Literature DB >> 35692460

Anti-spike protein antibody responses to BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine: A single-center survey in a COVID-19 non-epidemic area in Japan.

Sho Mokuda1,2, Namiki Kawanishi1, Shintaro Kuroshima1, Junko Kono1, Hirofumi Nakayama1, Hiroshi Mieno1, Masashi Kawamoto1.   

Abstract

Background: There are a few reports on antibody responses after a two-dose BNT162b2 vaccination in non-epidemic areas. We evaluated this phenomenon.
Methods: A total of 344 healthcare workers were vaccinated, and the serum anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) antibody concentrations before and after two weeks following the two-dose BNT162b2 vaccination were measured using electro chemiluminescence immunoassay system.
Results: Before vaccination, the antibody titers of all participants were less than 0.6 U/mL. After two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine injection in 342 participants (2 excluded), a high seroconversion rate (99.7%) was observed. The average (±standard deviation) serum anti-RBD antibody titers were 2324 ± 1739 U/mL. Antibody levels in females and males were 2443 ± 1833 U/mL and 1908 ± 1287 U/mL, respectively (p = 0.037).
Conclusion: In a non-epidemic area, two BNT162b2 doses induced a satisfactory antibody response, and the antibody concentrations in females were higher than in males.
© 2022 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACE2, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2; COVID-19; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; RBD, receptor-binding domain; Receptor-binding domain; SARS-CoV-2; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2; SD, standard deviation; Spike protein; mRNA vaccine; mRNA, messenger ribonucleic acid

Year:  2022        PMID: 35692460      PMCID: PMC9173831          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2022.100173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine X        ISSN: 2590-1362


Introduction

The novel severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), was first identified in Wuhan, China and is the causative agent of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic which began in December 2019 [1]. The receptor-binding domain (RBD) in the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 can bind to the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), the functional host receptor on host cell surfaces, to enter host cells [2]. Messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccines against COVID-19 including the BNT162b2 (Pfizer/BioNTech) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna) were developed and are currently being administered worldwide. BNT162b2 contains a lipid nanoparticle-formulated, nucleoside-modified mRNA which encodes the full-length spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 [3]. The Phase 2/3 clinical trial revealed that BNT162b2 was 95% effective in preventing COVID-19 [4]. In Japan, BNT162b2 vaccination began in February 2021, but there have been a few reports on the vaccine’s efficacy in the Japanese population. In this study, we investigated the anti-spike protein antibody responses to BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination at our hospital in Hiroshima Prefecture in Japan, a non-epidemic area.

Material and methods

Study design

This was a single-center, prospective, observational investigation of the antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination. This study was approved by the clinical ethics committees of Medical Corporation JR Hiroshima Hospital (approval number: 2020-56; approval data: March 9, 2021). We investigated 344 healthcare workers vaccinated with BNT162b2 and measured their serum anti-RBD antibody titers. The subjects’ provided informed consent before blood collection and vaccination. Two doses of BNT162b2 (Pfizer/BioNTech) intramuscular injection were administered three weeks apart. Adverse events were self-reported on the pre-vaccine interview of the third dose of BNT162b2, which was administrated 8 months after the second dose. Blood was collected before vaccination and two weeks after the final BNT162b2 injection. Subject demographics (age, sex and results of SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests) were obtained from the hospital’s medical records. The staffs of our hospital receive the salivary quantitative SARS-CoV-2 antigen test using the Lumipulse SARS-CoV-2 Ag system (Fujirebio, Tokyo, Japan) at random.

Measurement of anti-spike protein antibody with electro chemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA)

Serum antibody titers were measured using Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike immunoassay on a Cobas 6000 e601 module (Roche Diagnostics, Rotkreuz, Switzerland). Antibodies in this system can react to the RBD in SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. They were correlated with results from the cPass SARS-CoV-2 neutralization antibody detection kit (Genscript, Netherlands), which was available for a surrogate neutralization test based on the ACE2-spike protein interaction [5], [6]. Values ≥ 15 U/mL were considered positive for ≥ 20% neutralization with a positive predictive value of 99.10% [6].

