Literature DB >> 35692792

A Nomogram Combined Radiomics and Clinical Features as Imaging Biomarkers for Prediction of Visceral Pleural Invasion in Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Xinyi Zha1, Yuanqing Liu1, Xiaoxia Ping1,2, Jiayi Bao1, Qian Wu1, Su Hu1,2, Chunhong Hu1,2.   

Abstract

Objectives: To develop and validate a nomogram model based on radiomics features for preoperative prediction of visceral pleural invasion (VPI) in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.
Methods: A total of 659 patients with surgically pathologically confirmed lung adenocarcinoma underwent CT examination. All cases were divided into a training cohort (n = 466) and a validation cohort (n = 193). CT features were analyzed by two chest radiologists. CT radiomics features were extracted from CT images. LASSO regression analysis was applied to determine the most useful radiomics features and construct radiomics score (radscore). A nomogram model was developed by combining the optimal clinical and CT features and the radscore. The model performance was evaluated using ROC analysis, calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA).
Results: A total of 1316 radiomics features were extracted. A radiomics signature model with a selection of the six optimal features was developed to identify patients with or without VPI. There was a significant difference in the radscore between the two groups of patients. Five clinical features were retained and contributed as clinical feature models. The nomogram combining clinical features and radiomics features showed improved accuracy, specificity, positive predictive value, and AUC for predicting VPI, compared to the radiomics model alone (specificity: training cohort: 0.89, validation cohort: 0.88, accuracy: training cohort: 0.84, validation cohort: 0.83, AUC: training cohort: 0.89, validation cohort: 0.89). The calibration curve and decision curve analyses suggested that the nomogram with clinical features is beyond the traditional clinical and radiomics features.
Conclusion: A nomogram model combining radiomics and clinical features is effective in non-invasively prediction of VPI in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.
Copyright © 2022 Zha, Liu, Ping, Bao, Wu, Hu and Hu.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT; Nomogram; lung adenocarcinomas; prediction; radiomics; visceral pleural invasion

Year:  2022        PMID: 35692792      PMCID: PMC9174422          DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.876264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Oncol        ISSN: 2234-943X            Impact factor:   5.738


Introduction

Lung cancer is currently the second most common cancer in the world and remains the leading cause of death among malignant tumors (1). Over 83% of lung cancers are non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (2). Visceral pleural invasion (VPI), defined as tumor extension beyond the elastic layer of viscera pleura, is one of the most important adverse prognostic factors in non-small cell lung cancers with tumor sizes ≤ 3 cm (3, 4). In the eighth edition of TNM classification for NSCLC, VPI increases the T staging of lung cancer with diameters ≤ 3 cm: the presence of VPI leads to upstaging T1 tumor to T2 and stage IA tumor to IB (5, 6). Several studies have evaluated the morphological characteristics of VPI in NSCLC based on CT images (7–9). However, there is no definite morphological feature that can reliably predict VPI, especially when the tumor is far from the pleura without pleura indentation or pleural attachment (7–9). Radiomics extracts a large amount of quantitative information from medical images (10, 11). Radiomics have been utilized for clinical-decision support systems in lung cancer, including diagnose and prognostic prediction (12–14). However, few studies have been reported to assess for the presence of VPI in patients with NSCLC using radiomics methods (15). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to construct a nomogram model based on radiomics features, and determine whether VPI of lung adenocarcinoma can be predicted using the model.

Materials and Methods

Patients

This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board of the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Suzhou, China), and the requirement for patient informed consent was waived. Patients with peripheral lung adenocarcinoma who underwent chest CT scans with thin-section (1–1.25 mm) images from January 2016 to December 2020 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (a) all the patients were confirmed as lung adenocarcinoma by pathological examination, and whether pleural invasion or not was evaluated pathologically; (b) the peripheral lesion was determined as N0M0 stage with the largest diameter smaller than 3.0 cm; (c) thin-section CT scan was performed within 30 days before surgery; (d) available results for clinical data, including age, sex, smoking history; (e) at least one of the following features were presented on CT images: pleural depression, pleural attachment or pleural closeness. 750 patients were excluded because of the following reasons: (a) histological diagnosis of SCLC (n=89); (b) tumor size > 3 cm (n=185); (c) whether pleural invasion or not cannot be assessed pathologically (n=136); (d) the lesion is far from the pleura without any of the above three features (n =301). (e) poor imaging quality due to respiratory artifact during examination (n=39). Finally, A total of 659 patients met all the inclusion criteria and included in this study.

