Literature DB >> 35692280

Development of an algorithm to convert mammographic images to appear as if acquired with different technique factors.

Alistair Mackenzie1, Joana Boita2,3, David R Dance1,4, Kenneth C Young1,4.   

Abstract

Purpose: We set out a fully developed algorithm for adapting mammography images to appear as if acquired using different technique factors by changing the signal and noise within the images. The algorithm accounts for difference between the absorption by the object being imaged and the imaging system. Approach: Images were acquired using a Hologic Selenia Dimensions x-ray unit for the validation, of three thicknesses of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) blocks with or without different thicknesses of PMMA contrast objects acquired for a range of technique factors. One set of images was then adapted to appear the same as a target image acquired with a higher or lower tube voltage and/or a different anode/filter combination. The average linearized pixel value, normalized noise power spectra (NNPS), and standard deviation of the flat field images and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the contrast object images were calculated for the simulated and target images. A simulation study tested the algorithm on images created using a voxel breast phantom at different technique factors and the images compared using local signal level, variance, and power spectra.
Results: The average pixel value, NNPS, and standard deviation for the simulated and target images were found to be within 9%. The CNRs of the simulated and target images were found to be within 5% of each other. The differences between the target and simulated images of the voxel phantom were similar to those of the natural variability. Conclusions: We demonstrated that images can be successfully adapted to appear as if acquired using different technique factors. Using this conversion algorithm, it may be possible to examine the effect of tube voltage and anode/filter combination on cancer detection using clinical images.
© 2022 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).

Entities:  

Keywords:  mammography; noise; simulation; virtual clinical trial

Year:  2022        PMID: 35692280      PMCID: PMC9174342          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.9.3.033504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  26 in total

1.  Design and validation of realistic breast models for use in multiple alternative forced choice virtual clinical trials.

Authors:  Premkumar Elangovan; Alistair Mackenzie; David R Dance; Kenneth C Young; Victoria Cooke; Louise Wilkinson; Rosalind M Given-Wilson; Matthew G Wallis; Kevin Wells
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Simulation of images of CDMAM phantom and the estimation of measurement uncertainties of threshold gold thickness.

Authors:  Alistair Mackenzie; Timothy D Eales; Hannah L Dunn; Mary Yip Braidley; David R Dance; Kenneth C Young
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.685

Review 3.  Advances in digital and physical anthropomorphic breast phantoms for x-ray imaging.

Authors:  Stephen J Glick; Lynda C Ikejimba
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Impact of compressed breast thickness and dose on lesion detectability in digital mammography: FROC study with simulated lesions in real mammograms.

Authors:  Elena Salvagnini; Hilde Bosmans; Chantal Van Ongeval; Andreas Van Steen; Koen Michielsen; Lesley Cockmartin; Lara Struelens; Nicholas W Marshall
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Breast cancer detection rates using four different types of mammography detectors.

Authors:  Alistair Mackenzie; Lucy M Warren; Matthew G Wallis; Julie Cooke; Rosalind M Given-Wilson; David R Dance; Dev P Chakraborty; Mark D Halling-Brown; Padraig T Looney; Kenneth C Young
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Conversion of mammographic images to appear with the noise and sharpness characteristics of a different detector and x-ray system.

Authors:  Alistair Mackenzie; David R Dance; Adam Workman; Mary Yip; Kevin Wells; Kenneth C Young
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Image simulation and a model of noise power spectra across a range of mammographic beam qualities.

Authors:  Alistair Mackenzie; David R Dance; Oliver Diaz; Kenneth C Young
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Effect of image quality on calcification detection in digital mammography.

Authors:  Lucy M Warren; Alistair Mackenzie; Julie Cooke; Rosalind M Given-Wilson; Matthew G Wallis; Dev P Chakraborty; David R Dance; Hilde Bosmans; Kenneth C Young
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Detective quantum efficiency measured as a function of energy for two full-field digital mammography systems.

Authors:  N W Marshall
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Method for simulating dose reduction in digital mammography using the Anscombe transformation.

Authors:  Lucas R Borges; Helder C R de Oliveira; Polyana F Nunes; Predrag R Bakic; Andrew D A Maidment; Marcelo A C Vieira
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.