Literature DB >> 35692036

Endoscopic features of oxyntic gland adenoma and gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland type differ between patients with and without Helicobacter pylori infection: a retrospective observational study.

Masaya Iwamuro1, Chiaki Kusumoto2, Masahiro Nakagawa3, Kazuhiro Matsueda4, Sayo Kobayashi5, Masao Yoshioka6, Tomoki Inaba7, Tatsuya Toyokawa8, Chihiro Sakaguchi9, Shouichi Tanaka10, Takehiro Tanaka11, Hiroyuki Okada12.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The endoscopic features of oxyntic gland adenoma and gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland type have not been fully investigated in relation to Helicobacter pylori infection status. We compared the morphology, color, and location of these lesions between patients with and without H. pylori infection.
METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 165 patients (180 lesions) from 10 institutions. We divided the patients into the (i) Hp group (patients with current H. pylori infection [active gastritis, n = 13] and those with past infection [inactive gastritis, n = 76]) and (ii) uninfected group (H. pylori-uninfected patients, n = 52). We compared the clinical and endoscopic features of the two groups. We also performed an analysis between (i) lesions with atrophy of the surrounding gastric mucosa (atrophy group) and (ii) lesions without atrophy of the surrounding gastric mucosa (non-atrophy group).
RESULTS: The average age was older in the Hp group than in the uninfected group (68.1 ± 8.1 vs. 63.4 ± 8.7 years, p < 0.01). Although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.09), multiple lesions were observed in 9 of 89 patients (10.1%) in the Hp group and in only 1 of 52 patients (1.9%) in the uninfected group. Meanwhile, significant differences were observed in the prevalence of lesions located in the gastric fornix or cardia (uninfected group: 67.3% vs. Hp group: 38.0%, p < 0.01), with an elevated morphology (80.0% vs. 56.0%, p < 0.01), with a subepithelial-like appearance (78.2% vs. 42.0%, p < 0.01), and with a color similar to that of the peripheral mucosa (43.6% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.02). The male-to-female ratio, lesion size, and presence or absence of vascular dilatation or black pigmentation on the surface were not different between the two groups. In the analysis comparing lesions with and without mucosal atrophy, the prevalence of multiple lesions was significantly higher (p = 0.02) in the atrophy group (5/25 patients, 20.0%) than in the non-atrophy group (7/141 patients, 5.0%).
CONCLUSIONS: The endoscopic features of oxyntic gland adenoma and gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland type differ between patients with and without H. pylori infection.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland type; Gastric neoplasms; Oxyntic gland adenoma

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35692036      PMCID: PMC9188703          DOI: 10.1186/s12876-022-02368-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1471-230X            Impact factor:   2.847