CT Scans

Patients underwent preoperative unenhanced CT scanning using various multidetector row scanners: Brilliance 16 or Brilliance iCT (Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands), Somatom Sensation 64 or Somatom Definition (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany), GE revolution or Discovery CT 750 HD (GE Healthcare, Chicago, USA), Aquilion One (Toshiba Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan). The imaging parameters for thin-section CT were as follows: tube voltage 100-120 kV, automatic tube current modulation, matrix 512 × 512, field of view (FOV) of 400 mm (Brilliance 16 scanner) and 500 mm (other machines), slice thickness of 1-2 mm, the iterative reconstruction algorithm. All CT images were obtained in the supine position during inspiratory breath-hold.

Imaging Analysis

Two experienced radiologists analyzed the CT images independently with a lung window (window width, 1500 HU; window level, −500 HU) and mediastinum window (window width, 400 HU; window level, 60 HU). Consensus was reached by discussion in case of disagreement. Image features included the following (1): tumor density (solid/part-solid) (2); maximum diameter (3); margin (lobulated, spiculated) (4); air bronchogram (5); pleura indentation, pleural attachment, or pleural closeness (6); distance from the pleura. A part-solid nodule was defined as a tumor that included both GGO and solid components (0

Histologic Evaluation

Surgically resected specimens were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and examined to determine the presence or absence of VPI. VPI was defined as invasion beyond the elastic layer of the visceral pleura according to the 8th edition of the TNM classification criteria (5). Histologic evaluation was performed by one experienced pathologist.

Tumor Segmentation and Radiomics Feature Extraction

CT images of enrolled patients were exported from the picture archiving and communication system (PACS), and segmented semi-automatically using ITK-SNAP software (version 3.6.0, www.itk-snap.org) (18). The workflow of the analysis is summarized in . All images were automatically segmented and adjusted by a radiologist with 8 years of experience. After 4 weeks this radiologist segmented the images of 30 randomly selected patients for intra-observer reproducibility. In addition, another radiologist with 20 years of experience segmented 30 randomly selected patient images for inter-observer reproducibility. The inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of feature extraction was evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). ICCs greater than 0.75 were considered as good consistency.
Figure 1

Workflow of the study. Workflow can be divided into four parts: tumor segmentation, feature extraction, feature selection and analysis.

Workflow of the study. Workflow can be divided into four parts: tumor segmentation, feature extraction, feature selection and analysis. All images were performed image normalization before feature extraction (19). Radiomics features were extracted from the ROI by the pyradiomic package Python software (version 3.7.12, www.python.org). A total of 1316 high-dimensional features were extracted from each sample and these were classified into seven categories: first order statistics (n = 252), shape (n = 14), neighborhood gray-tone difference matrix (n = 70), grey level dependence matrix (GLDM) (n = 196), grey level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) (n = 336), run-length matrix (RLM) (n = 224), and grey level zone size matrix (GLZSM) (n = 224).

Radiomics Feature-Based Prediction Model Construction

Radiomics signature model based on selected features from the training cohort was constructed. Two feature selection methods were used to select the features. First, maximum relevance minimum redundancy (mRMR) was performed to eliminate redundant and irrelevant features. Then, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was used to select the most useful features. A radiomics score (Radscore) was computed for each patient through a linear combination of selected features weighted by their respective coefficients. The final formula for the Radscore was as follows: “Radscore=0.085*image_wavelet-LLL_glszm_LargeAreaHighGrayLevelEmphasis+-0.034*image_exponential_firstorder_TotalEnergy+-1.071*image_wavelet-LLL_ngtdm_Coarseness+0.21*image_exponential_glszm_LargeAreaLowGrayLevelEmphasis+0.083*image_square_glszm_ZoneVariance+-0.771*image_squareroot_firstorder_Skewness + -1.266”. Furthermore, the Radscore was compared between lung adenocarcinoma with VPI and those without VPI in both the training and validation cohorts. Logistic regression was performed to select the independent clinical predictors in the training cohort. Prediction models combining radiomics features and clinical variables were established. Finally, a radiomics nomogram based on the multivariate logistic regression model in the training cohort was constructed, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were developed to evaluate the discriminatory ability of the nomogram. The calibration curve and Hosmer-Lemeshow test was used to assess the goodness-of-fit of nomogram (20, 21). Decision curve analysis was performed to assessed the clinical value of nomogram. The net benefit is calculated within a threshold probability, defined as the minimum probability of a disease requiring further intervention (22).

