Literature DB >> 35692527

Comparing In-View to Out-of-View Stimulus Arrangements When Teaching Receptive Labels for Children Diagnosed With Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Caitlin C Garvey1,2, Julia L Ferguson2,3, Christine Milne2,3, Joseph H Cihon2,3, Justin B Leaf2,3, Ronald Leaf2, John McEachin2, Kim Schulze1.   

Abstract

One common best practice recommendation for teaching receptive labels to individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder is for the stimulus array to be arranged outside of the view of the learner. Another strategy that may have benefits would be to arrange the stimuli in view of the learner. The purpose of this study was to compare the relative effectiveness and efficiency of arranging the stimulus array in view versus out of view of the learner when teaching receptive labels to three children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. The results of an adapted alternating-treatments design demonstrated that both conditions were effective, and all participants reached the mastery criterion on all training sets. However, the in-view condition was more, or equally, efficient with respect to sessions to mastery when compared to the out-of-view condition. The results are discussed with respect to clinical and research implications for best practice recommendations related to teaching receptive language. © Association for Behavior Analysis International 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  counterbalance; autism spectrum disorder; best practice; receptive language

Year:  2021        PMID: 35692527      PMCID: PMC9120289          DOI: 10.1007/s40617-021-00596-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Anal Pract        ISSN: 1998-1929


  6 in total

1.  Evaluating Three Methods of Stimulus Rotation when Teaching Receptive Labels.

Authors:  Justin B Leaf; Joseph H Cihon; Julia L Ferguson; John McEachin; Ronald Leaf; Mitchell Taubman
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2018-04-17

2.  Teaching receptive language skills: recommendations for instructors.

Authors:  Laura Grow; Linda LeBlanc
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2013

3.  A randomized clinical trial of three prompting systems to teach tact relations.

Authors:  Joseph H Cihon; Julia L Ferguson; Justin B Leaf; Christine M Milne; Ron Leaf; John McEachin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2019-07-26

4.  Designing Receptive Language Programs: Pushing the Boundaries of Research and Practice.

Authors:  Vincent LaMarca; Jennifer LaMarca
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2018-01-29

5.  Comparison of constant time delay and the system of least prompts in teaching preschoolers with developmental delays.

Authors:  P M Doyle; M Wolery; D L Gast; M J Ault; K Wiley
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  1990

6.  Comparing Error Correction to Errorless Learning: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Justin B Leaf; Joseph H Cihon; Julia L Ferguson; Christine M Milne; Ronald Leaf; John McEachin
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  2020-02-19
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.