| Literature DB >> 35692792 |
Xinyi Zha1, Yuanqing Liu1, Xiaoxia Ping1,2, Jiayi Bao1, Qian Wu1, Su Hu1,2, Chunhong Hu1,2.
Abstract
Objectives: To develop and validate a nomogram model based on radiomics features for preoperative prediction of visceral pleural invasion (VPI) in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.Entities:
Keywords: CT; Nomogram; lung adenocarcinomas; prediction; radiomics; visceral pleural invasion
Year: 2022 PMID: 35692792 PMCID: PMC9174422 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.876264
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 5.738
Figure 1Workflow of the study. Workflow can be divided into four parts: tumor segmentation, feature extraction, feature selection and analysis.
Characteristics of 659 lung adenocarcinoma patients, according to the presence of the visceral pleural invasion.
| Characteristics | Total (n=659) | Univariate logistic regression | Multivariate logistic regression | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VPI (−) (n=466) | VPI (+) (n=193) |
|
| ||
|
|
|
| |||
| Male | 244 | 150 | 94 | ||
| Famale | 415 | 316 | 99 | ||
|
| 61 (53-67) | 60 (52-66) | 63 (57-69) |
| NA |
|
|
| NA | |||
| Active | 553 | 413 | 140 | ||
| Inactive | 106 | 53 | 53 | ||
|
|
|
| |||
| Present | 481 | 315 | 166 | ||
| Absent | 178 | 151 | 27 | ||
|
| 0.528 | ||||
| Present | 479 | 342 | 137 | ||
| Absent | 180 | 124 | 56 | ||
|
|
|
| |||
| Present | 352 | 298 | 54 | ||
| Absent | 307 | 168 | 139 | ||
|
|
| NA | |||
| Pure-solid | 381 | 217 | 164 | ||
| Part-solid | 278 | 249 | 29 | ||
|
|
|
| |||
| Present | 422 | 266 | 156 | ||
| Absent | 237 | 200 | 37 | ||
|
|
|
| |||
| Present | 327 | 193 | 134 | ||
| Absent | 332 | 273 | 59 | ||
Age is expressed as Median (interquartile range). Otherwise, data are number of patients. The P value marked bold indicated statistical significance.
NA means that the characteristic is not included in the logistic regression.
Variables and coefficients of clinical model.
| Variable | Adjusted OR | 95%CI |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | 1.95 | 1.17-3.25 | 0.011 |
| Lobulation | 0.32 | 0.19-0.53 | 0.040 |
| Air bronchogram | 2.11 | 1.03-4.31 | <0.0001 |
| Pleura indentation | 19.07 | 9.38-38.76 | <0.0001 |
| Pleural attachment | 10.10 | 5.33-19.14 | <0.0001 |
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 2Radiomics features associated with VPI were selected using LASSO regression models. (A) Cross-validation curve. An optimal log lambda (0.013) was selected, and 6 non-zero coefficients were chosen. (B) LASSO coefficient profiles of the 1316 radiomics features against the deviance explained. (C) Histogram shows the contribution of the selected parameters with their regression coefficients in the signature construction.
Figure 3Difference in the Radscore between lung adenocarcinoma with VPI and without VPI in training cohort (A) and validation cohort (B). (Label 0: No VPI; label 1: VPI).
Figure 4Comparison of the performance of three models for predicting VPI in lung adenocarcinoma. ROC curves for clinical features alone, radiomics features alone and combined features for the training (A) and validation (B) cohorts.
Predictive performance of the three models in the training and validation cohorts.
| Model | Accuracy [95%CI] | AUC [95%CI] | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Radiomics features | 0.74 [0.70-0.78] | 0.83 [0.79-0.86] | 0.86 | 0.69 | 0.55 | 0.91 |
| Clinics features | 0.75 [0.71-0.79] | 0.86 [0.82-0.90] | 0.87 | 0.69 | 0.56 | 0.93 |
| Joint features | 0.84 [0.81-0.88] | 0.89 [0.86-0.92] | 0.74 | 0.89 | 0.75 | 0.89 |
|
| ||||||
| Radiomics features | 0.73 [0.66-0.79] | 0.81 [0.74-0.87] | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.49 | 0.88 |
| Clinics features | 0.73 [0.66-0.79] | 0.83 [0.76-0.90] | 0.79 | 0.71 | 0.49 | 0.90 |
| Joint features | 0.83 [0.78-0.89] | 0.88 [0.83-0.94] | 0.71 | 0.88 | 0.65 | 0.90 |
AUC, area under the curve; 95%CI, confidence interval; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.
Figure 5Nomogram for prediction of VPI based on training cohort and the model evaluation of calibration curve. (A) Radiomics nomogram based on clinical characteristics and Radscore. The calibration curves were used to evaluate the consistency of the probability of VPI predicted by the nomogram with the actual fraction of visceral pleural invasion in the training (B) and validation (C) cohorts. (D) DCA for the prediction of VPI in lung adenocarcinoma for each model. X-axis represents the threshold probability and Y-axis represents the net benefit. The red curve represents the nomogram. The blue curve represents the clinical features model. The green curve represents the radiomics features model.