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using R software (version 4.1.0) for quantitative characterisation. The characteristics of patients with VPI and without VPI were compared by Student’s t-test for normally distributed data, otherwise the Mann-Whitney u-test was used. The intra-observer reproducibility of tumor segmentation and feature extraction were evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). ICCs greater than 0.75 were considered to have good consistency. A multivariate binary logistic regression was implemented using the “rms” package. The nomogram was created and the calibration plots were created using the “rms” package. ROC curves were plotted to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of the nomogram model. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated. P-values < 0.05 were considered to be significant.

Results

Clinical Characteristics

A total of 659 patients were included in this study, of whom 193 (29.3%) were diagnosed with VPI and 466 (70.7%) were diagnosed without VPI ( ).
Table 1

Characteristics of 659 lung adenocarcinoma patients, according to the presence of the visceral pleural invasion.

CharacteristicsTotal (n=659)Univariate logistic regressionMultivariate logistic regression
VPI (−) (n=466)VPI (+) (n=193) P value P value
Gender <0.001 0.01
Male24415094
Famale41531699
Age(years) 61 (53-67)60 (52-66)63 (57-69) <0.001 NA
Smoking status <0.001 NA
Active553413140
Inactive1065353
lobulation <0.001 0.04
Present481315166
Absent17815127
spiculation 0.528
Present479342137
Absent18012456
air bronchogram <0.001 <0.001
Present35229854
Absent307168139
Radiological tumor type <0.001 NA
Pure-solid381217164
Part-solid27824929
Pleura indentation <0.001 <0.001
Present422266156
Absent23720037
Pleural attachment <0.001 <0.001
Present327193134
Absent33227359

Age is expressed as Median (interquartile range). Otherwise, data are number of patients. The P value marked bold indicated statistical significance.

NA means that the characteristic is not included in the logistic regression.

Characteristics of 659 lung adenocarcinoma patients, according to the presence of the visceral pleural invasion. Age is expressed as Median (interquartile range). Otherwise, data are number of patients. The P value marked bold indicated statistical significance. NA means that the characteristic is not included in the logistic regression. There were significantly differences between VPI-presence and VPI-absence group in gender, pleural indentation, pleural attachment, air bronchogram, and lobulation (all P < 0.05). Gender, pleural indentation, pleural attachment, air bronchogram, and lobulation were independent risk factors for predicting VPI after logistic regression analysis ( ). A clinical model was developed based on these characteristics.
Table 2

Variables and coefficients of clinical model.

VariableAdjusted OR95%CI P value
Gender1.951.17-3.250.011
Lobulation0.320.19-0.530.040
Air bronchogram2.111.03-4.31<0.0001
Pleura indentation19.079.38-38.76<0.0001
Pleural attachment10.105.33-19.14<0.0001

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Variables and coefficients of clinical model. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Reproducibility Analysis

The average ICCs of intra-observer was 0.96, indicating satisfactory agreement. The number of features with fair consistency (0.75 > ICC ≥ 0.4) and poor consistency (ICC <0.4) were 4 (0.3%) and 26 (2.0%), respectively. The average ICCs of inter-observer was 0.95, indicating satisfactory agreement. The number of features with fair consistency (0.75 > ICC ≥ 0.4) and poor consistency (ICC <0.4) were 11 (0.8%) and 32 (2.4%), respectively.

Radiomics Feature Selection Signature Construction, Validation, and Evaluation

30 features were retained after eliminating the redundant and irrelevant features with mRMR. Then, 6 features were selected as the most predictive subset after LASSO ( ). The corresponding coefficients were evaluated ( ) and a predictive model was constructed. Radscore was calculated by summing the selected features weighted by their coefficients. There was a significant difference in radscore between lung adenocarcinoma with VPI and without VPI in the training and validation groups ( ).
Figure 2

Radiomics features associated with VPI were selected using LASSO regression models. (A) Cross-validation curve. An optimal log lambda (0.013) was selected, and 6 non-zero coefficients were chosen. (B) LASSO coefficient profiles of the 1316 radiomics features against the deviance explained. (C) Histogram shows the contribution of the selected parameters with their regression coefficients in the signature construction.

