Literature DB >> 35693045

Artificial Intelligence in Computer Vision: Cardiac MRI and Multimodality Imaging Segmentation.

Alan C Kwan1, Gerran Salto1,2,3, Susan Cheng1,2,3, David Ouyang1.   

Abstract

Purpose of Review: Anatomical segmentation has played a major role within clinical cardiology. Novel techniques through artificial intelligence-based computer vision have revolutionized this process through both automation and novel applications. This review discusses the history and clinical context of cardiac segmentation to provide a framework for a survey of recent manuscripts in artificial intelligence and cardiac segmentation. We aim to clarify for the reader the clinical question of "Why do we segment?" in order to understand the question of "Where is current research and where should be?". Recent Findings: There has been increasing research in cardiac segmentation in recent years. Segmentation models are most frequently based on a U-Net structure. Multiple innovations have been added in terms of pre-processing or connection to analysis pipelines. Cardiac MRI is the most frequently segmented modality, which is due in part to the presence of publically-available, moderately sized, computer vision competition datasets. Further progress in data availability, model explanation, and clinical integration are being pursued. Summary: The task of cardiac anatomical segmentation has experienced massive strides forward within the past five years due to convolutional neural networks. These advances provide a basis for streamlining image analysis, and a foundation for further analysis both by computer and human systems. While technical advances are clear, clinical benefit remains nascent. Novel approaches may improve measurement precision by decreasing inter-reader variability and appear to also have the potential for larger-reaching effects in the future within integrated analysis pipelines.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac segmentation; artificial intelligence; cardiac MRI; cardiac imaging; computer vision; convolutional neural networks

Year:  2021        PMID: 35693045      PMCID: PMC9187294          DOI: 10.1007/s12170-021-00678-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep        ISSN: 1932-9520


  49 in total

Review 1.  Current methods in medical image segmentation.

Authors:  D L Pham; C Xu; J L Prince
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 9.590

2.  A Platform Integrating Acquisition, Reconstruction, Visualization, and Manipulator Control Modules for MRI-Guided Interventions.

Authors:  Jose D Velazco Garcia; Nikhil V Navkar; Dawei Gui; Cristina M Morales; Eftychios G Christoforou; Alpay Ozcan; Julien Abinahed; Abdulla Al-Ansari; Andrew Webb; Ioannis Seimenis; Nikolaos V Tsekos
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 3.  Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms.

Authors:  N B Schiller; P M Shah; M Crawford; A DeMaria; R Devereux; H Feigenbaum; H Gutgesell; N Reichek; D Sahn; I Schnittger
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.251

4.  Displacement detection in human vision.

Authors:  G E Legge; F W Campbell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  A collaborative resource to build consensus for automated left ventricular segmentation of cardiac MR images.

Authors:  Avan Suinesiaputra; Brett R Cowan; Ahmed O Al-Agamy; Mustafa A Elattar; Nicholas Ayache; Ahmed S Fahmy; Ayman M Khalifa; Pau Medrano-Gracia; Marie-Pierre Jolly; Alan H Kadish; Daniel C Lee; Ján Margeta; Simon K Warfield; Alistair A Young
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  Diagnosis and risk stratification in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using machine learning wall thickness measurement: a comparison with human test-retest performance.

Authors:  João B Augusto; Rhodri H Davies; Anish N Bhuva; Kristopher D Knott; Andreas Seraphim; Mashael Alfarih; Clement Lau; Rebecca K Hughes; Luís R Lopes; Hunain Shiwani; Thomas A Treibel; Bernhard L Gerber; Christian Hamilton-Craig; Ntobeko A B Ntusi; Gianluca Pontone; Milind Y Desai; John P Greenwood; Peter P Swoboda; Gabriella Captur; João Cavalcante; Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci; Steffen E Petersen; Erik Schelbert; Charlotte Manisty; James C Moon
Journal:  Lancet Digit Health       Date:  2020-12-03

7.  Machine Learning of Three-dimensional Right Ventricular Motion Enables Outcome Prediction in Pulmonary Hypertension: A Cardiac MR Imaging Study.

Authors:  Timothy J W Dawes; Antonio de Marvao; Wenzhe Shi; Tristan Fletcher; Geoffrey M J Watson; John Wharton; Christopher J Rhodes; Luke S G E Howard; J Simon R Gibbs; Daniel Rueckert; Stuart A Cook; Martin R Wilkins; Declan P O'Regan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Fully Automated, Quality-Controlled Cardiac Analysis From CMR: Validation and Large-Scale Application to Characterize Cardiac Function.

Authors:  Bram Ruijsink; Esther Puyol-Antón; Ilkay Oksuz; Matthew Sinclair; Wenjia Bai; Julia A Schnabel; Reza Razavi; Andrew P King
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-07-17

9.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in the UK Biobank: a major international health research resource.

Authors:  Zahra Raisi-Estabragh; Nicholas C Harvey; Stefan Neubauer; Steffen E Petersen
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  Disentangled representation learning in cardiac image analysis.

Authors:  Agisilaos Chartsias; Thomas Joyce; Giorgos Papanastasiou; Scott Semple; Michelle Williams; David E Newby; Rohan Dharmakumar; Sotirios A Tsaftaris
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 8.545

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.