| Literature DB >> 35692415 |
Seonghye Kim1, Inwon Park1,2, Jae Hyuk Lee1,2, Serin Kim1, Dong-Hyun Jang1, You Hwan Jo1,2.
Abstract
Cerebral mitochondrial dysfunction during post-cardiac arrest syndrome (PCAS) remains unclear, resulting in a lack of therapeutic options that protect against cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury. We aimed to assess mitochondrial dysfunction in the hippocampus after cardiac arrest and whether vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) can improve mitochondrial dysfunction and neurological outcomes. In an asphyxial cardiac arrest model, male Sprague-Dawley rats were assigned to the vagus nerve isolation (CA) or VNS (CA + VNS) group. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed 450 s after pulseless electrical activity. After the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), left cervical VNS was performed for 3 h in the CA + VNS group. Mitochondrial respiratory function was evaluated using high-resolution respirometry of the hippocampal tissue. The neurologic deficit score (NDS) and overall performance category (OPC) were assessed at 24, 48, and 72 h after resuscitation. The leak respiration and oxidative phosphorylation capacity of complex I (OXPHOS CI) at 6 h after ROSC were significantly higher in the CA + VNS group than in the CA group (p = 0.0308 and 0.0401, respectively). Compared with the trends of NDS and OPC in the CA group, the trends of those in the CA + VNS group were significantly different, thus suggesting a favorable neurological outcome in the CA + VNS group (p = 0.0087 and 0.0064 between times × groups interaction, respectively). VNS ameliorated mitochondrial dysfunction after ROSC and improved neurological outcomes in an asphyxial cardiac arrest rat model.Entities:
Keywords: cell respiration; heart arrest; mitochondria; post-cardiac arrest syndrome; reperfusion injury; vagus nerve stimulation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35692415 PMCID: PMC9178208 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.762007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurosci ISSN: 1662-453X Impact factor: 5.152
FIGURE 1Schematics of the experimental protocol.
Comparison of hemodynamic and blood gas analysis variables.
| Variables | CA ( | CA + VNS ( | |
| Body weight | 294.0 [285.0–314.0] | 304.0 [295.0–313.0] | 0.43 |
|
| |||
| pH | 7.38 [7.35–7.40] | 7.38 [7.34–7.40] | 0.81 |
| PaCO2 (mmHg) | 36.5 [34.5–44.4] | 39.5 [35.8–42.2] | 0.62 |
| PaO2 (mmHg) | 68.1 [58.4–75.2] | 73.7 [59.9–80.1] | 0.32 |
| HCO3– (mmol/L) | 22.0 [20.6–24.9] | 22.6 [21.3–24.0] | 0.87 |
| Base excess (mmol/L) | –3.0 [–5.5–0.1] | –2.4 [–4.1—1.6] | 0.95 |
| Lactate (mmol/L) | 0.9 [0.8–1.0] | 0.9 [0.7–1.1] | 0.94 |
| MAP (mmHg) | 109.0 [90.0–140.0] | 110.0 [78.0–128.0] | 0.48 |
| Heart rate (bpm) | 287.0 [258.0–313.5] | 293.0 [271.3–312.8] | 0.48 |
| Body temperature (°C) | 37.1 [36.9–37.4] | 36.6 [36.3–37.2] | 0.07 |
|
| |||
| ph | 7.30 [7.22–7.33] | 7.31 [7.22–7.42] | 0.25 |
| PaCO2 (mmHg) | 74.6 [70.1–82.0] | 69.8 [60.1–79.1] | 0.22 |
| PaO2 (mmHg) | 115.9 [92.4–157.9] | 128.7 [107.7–156.3] | 0.25 |
| HCO3– (mmol/L) | 35.8 [31.4–40.6] | 37.1 [32.6–42.2] | 0.83 |
| Base excess (mmol/L) | 10.1 [4.8–14.0] | 11.4 [5.0–16.2] | 0.62 |
| Lactate (mmol/L) | 7.4 [5.5–7.9] | 6.6 [5.9–7.9] | 0.78 |
| MAP (mmHg) | 112.0 [100.0–131.0] | 101.0 [89.8–119.0] | 0.08 |
| Heart rate (bpm) | 136.0 [116.0–261.0] | 128.0 [96.0–165.0] | 0.13 |
| Body temperature (°C) | 34.5 [34.2–34.9] | 33.6 [33.1–34.9] | 0.07 |
|
| |||
| Body temperature (°C) | 36.7 [36.4–37.0] | 36.3 [35.9–36.9] | 0.13 |
| Induction time (s) | 73.0 [64.0–79.0] | 74.0 [68.0–82.0] | 0.41 |
| CPR duration (s) | 25.0 [24.0–29.0] | 24.0 [22.0–27.0] | 0.21 |
| Total ischemia time (s) | 550.0 [538.0–556.0] | 552.0 [544.0–556.0] | 0.21 |
Variables are presented with median [IQR]. ROSC, return of spontaneous circulation; MAP, mean arterial pressure.
FIGURE 2Comparisons of mitochondrial respiration at 3 h and 6 h after ROSC. (A) Leak, (B) OXPHOS CI, (C) OXHPOS CI + II, and (D) ETS in the sham group (n = 9), CA_3 h group (n = 8), and CA + VNS_3 h group (n = 8). (E) Leak, (F) OXPHOS CI, (G) OXHPOS CI + II, and (H) ETS in the sham group, CA_6 h group (n = 8), and CA + VNS_6 h group (n = 7). Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc multiple comparisons test was performed (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ns, not significant); CA, cardiac arrest; ETS, electron transfer system; OXPHOS, oxidative phosphorylation capacity; VNS, vagal nerve stimulation.
FIGURE 3Comparisons of neurological outcomes at 0, 24, 48, and 72 h after ROSC. (A) NDS in the CA (n = 12) and CA + VNS (n = 11) groups at 0, 24, 48, and 72 h after ROSC. p < 0.0001 between times, p = 0.0300 between groups, p = 0.0087 between times × groups; two-way RM ANOVA. (B) OPC (OPC; 1, normal; 2, slight disability; 3, severe disability; 4, comatose; 5, dead) in the CA (n = 12) and CA + VNS (n = 11) groups at 0, 24, 48, and 72 h after ROSC. p < 0.0001 between times, p = 0.0271 between groups, p = 0.0064 between times × groups; two-way RM ANOVA. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Only p-values < 0.05 are depicted in the graph and indicate the statistical comparisons of both groups at the marked time (Bonferroni’s post hoc multiple comparisons test). NDS, neurologic deficit score; OPC, overall performance category; ROSC, return of spontaneous circulation; VNS, vagal nerve stimulation; CA, cardiac arrest.