Introduction

Oxyntic gland adenoma and gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland type (GA-FG) are neoplasms composed of highly differentiated columnar cells, mainly chief cells, with pale basophilic cytoplasm and mild nuclear atypia, mimicking the oxyntic gland [1-3]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification, a neoplasm confined to the mucosa is called an oxyntic gland adenoma, whereas a neoplasm with submucosal invasion is classified as GA-FG [1]. Since GA-FG was first described in a single case report in 2007 [4], this neoplasm has been predominantly observed as a subepithelial lesion in the upper third of the stomach during esophagogastroduodenoscopy [5-7]. However, some oxyntic gland adenomas and GA-FG present as flat lesions in other parts of the stomach. We recently reported the clinicopathologic features of 126 oxyntic gland adenoma and GA-FG lesions in 116 patients from 10 institutions [8]. The lesions were classified into the following morphologic types: 0–IIa (57.1%), 0–IIb (31.0%), 0–IIc (7.1%), 0–IIa + IIc (3.2%), and 0–I (1.6%). Macroscopically, 64 lesions (50.8%) exhibited an elevated, subepithelial-like appearance. Through additional subgroup analyses, we observed that the endoscopic features of oxyntic gland adenoma and GA-FG and their predominant locations differed between patients with and without Helicobacter pylori infection. Therefore, in the current study, we analyzed the morphology, color, and location of these lesions in relation to H. pylori infection status, with more patients added to the population of our prior study.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical charts of patients with histologically confirmed oxyntic gland adenoma and GA-FG, as previously described [8]. Histologic diagnoses were made on the basis of endoscopic biopsy, endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), or surgical resection. The diagnoses of oxyntic gland adenoma and GA-FG were made on the basis of the presence of intramucosal proliferation of differentiated columnar cells, which have been found to mimic the oxyntic (fundic) gland [1]. The diagnoses were supported by positive immunohistochemical staining for pepsinogen I and mucin 6 (MUC6) in some patients. We identified 165 patients who were diagnosed with oxyntic gland adenoma or GA-FG between October 2008 and November 2021. These patients were retrospectively enrolled in this study. We retrospectively examined the H. pylori infection status and endoscopic features, in addition to the patients’ sex, age at diagnosis, histologic features, treatments, and prognoses. Based on the lesion morphology, depth of invasion, and histological diagnosis from the initial biopsy, the neoplastic lesions were classified according to the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma [9, 10]. Briefly, polypoid-protruding tumors were classified as type 0–I. Slightly elevated superficial tumors were defined as type 0–IIa. Superficial flat tumors without elevation or depression were classified as type 0–IIb. Slightly depressed tumors were defined as type 0–IIc. Excavated tumors with depression were classified as type 0–III. We defined an “elevated lesion” as a tumor with a 0–I, 0–IIa, or 0–IIa + IIc morphology. Biopsy results were categorized according to the group classification. For instance, Group 1 included normal tissue or non-neoplastic lesions. Group 2 included lesions that were difficult to be classified as neoplastic or non-neoplastic lesions. Group 3 included adenoma. Group 4 included neoplastic lesions suspected of being carcinomas, while Group 5 included lesions confirmed to be carcinomas [9]. The follow-up period was defined as the time from diagnosis to death of any cause or the last hospital visit. The endoscopic follow-up period was defined as the time from the endoscopic or surgical resection of the gastric lesions to the last esophagogastroduodenoscopy examination. The H. pylori infection status was examined using urea breath tests, rapid urease tests, microscopic observations or culture tests of endoscopically biopsied specimens, stool antigen tests, serum or urine antibody tests, or a combination of these methods. On the basis of the results of these tests, we divided the patients into two groups according to their H. pylori infection status: (i) Hp group, consisting of patients with current H. pylori infection (active gastritis) and those with past infection (inactive gastritis), and (ii) uninfected group, consisting of H. pylori-uninfected patients. We also performed a secondary analysis based on the presence or absence of gastric mucosal atrophy around the lesion. This study was approved by the ethics committees of Okayama University Hospital and the other participating institutions and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The requirement for written informed consent was waived because of the observational, non-interventional, and retrospective study design. All investigations were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Results

The patients’ characteristics are summarized in Table 1. This study included 108 men and 57 women. The mean age at diagnosis of oxyntic gland adenoma or GA-FG was 66.3 years (range, 43–91 years). Nine patients (5.5%) had two lesions, and two patients (1.2%) had four lesions. Thus, 180 oxyntic gland adenoma and GA-FG lesions were included in this study. The lesions were removed by ESD (n = 99, 55.0%), endoscopic mucosal resection using a diathermic snare (n = 68, 37.8%), surgery (n = 3, 1.7%), or ESD followed by surgery (n = 2, 1.1%), whereas no intervention was initiated for the other eight lesions (4.4%). The resected specimens of 170 lesions were pathologically analyzed for invasion depth. The depth of invasion was T1a in 99 lesions (55.0%) and T1b in 71 lesions (39.4%). Thus, 99 oxyntic gland adenoma lesions and 71 GA-FG lesions were included in this study. During the median follow-up period of 26 months (range, 0–155 months), four patients died of causes other than oxyntic gland adenoma or GA-FG (2.4%) and two patients had no outcome information. The remaining 159 patients were alive at the last follow-up (96.4%).
Table 1

