Literature DB >> 35692625

Making radiation therapy more effective in the era of precision medicine.

Xingchen Peng1, Zhigong Wei2, Leo E Gerweck1.   

Abstract

Cancer has become a leading cause of death and constitutes an enormous burden worldwide. Radiation is a principle treatment modality used alone or in combination with other forms of therapy, with 50%-70% of cancer patients receiving radiotherapy at some point during their illness. It has been suggested that traditional radiotherapy (daily fractions of approximately 1.8-2 Gy over several weeks) might select for radioresistant tumor cell sub-populations, which, if not sterilized, give rise to local treatment failure and distant metastases. Thus, the challenge is to develop treatment strategies and schedules to eradicate the resistant subpopulation of tumorigenic cells rather than the predominant sensitive tumor cell population. With continued technological advances including enhanced conformal treatment technology, radiation oncologists can increasingly maximize the dose to tumors while sparing adjacent normal tissues, to limit toxicity and damage to the latter. Increased dose conformality also facilitates changes in treatment schedules, such as changes in dose per treatment fraction and number of treatment fractions, to enhance the therapeutic ratio. For example, the recently developed large dose per fraction treatment schedules (hypofractionation) have shown clinical advantage over conventional treatment schedules in some tumor types. Experimental studies suggest that following large acute doses of radiation, recurrent tumors, presumably sustained by the most resistant tumor cell populations, may in fact be equally or more radiation sensitive than the primary tumor. In this review, we summarize the related advances in radiotherapy, including the increasing understanding of the molecular mechanisms of radioresistance, and the targeting of these mechanisms with potent small molecule inhibitors, which may selectively sensitize tumor cells to radiation.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf West China School of Medicine & West China Hospital of Sichuan University.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer stem cell; cancer treatment; conventional fractionation; hypofractionation; radiation therapy

Year:  2020        PMID: 35692625      PMCID: PMC8982539          DOI: 10.1093/pcmedi/pbaa038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Precis Clin Med        ISSN: 2516-1571


  138 in total

1.  A role for homologous recombination and abnormal cell-cycle progression in radioresistance of glioma-initiating cells.

Authors:  Yi Chieh Lim; Tara L Roberts; Bryan W Day; Angus Harding; Sergei Kozlov; Amanda W Kijas; Kathleen S Ensbey; David G Walker; Martin F Lavin
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 6.261

2.  Glioma stem cells promote radioresistance by preferential activation of the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Shideng Bao; Qiulian Wu; Roger E McLendon; Yueling Hao; Qing Shi; Anita B Hjelmeland; Mark W Dewhirst; Darell D Bigner; Jeremy N Rich
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  DNA double-strand breaks promote methylation of histone H3 on lysine 9 and transient formation of repressive chromatin.

Authors:  Marina K Ayrapetov; Ozge Gursoy-Yuzugullu; Chang Xu; Ye Xu; Brendan D Price
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Abnormal DNA methylation of CD133 in colorectal and glioblastoma tumors.

Authors:  Joo Mi Yi; Hsing-Chen Tsai; Sabine C Glöckner; Steven Lin; Joyce E Ohm; Hari Easwaran; C David James; Joseph F Costello; Gregory Riggins; Charles G Eberhart; John Laterra; Angelo L Vescovi; Nita Ahuja; James G Herman; Kornel E Schuebel; Stephen B Baylin
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  CD133+ glioblastoma stem-like cells are radiosensitive with a defective DNA damage response compared with established cell lines.

Authors:  Amy M McCord; Muhammad Jamal; Eli S Williams; Kevin Camphausen; Philip J Tofilon
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 6.  Targeting signalling pathways and the immune microenvironment of cancer stem cells - a clinical update.

Authors:  Joseph A Clara; Cecilia Monge; Yingzi Yang; Naoko Takebe
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  Phase 2 study of RO4929097, a gamma-secretase inhibitor, in metastatic melanoma: SWOG 0933.

Authors:  Thomas F Gajewski; Kim A Margolin; Sylvia M Lee; James Moon; Bruce G Redman; Tarek Chidiac; Lawrence E Flaherty; Yuanyuan Zha; Megan Othus; Antoni Ribas; Vernon K Sondak
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Preclinical evaluation of a potent novel DNA-dependent protein kinase inhibitor NU7441.

Authors:  Yan Zhao; Huw D Thomas; Michael A Batey; Ian G Cowell; Caroline J Richardson; Roger J Griffin; A Hilary Calvert; David R Newell; Graeme C M Smith; Nicola J Curtin
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Ionizing radiations sustain glioblastoma cell dedifferentiation to a stem-like phenotype through survivin: possible involvement in radioresistance.

Authors:  P Dahan; J Martinez Gala; C Delmas; S Monferran; L Malric; D Zentkowski; V Lubrano; C Toulas; E Cohen-Jonathan Moyal; A Lemarie
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 8.469

10.  Cellular injury to 1- to 3+-year-old stems of Camellia sinensis by Tuckerella japonica.

Authors:  Diann S Achor; Carl C Childers; Michael E Rogers
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 2.132

View more
  1 in total

1.  3D-printed bolus ensures the precise postmastectomy chest wall radiation therapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Xiran Wang; Jianling Zhao; Zhongzheng Xiang; Xuetao Wang; Yuanyuan Zeng; Ting Luo; Xi Yan; Zhuang Zhang; Feng Wang; Lei Liu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 5.738

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.