Kim Blom1, Ulrika Marking2, Sebastian Havervall2, Nina Greilert Norin2, Max Gordon2, Marina García3, Teghesti Tecleab4, Wanda Christ5, Mattias Forsell6, Mia Phillipson7, Peter Nilsson8, Sara Mangsbo9, Sophia Hober8, Mikael Åberg10, Jonas Klingström3, Charlotte Thålin11. 1. Department of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institutet Danderyd Hospital, 182 88 Stockholm, Sweden; Public Health Agency of Sweden, Stockholm, Sweden. 2. Department of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institutet Danderyd Hospital, 182 88 Stockholm, Sweden. 3. Public Health Agency of Sweden, Stockholm, Sweden; Center for Infectious Medicine, Department of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 4. Public Health Agency of Sweden, Stockholm, Sweden. 5. Center for Infectious Medicine, Department of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 6. Department of Clinical Microbiology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. 7. Department of Medical Cell Biology and SciLifeLab, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. 8. Department of Protein Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, SciLifeLab, Stockholm, Sweden. 9. Department of Pharmacy and SciLifeLab, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. 10. Department of Medical Sciences, Clinical Chemistry and SciLifeLab, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. 11. Department of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institutet Danderyd Hospital, 182 88 Stockholm, Sweden. Electronic address: charlotte.thalin@ki.se.
The SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant (B.1.1.529) is less sensitive to neutralising antibody responses induced by vaccination and prior infection than previous variants.1, 2 Less is known regarding omicron-induced serological and T-cell responses after breakthrough infection of vaccinated individuals with and without prior infection.In this prospective cohort study, we analysed serological and T-cell responses following omicron infection in 56 triple-vaccinated health-care workers in Sweden with and without prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. A surrogate virus neutralisation test (sVNT) was used to assess neutralisation of SARS-CoV-2 variants. Immune responses of all participants had been regularly assessed since April, 2020, in the ongoing Swedish COMMUNITY study.3, 4 For this sub-study, participants were screened with qPCR twice a week for 4 weeks, with additional qPCR tests every other day for 14 days if positive. Blood samples were collected 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 5 weeks, and 7 weeks after the first positive qPCR sample. For information on study design, demographic characteristics of the study population, and vaccination histories see appendix pp 4–5.Overall, we observed a two-fold increase in anti-spike IgG and sVNT titres against wildtype, delta (B.1.617.2), BA.1, and BA.2 variants 2–5 weeks after omicron breakthrough infection (appendix pp 6–7). Strikingly, however, post-omicron serological responses were significantly higher in previously non-infected (triple-vaccinated with no history of SARS-CoV-2 infection; n=40) than in previously SARS-CoV-2-infected (triple-vaccinated with a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 wildtype infection before primary vaccination; n=16) participants (figure A,C
; appendix pp 8–9). The magnitude of serological responses correlated with nadir cycle threshold (Ct) values (appendix pp 8–9). Notably, nadir Ct value and symptomatology were similar in participants with and without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection (appendix pp 8–9). The magnitude of serological responses correlated inversely with pre-infection titres in both previously non-infected and previously infected participants (appendix pp 10–11).
Figure
Immune responses following omicron BTI in triple-vaccinated health-care workers with and without prior SARS-CoV-2 infection
(A) GMTs (with 95% CIs) of anti-wildtype spike IgG at baseline and up to 5 weeks post-omicron BTI in participants without (n=20) and with (n=10) previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. The grey dots and dashed line represent participants who remained qPCR negative throughout the study period (n=69). (B) T-cell responses against SARS-CoV-2 S1 protein in participants without omicron BTI and 7 weeks post-infection in participants with omicron BTI; participants had no history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Individual-participant data (dots) and GMTs (with 95% CIs; lines) are shown. (C) GMTs (with 95% CIs) of anti-spike IgG against wildtype, delta, and omicron BA.1 and BA.2 variants at baseline and 7 weeks after omicron BTI in participants without (n=40) and with (n=16) previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. (D) T-cell responses against SARS-CoV-2 S1 protein in participants without omicron BTI and 7 weeks post-infection in participants with omicron BTI; participants had a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Individual-participant data (dots) and GMTs (with 95% CIs; lines) are shown. BTI=breakthrough infection. GMT=geometric mean titre. ns=not significant. SFU=spot-forming units. *p<0·001. †p<0·01. ‡p<0·0001.
Immune responses following omicron BTI in triple-vaccinated health-care workers with and without prior SARS-CoV-2 infection(A) GMTs (with 95% CIs) of anti-wildtype spike IgG at baseline and up to 5 weeks post-omicron BTI in participants without (n=20) and with (n=10) previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. The grey dots and dashed line represent participants who remained qPCR negative throughout the study period (n=69). (B) T-cell responses against SARS-CoV-2 S1 protein in participants without omicron BTI and 7 weeks post-infection in participants with omicron BTI; participants had no history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Individual-participant data (dots) and GMTs (with 95% CIs; lines) are shown. (C) GMTs (with 95% CIs) of anti-spike IgG against wildtype, delta, and omicron BA.1 and BA.2 variants at baseline and 7 weeks after omicron BTI in participants without (n=40) and with (n=16) previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. (D) T-cell responses against SARS-CoV-2 S1 protein in participants without omicron BTI and 7 weeks post-infection in participants with omicron BTI; participants had a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Individual-participant data (dots) and GMTs (with 95% CIs; lines) are shown. BTI=breakthrough infection. GMT=geometric mean titre. ns=not significant. SFU=spot-forming units. *p<0·001. †p<0·01. ‡p<0·0001.There were no differences in spike-specific T-cell responses between participants 7 weeks after omicron breakthrough infection and participants without omicron infection, regardless of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection status (figure B,D). A significant increase in specific T-cells against nucleocapsid and membrane proteins was observed in omicron-infected individuals without past SARS-CoV-2 infection, showing that omicron breakthrough infection can prime specific T-cells (appendix p 11). Higher serological responses against both BA.1 and BA.2, but similar T-cell responses, were observed in BA.1-infected compared with BA.2-infected individuals (appendix p 12).This study is limited by the use of sVNT, which is based on the capacity of antibodies to block binding of variant-specific spike protein to ACE2. It is possible that other factors are also involved in neutralisation, which might be better reflected in live microneutralisation assays. However, when analysing a subset of samples we observed a strong correlation between live microneutralising titres and sVNT titres for both wildtype and BA.1 (appendix p 13), mirroring other reports4, 7 suggesting that sVNT can be used as a surrogate method for live virus neutralisation.These findings suggest that previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, as well as high pre-infection antibody titres, might impact omicron-induced spike-specific serological responses in triple-vaccinated individuals. Close monitoring of immune responses following repeated antigenic exposures through infection or booster doses is needed.We declare no competing interests. KB, UM, SHa, JK, and CT contributed equally. This research was funded by grants from the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation (to CT and JK), the Jonas and Kristina af Jochnick Foundation (to CT), the Leif Lundblad Family Foundation (to CT), Region Stockholm (to CT), and Center for Innovative Medicine (to KB and JK).
