| Literature DB >> 35693257 |
Chunqing Zhao1, Yulong Tang1, Lirong Cheng1.
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the diagnostic value of luteinizing hormone (LH) peak value of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) stimulation test for girls with precocious puberty and its correlation with body mass index (BMI).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35693257 PMCID: PMC9184156 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4118911
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Math Methods Med ISSN: 1748-670X Impact factor: 2.809
Comparison of general data between the two groups.
| Factor | True group ( | Sham group ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 7.44 ± 0.63 | 7.37 ± 0.59 | 0.859 | 0.392 |
| Bone age | 9.54 ± 1.04 | 8.05 ± 0.68 | 12.161 | <0.001 |
| BMI | 17.68 ± 3.09 | 16.25 ± 3.33 | 3.363 | 0.001 |
| Breast stage | ||||
| B2 | 67 | 56 | 0.790 | 0.374 |
| B3 | 57 | 45 | ||
| B4 | 6 | 0 | ||
| Uterine volume (mL) | 1.98 ± 0.52 | 0.82 ± 0.22 | 20.907 | <0.001 |
| Ovarian volume (mL) | 2.15 ± 0.61 | 0.92 ± 0.26 | 18.880 | <0.001 |
Comparison of indicators of the GnRH stimulation test between the two groups ().
| Group | Cases | LH (U/L) | FSH (mIU/mL) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base value | Peak value | Base value | Peak value | ||
| True group | 130 | 1.07 ± 0.50 | 11.97 ± 3.20 | 3.40 ± 1.03 | 14.21 ± 1.93 |
| Sham group | 100 | 0.44 ± 0.11 | 4.98 ± 1.84 | 2.06 ± 0.50 | 10.43 ± 2.58 |
|
| 12.366 | 19.498 | 11.966 | 112.712 | |
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
Diagnostic value analysis of each index of the GnRH stimulation test on girls with precocious puberty.
| AUC |
| Cutoff value | 95% confidence interval | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LH base value | 0.895 | <0.001 | 0.69 | 0.853~0.937 |
| LH peak value | 0.973 | <0.001 | 7.27 | 0.930~0.980 |
| FSH base value | 0.875 | <0.001 | 2.53 | 0.833~0.918 |
| FSH peak value | 0.912 | <0.001 | 12.65 | 0.871~0.953 |
Figure 1ROC curve of the diagnostic value of each index of the GnRH stimulation test on girls with precocious puberty.
Comparison of each index level of the GnRH stimulation test in patients with different BMI in the true group ().
| Group | Cases | LH (U/L) | FSH (mIU/mL) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base value | Peak value | Base value | Peak value | ||
| Normal group | 48 | 1.62 ± 0.27 | 14.50 ± 2.58 | 4.47 ± 0.50 | 14.24 ± 1.30 |
| Overweight group | 43 | 0.97 ± 0.15① | 11.77 ± 2.39① | 3.07 ± 0.71① | 14.34 ± 1.69 |
| Obese group | 39 | 0.52 ± 0.14①② | 9.10 ± 1.87①② | 2.43 ± 0.46①② | 14.02 ± 1.10 |
|
| 331.944 | 58.365 | 149.328 | 0.563 | |
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.571 | |
① P < 0.05 when compared with the normal group; ②P < 0.05 when compared with the overweight group.
Comparison of breast development stages, uterine volume, ovarian volume, and bone age in patients with different BMI in the true group.
| Group | Cases | Breast development stage | Uterine volume (mL) | Ovarian volume (mL) | Bone age (years) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 3 | 4 | |||||
| Normal group | 48 | 14 | 31 | 3 | 2.00 ± 0.59 | 2.19 ± 0.20 | 9.01 ± 0.93 |
| Overweight group | 43 | 16 | 26 | 1 | 1.90 ± 0.47 | 2.09 ± 0.53 | 9.49 ± 1.03① |
| Obese group | 39 | 13 | 24 | 2 | 2.03 ± 0.44 | 2.17 ± 0.68 | 10.25 ± 0.74①② |
|
| 6.450 | 0.750 | 0.502 | 19.916 | |||
|
| 0.040 | 0.474 | 0.606 | <0.001 | |||
① P < 0.05 when compared with the normal group; ②P < 0.05 when compared with the overweight group.
Related hormones and BMI in each group ().
| Group | Cases | BMI | SHBG (mmol/L) | Leptin (ng/mL) | APN (ng/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal group | 48 | 15.08 ± 1.75 | 80.39 ± 10.32 | 5.02 ± 1.41 | 740.61 ± 114.85 |
| Overweight group | 43 | 17.33 ± 1.39① | 63.21 ± 7.94① | 11.60 ± 2.95① | 644.51 ± 85.02① |
| Obese group | 39 | 21.26 ± 2.18①② | 46.33 ± 5.44①② | 16.08 ± 2.62①② | 471.08 ± 93.76①② |
|
| 129.854 | 181.334 | 238.880 | 79.816 | |
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
① P < 0.05 when compared with the normal group; ②P < 0.05 when compared with the overweight group.
Correlation analysis between each index of the GnRH stimulation test and BMI in the true group.
| Related factors | BMI value | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
| LH base value | -0.695 | <0.001 |
| LH peak value | -0.548 | <0.001 |
| FSH base value | -0.628 | <0.001 |
| FSH peak value | -0.059 | 0.507 |
Figure 2Correlation analysis between each index of the GnRH stimulation test and BMI in the true group.