Clinical characteristics of the study patients

n%
Sex
 Male10865.5
 Female5734.5
Mean age (range), years66.3 (43–91)
No. of lesions
 115493.3
 295.5
 421.2
Helicobacter pylori infection status
 Uninfected5231.5
 Active gastritis137.9
 Inactive gastritis7646.1
 Undeterminable2414.5
Depth of invasion
 T1a (oxyntic gland adenoma)9955.0
 T1b (GA-FG)7139.4
 Not available105.6
Treatments
 ESD9955.0
 EMR6837.8
 Surgery31.7
 ESD followed by surgery21.1
 None84.4
Median follow-up period (range), months26 (0–155)
Median endoscopic follow-up period (range), months*24 (0–155)
Outcome
 Alive15996.4
 Died of other cause42.4
 Unknown21.2

GA-FG gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland type, ESD endoscopic submucosal dissection, EMR endoscopic mucosal resection using a diathermic snare

*169 lesions

Clinical characteristics of the study patients GA-FG gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland type, ESD endoscopic submucosal dissection, EMR endoscopic mucosal resection using a diathermic snare *169 lesions With respect to H. pylori infection status, 52 patients (31.5%) were uninfected, 13 patients (7.9%) had active gastritis, and 76 patients (46.1%) had inactive gastritis. The H. pylori infection status was undeterminable in 24 patients (14.5%). Thus, 89 patients (100 lesions) were classified into the Hp group and 52 patients (55 lesions) were classified into the uninfected group. The number of test methods needed per patient to determine the H. pylori infection status was 1 (n = 36) or 2 (n = 16) in the uninfected group; 1 (n = 7), 2 (n = 4), 3 (n = 1), and 4 (n = 1) in the active gastritis group; 1 (n = 33), 2 (n = 14), 3 (n = 28), and 6 (n = 1) in the inactive gastritis group; and 0 (n = 23) or 1 (n = 1) in the undeterminable group. A comparison of clinical and endoscopic features between the Hp and uninfected groups is shown in Table 2. The average age of the Hp group (68.1 ± 8.1 years) was older than that of the uninfected group (63.4 ± 8.7 years) (p = 0.002). Although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.092), 9 of 89 patients (10.1%) in the Hp group had multiple (two or four) lesions, whereas only 1 of 52 patients (1.9%) in the uninfected group had multiple (four) lesions. Oxyntic gland adenoma or GA-FG was more frequently found in the gastric fornix or cardia in the uninfected group (37/55 lesions, 67.3%) than in the Hp group (38/100 lesions, 38.0%) (p < 0.001, Fig. 1). With respect to macroscopic features, 44 of 55 lesions (80.0%) in the uninfected group showed elevation (0–I, 0–IIa, or 0–IIa + IIc), whereas 56 of 100 lesions (56.0%) in the Hp group appeared as elevated lesions (p = 0.003). Subepithelial-like lesions were more frequently observed in the uninfected group (43/55 lesions, 78.2%) than in the Hp group (42/100 lesions, 42.0%) (p < 0.001). A color similar to that of the peripheral mucosa was the most common lesion color in the uninfected group (24/55 lesions, 43.6%). In contrast, whitish (30/100, 30.0%) was most predominant lesion color, followed by yellowish–white (29/100, 29.0%), in the Hp group. Therefore, the prevalence of oxyntic gland adenoma or GA-FG showing a color similar to that of the peripheral mucosa was different between the groups (43.6% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.017). The male-to-female ratio, lesion size, and presence or absence of vascular dilatation or black pigmentation on the surface were not different between the two groups. Representative images of oxyntic gland adenoma and GA-FG in the Hp and uninfected groups are shown in Fig. 2.
Table 2