Authors: Chee Wah Tan; Wan Ni Chia; Xijian Qin; Pei Liu; Mark I-C Chen; Charles Tiu; Zhiliang Hu; Vivian Chih-Wei Chen; Barnaby E Young; Wan Rong Sia; Yee-Joo Tan; Randy Foo; Yongxiang Yi; David C Lye; Danielle E Anderson; Lin-Fa Wang Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2020-07-23 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Ann-Sofie Rudberg; Sebastian Havervall; Anna Månberg; August Jernbom Falk; Katherina Aguilera; Henry Ng; Lena Gabrielsson; Ann-Christin Salomonsson; Leo Hanke; Ben Murrell; Gerald McInerney; Jennie Olofsson; Eni Andersson; Cecilia Hellström; Shaghayegh Bayati; Sofia Bergström; Elisa Pin; Ronald Sjöberg; Hanna Tegel; My Hedhammar; Mia Phillipson; Peter Nilsson; Sophia Hober; Charlotte Thålin Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2020-10-08 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Rolando Pajon; Nicole A Doria-Rose; Xiaoying Shen; Stephen D Schmidt; Sijy O'Dell; Charlene McDanal; Wenhong Feng; Jin Tong; Amanda Eaton; Maha Maglinao; Haili Tang; Kelly E Manning; Venkata-Viswanadh Edara; Lilin Lai; Madison Ellis; Kathryn M Moore; Katharine Floyd; Stephanie L Foster; Christine M Posavad; Robert L Atmar; Kirsten E Lyke; Tongqing Zhou; Lingshu Wang; Yi Zhang; Martin R Gaudinski; Walker P Black; Ingelise Gordon; Mercy Guech; Julie E Ledgerwood; John N Misasi; Alicia Widge; Nancy J Sullivan; Paul C Roberts; John H Beigel; Bette Korber; Lindsey R Baden; Hana El Sahly; Spyros Chalkias; Honghong Zhou; Jing Feng; Bethany Girard; Rituparna Das; Anne Aunins; Darin K Edwards; Mehul S Suthar; John R Mascola; David C Montefiori Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2022-01-26 Impact factor: 176.079
Authors: Sebastian Havervall; Ulrika Marking; Nina Greilert-Norin; Max Gordon; Henry Ng; Wanda Christ; Mia Phillipson; Peter Nilsson; Sophia Hober; Kim Blom; Jonas Klingström; Sara Mangsbo; Mikael Åberg; Charlotte Thålin Journal: Clin Transl Immunology Date: 2022-04-18
Authors: Wanwisa Dejnirattisai; Robert H Shaw; Piyada Supasa; Chang Liu; Arabella Sv Stuart; Andrew J Pollard; Xinxue Liu; Teresa Lambe; Derrick Crook; Dave I Stuart; Juthathip Mongkolsapaya; Jonathan S Nguyen-Van-Tam; Matthew D Snape; Gavin R Screaton Journal: Lancet Date: 2021-12-20 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Neyme Veli; Christopher A Martin; Katherine Woolf; Joshua Nazareth; Daniel Pan; Amani Al-Oraibi; Rebecca F Baggaley; Luke Bryant; Laura B Nellums; Laura J Gray; Kamlesh Khunti; Manish Pareek Journal: BMC Med Date: 2022-10-10 Impact factor: 11.150
Authors: Kaiyuan Sun; Stefano Tempia; Jackie Kleynhans; Anne von Gottberg; Meredith L McMorrow; Nicole Wolter; Jinal N Bhiman; Jocelyn Moyes; Maimuna Carrim; Neil A Martinson; Kathleen Kahn; Limakatso Lebina; Jacques D du Toit; Thulisa Mkhencele; Cécile Viboud; Cheryl Cohen Journal: medRxiv Date: 2022-08-22
Authors: Kim Blom; Sebastian Havervall; Ulrika Marking; Nina Greilert Norin; Philip Bacchus; Ramona Groenheit; Andreas Bråve; Charlotte Thålin; Jonas Klingström Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2022-08-23 Impact factor: 16.126
Authors: Sebastian Havervall; Ulrika Marking; Julia Svensson; Nina Greilert-Norin; Philip Bacchus; Peter Nilsson; Sophia Hober; Max Gordon; Kim Blom; Jonas Klingström; Mikael Åberg; Anna Smed-Sörensen; Charlotte Thålin Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2022-09-14 Impact factor: 176.079