Statistical analysis

The Mann-Whitney U test determined the differences between two groups. Single regression analyses using the Pearson’s correlation coefficient were also performed. Data processing and analyses were conducted using the Graph Pad Prism 9 software program (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results are presented as average ± standard deviation (SD).

Results

Antibody response against spike protein after BNT162b2 vaccination

None of the 344 healthcare workers was previously diagnosed with COVID-19 through SARS-CoV-2 antigen quantitative testing. All participants were Asian, and the mean age was 41.5 ± 11.7 years. There were 268 (77.9%) female participants. Before the first BNT162b2 vaccination, the anti-RBD antibody titers for all participants were either undetectable or 0.6 U/mL (Table 1). Notably, two female participants did not able to receive the second vaccine dose due to vaccine-associated side reactions. After two vaccination doses, seroconversion was observed in 99.7% (341 out of 342), and the mean serum anti-RBD antibody titers was 2324 ± 1739 U/ml (Table 1; Fig. 1). After the second vaccination, seven participants were infected with COVID-19. All of their symptoms were mild. None of the participants went to the hospital for hyperglycemia.
Table1

Baseline characteristics for healthcare workers vaccinated with BNT162b2.

Before vaccinationAfter the two-dose vaccination
Case number344342
Female (n, %)268, 77.9%266, 77.8%



Age (years)
Total41.5 ± 11.741.6 ± 11.7
Female40.2 ± 11.340.3 ± 11.4
Male45.9 ± 12.046.1 ± 11.9



Antibody titer (U/mL)0.4 ± 0.01 *2324.1 ± 1739.0

Data was displayed as average ± standard deviation.

Undetectable cases were defined as 0.4 U/mL.

Fig. 1

Antibody response against the spike protein following two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine. Data are displayed as average (dotted line) and standard deviation.

Baseline characteristics for healthcare workers vaccinated with BNT162b2. Data was displayed as average ± standard deviation. Undetectable cases were defined as 0.4 U/mL. Antibody response against the spike protein following two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine. Data are displayed as average (dotted line) and standard deviation.

Females have higher antibody responses to BNT162b2

The mean serum anti-RBD antibody titers between vaccinated females and males were 2443 ± 1833 U/mL and 1908 ± 1287 U/mL, respectively, and there was a significantly difference between these two groups (p = 0.037; Fig. 2). These results indicated that antibody titers were higher in Japanese adult females than in males. We also measured the correlation coefficient between serum anti-RBD antibody levels and the healthcare workers’ age. There was no correlation between these two factors (p = 0.30; Fig. 3).
Fig. 2

Comparison of antibody response for the BNT162b2 vaccination in female and male healthcare workers. Data are displayed as average (dotted line) and standard deviation. * Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.05.

Fig. 3

The correlation between age and anti-spike protein antibody levels after the BNT162b2 vaccination. Gray dotted line is a regression line. Data was analyzed using Pearson’s correlation test.

Comparison of antibody response for the BNT162b2 vaccination in female and male healthcare workers. Data are displayed as average (dotted line) and standard deviation. * Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.05. The correlation between age and anti-spike protein antibody levels after the BNT162b2 vaccination. Gray dotted line is a regression line. Data was analyzed using Pearson’s correlation test.