Figure 3

Difference in the Radscore between lung adenocarcinoma with VPI and without VPI in training cohort (A) and validation cohort (B). (Label 0: No VPI; label 1: VPI).

Radiomics features associated with VPI were selected using LASSO regression models. (A) Cross-validation curve. An optimal log lambda (0.013) was selected, and 6 non-zero coefficients were chosen. (B) LASSO coefficient profiles of the 1316 radiomics features against the deviance explained. (C) Histogram shows the contribution of the selected parameters with their regression coefficients in the signature construction. Difference in the Radscore between lung adenocarcinoma with VPI and without VPI in training cohort (A) and validation cohort (B). (Label 0: No VPI; label 1: VPI). As shown in , the radiomics feature model had an AUC of 0.83 in the training cohort and 0.81 in the validation cohort. Then, clinical indicators ( ) with p values less than 0.01 in the logistic regression analysis with radscore were used to constructed a combined model, which showed an AUC of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.86-0.92) in the training cohort ( ) and an AUC of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.83-0.94) in the validation cohort ( ). The predictive performance of the combined model was shown in . In both the training and validation cohorts, the accuracy, specificity, positive predictive value, and AUC of the combined model outperformed both the radiomics feature model and the clinical feature-based model.
Figure 4

Comparison of the performance of three models for predicting VPI in lung adenocarcinoma. ROC curves for clinical features alone, radiomics features alone and combined features for the training (A) and validation (B) cohorts.

Table 3

Predictive performance of the three models in the training and validation cohorts.

ModelAccuracy [95%CI]AUC [95%CI]SensitivitySpecificityPPVNPV
Training cohort
Radiomics features0.74 [0.70-0.78]0.83 [0.79-0.86]0.860.690.550.91
Clinics features0.75 [0.71-0.79]0.86 [0.82-0.90]0.870.690.560.93
Joint features0.84 [0.81-0.88]0.89 [0.86-0.92]0.740.890.750.89
Validation cohort
Radiomics features0.73 [0.66-0.79]0.81 [0.74-0.87]0.750.720.490.88
Clinics features0.73 [0.66-0.79]0.83 [0.76-0.90]0.790.710.490.90
Joint features0.83 [0.78-0.89]0.88 [0.83-0.94]0.710.880.650.90

AUC, area under the curve; 95%CI, confidence interval; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.

Comparison of the performance of three models for predicting VPI in lung adenocarcinoma. ROC curves for clinical features alone, radiomics features alone and combined features for the training (A) and validation (B) cohorts. Predictive performance of the three models in the training and validation cohorts. AUC, area under the curve; 95%CI, confidence interval; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value. Subsequently, a nomogram model was created ( ). The calibration curve of the nomogram for predicting VPI matched well with the estimated and actual observed values of the radiomics nomogram. The p-value for the predictive power of the nomogram obtained by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test was 0.94 in the training cohort ( ) and 0.86 in the validation cohort ( ).
Figure 5

Nomogram for prediction of VPI based on training cohort and the model evaluation of calibration curve. (A) Radiomics nomogram based on clinical characteristics and Radscore. The calibration curves were used to evaluate the consistency of the probability of VPI predicted by the nomogram with the actual fraction of visceral pleural invasion in the training (B) and validation (C) cohorts. (D) DCA for the prediction of VPI in lung adenocarcinoma for each model. X-axis represents the threshold probability and Y-axis represents the net benefit. The red curve represents the nomogram. The blue curve represents the clinical features model. The green curve represents the radiomics features model.

Nomogram for prediction of VPI based on training cohort and the model evaluation of calibration curve. (A) Radiomics nomogram based on clinical characteristics and Radscore. The calibration curves were used to evaluate the consistency of the probability of VPI predicted by the nomogram with the actual fraction of visceral pleural invasion in the training (B) and validation (C) cohorts. (D) DCA for the prediction of VPI in lung adenocarcinoma for each model. X-axis represents the threshold probability and Y-axis represents the net benefit. The red curve represents the nomogram. The blue curve represents the clinical features model. The green curve represents the radiomics features model. The DCA showed that the net benefit of the combined nomogram outperformed the clinical and radiomics feature models ( ). The decision curve showed that the combined nomogram established in this study has more benefit for predicting VPI if the threshold probability of a patient is between 0 to 55%, 60% to 80% and 90% to 100%.