Comparison of the Hp and uninfected groups

Hp groupUninfected groupp value
n%n%
Sex0.550
 Male5966.33771.2
 Female3033.71528.8
Mean age ± SD, years68.1 ± 8.163.4 ± 8.70.002
No. of lesions0.091*
 18089.95198.1
 289.000.0
 411.111.9
Mean size ± SD, mm6.4 ± 4.56.6 ± 4.10.728
Depth of invasion0.541
 T1a (oxyntic gland adenoma)5656.02749.1
 T1b (GA-FG)4242.02545.5
 Not available22.035.5
Location0.001
 Fornix2626.02850.9
 Cardia1212.0916.4
 Body6262.01730.9
  Upper third of the body3010
  Middle third of the body264
  Lower third of the body63
 Angle00.011.8
 Antrum00.000.0
 Pylorus00.000.0
Morphology0.003§
 0–I11.011.8
 0–IIa5353.04174.5
 0–IIb3434.01018.2
 0–IIc1010.011.8
 0–IIa + IIc22.023.6
 0–III00.000.0
Macroscopic appearance< 0.001
 SEL-like4242.04378.2
 Non SEL-like5858.01221.8
Color0.017
 Similar to the color of the peripheral mucosa2525.02443.6
 Reddish1111.0916.4
 Whitish3030.01018.2
 Yellowish–white2929.0916.4
 Yellowish55.035.5
Vascular dilatation on the surface0.250
 Present6666.03461.8
 Absent3434.02138.2
Black pigmentation on the surface0.822
 Present1515.0916.4
 Absent8585.04683.6

The Hp group comprised patients with current Helicobacter pylori infection (active gastritis) and those with past infection (inactive gastritis). The uninfected group comprised H. pylori-uninfected patients

SD standard deviation, GA-FG gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland type, SEL subepithelial lesion

*Solitary versus multiple lesions

†T1a versus T1b

‡Fornix and cardia versus others

§Elevated (0–I, 0–IIa, or 0–IIa + IIc) versus depressed (other)

‖Similar to the color of the peripheral mucosa versus other

Fig. 1

Schematic illustrations indicating the location and morphology of oxyntic gland adenoma and gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland type. The stomach is divided into the fornix, cardia, body (upper, middle, and lower thirds), angle, antrum, and pylorus. Hp group, patients with current or past Helicobacter pylori infection

Fig. 2

Representative images of oxyntic gland adenoma and gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland type (GA-FG). A A 65-year-old female patient without Helicobacter pylori infection had an oxyntic gland adenoma with a 0-IIa, subepithelial lesion-like morphology in the gastric fornix. The color was similar to that of the surrounding gastric mucosa. B Magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging showed dilatations of the intervening part and the crypt opening. C A 76-year-old female patient with current H. pylori infection presented with a GA-FG with deep submucosal invasion (870 μm) in the gastric fornix. The 0–IIa lesion had a reddish surface and a distinct border, resulting in a non-subepithelial lesion-like morphology. D A 52-year-old female patient had an oxyntic gland adenoma in the atrophic mucosa of the upper gastric body. The lesion was reddish and showed a 0–IIa, non-subepithelial lesion-like morphology. E A 61-year-old male patient with past H. pylori infection had a GA-FG that presented as a whitish, depressed (0–IIc) lesion in the middle third of the gastric body. F A 73-year-old male patient with past H. pylori infection had a GA-FG in the atrophic mucosa of the middle third of the gastric body. The lesion showed a flat (0–IIb) morphology and a yellowish–white color

