBD in hamster immunized with candidate vaccine. All vaccinated animals receiving two intramuscular (IM) and one intranasal (IN) of candidate vaccine at 3-week intervals (days 0, 21 and 51). (A) Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin-A (IgA) antibody titers against RBD in serum of hamster for 210 days from the day it is received candidate vaccine; The increased IgA antibody of serum against RBD was significantly higher in animals receiving different doses of candidate vaccine until day 210 (P<0.001). (B) Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin-A (IgA) antibody titers against RBD in salivary of hamster for 210 days from the day it is received candidate vaccine. The results of IgA analysis in saliva showed a significant increase in IgA antibody level after the third dose of the candidate vaccine (IN) in hamsters (P<0.001). P values lower that 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Data are presented as mean ± SD. The levels of statistical significance for differences between test groups were determined using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. Statistical comparison was done by comparing the vaccinated group with the placebo group as a control. Placebo (adjutant of RAS-01) (group A), phosphate buffered saline (PBS, group B), low dose candidate vaccine (group C), medium dose candidate vaccine (group D), high dose candidate vaccine (group E).
Figure 6Virus Neutralizing Test (VNT) in vaccinated animals with middle dose of candidate vaccine. VNT has been done in Vero cell lines. All the vaccinated animals with middle dose of candidate vaccine were able to activate neutralizing antibodies after 14 days of the first vaccine booster. Excellent neutralizing titers of mice, hamsters, guinea pigs, and rabbits were observed in sera from the immunized animals on day 35 and 180 that showed significant difference with zero day. The seroconversion assay showed neutralizing antibodies on days 35 and 180 in 80 to 90% of the vaccinated animals. The control and placebo groups showed no ability to neutralize the virus. p values lower that 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant (*p<0.05). Data are presented as mean± SD. The levels of statistical significance for differences between test groups were determined using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. Statistical comparison was done by comparing the vaccinated group on days 0 with days of 35 and 180.
Primers used in this study for evaluating the genes expression including GAPDH, β-actin, IL-1, IL-2, IL-4, IL-10, IL-12p40, IL-13, IL-17, IL-18, TNF-α, INF-γ, and TGF through an iCycler from mouse splenocytes.
| Genes | Primer Forward | Primer Reverse |
|---|---|---|
|
| 5’-TGA GCA AGA GAG GCC CTA TC -3’ | 5’-AGG CCC CTC CTG TTA TTA TG -3’ |
|
| 5’-AGA GCG GGC CTT GAG AAA AG -3’ | 5’-TGG AGA GCC TGG ATT GTC ATC -3’ |
|
| 5’-CAA CCA ACA AGT GAT ATT CTC CAT G -3’ | 5’-GAT CCA CAC TCT CCA GCT GCA -3’ |
|
| 5’-CCT GAG CAG GAT GGA GAA TTA CA -3’ | 5’-TCC AGA ACA TGC CGC AGA G -3’ |
|
| 5’-ACA GGA GAA GGG ACG CCA T -3’ | 5’-GAA GCC CTA CAG ACG AGC TCA-3’ |
|
| 5’-GGT TGC CAA GCC TTA TCG GA -3’ | 5’- ACC TGC TCC ACT GCC TTG CT -3’ |
|
| 5’-GGA AGC ACG GCA GCA GAA TA -3’ | 5’- AAC TTG AGG GAG AAG TAG GAA TGG -3’ |
|
| 5’-GGA GCT GAG CAA CAT CAC ACA -3’ | 5’-GGT CCT GTA GAT GGC ATT GCA -3’ |
|
| 5’-GCT CCA GAA GGC CCT CAG A -3’ | 5’-AGC TTT CCC TCC GCA TTG A -3’ |
|
| 5’-CAG GCC TGA CAT CTT CTG CAA -3’ | 5’-TCT GAC ATG GCA GCC ATT GT -3’ |
|
| 5’-CAT CTT CTC AAA ATT CGA GTG ACA A -3’ | 5’-TGG GAG TAG ACA AGG TAC AAC CC -3’ |
|
| 5’-TCA AGT GGC ATA GAT GTG GAA GAA -3’ | 5’-TGG CTC TGC AGG ATT TTC ATG -3’ |
|
| 5’-TGA CGT CAC TGG AGT TGT ACG G -3’ | 5’-GGT TCA TGT CAT GGA TGG TGC -3’ |
Figure 7Gene expression profile of the splenocytes from immunized and control mice. Mice were primed-boosted with the middle dose of the RAZI-COV PARS vaccine (A, vaccine) or with the adjuvant RAS-01 only (B, placebo). On 35 days after immunization, mice were euthanized and splenocytes isolated and incubated with S protein for 24 hrs and total RNA was extracted. Gene expression was determined according to the ΔΔCt using IQ5 software. The results showed that the markers of the inflammation such as IL1 and IL18 had no changed in vaccinated group (P>0.05), moreover, the markers of Th1 responses such as IL-2, IL-12, IL-17, and IFNγ are significantly stimulated following vaccination (P<0.05), while the markers of Th2 responses such as IL-10, IL-4 and IL-13 were induced, but to a limited extent (P>0.05). Mean± SD is depicted in the bar graphs. The statistical significance was assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the two-tailed Mann-Whitney test between the two groups; p values less than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
Figure 8Histopathological examinations in lungs f of hamster from challenged animals on 3, 5, and 7 DPI (day post-infection). (A) Lungs of hamster from vaccinated group on 3 DPI showing alveolar septa with mild thickened (Hematoxylin and eosin × 40). (B) Lungs of hamster from non-vaccinated hamsters’ group on 3 DPI showing mild interstitial pneumonia (arrow) and small foci of hyperemia (arrowhead) (Hematoxylin and eosin×40). (C) Lungs of hamster from vaccinated hamsters challenged on 5 DPI showing foci of hyperemia (arrow) (Hematoxylin and eosin×40). (D) Lungs of hamster from non-vaccinated hamsters on 5 DPI showing moderate to severe interstitial pneumonia and lymphocytic infiltration (Hematoxylin and eosin× 40). (E) Lungs of hamster from vaccinated hamsters challenged on 7 DPI) Hematoxylin and eosin×40). (F) Lungs of hamster from non-vaccinated hamsters challenged on 7DPI showing severe interstitial pneumonia (arrow) and foci of hyperemia (arrowhead) (Hematoxylin and eosin×40).
Figure 9SARS-CoV-2 challenge of immunized hamsters (103 ± 20g) with middle (M) dose of candidate vaccine. (A) The viral load was calculated as TCID50%/mL. Lungs samples of the control group showed an average titer of 1.16×109 TCID50/ml, 7.83×108 TCID50/ml, and 10.2×107 TCID50/ml on 3, 5 and 7 DPI, respectively. In the vaccinated groups with the middle dose of candidate vaccines, the lung viral titer was remarkably low compared to the control group as 9.17×104 TCID50/ml, 10.2×103, and 0 on 3, 5, and 7 DPI, respectively. However, the vaccinated group did not show any live virus titer in any of the specimens on 5 and 7 DPI. (B) The weight change between day 0 and day 7 post SARS-CoV-2 challenge of the vaccinated and control hamsters. There was a significant difference in weight between the RAZI-COV PARS vaccine and the control group during the period of observation on days 1 and 2 (P <0.05) as well as statistically very significantly on days 3 to 7 (P <0.01). Results are presented as the mean ± SD. Comparisons between control and vaccine group were made between the two groups by T-test (P < 0.05). p values lower that 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant (*p <0.05).