Literature DB >> 35691090

Functional recursion of orientation cues in figure-ground separation.

Jonathan D Victor1, Mary M Conte2.   

Abstract

Visual texture is an important cue to figure-ground organization. While processing of texture differences is a prerequisite for the use of this cue to extract figure-ground organization, these stages are distinct processes. One potential indicator of this distinction is the possibility that texture statistics play a different role in the figure vs. in the ground. To determine whether this is the case, we probed figure-ground processing with a family of local image statistics that specified textures that varied in the strength and spatial scale of structure, and the extent to which features are oriented. For image statistics that generated approximately isotropic textures, the threshold for identification of figure-ground structure was determined by the difference in correlation strength in figure vs. ground, independent of whether the correlations were present in figure, ground, or both. However, for image statistics with strong orientation content, thresholds were up to two times higher for correlations in the ground, vs. the figure. This held equally for texture-defined objects with convex or concave boundaries, indicating that these threshold differences are driven by border ownership, not boundary shape. Similar threshold differences were found for presentation times ranging from 125 to 500 ms. These findings identify a qualitative difference in how texture is used for figure-ground analysis, vs. texture discrimination. Additionally, it reveals a functional recursion: texture differences are needed to identify tentative boundaries and consequent scene organization into figure and ground, but then scene organization modifies sensitivity to texture differences according to the figure-ground assignment.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Local image statistics; Scene organization; Texture discrimination; Visual textures

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35691090      PMCID: PMC9262819          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2022.108047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.984


  45 in total

1.  The figure has a shape, but the ground does not: evidence from a priming paradigm.

Authors:  G C Baylis; E M Cale
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  An egalitarian network model for the emergence of simple and complex cells in visual cortex.

Authors:  Louis Tao; Michael Shelley; David McLaughlin; Robert Shapley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-12-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Orientation selectivity in macaque V1: diversity and laminar dependence.

Authors:  Dario L Ringach; Robert M Shapley; Michael J Hawken
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Figure and ground in the visual cortex: v2 combines stereoscopic cues with gestalt rules.

Authors:  Fangtu T Qiu; Rüdiger von der Heydt
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Visual perception of materials and their properties.

Authors:  Roland W Fleming
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 6.  Textures as Probes of Visual Processing.

Authors:  Jonathan D Victor; Mary M Conte; Charles F Chubb
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 6.422

7.  From image statistics to scene gist: evoked neural activity reveals transition from low-level natural image structure to scene category.

Authors:  Iris I A Groen; Sennay Ghebreab; Hielke Prins; Victor A F Lamme; H Steven Scholte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The 3-dimensional, 4-channel model of human visual sensitivity to grayscale scrambles.

Authors:  Andrew E Silva; Charles Chubb
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Top-down coordination of local cortical state during selective attention.

Authors:  Jochem van Kempen; Marc A Gieselmann; Michael Boyd; Nicholas A Steinmetz; Tirin Moore; Tatiana A Engel; Alexander Thiele
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Shape recognition: convexities, concavities and things in between.

Authors:  Gunnar Schmidtmann; Ben J Jennings; Frederick A A Kingdom
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.