Comparison of the Hp and uninfected groups The Hp group comprised patients with current Helicobacter pylori infection (active gastritis) and those with past infection (inactive gastritis). The uninfected group comprised H. pylori-uninfected patients SD standard deviation, GA-FG gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland type, SEL subepithelial lesion *Solitary versus multiple lesions †T1a versus T1b ‡Fornix and cardia versus others §Elevated (0–I, 0–IIa, or 0–IIa + IIc) versus depressed (other) ‖Similar to the color of the peripheral mucosa versus other Schematic illustrations indicating the location and morphology of oxyntic gland adenoma and gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland type. The stomach is divided into the fornix, cardia, body (upper, middle, and lower thirds), angle, antrum, and pylorus. Hp group, patients with current or past Helicobacter pylori infection Representative images of oxyntic gland adenoma and gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland type (GA-FG). A A 65-year-old female patient without Helicobacter pylori infection had an oxyntic gland adenoma with a 0-IIa, subepithelial lesion-like morphology in the gastric fornix. The color was similar to that of the surrounding gastric mucosa. B Magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging showed dilatations of the intervening part and the crypt opening. C A 76-year-old female patient with current H. pylori infection presented with a GA-FG with deep submucosal invasion (870 μm) in the gastric fornix. The 0–IIa lesion had a reddish surface and a distinct border, resulting in a non-subepithelial lesion-like morphology. D A 52-year-old female patient had an oxyntic gland adenoma in the atrophic mucosa of the upper gastric body. The lesion was reddish and showed a 0–IIa, non-subepithelial lesion-like morphology. E A 61-year-old male patient with past H. pylori infection had a GA-FG that presented as a whitish, depressed (0–IIc) lesion in the middle third of the gastric body. F A 73-year-old male patient with past H. pylori infection had a GA-FG in the atrophic mucosa of the middle third of the gastric body. The lesion showed a flat (0–IIb) morphology and a yellowish–white color Subgroup analysis comparing the active and inactive gastritis groups revealed that the average age of patients in the active gastritis group (63.4 ± 8.2 years) was lower than that of patients in the inactive gastritis group (69.0 ± 7.9 years) (p = 0.037) (Additional file 1: Table S1). However, no differences were observed concerning other clinical and endoscopic characteristics, including sex, the number of lesions, mean lesion size, depth of invasion, location, morphology, macroscopic appearance, color, presence or absence of vascular dilatation, and black pigmentation on the surface. Subsequently, we investigated the atrophy status of the gastric mucosa surrounding each oxyntic gland adenoma or GA-FG and subdivided the lesions into two groups based on the presence or absence of atrophy. The characteristics of the patients and the endoscopic features of the lesions in the two groups are presented in Tables 3 and 4. One female patient had four lesions, two of which were associated with atrophy of the surrounding mucosa and the other two were not. Thereby, the atrophy group consisted of 12 male and 13 female patients, whereas the non-atrophy group included 96 male and 45 female patients. Although the difference was not significant (p = 0.052), the proportion of male patients was higher in the non-atrophy group (68.1%) than in the atrophy group (48.0%). The prevalence of multiple lesions was 20.0% (5/25 patients) in the atrophy group, which was significantly higher than that in the non-atrophy group (5.0%, 7/141 patients) (p = 0.020). The diagnosis from the initial biopsy was non-neoplastic (Group 1 or 2) in 3/30 lesions (10.0%) in the atrophy group and 14/150 lesions (9.3%) in the non-atrophy group. The lesions in the non-atrophy group more frequently appeared in the gastric fornix or cardia (61.3% vs. 6.7%, p < 0.001), as elevated lesions (65.3% vs. 46.7%, p = 0.035), and as subepithelial-like lesions (58.0% vs. 26.7%, p = 0.002) than those in the atrophy group. The lesion size, invasion depth, lesion color, and presence or absence of vascular dilatation or black pigmentation on the surface were not different between the two groups.
Table 3

Comparison of patients with and without atrophy of the surrounding mucosa

Atrophy groupNon-atrophy groupp value
n%n%
Sex0.052
 Male1248.09668.1
 Female13*52.045*31.9
Mean age ± SD, years69.7 ± 9.265.7 ± 9.1< 0.001
No. of lesions0.020
 12080.013495.0
 25*20.06*4.3
 400.010.7
Diagnosis from the initial biopsy1.000
 Group 100.074.7
 Group 2310.074.7
 Group 313.342.7
 Group 4620.01812.0
 Group 52066.711476.0

The atrophy group comprised lesions with atrophy of the surrounding gastric mucosa. The non-atrophy group comprised lesions without atrophy of the surrounding gastric mucosa

SD standard deviation

*One female patient had two lesions with atrophy of the peripheral mucosa and two lesions without atrophy of the peripheral mucosa

