Literature DB >> 35692926

Endoscopic submucosal dissection in the duodenum: Ready for prime time?

Maximilien Barret1,2, Maxime Amoyel1,2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35692926      PMCID: PMC9187416          DOI: 10.1055/a-1799-7857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endosc Int Open        ISSN: 2196-9736


× No keyword cloud information.
We thank Enrique Perez-Cuadrado-Robles and Pierre Deprez for their comments. We concur with them on the fact that delayed perforation represents a minority (10 %–20 %) of all perforations after duodenal ESD 1 2 3 . In our eyes, however, this number is unacceptably high, considering that management of such patients can require emergent duodenopancreatectomy and is associated with significant morbidity. In addition, perprocedural perforations during duodenal ESD are very different from those occurring during resections in other parts of the gastrointestinal tract: In a series of 36 duodenal perforations after ESD, Fukuhara et al. showed that complete endoscopic closure of an intraoperative perforation, even in expert hands, was only achieved in 41 % of patients, resulting in long and complex medical management, with a median (range) of 12 days (4–58) of hospital admission in these patients 1 . The valuable work of Perez-Cuadrado-Robles et al. reporting the outcomes of one of the only European studies of duodenal ESD outside Japan, however, concurs with our statement, since: 1) It failed to demonstrate any benefit of duodenal ESD over duodenal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) in terms of en bloc resection, complete resection, or local recurrence rate; and 2) It did show a seven times higher (and statistically significant) risk of duodenal perforation with duodenal ESD over EMR 2 . In the second self-cited work by Perez-Cuadrado-Robles et al., including 784 lesions among 14 studies, the authors again did not show the clinical benefit of duodenal ESD, since the ultimate goal of en bloc resection – prevention of local recurrence – was not achieved significantly better with ESD over EMR 4 . Finally, we agree with the fact that all the studies on duodenal ESD show a learning curve effect, involving the endoscopists’ experience, and possibly a better selection of lesions 5 . However, in 2022, we believe that the “risky” conclusion would be to promote liberal use of ESD for resection of duodenal adenomas.
  5 in total

1.  Outcomes of endoscopic resection for superficial duodenal tumors: 10 years' experience in 18 Japanese high volume centers.

Authors:  Motohiko Kato; Yoji Takeuchi; Shu Hoteya; Tsuneo Oyama; Satoru Nonaka; Shoichi Yoshimizu; Naomi Kakushima; Ken Ohata; Hironori Yamamoto; Yuko Hara; Hisashi Doyama; Osamu Dohi; Yasushi Yamasaki; Hiroya Ueyama; Kengo Takimoto; Koichi Kurahara; Tomoaki Tashima; Nobutsugu Abe; Atsushi Nakayama; Ichiro Oda; Naohisa Yahagi
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 9.776

2.  Management of perforation related to endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial duodenal epithelial tumors.

Authors:  Seiichiro Fukuhara; Motohiko Kato; Eisuke Iwasaki; Motoki Sasaki; Koshiro Tsutsumi; Yoshiyuki Kiguchi; Teppei Akimoto; Yusaku Takatori; Atsushi Nakayama; Tadateru Maehata; Kazuhiro Minami; Haruhiko Ogata; Takanori Kanai; Naohisa Yahagi
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Comparative analysis of ESD versus EMR in a large European series of non-ampullary superficial duodenal tumors.

Authors:  Enrique Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles; Lucille Quénéhervé; Walter Margos; Leila Shaza; Hrvoje Ivekovic; Tom G Moreels; Ralph Yeung; Hubert Piessevaux; Emmanuel Coron; Anne Jouret-Mourin; Pierre H Deprez
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2018-08-03

Review 4.  ESD versus EMR in non-ampullary superficial duodenal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Enrique Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles; Lucille Quénéhervé; Walter Margos; Tom G Moreels; Ralph Yeung; Hubert Piessevaux; Emmanuel Coron; Anne Jouret-Mourin; Pierre H Deprez
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2018-08-03

5.  Predictors of technical difficulty with duodenal ESD.

Authors:  Motohiko Kato; Motoki Sasaki; Mari Mizutani; Koshiro Tsutsumi; Yoshiyuki Kiguchi; Teppei Akimoto; Makoto Mutaguchi; Atsushi Nakayama; Kaoru Takabayashi; Ai Fujimoto; Yasutoshi Ochiai; Tadateru Maehata; Takanori Kanai; Naohisa Yahagi
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2019-12-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.