Literature DB >> 3569219

Differences in ventilatory responses to hypoxia and hypercapnia between normal and judo athletes with moderate obesity.

Y Nishibayashi, H Kimura, R Maruyama, Y Ohyabu, H Masuyama, Y Honda.   

Abstract

Hypercapnic and hypoxic ventilatory sensitivities were compared in twenty-one judoists and 24 control subjects with similar degrees of moderate obesity. Data from ten non-obese control subjects were also included as a reference. Mean body weight (BW) and % of ideal body weight in the judoists and the obese and non-obese controls were 100 +/- 14.8, 94.4 +/- 5.3 and 63.4 +/- 6.1 (mean +/- SD) kg, and 142.3 +/- 16.7, 142.2 +/- 12.9 and 98.4 +/- 10.7%, respectively. Mean body fat in the judoists was 16.2 +/- 13.9%, being 25.3 +/- 7.7% in the obese control group, the difference being significant (p less than 0.01). Hypercapnic sensitivities in terms of the CO2 ventilatory response slope (S) and its normalized value for 70 kg BW (SN) of the obese controls were higher than the judoists. These findings were also verified by the CO2-occlusion pressure responses. S and SN in the obese controls were significantly correlated with BW and % body fat. However, no positive correlation was found between BW and S or SN in the judoists as well as between lean body mass and S or SN in the obese control. Hypoxic sensitivity in terms of the PETO2-ventilation hyperbola slope (A) and its normalized value (AN) in the obese control was significantly higher than the non-obese control, but the difference from the judoists was not significant. A and AN were found to increase with increasing % body fat in both judoists and obese controls.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3569219     DOI: 10.1007/bf00640637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol        ISSN: 0301-5548


  15 in total

1.  DENSITOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF BODY COMPOSITION: REVISION OF SOME QUANTITATIVE ASSUMPTIONS.

Authors:  J BROZEK; F GRANDE; J T ANDERSON; A KEYS
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1963-09-26       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  The effects of weight reduction on pulmonary function and the sensitivity of the respiratory center in obesity.

Authors:  C Emirgil; B J Sobol
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1973-10

3.  Acute respiratory failure and obesity with normal ventilatory response to carbon dioxide and absent hypoxic ventilatory drive.

Authors:  R S Kronenberg; C W Drage; J E Stevenson
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Ventilatory regulation in eucapnic morbid obesity.

Authors:  N K Burki; R W Baker
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1984-04

5.  Hypoxic ventilatory drive in normal man.

Authors:  J V Weil; E Byrne-Quinn; I E Sodal; W O Friesen; B Underhill; G F Filley; R F Grover
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1970-06       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Ventilatory and heart rate responses to hypoxia in well-trained judo athletes.

Authors:  Y Ohyabu; A Yoshida; F Hayashi; Y Nishibayashi; Y Sakakibara; N Sato; Y Honda
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1984

7.  High ventilatory response to hypoxia observed in obese Judo athletes.

Authors:  Y Ohyabu; A Yoshida; F Hayashi; N Sato; Y Honda
Journal:  Jpn J Physiol       Date:  1982

8.  Diaphragm activity in obesity.

Authors:  R V Lourenço
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  Analysis of pressure profile in the occluded airway obtained at the beginning of inspiration in steady state hypercapnia.

Authors:  A Yoshida; F Hayashi; K Sasaki; Y Masuda; Y Honda
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1981-09

10.  Neuromechanical properties in obese patients during carbon dioxide rebreathing.

Authors:  M G Sampson; K Grassino
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 4.965

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Obesity: challenges to ventilatory control during exercise--a brief review.

Authors:  Tony G Babb
Journal:  Respir Physiol Neurobiol       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 1.931

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.