†Solitary versus multiple lesions

‡Groups 1 or 2 versus Groups 3–5

Table 4

Comparison of lesions with and without atrophy of the surrounding mucosa

Atrophy groupNon-atrophy groupp value
Mean size ± SD, mm7.8 ± 7.25.9 ± 3.60.176
Depth of invasion0.963
 T1a (oxyntic gland adenoma)1756.78254.7
 T1b (GA-FG)1240.05939.3
 Not available13.396.0
Location< 0.001
 Fornix26.76644.0
 Cardia00.02617.3
 Body2893.35738.0
  Upper third of the body1131
  Middle third of the body1716
  Lower third of the body010
 Angle00.010.7
 Antrum00.00.0
 Pylorus00.00.0
Morphology0.035§
 0–I00.032.0
 0–IIa1343.39160.7
 0–IIb1343.34328.7
 0–IIc310.096.0
 0–IIa + IIc13.342.7
 0–III00.000.0
Macroscopic appearance0.002
 SEL-like826.78758.0
 Non SEL-like2273.36342.0
Color0.196
 Similar to the color of the peripheral mucosa620.05134.0
 Reddish310.01711.3
 Whitish930.03825.3
 Yellowish–white1033.33825.3
 Yellowish26.764.0
Vascular dilatation on the surface0.584
 Present1756.79362.0
 Absent1343.35738.0
Black pigmentation on the surface1.000
 Present413.32416.0
 Absent2686.712684.0

The atrophy group comprised lesions with atrophy of the surrounding gastric mucosa. The non-atrophy group comprised lesions without atrophy of the surrounding gastric mucosa

SD standard deviation, GA-FG gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland type, SEL subepithelial lesion

†T1a versus T1b

‡Fornix and cardia versus others

§Elevated versus depressed

‖Similar to the color of the peripheral mucosa versus other

Comparison of patients with and without atrophy of the surrounding mucosa The atrophy group comprised lesions with atrophy of the surrounding gastric mucosa. The non-atrophy group comprised lesions without atrophy of the surrounding gastric mucosa SD standard deviation *One female patient had two lesions with atrophy of the peripheral mucosa and two lesions without atrophy of the peripheral mucosa †Solitary versus multiple lesions ‡Groups 1 or 2 versus Groups 3–5 Comparison of lesions with and without atrophy of the surrounding mucosa The atrophy group comprised lesions with atrophy of the surrounding gastric mucosa. The non-atrophy group comprised lesions without atrophy of the surrounding gastric mucosa SD standard deviation, GA-FG gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland type, SEL subepithelial lesion †T1a versus T1b ‡Fornix and cardia versus others §Elevated versus depressed ‖Similar to the color of the peripheral mucosa versus other