Discussion

Trained immunity by live attenuated vaccines (e.g., BCG), innate immunity, and T cell responses have been reported to be essential host immunological systems against COVID-19 [7], [8], [9]. Though the host immunological mechanisms against SARS-CoV-2 are still unclear, humoral immunity may also play a significant role in fighting SARS-CoV-2 infections. Bamlanivimab (LY-CoV555), an anti-RBD monoclonal antibody, was ineffective in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 but reduced the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infections in residents and staff of skilled nursing and assisted living facilities [10], [11]. Therefore, we hypothesize that the measurement of anti-RBD antibody concentrations is useful in COVID-19 vaccination follow-ups. Anti-RBD antibodies have the potential to protect the host by neutralizing the S protein and exhibiting antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) activity [12]. While, there is a hypothesis that the anti-RBD antibodies produce infection-enhancing activities [13]. However, follow-ups of our subjects showed that there were only 7 mild cases of COVID-19; therefore, the theory is not well supported by our data. There are several methods to evaluate the effectiveness of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in individuals, including ex vivo interferon-gamma enzyme-linked immunospot using CD4+ or CD8+ T cells, surrogate neutralization test, and serum anti-RBD/anti-spike protein antibody levels [5], [14]. Here, we used the serum anti-RBD antibody titer system purchased from Roche, which can be used on several general-purpose machine in clinical laboratories. In Japan, we can also use the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant-test system to detect serum anti-RBD antibodies, which has a good correlation with the above-mentioned system [15]. Reiterer M. et al. reported that patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and COVID-19 had insulin resistance and hyperglycemia, independent of glucocorticoid treatment [16]. In our study, there were no incidences of hyperglycemia in participants who received the second dose. Therefore, we cannot determine whether there were any relationships with hyperglycemia in our study population. Individuals previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 can boost their antibody response by a single BNT162b2 dose [17], [18], [19]. Most of the vaccination clinical trials and observational studies thus far have been performed in COVID-19 epidemic areas. Therefore, BNT162b2 vaccination efficiency may be affected by some factors in these areas. Our hospital is located in a non-epidemic area; thus, differences with epidemic area are expected. Notably, anti-RBD antibody concentrations prior to vaccination were extremely low. In this present study, we certified that two dose of BNT162b2 elicited adequate antibody response in a non-epidemic area as the rate of seroconversion was 99.7%. Additionally, our data indicated that females had higher antibody levels after two vaccination doses when compared to males. Several factors may potentially influence their antibody titers after two doses of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Non-Caucasian ethnicities have been associated with higher anti-spike antibody concentrations than Caucasian ethics groups [6]. Current smokers and older individuals were also independently associated with lower antibody levels than non-smokers and younger individuals, respectively [6]. However, we did not detect a relationship between the antibody concentration and age in our study in Japan.

Conclusions

This is the first study to measure anti-spike antibody responses to BNT162b2 vaccination in a cohort from a non-epidemic area of Japan. Two BNT162b2 doses prompted sufficient antibody responses, and these responses were higher in Japanese females than in males. Our study had several limitations. First, we conducted a single-center study. A multi-center study would be needed for have provided more reliable data and information on risk factors. Secondly, we used ECLIA to measure antibody levels instead of a neutralizing assay, which is more biologically relevant. Lastly, we failed to collect more subject demographics such as smoking status, underlying diseases, and medications taken.

Funding

This work was supported in part by JSPS KAKENHI (Grant Number 22K08599 to S.M.), Mitsubishi Foundation, Takeda Science Foundation, Mochida Memorial Foundation for Medical and Pharmaceutical Research, Japanese Respiratory Foundation, Japan Rheumatism Foundation, The Japan College of Rheumatology Grant for Promoting Research for Early RA, Nakatomi Foundation and Okinaka Memorial Institute for Medical Research. Grants were awarded to S.M.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
  18 in total

1.  A SARS-CoV-2 surrogate virus neutralization test based on antibody-mediated blockage of ACE2-spike protein-protein interaction.

Authors:  Chee Wah Tan; Wan Ni Chia; Xijian Qin; Pei Liu; Mark I-C Chen; Charles Tiu; Zhiliang Hu; Vivian Chih-Wei Chen; Barnaby E Young; Wan Rong Sia; Yee-Joo Tan; Randy Foo; Yongxiang Yi; David C Lye; Danielle E Anderson; Lin-Fa Wang
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Anti-Spike Protein Assays to Determine SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Levels: a Head-to-Head Comparison of Five Quantitative Assays.