Discussion

This study constructed and validated a nomogram model based on clinical and radiomics features extracted from CT imaging for identifying VPI in lung adenocarcinoma less than or equal to 3 cm. The nomogram model was able to classify stage I lung adenocarcinoma into those with VPI and without VPI, with AUC values greater than those of the radiomics model and the clinical model. The results demonstrated that the combined model can reliability predict VPI. In this study, we included patients with lung adenocarcinoma to construct a nomogram to predict with or without VPI. This is because research showed that no significant difference in survival rates associated with VPI in NSCLC (23). As for NSCLC, squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma showed significantly different biological behaviors (24). Whereas the heterogeneity in biological behavior between lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma can be reflected by radiomics, radiomics can predict their histological subtypes (25, 26). In addition, lung adenocarcinoma is the most common subtype of lung cancer, so in this study we only discussed lung adenocarcinoma.VPI is a poor prognostic factor for lung adenocarcinoma (27–29), since VPI has been associated with increased overall mortality and decreased disease-free survival (30). The visceral pleura is rich in lymphatic vessels and forms an intercommunicating network on the lung surface. This network penetrates the lung parenchyma, connects to the bronchial lymphatics and flows into the hilar lymph nodes (31), which may progressively develop into metastatic disease (lymph node metastasis or distant metastasis). According to the 8th edition of the AJCC staging manual, a tumour size of 0-3 cm with VPI (including PL1 and PL2) is considered IB stage (31). Some previous studies have shown that patients with stage IB NSCLC can benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy treatment (32–34). The correlation between CT morphological features and VPI has been reported previously (30, 35, 36). The present study concluded that lobulation and air bronchogram were not significant indicators of VPI in lung adenocarcinoma, which was consistent with previous study (30, 35). A lobulated contour implies uneven growth, which is associated with malignancy. However, lobulation also occurs in up to 25% of benign nodules (37). In our study, the lobulation sign was not an independent risk factor for predicting VPI, which may be due to a selection bias resulting from the small size of our enrolled tumors and the fact that the number of patients in this study was not large enough. The air bronchogram sign is the result of tumor cells spreading along the wall of fine bronchus and alveolar wall in a volvulus-like growth pattern without destroying the lung scaffold structure, and the residual gas in the bronchus and alveoli is visualized (38). In previous studies, air bronchogram signs were associated with low invasiveness and helped to distinguish with or without VPI of lung adenocarcinoma (39). Many studies have suggested that the node-pleura relationship is an important predictor of positive VPI. In lung adenocarcinoma, pleural indentation is generally considered to be a positive predictor of VPI (39). Indentation increases the risk of tumor invasion of the visceral pleura (40). Pleural attachment is another known factor for local recurrence and poor survival of lung adenocarcinoma after radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (41, 42). Although most studies have evaluated the morphologic features of VPI on CT images, the accuracy of studies based on morphologic features of CT images remained low, and the morphological features identified are dependent on the experience of the radiologists (7–10). Currently, radiomics allows for the non-invasive evaluation of internal tumor heterogeneity by extracting and analyzing a large number of advanced quantitative imaging features from CT images (12, 43). Yuan et al. proposed a support vector machine (SVM) based deep learning model to predict the status of VPI from preoperative CT scans, with a high AUC in the validation cohort (10). However, the model could only distinguish patients with or without VPI based on radiomics models, without incorporating relevant clinical characteristic parameters, and did not take the relations of tumor to adjacent pleura into account. In this study, six optimal quantitative radiomics features (including Coarseness, Skewness, TotalEnergy, ZoneVariance, LAHGLE and LALGLE) were extracted Coarseness is a parameter for the neighbouring gray tone difference matrix (NGTDM). The lower coarseness values in the present study indicated more heterogeneous textures of the lesion. Skewness and total energy are both the first order parameters. Lower skewness and total energy values indicated higher heterogeneity of the lesion. LAHGLE and LALGLE are parameters for the gray level size zone matrix (GLSZM). Zone variance is also a parameter for the GLSZM. In this study, the high LAHGLE, LALGLE and zone variance values indicated high heterogeneity of the lesion. According to our findings, the model that combines radiomics features and clinical features is more effective.The clinical features model included four semantic features (the signs of lobulation, air bronchogram, pleural attachment and pleural indentation) among the five features, all describing the perimeter and morphology of tumor. Because of the difficulty in outlining peritumoral ROI due to the proximity of the tumor to the pleura, this imaging histology study focused only on the interior of the tumor. However, we included some of the imaging signs to reflect the peritumoral situation as described previously. Previous studies have demonstrated that the above features were the risk factors of VPI. Furthermore, the radiomics focused on the heterogeneity within the tumor, the two models were complementary to each other. Although the diagnostic performances of the radiomic model and the clinical model were similar, the combination of the two models can obtain a higher diagnostic efficiency. The AUC values of the combined model were higher than those of the radiomics and clinical models (p < 0. 05). Moreover, the DCA results showed that the nomogram was superior to both the clinical features model and the radiomics model for most ranges of reasonable threshold probabilities. There are several limitations in this study. Firstly, it was a retrospective study and there may have been selection bias. Secondly, tumour serum indicators may be missing due to the small size of the tumour. Thirdly, multiple different CT scanning devices were used, using different acquisition protocols. Multicentre studies should be conduted to validate the reliability of Nomogram. In summary, a CT image-based nomogram model combining radiomics features and clinical features was developed for predicting VPI in lung adenocarcinoma. A nomogram based on radiomics features may provide a non-invasive method to evaluate the prognosis of early lung adenocarcinoma.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Author Contributions