Discussion

We previously reported the clinicopathologic features of 116 patients with 126 oxyntic gland adenoma or GA-FG lesions and concluded that endoscopic resection is a suitable initial treatment strategy for these neoplasms [8]. In the current study, we added 49 patients with 54 oxyntic gland adenoma and GA-FG lesions to the previous study population, resulting in the largest number of lesions investigated to date. A small, elevated lesion with a subepithelial tumor-like appearance occurring in the upper third of the stomach is a representative endoscopic feature of oxyntic gland adenoma or GA-FG [3, 4, 11–21]. Benedict et al. reviewed 111 previously reported cases and described that most tumors (89 cases, 80.2%) occurred in the upper third of the stomach [2]. Ueyama et al. reported a similar proportion of lesions in the upper third of the stomach (79/100, 79.0%) [6]. They also reported that 62 of the 100 lesions (62.0%) showed a protruded morphology. In the current study, the H. pylori-uninfected group showed the following typical features of oxyntic gland adenoma or GA-FG: (i) frequent occurrence in the gastric fornix or cardia; (ii) elevated, subepithelial lesion-like morphology; and (iii) a color similar to that of the peripheral mucosa. Conversely, in patients with current or past H. pylori infection, oxyntic gland adenoma and GA-FG appeared as flat lesions in atypical locations, rather than in the upper third of the stomach. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the difference in the endoscopic features of oxyntic gland adenoma and GA-FG between patients with and without H. pylori infection. H. pylori infection is a major causative factor in the development of conventional gastric cancer through chronic inflammation, in addition to environmental, dietary, and genetic factors [22]. In contrast, oxyntic gland adenoma and GA-FG are believed to develop independently of H. pylori infection, as most of these neoplasms arise in areas with no apparent atrophy endoscopically or pathologically [23]. In the present study, atrophic changes were not identified endoscopically in the surrounding mucosa in 150 of the 180 lesions (83.3%). Ueyama et al. investigated the clinicopathologic and molecular biological features of 100 lesions and found no significant differences between H. pylori infection-negative and H. pylori infection-positive or -eradicated groups, except for patient age and Ki-67 MIB-1 labeling index [6]. These results suggest that oxyntic gland adenoma and GA-FG have similar carcinogenesis and biological properties, regardless of the H. pylori infection status. However, we observed that the location and morphology were different between the Hp and uninfected groups. In addition, multiple tumors were more frequently found in the atrophy group than in the non-atrophy group (20.0% vs. 5.0%) in the present study. On pathologic examination, the surface of these lesions is generally covered by normal-appearing foveolar-type epithelium [1, 2]. We speculate that oxyntic gland adenoma and GA-FG occurring in the gastric body, particularly flat lesions, are less detectable in patients without H. pylori infection owing to the non-atrophic, thick mucosa that covers the lesions. In contrast, during esophagogastroduodenoscopy in patients with H. pylori infection, these lesions may be more noticeable in the mucosa, which shows atrophic change, inflammation, or metaplasia due to the infection. Another hypothesis is that oxyntic gland adenoma and GA-FG may be misinterpreted as fundic gland polyps and may be underdiagnosed in H. pylori-uninfected patients. These hypotheses might explain why the location, morphology, color, and number of lesions differed between patients with and without H. pylori infection. However, further investigation is required to elucidate the nature of oxyntic gland adenoma and GA-FG in relation to H. pylori infection status. As previously described, although an elevated, subepithelial lesion-like morphology is a representative endoscopic feature of oxyntic gland adenoma and GA-FG, tumors often present as flat lesions [23-30]. Ueyama et al. reported that 62 of 100 lesions (62.0%) showed a protruded morphology, whereas the remaining 38 lesions (38.0) presented as flat or depressed lesions [6]. In the present study, we observed that the flat or depressed type of oxyntic gland adenoma and GA-FG predominantly occurred in the gastric body in the Hp group (Fig. 1). As these lesions can show a whitish color (Fig. 2E, F), endoscopists may need to differentiate them from conventional gastric cancer and extranodal marginal zone lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue. Meanwhile, from the standpoint of pathologists, oxyntic gland adenoma and GA-FG may be mistaken for a neuroendocrine tumor or even non-neoplastic polyps on pathologic analysis [1]. Thus, endoscopists should be aware of the occurrence of oxyntic gland adenoma and GA-FG with a flat or depressed morphology in the gastric body of patients with current or past H. pylori infection. In addition, endoscopists and pathologists should have a similar index of suspicion for oxyntic gland adenoma and GA-FG to make an appropriate diagnosis. This study had several limitations. First, the H. pylori infection status was classified into uninfected, active, and inactive gastritis based on a single test method in 76 patients. Thus, over- and underestimation of the infection status might have occurred because of false-positive and false-negative results. Second, researchers at various institutions subjectively investigated the presence or absence of atrophy in the surrounding mucosa using endoscopic images. Interobserver variations and differences in methodologies between the participating endoscopists may have resulted in interpretation bias during the analysis of the atrophy and non-atrophy groups. Thus, pathologic evaluation of mucosal atrophy should be incorporated in the analysis of these cases. Third, immunohistochemical studies were not performed for all patients. Although a diagnosis can essentially be made according to the WHO classification criteria [1], confirmation by positive immunohistochemical staining for both pepsinogen I and MUC6, as well as cell differentiation markers such as H+/K+-ATPase (parietal cell) and MUC5AC (foveolar epithelium), is preferable [5-7].

Conclusions

We retrospectively investigated 165 patients with 180 oxyntic gland adenoma or GA-FG lesions. The lesions in the H. pylori-uninfected group predominantly showed typical features such as frequent occurrence in the gastric fornix or cardia, elevated and subepithelial lesion-like morphology, and a color similar to that of the peripheral mucosa. Endoscopists should be aware that these tumors may appear as flat lesions in atypical locations, instead of in the upper third of the stomach, in patients with current or past H. pylori infection. In addition, multiple tumors may exist in the atrophic mucosa. We believe that these features related to H. pylori infection status will facilitate the identification and prompt endoscopic diagnosis of oxyntic gland adenoma or GA-FG. Additional file 1. Table S1. Comparison of the active and inactive gastritis groups.
  29 in total

1.  Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  Mutation spectrum in the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in gastric fundic gland-associated neoplasms/polyps.

