| Literature DB >> 35693312 |
Fang Lyu1, Jinlu Gan1, Haijun Wang1, Hongyang Zhao1, Lei Wang1, Fangcheng Zhang1.
Abstract
Background: Rare giant vestibular schwannomas (GVSs) invade the temporal bone extensively, which carries unique risks for surgery owing to their complicated relationship with adjacent structures, difficult dissection of the temporal bone, and high risk of complications. The underlying mechanism of this invasive behavior remains unknown. Case description: We report on a 28-year-old woman who presented with typical hearing loss and facial paralysis (House-Brackmann II). Magnetic resonance imaging exhibited a giant mass (∼5.0 cm) in the right cerebellopontine angle (CPA), petrous apex, and middle cranial fossa. Her primary diagnosis was GVS with petrous apex invasion. With the aid of presurgical imaging reconstruction and intraoperative facial nerve monitoring, we adopted a sequential therapeutic strategy, which included microsurgery for the CPA lesion followed by gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for the petrous mass. During follow-up, stable tumor control was achieved with functional preservation of the facial nerve and no other complications. The postoperative immunohistochemical examination demonstrated dramatic intratumoral inflammation, which suggested its potential role in bony erosion. We reviewed the literature of large vestibular schwannoma with a petrous invasion and further discussed its treatment.Entities:
Keywords: acoustic neuroma; gamma knife surgery; inflammation; microscopic surgery; temporal bone invasion; vestibular schwannoma
Year: 2022 PMID: 35693312 PMCID: PMC9174606 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.759163
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Surg ISSN: 2296-875X
Figure 1Preoperative hearing and imaging scans. (A) Preoperative pure tone threshold audiometry demonstrated profound mixed hearing impairment of the right ear. (B–F) MRI scan revealed a mass with a maximal diameter of 5.0 cm at the right cerebellopontine angle with petrous bone invasion. The lesion exhibited low- to iso-intense on T1-weighted images (B), iso- to high-intense on T2-FLAIR images (C), mixed intense on constructive interference in steady state (CISS) images (D), and heterogeneously enhanced after Gd-DTPA administration (E,F). (G) In the CT scan, we observed an enlargement of the right IAC with significantly bony destruction of the temporal apex (white arrows) and a slightly high ride of the jugular bulb (white triangle).
Figure 2Reconstruction tumor model, imaging scan and pathological examination after surgery. (A) Three-dimensional tumor model was reconstructed based on preoperative MRI and CT scan to demonstrate the spatial relationship of the tumor, adjacent nerves, arteries, and veins. (B) Postoperative MRI scan exhibited near-total resection of GVS in the posterior cranial fossa. (C,D) Pathological examination exhibited typical Verocay bodies in Antoni A region with positive S100 immunoactivity (C. H&E staining; D. S100b+ cells in IHC. Scale bar, 50 μm). Abbreviations, AICA, anterior inferior cerebellar artery; N., nerve; SPS, superior petrous sinus. (E-H). High immunoactivity of Iba-1 and TNFα in the tumor. (E) Iba-1 expression in Antoni A region; (F) TNFα expression in Antoni A region; (G) Iba-1 expression in Antoni B region; (H) TNFα expression in Antoni B region. Scale bar, 50 μm. Abbreviations, Iba-1, ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule 1; TNFα, tumor necrosis factor-alpha.
Figure 3Consecutive follow-up MRI. (A) Presurgical scan; (B) MRI scan after microsurgery; (C) MRI scan one month after gamma knife radiosurgery; (D) MRI scan one year after gamma knife radiosurgery. (E) the comparison of MRI findings between pre-surgical scan and the scan one year after gamma knife radiosurgery.
Literature review of large VS with temporal bone invasion.
| Author | Year | Gender | Age | Max. D. | Treatment | Outcome | Facial N. (H-B) | Follow up |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feghali JG | 1995 | M | 43 | 35 | Transcranial suboccipital translabyrinthine approach | GTR | IV | N.A. |
| F | 57 | 34 | Transcranial suboccipital translabyrinthine approach | NTR | III | 12 months | ||
| F | 38 | 60 | Transcranial suboccipital translabyrinthine approach | N.A. | IV | 10 months | ||
| F | 77 | N.A. | Transmastoid translabyrinthine approach | GTR | N.A. | N.A. | ||
| Matsumura H | 2019 | M | 62 | N.A. | Transmastoid translabyrinthine and retrosigmoid approach | STR | I | N.A. |
| Park SJ | 2015 | M | 51 | 40 | Translabyrinthine and retrosigmoid approach | GTR | I | 18 months |
| Sato Y | 2017 | M | 27 | 45 | Retrosigmoid intradural suprameatal-inframeatal approach | GTR | IV | N.A. |
Abbreviations: F, Female; M, Male; N, No; N.A., Not Available; Y, Yes; Max. D., Maximum Diameter; H-B, House-Brackmann; mths, months; GTR, Gross Total Resection; STR, Subtotal Resection.