Authors:  Thomas Perkmann; Nicole Perkmann-Nagele; Thomas Koller; Patrick Mucher; Astrid Radakovics; Rodrig Marculescu; Michael Wolzt; Oswald F Wagner; Christoph J Binder; Helmuth Haslacher
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2021-06-30

3.  Antibody responses to the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in individuals previously infected with SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Jonathan G Braun; Susan Cheng; Kimia Sobhani; Joseph E Ebinger; Justyna Fert-Bober; Ignat Printsev; Min Wu; Nancy Sun; John C Prostko; Edwin C Frias; James L Stewart; Jennifer E Van Eyk
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 4.  Trained Immunity: a Tool for Reducing Susceptibility to and the Severity of SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

Authors:  Mihai G Netea; Evangelos J Giamarellos-Bourboulis; Jorge Domínguez-Andrés; Nigel Curtis; Reinout van Crevel; Frank L van de Veerdonk; Marc Bonten
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern.

Authors:  Chen Wang; Peter W Horby; Frederick G Hayden; George F Gao
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  A Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibody for Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19.

Authors:  Jens D Lundgren; Birgit Grund; Christina E Barkauskas; Thomas L Holland; Robert L Gottlieb; Uriel Sandkovsky; Samuel M Brown; Kirk U Knowlton; Wesley H Self; D Clark Files; Mamta K Jain; Thomas Benfield; Michael E Bowdish; Bradley G Leshnower; Jason V Baker; Jens-Ulrik Jensen; Edward M Gardner; Adit A Ginde; Estelle S Harris; Isik S Johansen; Norman Markowitz; Michael A Matthay; Lars Østergaard; Christina C Chang; Victoria J Davey; Anna Goodman; Elizabeth S Higgs; Daniel D Murray; Thomas A Murray; Roger Paredes; Mahesh K B Parmar; Andrew N Phillips; Cavan Reilly; Shweta Sharma; Robin L Dewar; Marc Teitelbaum; Deborah Wentworth; Huyen Cao; Paul Klekotka; Abdel G Babiker; Annetine C Gelijns; Virginia L Kan; Mark N Polizzotto; B Taylor Thompson; H Clifford Lane; James D Neaton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  An infectivity-enhancing site on the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein targeted by antibodies.

Authors:  Yafei Liu; Wai Tuck Soh; Jun-Ichi Kishikawa; Mika Hirose; Emi E Nakayama; Songling Li; Miwa Sasai; Tatsuya Suzuki; Asa Tada; Akemi Arakawa; Sumiko Matsuoka; Kanako Akamatsu; Makoto Matsuda; Chikako Ono; Shiho Torii; Kazuki Kishida; Hui Jin; Wataru Nakai; Noriko Arase; Atsushi Nakagawa; Maki Matsumoto; Yukoh Nakazaki; Yasuhiro Shindo; Masako Kohyama; Keisuke Tomii; Koichiro Ohmura; Shiro Ohshima; Toru Okamoto; Masahiro Yamamoto; Hironori Nakagami; Yoshiharu Matsuura; Atsushi Nakagawa; Takayuki Kato; Masato Okada; Daron M Standley; Tatsuo Shioda; Hisashi Arase
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Antibody Response to the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine in Subjects with Prior SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

Authors:  Federico Gobbi; Dora Buonfrate; Lucia Moro; Paola Rodari; Chiara Piubelli; Sara Caldrer; Silvia Riccetti; Alessandro Sinigaglia; Luisa Barzon
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 9.  T-cell responses and therapies against SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Authors:  Salman M Toor; Reem Saleh; Varun Sasidharan Nair; Rowaida Z Taha; Eyad Elkord
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 7.397

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.