Authors:  Se-Yong Lee; Tsuyoshi Saito; Hiroyuki Mitomi; Yasuhiro Hidaka; Takashi Murakami; Ryosuke Nomura; Sumio Watanabe; Takashi Yao
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-03-29       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland type (chief cell predominant type).

Authors:  Hiroya Ueyama; Kenshi Matsumoto; Akihito Nagahara; Takuo Hayashi; Takashi Yao; Sumio Watanabe
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  Pepsinogen I- and H+/K+-ATPase-immunohistochemical Positivity in Endoscopically Resected Early Gastric Neoplasia.

Authors:  Junnosuke Hayasaka; Naoko Inoshita; Yugo Suzuki; Kosuke Nomura; Hiroyuki Odagiri; Yorinari Ochiai; Masami Tanaka; Satoshi Yamashita; Akira Matsui; Daisuke Kikuchi; Masanobu Kitagawa; Shu Hoteya
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 6.394

5.  Gastric adenocarcinoma of fundic gland type (chief cell predominant type) with unique endoscopic appearance curatively treated by endoscopic submucosal resection.

Authors:  S Takeda; A Mitoro; T Namisaki; M Yoshida; M Sawai; J Yamao; H Yoshiji; M Uejima; K Moriya; A Douhara; K Seki; K Ishida; K Morita; R Noguchi; M Kitade; H Kawaratani; Y Okura; H Takaya; H Fukui
Journal:  Acta Gastroenterol Belg       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.316

Review 6.  Gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland (chief cell-predominant type): A review of endoscopic and clinicopathological features.

Authors:  Masaki Miyazawa; Mitsuru Matsuda; Masaaki Yano; Yasumasa Hara; Fumitaka Arihara; Yosuke Horita; Koichiro Matsuda; Akito Sakai; Yatsugi Noda
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Characteristic endoscopic findings of gastric adenocarcinoma of fundic-gland mucosa type.

Authors:  Kentaro Imamura; Kenshi Yao; Satoshi Nimura; Hiroshi Tanabe; Takao Kanemitsu; Masaki Miyaoka; Yoichiro Ono; Toshiharu Ueki; Akinori Iwashita
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 7.701

8.  Twelve-year natural history of a gastric adenocarcinoma of fundic gland type.

Authors:  Yoshinori Sato; Takashi Fujino; Akira Kasagawa; Ryo Morita; Shun-Ichiro Ozawa; Yasumasa Matsuo; Tadateru Maehata; Hiroshi Yasuda; Masayuki Takagi; Fumio Itoh
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-09-13

9.  Gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland type: A case report.

Authors:  Xue Fan; Xue-Song Yang; Peng Bai; Yu-Bo Ren; Lei Zhang; Xin Li; Li Wang; Yan Wang; Yi-Ming Ding; Ran-Ran Zeng; Xiang-Chun Lin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Gastric epithelial neoplasm of fundic-gland mucosa lineage: proposal for a new classification in association with gastric adenocarcinoma of fundic-gland type.

Authors:  Hiroya Ueyama; Takashi Yao; Yoichi Akazawa; Takuo Hayashi; Koichi Kurahara; Yumi Oshiro; Masayoshi Yamada; Ichiro Oda; Shin Fujioka; Chiaki Kusumoto; Masayoshi Fukuda; Kunihisa Uchita; Tomohiro Kadota; Yasuhiro Oono; Kazuhisa Okamoto; Kazunari Murakami; Yasumasa Matsuo; Motohiko Kato; Tadateru Maehata; Naohisa Yahagi; Yumiko Yasuhara; Tomoyuki Yada; Koji Uraushihara; Tetsumi Yamane; Taiji Matsuo; Masanori Ito; Yasuhiko Maruyama; Ayumi Osako; Shoko Ono; Mototsugu Kato; Kazuyoshi Yagi; Takashi Hashimoto; Natsumi Tomita; Sho Tsuyama; Tsuyoshi Saito; Kohei Matsumoto; Kenshi Matsumoto; Sumio Watanabe; Naomi Uemura; Tsutomu Chiba; Akihito Nagahara
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 7.527

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.