XZ and CH designed the research. XZ and JB helped collect patient information. YL and XP analyzed data. YL and QW prepared figures and tables. XZ and YL wrote the paper. CH and SH conceived the project and supervised and coordinated all aspects of the work. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This study was supported by Gusu health talent project of Suzhou (GSWS2020003).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
  43 in total

1.  Influence of MRI acquisition protocols and image intensity normalization methods on texture classification.

Authors:  G Collewet; M Strzelecki; F Mariette
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 2.  Lung cancer: diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Lauren G Collins; Christopher Haines; Robert Perkel; Robert E Enck
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 3.292

3.  Visceral pleural invasion is an invasive and aggressive indicator of non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Kimihiro Shimizu; Junji Yoshida; Kanji Nagai; Mitsuyo Nishimura; Genichiro Ishii; Yasuo Morishita; Yutaka Nishiwaki
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Semiquantitative Computed Tomography Characteristics for Lung Adenocarcinoma and Their Association With Lung Cancer Survival.

Authors:  Hua Wang; Matthew B Schabath; Ying Liu; Anders E Berglund; Gregory C Bloom; Jongphil Kim; Olya Stringfield; Edward A Eikman; Donald L Klippenstein; John J Heine; Steven A Eschrich; Zhaoxiang Ye; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 4.785

5.  Visceral pleural invasion impacts the prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Q-X Liu; X-F Deng; D Zhou; J-M Li; J-X Min; J-G Dai
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 4.424

6.  A nomogram for predicting the risk of invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma for patients with solitary peripheral subsolid nodules.

Authors:  Chenghua Jin; Jinlin Cao; Yu Cai; Lijie Wang; Kai Liu; Weiyu Shen; Jian Hu
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Pleural invasion by peripheral lung cancer: prediction with three-dimensional CT.

Authors:  Kiyonori Ebara; Shodayu Takashima; Binghu Jiang; Hodaka Numasaki; Mai Fujino; Yasuhiko Tomita; Katsuyuki Nakanishi; Masahiko Higashiyama
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Visceral pleural invasion is not a significant prognostic factor in patients with a part-solid lung cancer.

Authors:  Aritoshi Hattori; Kenji Suzuki; Takeshi Matsunaga; Kazuya Takamochi; Shiaki Oh
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Correlation of radio- and histomorphological pattern of pulmonary adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Mathieu Lederlin; Michael Puderbach; Thomas Muley; Philipp A Schnabel; Albrecht Stenzinger; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Claus Peter Heussel; Felix J F Herth; Hans Hoffmann; Hendrik Dienemann; Wilko Weichert; Arne Warth
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 16.671

10.  Subgroup analysis based on prognostic and predictive gene signatures for adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Hojin Moon; Yuan Zhao; Dustin Pluta; Hongshik Ahn
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 1.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.